{"id":79521,"date":"2016-10-19T10:11:51","date_gmt":"2016-10-19T04:41:51","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=79521"},"modified":"2016-11-29T11:33:03","modified_gmt":"2016-11-29T06:03:03","slug":"acquittal-of-husband-and-his-family-members-in-dowry-demand-case-held-is-no-ground-to-deny-maintenance-to-the-wife-and-child","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/10\/19\/acquittal-of-husband-and-his-family-members-in-dowry-demand-case-held-is-no-ground-to-deny-maintenance-to-the-wife-and-child\/","title":{"rendered":"Acquittal of husband and his family members in dowry demand case held, is no ground to deny maintenance to the wife and child"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>High Court of Punjab and Haryana:\u00a0<\/strong>While deciding upon the challenge to the orders of the Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Hansi and the Addl. Sessions Judge, Hisar passed in relation to a maintenance petition under Section 12 of the Protection of Women against Domestic Violence Act, 2005, the Bench comprising of Anita Chaudhry, J. held that the acquittal of the petitioner and his family members in dowry demand case is no ground to deny maintenance to the wife and the child.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">In the present case the wife had filed a petition under Section 12 \u00a0of the 2005 Act for maintenance alleging therein that she and her son were unable to maintain themselves after the husband had levelled charges of adultery against her and \u00a0denied the paternity of the son born out of wedlock, thus claiming compensation, a protection order, residency order and maintenance from the husband. The husband resisted the claim on the ground that the wife had willfully deserted him and that she was a lady of easy virtue and even denied the paternity of the son. He denied the responsibility of the wife and the child. It was claimed that the wife was working in Anganwari and getting Rs. 3000 as salary, besides getting Rs. 750 as pension from the Government. Thereby the husband challenged the legality and validity of the orders passed by the Judicial Magistrate \u00a0and the Addl. Sessions Judge who allowed the wife&#8217;s petition for maintenance.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The Court while examining the contentions of the parties held that the petitioner while averting the chastity of the respondent and the paternity of the son, had produced no material evidence to substitute his plea. The Court pointed out that with such baseless and unproved allegation it was impossible for the respondent to live with the petitioner however the respondent in a bid to restore her married life withdrew the maintenance petition as well as criminal complaint in 2004 but was turned away again from her matrimonial home and was hence living separately since then. The Court further observed that it is not possible for the respondent to cohabit with petitioner in such terrible and unnerving predicaments hence the directions of the learned Magistrate providing for maintenance and residential accommodation to the respondent are just and proper.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">While deciding in favor of the respondent and dismissing the appeal the Court held that acquittal of the petitioner and his family members in dowry demand case is no ground to deny maintenance to the wife and the child. The petitioner cannot be absolved of his liability to maintain the wife and the child on this score. The case in hand is required to be decided on the preponderance of probabilities and no strict standard of proof is required to be\u00a0proved.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Ruling upon the issue of quantum of maintenance payable under Section 12 of the Protection of Women against Domestic Violence Act, 2005, the Court held that since the son has attained majority, he is not legally entitled to claim any maintenance hence the amount of maintenance granted in the order of the Judicial Magistrate and the \u00a0Sessions Judge has to be adjusted accordingly after deducting half- share of the child in the maintenance amount. [<em>Narender<\/em>\u00a0 v. <em>Sunita<\/em>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/LoginForNewsLink\/2016_SCC_OnLine_P&amp;H_7608\">2016 SCC OnLine P&amp;H 7608<\/a>, decided on September 20, 2016]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>High Court of Punjab and Haryana:\u00a0While deciding upon the challenge to the orders of the Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Hansi and the <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":91,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-79521","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Acquittal of husband and his family members in dowry demand case held, is no ground to deny maintenance to the wife and child | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/10\/19\/acquittal-of-husband-and-his-family-members-in-dowry-demand-case-held-is-no-ground-to-deny-maintenance-to-the-wife-and-child\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Acquittal of husband and his family members in dowry demand case held, is no ground to deny maintenance to the wife and child\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"High Court of Punjab and Haryana:\u00a0While deciding upon the challenge to the orders of the Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Hansi and the\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/10\/19\/acquittal-of-husband-and-his-family-members-in-dowry-demand-case-held-is-no-ground-to-deny-maintenance-to-the-wife-and-child\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2016-10-19T04:41:51+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-11-29T06:03:03+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/panjab_and_hariyana_high_court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Saba\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Saba\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/10\/19\/acquittal-of-husband-and-his-family-members-in-dowry-demand-case-held-is-no-ground-to-deny-maintenance-to-the-wife-and-child\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/10\/19\/acquittal-of-husband-and-his-family-members-in-dowry-demand-case-held-is-no-ground-to-deny-maintenance-to-the-wife-and-child\/\",\"name\":\"Acquittal of husband and his family members in dowry demand case held, is no ground to deny maintenance to the wife and child | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2016-10-19T04:41:51+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-11-29T06:03:03+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/10\/19\/acquittal-of-husband-and-his-family-members-in-dowry-demand-case-held-is-no-ground-to-deny-maintenance-to-the-wife-and-child\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/10\/19\/acquittal-of-husband-and-his-family-members-in-dowry-demand-case-held-is-no-ground-to-deny-maintenance-to-the-wife-and-child\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/10\/19\/acquittal-of-husband-and-his-family-members-in-dowry-demand-case-held-is-no-ground-to-deny-maintenance-to-the-wife-and-child\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Acquittal of husband and his family members in dowry demand case held, is no ground to deny maintenance to the wife and child\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785\",\"name\":\"Saba\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Saba\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_2\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Acquittal of husband and his family members in dowry demand case held, is no ground to deny maintenance to the wife and child | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/10\/19\/acquittal-of-husband-and-his-family-members-in-dowry-demand-case-held-is-no-ground-to-deny-maintenance-to-the-wife-and-child\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Acquittal of husband and his family members in dowry demand case held, is no ground to deny maintenance to the wife and child","og_description":"High Court of Punjab and Haryana:\u00a0While deciding upon the challenge to the orders of the Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Hansi and the","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/10\/19\/acquittal-of-husband-and-his-family-members-in-dowry-demand-case-held-is-no-ground-to-deny-maintenance-to-the-wife-and-child\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2016-10-19T04:41:51+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-11-29T06:03:03+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/panjab_and_hariyana_high_court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Saba","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Saba","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/10\/19\/acquittal-of-husband-and-his-family-members-in-dowry-demand-case-held-is-no-ground-to-deny-maintenance-to-the-wife-and-child\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/10\/19\/acquittal-of-husband-and-his-family-members-in-dowry-demand-case-held-is-no-ground-to-deny-maintenance-to-the-wife-and-child\/","name":"Acquittal of husband and his family members in dowry demand case held, is no ground to deny maintenance to the wife and child | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2016-10-19T04:41:51+00:00","dateModified":"2016-11-29T06:03:03+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/10\/19\/acquittal-of-husband-and-his-family-members-in-dowry-demand-case-held-is-no-ground-to-deny-maintenance-to-the-wife-and-child\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/10\/19\/acquittal-of-husband-and-his-family-members-in-dowry-demand-case-held-is-no-ground-to-deny-maintenance-to-the-wife-and-child\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/10\/19\/acquittal-of-husband-and-his-family-members-in-dowry-demand-case-held-is-no-ground-to-deny-maintenance-to-the-wife-and-child\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Acquittal of husband and his family members in dowry demand case held, is no ground to deny maintenance to the wife and child"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785","name":"Saba","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Saba"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_2\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":169414,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/11\/20\/merely-husband-acquitted-domestic-violence-case-not-amount-cruelty-behalf-wife-succeed-divorce-petition\/","url_meta":{"origin":79521,"position":0},"title":"Merely because husband is acquitted in domestic violence case, would not amount to cruelty on behalf of wife to succeed in divorce petition","author":"Saba","date":"November 20, 2017","format":false,"excerpt":"Chhattisgarh High Court: The Court recently heard an appeal from the Family Court under Section 19(1) of the Family Courts Act, 1984 by wife against decree allowing the respondent husband's prayer for dissolution of marriage. Both the parties got married in 2005 and have a girl child aged 8 years\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":314543,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/19\/ap-hc-maintenance-order-passed-without-filing-statements-assets-not-illegal-if-income-not-denied-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":79521,"position":1},"title":"Maintenance order passed without filing statements of assets and liabilities by wife not illegal, if income not specifically denied by husband: Andhra Pradesh HC","author":"Arushi","date":"February 19, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThe petitioner submitted that the Trial Court erred in allowing the petition even without filing the statement of assets and liabilities and the respondent herself deserted the petitioner and yet, sought maintenance, therefore, she is not entitled to claim any interim maintenance.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"andhra pradesh high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/andhra-pradesh-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/andhra-pradesh-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/andhra-pradesh-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/andhra-pradesh-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":372898,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/16\/all-hc-women-sacrifice-of-employment-devilish-maintenance\/","url_meta":{"origin":79521,"position":2},"title":"Women&#8217;s sacrifice of gainful employment often portrayed &#8216;devilish&#8217; to extract money after separation: Allahabad HC remands maintenance matter to Family Judge","author":"Shriya Singh","date":"January 16, 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThe statutory right of the wife to maintenance cannot be permitted to be parted away and infringed by setting up a case that she had the capacity to earn.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"women's sacrifice of employment","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/womens-sacrifice-of-employment.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/womens-sacrifice-of-employment.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/womens-sacrifice-of-employment.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/womens-sacrifice-of-employment.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":218626,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/08\/26\/mp-hc-petitioner-claiming-to-have-no-source-of-personal-income-is-liable-to-maintain-his-wife-if-he-has-interest-in-agricultural-lands-of-joint-family\/","url_meta":{"origin":79521,"position":3},"title":"MP HC | Petitioner claiming to have no source of personal income is liable to maintain his wife if he has interest in agricultural lands of joint family","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"August 26, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Madhya Pradesh High Court: S.K. Awasthi, J., dismissed the petition filed by the petitioner under Section 482 CrPC for quashing the maintenance order passed by the Additional Principal Judge. The respondent filed an application under Section 125 CrPC to claim maintenance from the petitioner as she was forced to live\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":170454,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/11\/22\/husband-cannot-deny-duty-maintain-wife-neither-earning-divorce\/","url_meta":{"origin":79521,"position":4},"title":"Husband cannot deny his duty to maintain the wife, neither when she is earning nor after the divorce","author":"Saba","date":"November 22, 2017","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court: The Single Judge Bench comprising of I.S. Mehta J., decided upon a case related to the Protection of Women against Domestic Violence Act, 2005 (DV Act). The present appeal is from the petitioner husband, aggrieved by the decision of the Metropoliton Magistrate, who ordered him to pay\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":218440,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/08\/21\/del-hc-qualification-of-wife-and-capacity-to-earn-cannot-be-ground-to-deny-her-interim-maintenance-if-she-is-without-source-of-income\/","url_meta":{"origin":79521,"position":5},"title":"Del HC | Qualification of wife and capacity to earn cannot be ground to deny her interim maintenance if she is without source of income","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"August 21, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court:\u00a0Sanjeev Sachdeva, J. allowed a criminal revision petition filed by the petitioner-wife against the order of the Appellate Court whereby her appeal against the trial court order rejecting the\u00a0application for grant of interim maintenance was dismissed. The petitioner had filed an application under Protection of Women from Domestic\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/79521","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/91"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=79521"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/79521\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=79521"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=79521"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=79521"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}