{"id":74241,"date":"2016-09-29T14:30:51","date_gmt":"2016-09-29T09:00:51","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=74241"},"modified":"2016-12-05T18:05:28","modified_gmt":"2016-12-05T12:35:28","slug":"parents-of-a-married-officer-not-entitled-to-receive-the-pension-amount-as-per-the-the-family-pension-scheme-1964","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/09\/29\/parents-of-a-married-officer-not-entitled-to-receive-the-pension-amount-as-per-the-the-family-pension-scheme-1964\/","title":{"rendered":"Parents of a married officer not entitled to receive the pension amount as per the the Family Pension Scheme, 1964"},"content":{"rendered":"

Supreme Court<\/strong>: In the matter where the widow of a Government Employee aggrieved by the order of the High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh where it was directed that 50% of the pension be paid to the mother of the Government Employee, the Court set aside the impugned order and held that the parents of a married officer are not entitled to receive the pension amount as per the the Family Pension Scheme, 1964.<\/p>\n

The Bench of A.R. Dave and L. Nageswara Rao, JJ took note of the Scheme and said that the mother of the deceased is not included in the definition of the term \u201cfamily\u201d for the reason that as per the provisions of sub-clause (f), parents of an unmarried officer would be a part of the family.<\/p>\n

Explaining the difference between the position of law under the Hindu Succession Act, 1956 and the Family Pension Scheme, the Court said that as far as the Succession Law is concerned, it is true that the properties of a Hindu, who dies intestate would first of all go to the persons enumerated in class I of the schedule as per the provisions of Section 8 of the said Act and therefore and hence, the properties of the deceased in the case at hand would be divided among the respondent mother and the appellant wife, provided there is no other family member alive, who would fall within class 1 heirs, but position in this case, with regard to pension, is different.<\/p>\n

The Court said that it is pertinent to note that in this case the pension is to be given under the provisions of the Scheme and therefore, only the person who is entitled to get the pension as per the Scheme would get it. The Court, hence, directed that the full amount of pension be paid to the widow of the Government employee. [Nitu v. Sheela Rani, 2016 SCC OnLine SC 1004<\/a>, decided on 28.09.2016]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Supreme Court: In the matter where the widow of a Government Employee aggrieved by the order of the High Court of Punjab <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":121,"featured_media":154914,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,9],"tags":[2898,5271,9771],"class_list":["post-74241","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-supremecourt","tag-Family_Pension","tag-pension","tag-succession"],"yoast_head":"\nParents of a married officer not entitled to receive the pension amount as per the the Family Pension Scheme, 1964 | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/09\/29\/parents-of-a-married-officer-not-entitled-to-receive-the-pension-amount-as-per-the-the-family-pension-scheme-1964\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Parents of a married officer not entitled to receive the pension amount as per the the Family Pension Scheme, 1964\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Supreme Court: In the matter where the widow of a Government Employee aggrieved by the order of the High Court of Punjab\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/09\/29\/parents-of-a-married-officer-not-entitled-to-receive-the-pension-amount-as-per-the-the-family-pension-scheme-1964\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2016-09-29T09:00:51+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-12-05T12:35:28+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Prachi Bhardwaj\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Prachi Bhardwaj\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/09\/29\/parents-of-a-married-officer-not-entitled-to-receive-the-pension-amount-as-per-the-the-family-pension-scheme-1964\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/09\/29\/parents-of-a-married-officer-not-entitled-to-receive-the-pension-amount-as-per-the-the-family-pension-scheme-1964\/\",\"name\":\"Parents of a married officer not entitled to receive the pension amount as per the the Family Pension Scheme, 1964 | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/09\/29\/parents-of-a-married-officer-not-entitled-to-receive-the-pension-amount-as-per-the-the-family-pension-scheme-1964\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/09\/29\/parents-of-a-married-officer-not-entitled-to-receive-the-pension-amount-as-per-the-the-family-pension-scheme-1964\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2016-09-29T09:00:51+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-12-05T12:35:28+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/de579aff4bc6dd24b68d6d472ac92942\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/09\/29\/parents-of-a-married-officer-not-entitled-to-receive-the-pension-amount-as-per-the-the-family-pension-scheme-1964\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/09\/29\/parents-of-a-married-officer-not-entitled-to-receive-the-pension-amount-as-per-the-the-family-pension-scheme-1964\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/09\/29\/parents-of-a-married-officer-not-entitled-to-receive-the-pension-amount-as-per-the-the-family-pension-scheme-1964\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg\",\"width\":1330,\"height\":887},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/09\/29\/parents-of-a-married-officer-not-entitled-to-receive-the-pension-amount-as-per-the-the-family-pension-scheme-1964\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Parents of a married officer not entitled to receive the pension amount as per the the Family Pension Scheme, 1964\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/de579aff4bc6dd24b68d6d472ac92942\",\"name\":\"Prachi Bhardwaj\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Prachi-Image2-150x150.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Prachi-Image2-150x150.png\",\"caption\":\"Prachi Bhardwaj\"},\"description\":\"Senior Associate Editor\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_3\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Parents of a married officer not entitled to receive the pension amount as per the the Family Pension Scheme, 1964 | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/09\/29\/parents-of-a-married-officer-not-entitled-to-receive-the-pension-amount-as-per-the-the-family-pension-scheme-1964\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Parents of a married officer not entitled to receive the pension amount as per the the Family Pension Scheme, 1964","og_description":"Supreme Court: In the matter where the widow of a Government Employee aggrieved by the order of the High Court of Punjab","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/09\/29\/parents-of-a-married-officer-not-entitled-to-receive-the-pension-amount-as-per-the-the-family-pension-scheme-1964\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2016-09-29T09:00:51+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-12-05T12:35:28+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Prachi Bhardwaj","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/09\/29\/parents-of-a-married-officer-not-entitled-to-receive-the-pension-amount-as-per-the-the-family-pension-scheme-1964\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/09\/29\/parents-of-a-married-officer-not-entitled-to-receive-the-pension-amount-as-per-the-the-family-pension-scheme-1964\/","name":"Parents of a married officer not entitled to receive the pension amount as per the the Family Pension Scheme, 1964 | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/09\/29\/parents-of-a-married-officer-not-entitled-to-receive-the-pension-amount-as-per-the-the-family-pension-scheme-1964\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/09\/29\/parents-of-a-married-officer-not-entitled-to-receive-the-pension-amount-as-per-the-the-family-pension-scheme-1964\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg","datePublished":"2016-09-29T09:00:51+00:00","dateModified":"2016-12-05T12:35:28+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/de579aff4bc6dd24b68d6d472ac92942"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/09\/29\/parents-of-a-married-officer-not-entitled-to-receive-the-pension-amount-as-per-the-the-family-pension-scheme-1964\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/09\/29\/parents-of-a-married-officer-not-entitled-to-receive-the-pension-amount-as-per-the-the-family-pension-scheme-1964\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/09\/29\/parents-of-a-married-officer-not-entitled-to-receive-the-pension-amount-as-per-the-the-family-pension-scheme-1964\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg","width":1330,"height":887},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/09\/29\/parents-of-a-married-officer-not-entitled-to-receive-the-pension-amount-as-per-the-the-family-pension-scheme-1964\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Parents of a married officer not entitled to receive the pension amount as per the the Family Pension Scheme, 1964"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/de579aff4bc6dd24b68d6d472ac92942","name":"Prachi Bhardwaj","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Prachi-Image2-150x150.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Prachi-Image2-150x150.png","caption":"Prachi Bhardwaj"},"description":"Senior Associate Editor","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_3\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":270739,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/07\/27\/freedom-fighters-pension-cannot-be-taken-as-income-to-deny-family-pension-objective-of-freedom-fighter-pension-scheme-is-to-honour-the-sacrifices-of-the-fighters-madras-high-court\/","url_meta":{"origin":74241,"position":0},"title":"Freedom fighters’ pension cannot be taken as ‘income’ to deny family pension; Objective of Freedom Fighter Pension Scheme is to honour the sacrifices of the fighters: Madras High Court","author":"Editor","date":"July 27, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Madras High Court: B Pugalendhi J. allowed the family pension to be given to the daughter \u2018petitioner' arising out of the employment of her deceased mother. The family pension was rejected by The Senior Accounts Officer, Officer of the Principal Accountant General as she was already in receipt of Freedom\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Madras High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Madras-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Madras-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Madras-HC.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Madras-HC.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Madras-HC.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":246221,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/03\/27\/family-pension\/","url_meta":{"origin":74241,"position":1},"title":"CAT | Widow of a substitute servant cannot be denied rights of family pension and death-cum-retirement benefits accorded to temporary servants","author":"Editor","date":"March 27, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT): Pradeep Kumar, Member (A) addressed the instant application wherein the widow of one Narayan Dutt, who was engaged as casual labour on 18-12-1972 under the respondent-Railway, had sought for the grant of family pension. The deceased was drawing a basic pay of Rs 226\/- p.m. when\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/05\/CAT.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/05\/CAT.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/05\/CAT.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/05\/CAT.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/05\/CAT.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":214218,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/02\/chh-hc-govt-servant-cannot-make-will-of-family-pension-guiding-principles-regarding-retrial-benefits-vis-a-vis-testamentary-disposition-recapitulated\/","url_meta":{"origin":74241,"position":2},"title":"Chh HC | Govt. servant cannot make Will of family pension; guiding principles regarding retiral benefits vis-a-vis testamentary disposition recapitulated","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"May 2, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Chhattisgarh High Court:\u00a0Sanjay K. Agrawal, J. has held that a Government servant is not entitled to make a Will of the family pension which is granted in accordance with the service rules. Vijay Kumar Kaushik, Head Constable in the Police Department, died in harness. He had two wives and children\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":298492,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/04\/old-pension-scheme-or-contributory-pension-scheme-applicable-government-servants-madras-hc\/","url_meta":{"origin":74241,"position":3},"title":"Old Pension scheme or contributory Pension Scheme, which will be applicable to Government servants appointed after 01-04-2003? Madras HC answers","author":"Apoorva","date":"August 4, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Because of the retrospective operation of the new pension scheme, no employer or employee would have forethought that appointments made after 01-04-2003 would not be eligible for the old pension scheme.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"madras high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/madras-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/madras-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/madras-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/madras-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":221515,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/10\/26\/chh-hc-second-wife-wedded-in-contravention-of-s-5-hma-held-not-entitled-to-share-in-family-pension-of-deceased-government-employee\/","url_meta":{"origin":74241,"position":4},"title":"Chh HC | Second wife, wedded in contravention of S. 5 HMA, held not entitled to share in family pension of deceased Government employee","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"October 26, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Chhattisgarh High Court:\u00a0Sanjay K. Agrawal, J. allowed a second appeal filed by the first wife of the deceased who died in harness while working as Supervisor in Chhattisgarh State Power Generation Co. Ltd., and held that his second wife was not entitled to any share in the family pension. Provisions\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":224513,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/01\/24\/jhar-hc-succession-certificate-issued-by-a-competent-court-is-mandatory-for-legal-heirs-to-claim-pension-under-coal-mines-provident-fund-scheme\/","url_meta":{"origin":74241,"position":5},"title":"Jhar HC | \u2018Succession Certificate\u2019 issued by a competent court, is mandatory for legal heirs to claim pension under Coal Mines Provident Fund Scheme","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"January 24, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Jharkhand High Court: A Division Bench of Dr Ravi Ranjan, CJ and Sujit Narayan Prasad, J. addressed an appeal in which the daughter-in-law of a deceased employee of State-owned respondent company Central Coalfields Limited (CCL) sought for payment of family pension as well as other dues accrued to her mother-in-law\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/74241","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/121"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=74241"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/74241\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/154914"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=74241"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=74241"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=74241"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}