{"id":6800,"date":"2014-08-26T11:08:00","date_gmt":"2014-08-26T11:08:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/localhost\/sccblog\/?p=6800"},"modified":"2016-12-06T18:03:22","modified_gmt":"2016-12-06T12:33:22","slug":"married-daughters-born-before-2005-have-equal-rights-on-ancestral-property","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2014\/08\/26\/married-daughters-born-before-2005-have-equal-rights-on-ancestral-property\/","title":{"rendered":"Married daughters born before 2005 have equal rights on ancestral property"},"content":{"rendered":"

Bombay High Court<\/span><\/b>: In a landmark judgment, a Full Bench comprising of \u00a0Mohit Shah CJ, MS Sanklecha and MS Sonak, JJ. held that the daughters alive on September 9, 2005 would be entitled to equal rights in ancestral property. Earlier, a Division Bench in \u00a0Vaishali S. Ganorkar vs. Satish Keshavrao Ganorkar <\/span>2012 (5) Bom CR 210<\/a> <\/span>had upheld the prospective operation of the\u00a0 Hindu Succession (Amendment) Act, 2005 which in effect disentitled all daughters born before 9 September 2005 to claim their equal interest in the Joint HUF. A single bench comprising of RG Ketkar, J. disagreed with the decision of the Ganorkar case and concluded that the amended Section 6 had retrospective effect from the date of the enactment of the Principal Act and is applicable to all daughters who are born before or after 2005 as a daughter becomes a coparcener in her own right by\u00a0 her birth itself.\u00a0 When the matter was referred to this Court, the Court agreed with the decision of Justice Ketkar.<\/span><\/p>\n

The Court clarified that in case the coparcener had died before 2005, then the pre-amended law was applicable but by passing of the Amendment Act, 2005 all daughters who are alive ipso facto <\/i>become coparceners, thus settling the interpretation of the amended Section 6. The Court observed that the only requirement was that when an Act was being sought to be applied, the person concerned must be alive as the Legislature had specifically used the word \u2018on and from the commencement of Hindu Succession (Amendment) Act, 2005.\u00a0 This was done so as to ensure that rights which are already settled are not disturbed by virtue of person claiming as an heir to a daughter who had passed away before the Amendment Act came into force.<\/p>\n

The Court also denied the reference of the Sheeladevi judgment, clarifying that\u00a0 principle laid down\u00a0 in\u00a0 Sheeladevi vs. Lalchand\u00a0 (2006) 8 SCC 581<\/a> that the Amendment Act of 2005 is prospective and would have no application where succession opened prior to the Amendment Act of 2005 coming into force, does not militate against the view taken by them. The Amendment Act of 2005 applies to a daughter of coparcener who is born before 9 September 2005 and alive on 9 September 2005, on which date the Amendment Act of 2005 came into force, and obviously there is no dispute about the entitlement of daughter born on or after 9th September 2005. [Badrinarayan Shankar Bhandari vs. Omprakash Shankar Bhandari, <\/i>2014 SCC OnLine Bom 908<\/a>, decided on August 14, 2014]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Bombay High Court: In a landmark judgment, a Full Bench comprising of \u00a0Mohit Shah CJ, MS Sanklecha and MS Sonak, JJ. held <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":74381,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[2626],"class_list":["post-6800","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-married_daughter"],"yoast_head":"\nMarried daughters born before 2005 have equal rights on ancestral property | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2014\/08\/26\/married-daughters-born-before-2005-have-equal-rights-on-ancestral-property\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Married daughters born before 2005 have equal rights on ancestral property\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Bombay High Court: In a landmark judgment, a Full Bench comprising of \u00a0Mohit Shah CJ, MS Sanklecha and MS Sonak, JJ. held\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2014\/08\/26\/married-daughters-born-before-2005-have-equal-rights-on-ancestral-property\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2014-08-26T11:08:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-12-06T12:33:22+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1331\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Sucheta\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Sucheta\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2014\\\/08\\\/26\\\/married-daughters-born-before-2005-have-equal-rights-on-ancestral-property\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2014\\\/08\\\/26\\\/married-daughters-born-before-2005-have-equal-rights-on-ancestral-property\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Sucheta\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa\"},\"headline\":\"Married daughters born before 2005 have equal rights on ancestral property\",\"datePublished\":\"2014-08-26T11:08:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-12-06T12:33:22+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2014\\\/08\\\/26\\\/married-daughters-born-before-2005-have-equal-rights-on-ancestral-property\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":401,\"commentCount\":11,\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2014\\\/08\\\/26\\\/married-daughters-born-before-2005-have-equal-rights-on-ancestral-property\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2016\\\/09\\\/Bombay-HC.jpg\",\"keywords\":[\"married daughter\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Case Briefs\",\"High Courts\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2014\\\/08\\\/26\\\/married-daughters-born-before-2005-have-equal-rights-on-ancestral-property\\\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2014\\\/08\\\/26\\\/married-daughters-born-before-2005-have-equal-rights-on-ancestral-property\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2014\\\/08\\\/26\\\/married-daughters-born-before-2005-have-equal-rights-on-ancestral-property\\\/\",\"name\":\"Married daughters born before 2005 have equal rights on ancestral property | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2014\\\/08\\\/26\\\/married-daughters-born-before-2005-have-equal-rights-on-ancestral-property\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2014\\\/08\\\/26\\\/married-daughters-born-before-2005-have-equal-rights-on-ancestral-property\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2016\\\/09\\\/Bombay-HC.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2014-08-26T11:08:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-12-06T12:33:22+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2014\\\/08\\\/26\\\/married-daughters-born-before-2005-have-equal-rights-on-ancestral-property\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2014\\\/08\\\/26\\\/married-daughters-born-before-2005-have-equal-rights-on-ancestral-property\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2014\\\/08\\\/26\\\/married-daughters-born-before-2005-have-equal-rights-on-ancestral-property\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2016\\\/09\\\/Bombay-HC.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2016\\\/09\\\/Bombay-HC.jpg\",\"width\":1331,\"height\":887},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2014\\\/08\\\/26\\\/married-daughters-born-before-2005-have-equal-rights-on-ancestral-property\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Married daughters born before 2005 have equal rights on ancestral property\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa\",\"name\":\"Sucheta\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Sucheta\"},\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/author\\\/legal_editor\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Married daughters born before 2005 have equal rights on ancestral property | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2014\/08\/26\/married-daughters-born-before-2005-have-equal-rights-on-ancestral-property\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Married daughters born before 2005 have equal rights on ancestral property","og_description":"Bombay High Court: In a landmark judgment, a Full Bench comprising of \u00a0Mohit Shah CJ, MS Sanklecha and MS Sonak, JJ. held","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2014\/08\/26\/married-daughters-born-before-2005-have-equal-rights-on-ancestral-property\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2014-08-26T11:08:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-12-06T12:33:22+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1331,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Sucheta","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Sucheta","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2014\/08\/26\/married-daughters-born-before-2005-have-equal-rights-on-ancestral-property\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2014\/08\/26\/married-daughters-born-before-2005-have-equal-rights-on-ancestral-property\/"},"author":{"name":"Sucheta","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa"},"headline":"Married daughters born before 2005 have equal rights on ancestral property","datePublished":"2014-08-26T11:08:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-12-06T12:33:22+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2014\/08\/26\/married-daughters-born-before-2005-have-equal-rights-on-ancestral-property\/"},"wordCount":401,"commentCount":11,"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2014\/08\/26\/married-daughters-born-before-2005-have-equal-rights-on-ancestral-property\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg","keywords":["married daughter"],"articleSection":["Case Briefs","High Courts"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2014\/08\/26\/married-daughters-born-before-2005-have-equal-rights-on-ancestral-property\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2014\/08\/26\/married-daughters-born-before-2005-have-equal-rights-on-ancestral-property\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2014\/08\/26\/married-daughters-born-before-2005-have-equal-rights-on-ancestral-property\/","name":"Married daughters born before 2005 have equal rights on ancestral property | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2014\/08\/26\/married-daughters-born-before-2005-have-equal-rights-on-ancestral-property\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2014\/08\/26\/married-daughters-born-before-2005-have-equal-rights-on-ancestral-property\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg","datePublished":"2014-08-26T11:08:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-12-06T12:33:22+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2014\/08\/26\/married-daughters-born-before-2005-have-equal-rights-on-ancestral-property\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2014\/08\/26\/married-daughters-born-before-2005-have-equal-rights-on-ancestral-property\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2014\/08\/26\/married-daughters-born-before-2005-have-equal-rights-on-ancestral-property\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg","width":1331,"height":887},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2014\/08\/26\/married-daughters-born-before-2005-have-equal-rights-on-ancestral-property\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Married daughters born before 2005 have equal rights on ancestral property"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa","name":"Sucheta","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Sucheta"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/legal_editor\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":374558,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/02\/03\/daughters-property-rights-before-and-after-2005-amendment\/","url_meta":{"origin":6800,"position":0},"title":"Daughters’ Property Rights under Hindu Law – Before & After 2005 Amendment","author":"Sunaina","date":"February 3, 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"This article offers a clear overview of daughters\u2019 property rights under Hindu law\u2014how the law under Hindu Succession Act, 1956 worked before the 2005 Amendment, and how the amendment transformed daughters into coparceners by birth. It traces the major Supreme Court rulings leading up to Vineeta Sharma (2020) 9 SCC\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Law made Easy"","block_context":{"text":"Law made Easy","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/law-made-easy\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Daughter's property rights","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/Daughters-property-rights.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/Daughters-property-rights.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/Daughters-property-rights.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/Daughters-property-rights.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":356187,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/08\/10\/ancestral-property-latest-supreme-court-judgments-scc-times\/","url_meta":{"origin":6800,"position":1},"title":"Ancestral Property: Key Supreme Court Rulings You Should Know","author":"Editor","date":"August 10, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cAncestral property is a rightful heritage, not a personal asset.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Law made Easy"","block_context":{"text":"Law made Easy","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/law-made-easy\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Ancestral Property","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/Ancestral-Property.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/Ancestral-Property.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/Ancestral-Property.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/Ancestral-Property.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":258318,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/12\/10\/daughters-as-coparceners\/","url_meta":{"origin":6800,"position":2},"title":"Daughters as Co-parceners | S. 6 of Hindu Succession Act prevails over S. 29-A inserted by Maharashtra Amendment; wasn’t necessary for Parliament to repeal S. 29-A: Bom HC","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"December 10, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Bombay High Court, Bench at Aurangabad: Vibha Kankanwadi, J., while addressing a matter revolving around the property, observed that, Article 254 of the Constitution gets attracted only when both Central and State legislations have been enacted on any of the matters in the said List and there is conflict between\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":290130,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/04\/20\/sc-explains-daughters-right-on-ancestral-property-and-validity-of-family-settlement-deed-legal-research-legal-news-updates\/","url_meta":{"origin":6800,"position":3},"title":"Supreme Court’s verdict on daughter’s right to inherit ancestral property before Hindu Succession Act 2005 Amendment and validity of settlement deed, explained","author":"Ridhi","date":"April 20, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Since the daughter had not signed the alleged settlement deed, the Supreme Court clarified that \u201cIn a suit for partition of joint property, a decree by consent amongst some of the parties cannot be maintained\u201d.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"daughters right on ancestral property","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/daughters-right-on-ancestral-property.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/daughters-right-on-ancestral-property.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/daughters-right-on-ancestral-property.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/daughters-right-on-ancestral-property.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":233771,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/08\/11\/daughters-have-coparcenary-rights-even-if-parents-died-before-the-hindu-succession-amendment-act-2005-came-into-force\/","url_meta":{"origin":6800,"position":4},"title":"Daughters have coparcenary rights by birth even if father died before the Hindu Succession (Amendment) Act, 2005 came into force [DETAILED REPORT]","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"August 11, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: The 3-judge bench of Arun Mishra, SA Nazeer and MR Shah, JJ has held that daughters have right in coparcenary by birth and that it is not necessary that the father coparcener should be living when the Hindu Succession (Amendment) Act, 2005 came into force. \u201cThe conferral of\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":254367,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/09\/17\/daughters-are-daughters-forever-and-sons-are-sons-till-they-are-married\/","url_meta":{"origin":6800,"position":5},"title":"“Daughters are daughters forever and sons are sons till they are married”: Bom HC orders son to vacate flat of 90 yrs old parents","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"September 17, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Bombay High Court: Noting the misery of parents aged 90 years, G.S. Kulkarni, J., observed that, \u201cDaughters are daughters forever and sons are sons till they are married\u201d albeit there would surely be exemplary exceptions. A Sad Case In the present matter, petitioner 1 alongwith his wife petitioner 2 and\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6800","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=6800"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6800\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/74381"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=6800"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=6800"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=6800"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}