{"id":6748,"date":"2015-08-13T11:08:00","date_gmt":"2015-08-13T11:08:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/localhost\/sccblog\/?p=6748"},"modified":"2015-10-15T15:53:20","modified_gmt":"2015-10-15T10:23:20","slug":"parties-and-their-counsel-are-responsible-for-delay-in-disposal-of-the-cases-compat-imposed-cost-of-rs-20-000-upon-a-party-for-causing-adjournment","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/08\/13\/parties-and-their-counsel-are-responsible-for-delay-in-disposal-of-the-cases-compat-imposed-cost-of-rs-20-000-upon-a-party-for-causing-adjournment\/","title":{"rendered":"Parties and their counsel are responsible for delay in disposal of the cases: CompAT imposed cost of Rs. 20,000\/- upon a party for causing adjournment"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><b><span lang=\"EN-GB\">Competition Appellate Tribunal: <\/span><\/b><span lang=\"EN-GB\">The Chairperson, Justice G.S. Singhvi, of the Competition Appellate Tribunal who alone is hearing a large number of appeals against CCI orders, compensation applications under the Competition Act, 2002, and transferred cases under the erstwhile MRTP Act, 1969 took a serious note of delays cases by the parties of the cases before the tribunal. It is noteworthy that the CompAT is functioning without its members since last one year, as the government has not filled the vacancy.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span lang=\"EN-GB\">The present case for compensation under S. 12-B of the MRTP Act, pending for last seven years, <\/span><span lang=\"EN-US\">has been adjourned on one or the other pretext in seven years time. In the last one year, as the chairperson observed, there have been five adjournments at hearing before the registrar. Parties were neither appearing nor were submitting any affidavit. The tribunal said that:<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span lang=\"EN-US\">\u201cThe manner in which the parties have conducted this case gives impression that both the sides are extremely casual and they have taken benefit of the extra liberal attitude exhibited by the erstwhile Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission and the Tribunal. In recent times, it has become a fashion to blame the courts and other adjudicatory bodies for delay in disposal of the cases, though in most of the cases, the parties and their counsel are responsible for this. It is they who seek adjournments on one or the other ground and succeed in delaying final adjudication of the matter.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span lang=\"EN-US\">To curb such practices of causing delay the tribunal imposes cost of Rs. 20,000 on the respondent company for causing adjournment for the days proceeding<\/span><span lang=\"EN-GB\">. Also, in one of its order in another leading case the tribunal warned Cement Manufacturing Association and the CCI <\/span><span lang=\"EN-US\">that the cases shall not be adjourned on the next date of hearing and if any miscellaneous application is filed to prolonging the hearing and then the concerned applicant may have to suffer heavy cost. <\/span><span lang=\"EN-US\">\u00a0<\/span><span lang=\"EN-GB\"><i>James Kutty v. Tread Stone Limited,\u00a0<\/i><\/span><a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/LoginForNewsLink\/[2015]_Comp_AT_1\">2015 Comp AT 1<\/a>,\u00a0order on 07.08.2015<\/p>\n<p><span lang=\"EN-GB\">\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Competition Appellate Tribunal: The Chairperson, Justice G.S. Singhvi, of the Competition Appellate Tribunal who alone is hearing a large number of appeals <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":7321,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[11],"tags":[3685],"class_list":["post-6748","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-tribunals_commissions_regulatorybodies","tag-Competition_Appellate_Tribunal"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Parties and their counsel are responsible for delay in disposal of the cases: CompAT imposed cost of Rs. 20,000\/- upon a party for causing adjournment | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/08\/13\/parties-and-their-counsel-are-responsible-for-delay-in-disposal-of-the-cases-compat-imposed-cost-of-rs-20-000-upon-a-party-for-causing-adjournment\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Parties and their counsel are responsible for delay in disposal of the cases: CompAT imposed cost of Rs. 20,000\/- upon a party for causing adjournment\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Competition Appellate Tribunal: The Chairperson, Justice G.S. Singhvi, of the Competition Appellate Tribunal who alone is hearing a large number of appeals\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/08\/13\/parties-and-their-counsel-are-responsible-for-delay-in-disposal-of-the-cases-compat-imposed-cost-of-rs-20-000-upon-a-party-for-causing-adjournment\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2015-08-13T11:08:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2015-10-15T10:23:20+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Sucheta\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Sucheta\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/08\/13\/parties-and-their-counsel-are-responsible-for-delay-in-disposal-of-the-cases-compat-imposed-cost-of-rs-20-000-upon-a-party-for-causing-adjournment\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/08\/13\/parties-and-their-counsel-are-responsible-for-delay-in-disposal-of-the-cases-compat-imposed-cost-of-rs-20-000-upon-a-party-for-causing-adjournment\/\",\"name\":\"Parties and their counsel are responsible for delay in disposal of the cases: CompAT imposed cost of Rs. 20,000\/- upon a party for causing adjournment | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/08\/13\/parties-and-their-counsel-are-responsible-for-delay-in-disposal-of-the-cases-compat-imposed-cost-of-rs-20-000-upon-a-party-for-causing-adjournment\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/08\/13\/parties-and-their-counsel-are-responsible-for-delay-in-disposal-of-the-cases-compat-imposed-cost-of-rs-20-000-upon-a-party-for-causing-adjournment\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2015-08-13T11:08:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-10-15T10:23:20+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/08\/13\/parties-and-their-counsel-are-responsible-for-delay-in-disposal-of-the-cases-compat-imposed-cost-of-rs-20-000-upon-a-party-for-causing-adjournment\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/08\/13\/parties-and-their-counsel-are-responsible-for-delay-in-disposal-of-the-cases-compat-imposed-cost-of-rs-20-000-upon-a-party-for-causing-adjournment\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/08\/13\/parties-and-their-counsel-are-responsible-for-delay-in-disposal-of-the-cases-compat-imposed-cost-of-rs-20-000-upon-a-party-for-causing-adjournment\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg\",\"width\":1330,\"height\":887},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/08\/13\/parties-and-their-counsel-are-responsible-for-delay-in-disposal-of-the-cases-compat-imposed-cost-of-rs-20-000-upon-a-party-for-causing-adjournment\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Parties and their counsel are responsible for delay in disposal of the cases: CompAT imposed cost of Rs. 20,000\/- upon a party for causing adjournment\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa\",\"name\":\"Sucheta\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Sucheta\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/legal_editor\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Parties and their counsel are responsible for delay in disposal of the cases: CompAT imposed cost of Rs. 20,000\/- upon a party for causing adjournment | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/08\/13\/parties-and-their-counsel-are-responsible-for-delay-in-disposal-of-the-cases-compat-imposed-cost-of-rs-20-000-upon-a-party-for-causing-adjournment\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Parties and their counsel are responsible for delay in disposal of the cases: CompAT imposed cost of Rs. 20,000\/- upon a party for causing adjournment","og_description":"Competition Appellate Tribunal: The Chairperson, Justice G.S. Singhvi, of the Competition Appellate Tribunal who alone is hearing a large number of appeals","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/08\/13\/parties-and-their-counsel-are-responsible-for-delay-in-disposal-of-the-cases-compat-imposed-cost-of-rs-20-000-upon-a-party-for-causing-adjournment\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2015-08-13T11:08:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2015-10-15T10:23:20+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Sucheta","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Sucheta","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/08\/13\/parties-and-their-counsel-are-responsible-for-delay-in-disposal-of-the-cases-compat-imposed-cost-of-rs-20-000-upon-a-party-for-causing-adjournment\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/08\/13\/parties-and-their-counsel-are-responsible-for-delay-in-disposal-of-the-cases-compat-imposed-cost-of-rs-20-000-upon-a-party-for-causing-adjournment\/","name":"Parties and their counsel are responsible for delay in disposal of the cases: CompAT imposed cost of Rs. 20,000\/- upon a party for causing adjournment | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/08\/13\/parties-and-their-counsel-are-responsible-for-delay-in-disposal-of-the-cases-compat-imposed-cost-of-rs-20-000-upon-a-party-for-causing-adjournment\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/08\/13\/parties-and-their-counsel-are-responsible-for-delay-in-disposal-of-the-cases-compat-imposed-cost-of-rs-20-000-upon-a-party-for-causing-adjournment\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg","datePublished":"2015-08-13T11:08:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-10-15T10:23:20+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/08\/13\/parties-and-their-counsel-are-responsible-for-delay-in-disposal-of-the-cases-compat-imposed-cost-of-rs-20-000-upon-a-party-for-causing-adjournment\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/08\/13\/parties-and-their-counsel-are-responsible-for-delay-in-disposal-of-the-cases-compat-imposed-cost-of-rs-20-000-upon-a-party-for-causing-adjournment\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/08\/13\/parties-and-their-counsel-are-responsible-for-delay-in-disposal-of-the-cases-compat-imposed-cost-of-rs-20-000-upon-a-party-for-causing-adjournment\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg","width":1330,"height":887},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/08\/13\/parties-and-their-counsel-are-responsible-for-delay-in-disposal-of-the-cases-compat-imposed-cost-of-rs-20-000-upon-a-party-for-causing-adjournment\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Parties and their counsel are responsible for delay in disposal of the cases: CompAT imposed cost of Rs. 20,000\/- upon a party for causing adjournment"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa","name":"Sucheta","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Sucheta"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/legal_editor\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":6747,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/08\/14\/compat-awarded-compound-interest-15-p-a-under-erstwhile-mrtp-act-to-the-victim-of-unfair-trade-practice-by-builder-prayer-for-delivery-of-possession-rejected\/","url_meta":{"origin":6748,"position":0},"title":"CompAT awarded compound interest 15% p.a. under erstwhile MRTP Act to the victim of Unfair Trade Practice by builder, prayer for delivery of possession rejected","author":"Sucheta","date":"August 14, 2015","format":false,"excerpt":"Competition Appellate Tribunal: Deciding a transferred case under the erstwhile MRTP Act, 1969, the Competition Appellate Tribunal held that the delay in delivery of possession of constructed apartment by the builder and non-disclosure of progress of construction to the buyer amount to unfair trade practice under section 36-A (1); of\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Tribunals\/Commissions\/Regulatory Bodies&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Tribunals\/Commissions\/Regulatory Bodies","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/tribunals_commissions_regulatorybodies\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":284063,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/02\/16\/up-builder-not-liable-to-pay-interest-to-the-allottee-in-accordance-with-order-xxi-rule-4-cpc-amount-deposited-with-registry-should-be-deposited-with-banks-to-avoid-loss-supreme-court-asks-courts-judi\/","url_meta":{"origin":6748,"position":1},"title":"\u2018Amount deposited with the Registry should be deposited with banks to avoid loss\u2019; Supreme Court asks Courts\/Judicial Forums to frame guidelines","author":"Editor","date":"February 16, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"In a builder-home buyers\u2019 dispute, the Supreme Court agreed with the builder 's argument that the rule embodied in Order XXI, Rule 4 of CPC, was applicable and the builder could not be fastened with any legal liability to pay interest after April 2005. The bench further opined that all\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-393.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":21481,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/10\/19\/director-general-cannot-investigate-on-the-issue-not-raised-in-the-information\/","url_meta":{"origin":6748,"position":2},"title":"Director General cannot investigate on the issue not raised in the information","author":"Sucheta","date":"October 19, 2015","format":false,"excerpt":"Competition Appellate Tribunal (CompAT): CompAT, in want of material evidence, set aside an order by the Competition Commission of India (CCI) against Andhra Pradesh Film Chamber of Commerce (APFCC) for contravention of S. 3 of the Competition Act, 2002 (e.g. entering into anti-competitive agreements and cartels). CCI had imposed a\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Competition-Commission.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Competition-Commission.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Competition-Commission.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Competition-Commission.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Competition-Commission.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":199378,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/08\/the-ninth-mile-of-indian-competition-the-rebirthing-to-the-contemporary\/","url_meta":{"origin":6748,"position":3},"title":"The Ninth Mile of Indian Competition: The Rebirthing to the Contemporary","author":"Saba","date":"August 8, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"by Priya & Karan Vijay*","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Op Eds&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Op Eds","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/op-ed\/legal-analysis\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Competition-Commission.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Competition-Commission.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Competition-Commission.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Competition-Commission.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Competition-Commission.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":86721,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/11\/21\/investigation-directed-into-alleged-unfair-business-practices-against-warner-bros-walt-disney-fox-star-studios-and-4-other-entities\/","url_meta":{"origin":6748,"position":4},"title":"Investigation directed into alleged unfair business practices against Warner Bros, Walt Disney, Fox Star Studios and 4 other entities","author":"Saba","date":"November 21, 2016","format":false,"excerpt":"Competition Appellate Tribunal (COMPAT):\u00a0\u201cIn times where technology is proving to be a guiding factor in evolution and definition of markets, there is no doubt that more and more cases will come before Competition authorities where technology would play a significant role in creating competitive environment. Many a times from the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/11\/COMPAT_1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/11\/COMPAT_1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/11\/COMPAT_1.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/11\/COMPAT_1.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/11\/COMPAT_1.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":86751,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/11\/21\/rs-64-crore-penalty-imposed-upon-glaxosmithkline-pharmaceuticals-and-sanofi-pasteur-india-by-cci-set-aside\/","url_meta":{"origin":6748,"position":5},"title":"Rs 64 crore penalty imposed upon GlaxoSmithKline Pharmaceuticals and Sanofi Pasteur India by CCI, set aside","author":"Saba","date":"November 21, 2016","format":false,"excerpt":"Competition Appellate Tribunal (COMPAT):\u00a0While declaring the fine of about Rs 64 crore imposed upon GlaxoSmithKline Pharmaceuticals Ltd. and Sanofi Pasteur India by CCI as \u201clegally unsustainable\u201d, the Competition Appellate Tribunal set aside the order of CCI imposing the penalties. Earlier in June 2015, CCI imposed a total fine of about\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/11\/COMPAT_1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/11\/COMPAT_1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/11\/COMPAT_1.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/11\/COMPAT_1.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/11\/COMPAT_1.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6748","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=6748"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6748\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/7321"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=6748"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=6748"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=6748"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}