{"id":6746,"date":"2015-08-18T14:08:00","date_gmt":"2015-08-18T14:08:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/localhost\/sccblog\/?p=6746"},"modified":"2015-10-15T15:51:15","modified_gmt":"2015-10-15T10:21:15","slug":"performance-linked-incentive-program-is-not-tying-in-agreement-but-a-business-strategy-cci-rejected-case-against-chocolate-giant-craft-food-inc","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/08\/18\/performance-linked-incentive-program-is-not-tying-in-agreement-but-a-business-strategy-cci-rejected-case-against-chocolate-giant-craft-food-inc\/","title":{"rendered":"Performance linked incentive program is not tying in agreement but a business strategy, CCI rejected case against chocolate giant Craft Food Inc"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><b><span lang=\"EN-GB\">Competition Commission of India: <\/span><\/b><span style=\"font-size: medium;\"><span lang=\"EN-GB\">The competition watchdog in the country, CCI, rejected a case filed against <\/span><span lang=\"EN-GB\">Mondelez India Foods (of Craft Food Inc) alleging abuse of dominant position and tying in agreement in chocolates and confectionery business. CCI found Mondelez dominant in the market for chocolate in Karnataka but ruled that the cause of the informant, a stockist, is <\/span><span lang=\"EN-US\">the case of business feud and breach of contract between them. It found nothing on record to suggest that Mondelez is imposing condition on stockists, which can be considered as unfair in violation of the provisions of section 4 of the Competition Act, 2002.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-size: medium;\"><span lang=\"EN-US\">On the allegation that Mondelez used its dominant position in the relevant market to enter the market of\u00a0 \u201cinstant fruit flavored drinks and biscuits\u201d and to protect the market of \u201cchocolate malt beverage\u201d by tying in agreements in the garb of \u201cPerformance Linked Incentive Program<\/span><span lang=\"EN-US\">\u201d<\/span><span lang=\"EN-US\"> (\u201cPLIP\u201d). The Commission observed that there is no evidence suggesting that the Mondelez is forcing stockists to buy the new range of products or is making the supply of chocolates conditional on the purchase of such other product. <i>Prima facie<\/i>, PLIP is not in the nature of tying- in arrangement but only a business strategy, which seems to be aimed at triggering the growth of new range of its products. The Commission opined that there exists no <i>prima facia<\/i> case of violation of S. 3(1); read with 3(4) of the Act. Thus, the case stands closed under S. 26(2) of the Competition Act, 2002. <\/span><i><span lang=\"EN-GB\">Sri Rama Agency v. Mondelez India Foods Private Limited<\/span><\/i><span lang=\"EN-GB\">,<\/span><span lang=\"EN-US\">\u00a0<\/span><\/span><a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/LoginForNewsLink\/[2015]_CCI_20\">(2015) CCI 20<\/a><span lang=\"EN-US\"><b>, <\/b><\/span><span lang=\"EN-GB\">decided on 11.08.2015<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span lang=\"EN-US\"><span style=\"font-size: medium;\">\u00a0<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Competition Commission of India: The competition watchdog in the country, CCI, rejected a case filed against Mondelez India Foods (of Craft Food <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":7321,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[11],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-6746","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-tribunals_commissions_regulatorybodies"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Performance linked incentive program is not tying in agreement but a business strategy, CCI rejected case against chocolate giant Craft Food Inc | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/08\/18\/performance-linked-incentive-program-is-not-tying-in-agreement-but-a-business-strategy-cci-rejected-case-against-chocolate-giant-craft-food-inc\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Performance linked incentive program is not tying in agreement but a business strategy, CCI rejected case against chocolate giant Craft Food Inc\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Competition Commission of India: The competition watchdog in the country, CCI, rejected a case filed against Mondelez India Foods (of Craft Food\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/08\/18\/performance-linked-incentive-program-is-not-tying-in-agreement-but-a-business-strategy-cci-rejected-case-against-chocolate-giant-craft-food-inc\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2015-08-18T14:08:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2015-10-15T10:21:15+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Sucheta\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Sucheta\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"1 minute\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/08\/18\/performance-linked-incentive-program-is-not-tying-in-agreement-but-a-business-strategy-cci-rejected-case-against-chocolate-giant-craft-food-inc\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/08\/18\/performance-linked-incentive-program-is-not-tying-in-agreement-but-a-business-strategy-cci-rejected-case-against-chocolate-giant-craft-food-inc\/\",\"name\":\"Performance linked incentive program is not tying in agreement but a business strategy, CCI rejected case against chocolate giant Craft Food Inc | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/08\/18\/performance-linked-incentive-program-is-not-tying-in-agreement-but-a-business-strategy-cci-rejected-case-against-chocolate-giant-craft-food-inc\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/08\/18\/performance-linked-incentive-program-is-not-tying-in-agreement-but-a-business-strategy-cci-rejected-case-against-chocolate-giant-craft-food-inc\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2015-08-18T14:08:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-10-15T10:21:15+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/08\/18\/performance-linked-incentive-program-is-not-tying-in-agreement-but-a-business-strategy-cci-rejected-case-against-chocolate-giant-craft-food-inc\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/08\/18\/performance-linked-incentive-program-is-not-tying-in-agreement-but-a-business-strategy-cci-rejected-case-against-chocolate-giant-craft-food-inc\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/08\/18\/performance-linked-incentive-program-is-not-tying-in-agreement-but-a-business-strategy-cci-rejected-case-against-chocolate-giant-craft-food-inc\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg\",\"width\":1330,\"height\":887},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/08\/18\/performance-linked-incentive-program-is-not-tying-in-agreement-but-a-business-strategy-cci-rejected-case-against-chocolate-giant-craft-food-inc\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Performance linked incentive program is not tying in agreement but a business strategy, CCI rejected case against chocolate giant Craft Food Inc\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa\",\"name\":\"Sucheta\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Sucheta\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/legal_editor\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Performance linked incentive program is not tying in agreement but a business strategy, CCI rejected case against chocolate giant Craft Food Inc | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/08\/18\/performance-linked-incentive-program-is-not-tying-in-agreement-but-a-business-strategy-cci-rejected-case-against-chocolate-giant-craft-food-inc\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Performance linked incentive program is not tying in agreement but a business strategy, CCI rejected case against chocolate giant Craft Food Inc","og_description":"Competition Commission of India: The competition watchdog in the country, CCI, rejected a case filed against Mondelez India Foods (of Craft Food","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/08\/18\/performance-linked-incentive-program-is-not-tying-in-agreement-but-a-business-strategy-cci-rejected-case-against-chocolate-giant-craft-food-inc\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2015-08-18T14:08:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2015-10-15T10:21:15+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Sucheta","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Sucheta","Est. reading time":"1 minute"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/08\/18\/performance-linked-incentive-program-is-not-tying-in-agreement-but-a-business-strategy-cci-rejected-case-against-chocolate-giant-craft-food-inc\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/08\/18\/performance-linked-incentive-program-is-not-tying-in-agreement-but-a-business-strategy-cci-rejected-case-against-chocolate-giant-craft-food-inc\/","name":"Performance linked incentive program is not tying in agreement but a business strategy, CCI rejected case against chocolate giant Craft Food Inc | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/08\/18\/performance-linked-incentive-program-is-not-tying-in-agreement-but-a-business-strategy-cci-rejected-case-against-chocolate-giant-craft-food-inc\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/08\/18\/performance-linked-incentive-program-is-not-tying-in-agreement-but-a-business-strategy-cci-rejected-case-against-chocolate-giant-craft-food-inc\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg","datePublished":"2015-08-18T14:08:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-10-15T10:21:15+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/08\/18\/performance-linked-incentive-program-is-not-tying-in-agreement-but-a-business-strategy-cci-rejected-case-against-chocolate-giant-craft-food-inc\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/08\/18\/performance-linked-incentive-program-is-not-tying-in-agreement-but-a-business-strategy-cci-rejected-case-against-chocolate-giant-craft-food-inc\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/08\/18\/performance-linked-incentive-program-is-not-tying-in-agreement-but-a-business-strategy-cci-rejected-case-against-chocolate-giant-craft-food-inc\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg","width":1330,"height":887},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/08\/18\/performance-linked-incentive-program-is-not-tying-in-agreement-but-a-business-strategy-cci-rejected-case-against-chocolate-giant-craft-food-inc\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Performance linked incentive program is not tying in agreement but a business strategy, CCI rejected case against chocolate giant Craft Food Inc"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa","name":"Sucheta","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Sucheta"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/legal_editor\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":6552,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/02\/25\/complaint-against-volkswagen-group-alleging-abuse-of-dominant-market-position-dismissed\/","url_meta":{"origin":6746,"position":0},"title":"Complaint against Volkswagen Group alleging abuse of dominant market position, dismissed","author":"Sucheta","date":"February 25, 2015","format":false,"excerpt":"Competition Commission of India (CCI): India\u2019s competition watchdog, CCI had rejected a complaint filed by Delhi-NCR based Bhasin Motors alleging that Volkswagen Group Sales India Pvt. Ltd. was abusing its dominant market position with regard to dealership agreements. Bhasin Motors had alleged in the complaint that by virtue of its\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Tribunals\/Commissions\/Regulatory Bodies&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Tribunals\/Commissions\/Regulatory Bodies","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/tribunals_commissions_regulatorybodies\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":6671,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/06\/25\/allegations-of-unfair-trade-practices-against-bank-of-baroda-rejected\/","url_meta":{"origin":6746,"position":1},"title":"Allegations of unfair trade practices against Bank of Baroda, rejected","author":"Sucheta","date":"June 25, 2015","format":false,"excerpt":"Competition Commission of India (CCI): While rejecting the allegations of unfair trade practices against Bank of Baroda in the market of commercial\/corporate loan in India, CCI closed an information filed by Uttarakhand-based firm Dhanvir Food Product in the matter. Said information was filed by Dhanvir Food Product, which had availed\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Tribunals\/Commissions\/Regulatory Bodies&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Tribunals\/Commissions\/Regulatory Bodies","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/tribunals_commissions_regulatorybodies\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":6220,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2014\/06\/02\/adidas-ag-and-reebok-international-ltd-not-abusing-their-dominant-market-position-with-regard-to-sale-of-premium-sports-goods-in-noida\/","url_meta":{"origin":6746,"position":2},"title":"Adidas AG and Reebok International Ltd. not abusing their dominant market position with regard to sale of premium sports goods in Noida","author":"Sucheta","date":"June 2, 2014","format":false,"excerpt":"Competition Commission of India (CCI): CCI has rejected a complaint filed by Kalpataru Enterprises, a franchisee of Reebok India Co. alleging that Adidas AG, Reebok International Ltd and Reebok India Company, as a group, abused its dominant position in the relevant market of sale of premium sports goods in Noida.\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Tribunals\/Commissions\/Regulatory Bodies&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Tribunals\/Commissions\/Regulatory Bodies","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/tribunals_commissions_regulatorybodies\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":31581,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/01\/04\/uber-is-not-dominant-in-services-offered-by-radio-taxis-and-yellow-taxis-in-kolkata\/","url_meta":{"origin":6746,"position":3},"title":"UBER is not dominant in services offered by radio taxis and yellow taxis    in Kolkata","author":"Sucheta","date":"January 4, 2016","format":false,"excerpt":"Competition Commission of India (CCI): Extending the limit on relevant product market in Kolkata in comparison to Bengaluru (OLA case), the fair competition regulator CCI closed a case filed against radio-taxi operator UBER. The informant, another radio-taxi operator in Kolkata, alleged that UBER is abusing its dominant position by adopting\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/01\/Uber.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/01\/Uber.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/01\/Uber.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/01\/Uber.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/01\/Uber.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":18417,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/10\/13\/hyundai-motor-is-not-dominant-in-the-market-of-sports-multi-utility-vehicles-in-india-case-of-abuse-of-dominance-closed\/","url_meta":{"origin":6746,"position":4},"title":"Hyundai Motor is not dominant in the market of Sports\/ Multi Utility Vehicles in India, case of abuse of dominance closed","author":"Sucheta","date":"October 13, 2015","format":false,"excerpt":"Competition Commission of India (CCI): Already litigating before the Competition Appellate Tribunal, to avoid penalty imposed by CCI for abuse of dominance in spare part market, Hyundai got escape from examination of its conducts in market of Sports\/ Multi Utility Vehicles (SUV) under the provisions of section 4 of the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Competition-Commission.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Competition-Commission.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Competition-Commission.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Competition-Commission.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Competition-Commission.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":57531,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/07\/21\/allegations-of-abuse-of-dominant-market-position-against-coal-india-ltd-dismissed\/","url_meta":{"origin":6746,"position":5},"title":"Allegations of abuse of dominant market position against Coal India Ltd., dismissed","author":"Sucheta","date":"July 21, 2016","format":false,"excerpt":"Competition Commission of India (CCI): While observing that though Coal India Ltd. was dominant in the market of \u201cprovision of services relating to collection, preparation and transportation of coal samples in India,\u201d no entry barrier were created through the conditions of depositing of Rs 1 crore earnest money and annual\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Competition-Commission.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Competition-Commission.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Competition-Commission.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Competition-Commission.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Competition-Commission.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6746","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=6746"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6746\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/7321"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=6746"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=6746"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=6746"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}