{"id":67441,"date":"2016-09-08T10:13:58","date_gmt":"2016-09-08T04:43:58","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=67441"},"modified":"2016-09-19T13:36:23","modified_gmt":"2016-09-19T08:06:23","slug":"mere-hesitation-on-childs-part-no-ground-to-deny-visitation-rights-to-parent","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/09\/08\/mere-hesitation-on-childs-part-no-ground-to-deny-visitation-rights-to-parent\/","title":{"rendered":"Mere hesitation on child’s part no ground to deny visitation rights to parent"},"content":{"rendered":"

Delhi High Court:<\/strong> Hearing an appeal against the Family Court’s order granting only an \u00a0hour every month as visitation rights to the appellant father, the Court observed that mere hesitation on the child’s part to meet either of the parent should not be a ground to\u00a0deny proper access to the spouse in question.\u00a0It is trite that it is always in the interest of a child to bond with\u00a0both parents notwithstanding the parents being estranged.<\/p>\n

Terming the visitation right as illusory, the appellant was aggrieved by the impugned order wherein the learned Judge had noted that during his interaction with the child he found the child completely hesitant to be with his father.<\/p>\n

The Division Bench comprising of Pradeep Nadrajog and Pratibha Rani, JJ.\u00a0observed that the learned Judge ought not to have rushed through the matter in a casual manner. One interaction with the child was not enough. If a child is hesitant to be with a parent, it is duty of the Presiding Judge of the Family Court to have the child counselled with the help of the counsellors attached to the Court. Every effort has to be made to counsel both parents to spare the child the agony of their separation. The parents have to be counselled to keep the child out of the litigation and in turn encourage the child to meet the other spouse. This process of breaking the ice thought slow and cumbersome, has to be followed. Meaning thereby, if a Judge of a Family Court finds a child hesitant to meet either parent, it should not be the ground to deny proper access to the spouse in question.<\/p>\n

The Court directed the Family Court to refer the parents to the counsellors attached to the Court to try to reach a compromise. Till a resolution takes place, as an interim measure the Court directed the appellant be granted access to the child on fortnightly basis. The meeting\u00a0would be initially either in the counsellors\u2019 room attached to the Family\u00a0Court Complex or in the children room.\u00a0If the counsellors find the child comfortable with the father \u00a0and the situation improves, the ultimate endeavour would be for the child to spend six to eight hours every week with his father.\u00a0Disposing of the appeal, the appellant’s application under Section 12 of the Guardians and Wards Act was directed to be taken up afresh by the Family Court. \u00a0[Aditya Mahajan<\/em> v. Shachi Mahajan<\/em>, \u00a02016 SCC OnLine Del 5056<\/a>\u00a0, decided on September 1, 2016]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Delhi High Court: Hearing an appeal against the Family Court’s order granting only an \u00a0hour every month as visitation rights to the <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":91,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[9061,9071],"class_list":["post-67441","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-marriage-counselling","tag-visitation-rights"],"yoast_head":"\nMere hesitation on child's part no ground to deny visitation rights to parent | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/09\/08\/mere-hesitation-on-childs-part-no-ground-to-deny-visitation-rights-to-parent\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Mere hesitation on child's part no ground to deny visitation rights to parent\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Delhi High Court: Hearing an appeal against the Family Court’s order granting only an \u00a0hour every month as visitation rights to the\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/09\/08\/mere-hesitation-on-childs-part-no-ground-to-deny-visitation-rights-to-parent\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2016-09-08T04:43:58+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-09-19T08:06:23+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Delhi-HC.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1329\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"888\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Saba\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Saba\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/09\/08\/mere-hesitation-on-childs-part-no-ground-to-deny-visitation-rights-to-parent\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/09\/08\/mere-hesitation-on-childs-part-no-ground-to-deny-visitation-rights-to-parent\/\",\"name\":\"Mere hesitation on child's part no ground to deny visitation rights to parent | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2016-09-08T04:43:58+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-09-19T08:06:23+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/09\/08\/mere-hesitation-on-childs-part-no-ground-to-deny-visitation-rights-to-parent\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/09\/08\/mere-hesitation-on-childs-part-no-ground-to-deny-visitation-rights-to-parent\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/09\/08\/mere-hesitation-on-childs-part-no-ground-to-deny-visitation-rights-to-parent\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Mere hesitation on child’s part no ground to deny visitation rights to parent\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785\",\"name\":\"Saba\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Saba\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_2\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Mere hesitation on child's part no ground to deny visitation rights to parent | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/09\/08\/mere-hesitation-on-childs-part-no-ground-to-deny-visitation-rights-to-parent\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Mere hesitation on child's part no ground to deny visitation rights to parent","og_description":"Delhi High Court: Hearing an appeal against the Family Court’s order granting only an \u00a0hour every month as visitation rights to the","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/09\/08\/mere-hesitation-on-childs-part-no-ground-to-deny-visitation-rights-to-parent\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2016-09-08T04:43:58+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-09-19T08:06:23+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1329,"height":888,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Delhi-HC.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Saba","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Saba","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/09\/08\/mere-hesitation-on-childs-part-no-ground-to-deny-visitation-rights-to-parent\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/09\/08\/mere-hesitation-on-childs-part-no-ground-to-deny-visitation-rights-to-parent\/","name":"Mere hesitation on child's part no ground to deny visitation rights to parent | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2016-09-08T04:43:58+00:00","dateModified":"2016-09-19T08:06:23+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/09\/08\/mere-hesitation-on-childs-part-no-ground-to-deny-visitation-rights-to-parent\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/09\/08\/mere-hesitation-on-childs-part-no-ground-to-deny-visitation-rights-to-parent\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/09\/08\/mere-hesitation-on-childs-part-no-ground-to-deny-visitation-rights-to-parent\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Mere hesitation on child’s part no ground to deny visitation rights to parent"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785","name":"Saba","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Saba"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_2\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":291469,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/05\/06\/issuance-of-passport-without-fathers-name-permissible-in-certain-cases-delhi-high-court-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":67441,"position":0},"title":"Issuance of passport without father’s name is permissible in certain cases: Delhi High Court","author":"Simranjeet","date":"May 6, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The Delhi High Court opined that passports can be issued under different circumstances without the name of the father, depending upon the factual position in each case and no hard and fast rule can be applied.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"delhi high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":262412,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/02\/25\/child-custody\/","url_meta":{"origin":67441,"position":1},"title":"Due to father\u2019s field job, mother granted custody of child: Did Chh HC also grant contact and visitation right to father? Read","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"February 25, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Chhattisgarh High Court: In a child custody battle, the Division Bench of Goutam Bhaduri and Rajani Dubey, JJ., reiterated the position of law in the Supreme Court\u2019s decision of Yashita Sahu v. State of Rajasthan, (2020) 3 SCC 67, wherein it was held that the court cannot provide one happy\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":323258,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/30\/kerala-hc-refuses-interfere-with-order-family-court-granting-visitation-rights-father\/","url_meta":{"origin":67441,"position":2},"title":"\u2018Affection of both parents a basic human right for growing child\u2019: Kerala HC refuses to interfere with Family Court\u2019s order granting visitation rights to father","author":"Editor","date":"May 30, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cWhile considering the claim for custody of a minor child, unless very serious, proven conduct should make one of them unworthy to claim for custody of the child concerned, the question can and shall be decided solely by looking into the question as to, 'what would be the best interest\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Kerala High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Kerala-High-Court-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Kerala-High-Court-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Kerala-High-Court-1.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Kerala-High-Court-1.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":264459,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/03\/26\/right-of-putative-father-to-visit-minor-child-upheld\/","url_meta":{"origin":67441,"position":3},"title":"Right of Putative Father to visit minor child upheld: Del HC","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"March 26, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court: Upholding the rights of the putative father, V. Kameswar Rao, J., expressed that while determining and granting such rights, more so when the child is of less than 3 years of age, surely his well-being\/welfare is of paramount importance. The petition sought aside, the lower Court\u2019s decision\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/Delhi_New-logo.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/Delhi_New-logo.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/Delhi_New-logo.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/Delhi_New-logo.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/Delhi_New-logo.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":350386,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/06\/11\/orissa-hc-upholds-fathers-visitation-rights\/","url_meta":{"origin":67441,"position":4},"title":"\u2018Love, company, protection and guidance of both parents are basic human rights and need of child\u2019; Orissa HC upholds father\u2019s visitation right","author":"Editor","date":"June 11, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"The child is always the victim in the custody battles and in the fight of egos and acrimonies between two spouses, but the childhood of such child is the worse sufferer, and such childhood is spoiled due to the alter egos\u2019 of the spouses.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Orissa High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Orissa-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Orissa-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Orissa-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Orissa-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":260993,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/02\/02\/can-court-compel-a-parent-to-go-aboard-with-child-in-a-habeas-corpus-case-supreme-court-answers\/","url_meta":{"origin":67441,"position":5},"title":"Can Court compel a parent to go abroad with child in a habeas corpus case? Supreme Court answers","author":"Editor","date":"February 2, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: In a habeas corpus case the Division Bench Ajay Rastogi and Abhay S. Oka*, JJ., held that in a case for custody of the child the rights of the parties to a custody dispute (parents) are irrelevant. However, adding an exception, the Bench stated, \u00a0\u201cWe may note here\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-68.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-68.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-68.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-68.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-68.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/67441","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/91"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=67441"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/67441\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=67441"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=67441"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=67441"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}