{"id":6727,"date":"2015-08-03T11:08:00","date_gmt":"2015-08-03T11:08:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/localhost\/sccblog\/?p=6727"},"modified":"2015-10-14T12:47:41","modified_gmt":"2015-10-14T07:17:41","slug":"previous-adverse-remarks-of-dishonesty-not-washed-off-by-subsequent-promotion","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/08\/03\/previous-adverse-remarks-of-dishonesty-not-washed-off-by-subsequent-promotion\/","title":{"rendered":"Previous adverse remarks of dishonesty not \u201cwashed off\u201d by subsequent promotion"},"content":{"rendered":"

Rajasthan High Court:<\/span><\/b> While dismissing a petition relating to the promotion of a Grade IV employee, the Court held that the adverse remarks given earlier related to dishonesty and integrity not washed off by subsequent promotion in considering suitability for a post which is based on evaluation of entire record.<\/o:p><\/span><\/p>\n

In the present case, the petitioner, a grade IV employee of the RBI was declined a promotion to the post of Assistant Care Taker in Grade III by the Bank on the ground of being found guilty of misconduct by a Departmental Inquiry in 1998. He filed a civil writ petition against his non-promotion before the Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.<\/o:p><\/span><\/p>\n

The petitioner alleged arbitrariness and mala fide in the action of the Selection Committee in not considering him for promotion to the relevant post and also invoked \u201cwash off\u201d theory to contend that subsequent promotion after the punishment of 1998 washed off the previous guilt and hence he was eligible for promotion. Besides, the petitioner also raised the plea of equity and wanted the Court to be sympathetic to him as the misconduct and subsequent punishment by the Departmental Inquiry of the year 1998 had become stale by then.<\/span><\/p>\n

The Single Judge bench comprising of Alok Sharma, J. dismissed the petition and held that it would not, by virtue of power under Article 226, interfere with the Administrative process except in the cases of Wednesbury unreasonableness, ex-facie unfairness, bias and mala fides which, in the present case, were not there since the suitability for promotion as Assistant Care Taker assessable under RBI’s Master Circular on Promotion Policy for Class-III and IV employees issued on 2nd July 2012 was to be based on the evaluation of the entire record of the employee.<\/span><\/p>\n

As to the \u201cwashing off\u201d theory, Court relied on Badrinath v. Government of Tamil Nadu <\/i>(2000) 8 SCC 395, <\/b>in which it was held that if adverse remarks relate to a period prior to an earlier promotion, they indeed can be treated as having lost their sting and being rendered weak subject to the rider that if they relate to dishonesty or lack of integrity, they can be considered to have not lost their strength fully so as to be ignored altogether. The Court also rejected the plea of equity on the ground that where there is a conflict between law <\/b>and equity, it is the law which will prevail. Patel Ram Meena v. Reserve Bank of India, <\/i><\/span>2015 SCC OnLine Raj 1637<\/a>, <\/font><\/span>decided on 27.07.2015<\/i><\/p>\n

 <\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Rajasthan High Court: While dismissing a petition relating to the promotion of a Grade IV employee, the Court held that the adverse <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":7321,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[10],"tags":[3646],"class_list":["post-6727","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-highcourts","tag-adverse_remarks"],"yoast_head":"\nPrevious adverse remarks of dishonesty not \u201cwashed off\u201d by subsequent promotion | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/08\/03\/previous-adverse-remarks-of-dishonesty-not-washed-off-by-subsequent-promotion\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Previous adverse remarks of dishonesty not \u201cwashed off\u201d by subsequent promotion\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Rajasthan High Court: While dismissing a petition relating to the promotion of a Grade IV employee, the Court held that the adverse\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/08\/03\/previous-adverse-remarks-of-dishonesty-not-washed-off-by-subsequent-promotion\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2015-08-03T11:08:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2015-10-14T07:17:41+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Sucheta\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Sucheta\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/08\/03\/previous-adverse-remarks-of-dishonesty-not-washed-off-by-subsequent-promotion\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/08\/03\/previous-adverse-remarks-of-dishonesty-not-washed-off-by-subsequent-promotion\/\",\"name\":\"Previous adverse remarks of dishonesty not \u201cwashed off\u201d by subsequent promotion | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/08\/03\/previous-adverse-remarks-of-dishonesty-not-washed-off-by-subsequent-promotion\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/08\/03\/previous-adverse-remarks-of-dishonesty-not-washed-off-by-subsequent-promotion\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2015-08-03T11:08:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-10-14T07:17:41+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/08\/03\/previous-adverse-remarks-of-dishonesty-not-washed-off-by-subsequent-promotion\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/08\/03\/previous-adverse-remarks-of-dishonesty-not-washed-off-by-subsequent-promotion\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/08\/03\/previous-adverse-remarks-of-dishonesty-not-washed-off-by-subsequent-promotion\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg\",\"width\":1330,\"height\":887},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/08\/03\/previous-adverse-remarks-of-dishonesty-not-washed-off-by-subsequent-promotion\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Previous adverse remarks of dishonesty not \u201cwashed off\u201d by subsequent promotion\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa\",\"name\":\"Sucheta\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Sucheta\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/legal_editor\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Previous adverse remarks of dishonesty not \u201cwashed off\u201d by subsequent promotion | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/08\/03\/previous-adverse-remarks-of-dishonesty-not-washed-off-by-subsequent-promotion\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Previous adverse remarks of dishonesty not \u201cwashed off\u201d by subsequent promotion","og_description":"Rajasthan High Court: While dismissing a petition relating to the promotion of a Grade IV employee, the Court held that the adverse","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/08\/03\/previous-adverse-remarks-of-dishonesty-not-washed-off-by-subsequent-promotion\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2015-08-03T11:08:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2015-10-14T07:17:41+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Sucheta","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Sucheta","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/08\/03\/previous-adverse-remarks-of-dishonesty-not-washed-off-by-subsequent-promotion\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/08\/03\/previous-adverse-remarks-of-dishonesty-not-washed-off-by-subsequent-promotion\/","name":"Previous adverse remarks of dishonesty not \u201cwashed off\u201d by subsequent promotion | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/08\/03\/previous-adverse-remarks-of-dishonesty-not-washed-off-by-subsequent-promotion\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/08\/03\/previous-adverse-remarks-of-dishonesty-not-washed-off-by-subsequent-promotion\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg","datePublished":"2015-08-03T11:08:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-10-14T07:17:41+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/08\/03\/previous-adverse-remarks-of-dishonesty-not-washed-off-by-subsequent-promotion\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/08\/03\/previous-adverse-remarks-of-dishonesty-not-washed-off-by-subsequent-promotion\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/08\/03\/previous-adverse-remarks-of-dishonesty-not-washed-off-by-subsequent-promotion\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg","width":1330,"height":887},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/08\/03\/previous-adverse-remarks-of-dishonesty-not-washed-off-by-subsequent-promotion\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Previous adverse remarks of dishonesty not \u201cwashed off\u201d by subsequent promotion"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa","name":"Sucheta","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Sucheta"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/legal_editor\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":350495,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/06\/12\/punjab-and-haryana-hc-refuses-relief-haryana-appeal-against-policewoman-promotion\/","url_meta":{"origin":6727,"position":0},"title":"Punjab and Haryana High Court dismisses State’s appeals against Policewoman’s Promotion; criticises baseless Adverse Remarks in ACR","author":"Sonali Ahuja","date":"June 12, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"The Court stated that the Single Judge correctly assessed the sharp contradiction that crept in the policewoman\u2019s work record as she received a commendation certificate the same year as the adverse remarks. The Single Judge also noticed that the Commissioner of Police made adverse remarks in the ACR while the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Punjab and Haryana High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Punjab-and-Haryana-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Punjab-and-Haryana-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Punjab-and-Haryana-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Punjab-and-Haryana-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":346692,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/04\/29\/promotion-denied-based-on-adverse-confidential-reports-which-were-never-conveyed-to-employee-sc\/","url_meta":{"origin":6727,"position":1},"title":"Can promotion be denied based on adverse confidential reports which were never conveyed to the employee, depriving of opportunity to representation? SC answers","author":"Editor","date":"April 29, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"The Commandant with Border Security Force (BSF) was denied promotion to the post of Deputy Inspector General from the date his juniors were promoted.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Denial of Promotion","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/04\/Denial-of-Promotion.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/04\/Denial-of-Promotion.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/04\/Denial-of-Promotion.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/04\/Denial-of-Promotion.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":360756,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/19\/ph-hc-sets-aside-compulsory-retirement-of-58-years-old-district-judge\/","url_meta":{"origin":6727,"position":2},"title":"Punjab and Haryana HC sets aside compulsory retirement of 58-year-old District Judge; Criticizes Administrative Judge\u2019s adverse remarks on integrity","author":"Editor","date":"September 19, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cIt is difficult to comprehend that an officer who had no adverse remarks in his entire career spanning 30 years, behaved and conducted himself in such a manner, compelling the Administrative Judge to categorize the District and Sessions Judge from 'Very Good' in 2009-10, down to 'C' (doubtful integrity) in\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"compulsory retirement of 58 year old District Judge","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/compulsory-retirement-of-58-year-old-District-Judge.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/compulsory-retirement-of-58-year-old-District-Judge.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/compulsory-retirement-of-58-year-old-District-Judge.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/compulsory-retirement-of-58-year-old-District-Judge.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":298626,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/05\/rajasthan-hc-quashes-the-entries-made-in-acr-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":6727,"position":3},"title":"\u2018Performance cannot be both unsatisfactory and outstanding in same year’; Rajasthan High Court quashes adverse entries made in Annual Confidential Report","author":"Editor","date":"August 5, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cIt is duty of the Reporting Officer and the Reviewing Officer to take care not only that in their assessment of overall performance of the subordinate officer but also they are not influenced by any personal interest, bias or malice.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"rajasthan high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/rajasthan-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/rajasthan-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/rajasthan-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/rajasthan-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":197862,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/06\/30\/refusal-of-promotion-by-an-employee-does-not-deprive-him-of-the-benefit-of-pay-upgradation\/","url_meta":{"origin":6727,"position":4},"title":"Refusal of promotion by an employee does not deprive him of the benefit of pay upgradation","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"June 30, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Madhya Pradesh High Court: A Single Judge Bench comprising of Sanjay Dwivedi, J., allowed a petition filed by an employee against the decision of the employer whereby the order of his pay upgradation was withdrawn. The petitioner was aggrieved by the decision of his employer to withdraw the benefits of\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/04\/MPHC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/04\/MPHC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/04\/MPHC.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/04\/MPHC.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/04\/MPHC.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":334193,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/10\/30\/delhi-hc-obliterates-adverse-observations-against-enforcement-directorate-order-trial-court-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":6727,"position":5},"title":"\u2018Adverse remarks against government servants have deleterious impact on their careers\u2019; Delhi HC obliterates adverse observations against ED in Trial Court\u2019s order","author":"Editor","date":"October 30, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"\u2018The law is clear that custody of an accused can be sought even after filing of a chargesheet or complaint.\u2019","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6727","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=6727"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6727\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/7321"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=6727"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=6727"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=6727"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}