{"id":6674,"date":"2015-06-25T10:06:00","date_gmt":"2015-06-25T10:06:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/localhost\/sccblog\/?p=6674"},"modified":"2015-10-14T12:54:36","modified_gmt":"2015-10-14T07:24:36","slug":"methodology-of-selection-by-prescribing-the-roster-points-is-discriminatory-arbitrary-and-unreasonable","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/06\/25\/methodology-of-selection-by-prescribing-the-roster-points-is-discriminatory-arbitrary-and-unreasonable\/","title":{"rendered":"Methodology of selection by prescribing the roster points is discriminatory, arbitrary and unreasonable"},"content":{"rendered":"

Himachal Pradesh High Court<\/span><\/b>– Deciding the writ petitions involving common questions of fact and law wherein the allocation of seats on the basis of roster points based on sub-groups in para 3.1 in the prospectus issued by the Department of Medical Education and Research, Himachal Pradesh and the notice issued regarding the 4 point roster has been challenged, the division bench of Rajiv Sharma and Sureshwar Thakur, JJ, held such allocation as arbitrary and unreasonable and the groups should have been treated as one group for the purpose of admission to MD\/MS\/MDS courses.<\/span><\/p>\n

In the instant case, the petitioners have participated in the selection process seeking admission to MD\/MS\/MDS courses for the academic session 2015-18, according to the prospectus. As per para 3.1 of the prospectus, 66.6% of the State quota seats are to be filled up by in-service candidates. The in-service group comprises of two further sub-groups. Subsequently by the notice issued by the respondent-State, the first two seats would go to Regular and 3rd to Contractual and thereafter 4th to Regular (Medical Officers). Counsel for the petitioners contended that distribution of seats as per the sub-groups was impermissible and unconstitutional and merit should be the sole criterion for MD\/MS and MDS courses. While counsels for the respondents contended that constituting of sub-groups was in accordance with law and also justified the preparation of roster.<\/span><\/p>\n

With regard to the distribution of seats, the Court observed that in-service candidates and non-service candidates are two separate classes based on intelligible differentia, having a rationale relation with the object sought to be achieved, however, there could not be further micro classification on the basis of source of recruitment qua in-service candidates. Stating that the goal to be achieved by classification is that only meritorious candidates are admitted in postgraduate courses, the Court emphasized that the methodology adopted by the respondents by prescribing the roster points would promote only mediocracy and not merit. Consequently, the admissions made through first, second and third counseling were quashed and directed the respondents to redo the admissions based on merit only. Dr.<\/i> Vivek Kumar Garg v. State of H.P<\/i>., 2015 SCC OnLine HP 1374<\/a>, decided on 18.6.2015<\/o:p><\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/span><\/b><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Himachal Pradesh High Court– Deciding the writ petitions involving common questions of fact and law wherein the allocation of seats on the <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":7321,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[10],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-6674","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-highcourts"],"yoast_head":"\nMethodology of selection by prescribing the roster points is discriminatory, arbitrary and unreasonable | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/06\/25\/methodology-of-selection-by-prescribing-the-roster-points-is-discriminatory-arbitrary-and-unreasonable\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Methodology of selection by prescribing the roster points is discriminatory, arbitrary and unreasonable\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Himachal Pradesh High Court– Deciding the writ petitions involving common questions of fact and law wherein the allocation of seats on the\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/06\/25\/methodology-of-selection-by-prescribing-the-roster-points-is-discriminatory-arbitrary-and-unreasonable\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2015-06-25T10:06:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2015-10-14T07:24:36+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Sucheta\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Sucheta\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2015\\\/06\\\/25\\\/methodology-of-selection-by-prescribing-the-roster-points-is-discriminatory-arbitrary-and-unreasonable\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2015\\\/06\\\/25\\\/methodology-of-selection-by-prescribing-the-roster-points-is-discriminatory-arbitrary-and-unreasonable\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Sucheta\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa\"},\"headline\":\"Methodology of selection by prescribing the roster points is discriminatory, arbitrary and unreasonable\",\"datePublished\":\"2015-06-25T10:06:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-10-14T07:24:36+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2015\\\/06\\\/25\\\/methodology-of-selection-by-prescribing-the-roster-points-is-discriminatory-arbitrary-and-unreasonable\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":374,\"commentCount\":1,\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2015\\\/06\\\/25\\\/methodology-of-selection-by-prescribing-the-roster-points-is-discriminatory-arbitrary-and-unreasonable\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2015\\\/10\\\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg\",\"articleSection\":[\"High Courts\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2015\\\/06\\\/25\\\/methodology-of-selection-by-prescribing-the-roster-points-is-discriminatory-arbitrary-and-unreasonable\\\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2015\\\/06\\\/25\\\/methodology-of-selection-by-prescribing-the-roster-points-is-discriminatory-arbitrary-and-unreasonable\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2015\\\/06\\\/25\\\/methodology-of-selection-by-prescribing-the-roster-points-is-discriminatory-arbitrary-and-unreasonable\\\/\",\"name\":\"Methodology of selection by prescribing the roster points is discriminatory, arbitrary and unreasonable | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2015\\\/06\\\/25\\\/methodology-of-selection-by-prescribing-the-roster-points-is-discriminatory-arbitrary-and-unreasonable\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2015\\\/06\\\/25\\\/methodology-of-selection-by-prescribing-the-roster-points-is-discriminatory-arbitrary-and-unreasonable\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2015\\\/10\\\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2015-06-25T10:06:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-10-14T07:24:36+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2015\\\/06\\\/25\\\/methodology-of-selection-by-prescribing-the-roster-points-is-discriminatory-arbitrary-and-unreasonable\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2015\\\/06\\\/25\\\/methodology-of-selection-by-prescribing-the-roster-points-is-discriminatory-arbitrary-and-unreasonable\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2015\\\/06\\\/25\\\/methodology-of-selection-by-prescribing-the-roster-points-is-discriminatory-arbitrary-and-unreasonable\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2015\\\/10\\\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2015\\\/10\\\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg\",\"width\":1330,\"height\":887},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2015\\\/06\\\/25\\\/methodology-of-selection-by-prescribing-the-roster-points-is-discriminatory-arbitrary-and-unreasonable\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Methodology of selection by prescribing the roster points is discriminatory, arbitrary and unreasonable\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa\",\"name\":\"Sucheta\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Sucheta\"},\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/author\\\/legal_editor\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Methodology of selection by prescribing the roster points is discriminatory, arbitrary and unreasonable | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/06\/25\/methodology-of-selection-by-prescribing-the-roster-points-is-discriminatory-arbitrary-and-unreasonable\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Methodology of selection by prescribing the roster points is discriminatory, arbitrary and unreasonable","og_description":"Himachal Pradesh High Court– Deciding the writ petitions involving common questions of fact and law wherein the allocation of seats on the","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/06\/25\/methodology-of-selection-by-prescribing-the-roster-points-is-discriminatory-arbitrary-and-unreasonable\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2015-06-25T10:06:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2015-10-14T07:24:36+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Sucheta","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Sucheta","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/06\/25\/methodology-of-selection-by-prescribing-the-roster-points-is-discriminatory-arbitrary-and-unreasonable\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/06\/25\/methodology-of-selection-by-prescribing-the-roster-points-is-discriminatory-arbitrary-and-unreasonable\/"},"author":{"name":"Sucheta","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa"},"headline":"Methodology of selection by prescribing the roster points is discriminatory, arbitrary and unreasonable","datePublished":"2015-06-25T10:06:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-10-14T07:24:36+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/06\/25\/methodology-of-selection-by-prescribing-the-roster-points-is-discriminatory-arbitrary-and-unreasonable\/"},"wordCount":374,"commentCount":1,"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/06\/25\/methodology-of-selection-by-prescribing-the-roster-points-is-discriminatory-arbitrary-and-unreasonable\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg","articleSection":["High Courts"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/06\/25\/methodology-of-selection-by-prescribing-the-roster-points-is-discriminatory-arbitrary-and-unreasonable\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/06\/25\/methodology-of-selection-by-prescribing-the-roster-points-is-discriminatory-arbitrary-and-unreasonable\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/06\/25\/methodology-of-selection-by-prescribing-the-roster-points-is-discriminatory-arbitrary-and-unreasonable\/","name":"Methodology of selection by prescribing the roster points is discriminatory, arbitrary and unreasonable | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/06\/25\/methodology-of-selection-by-prescribing-the-roster-points-is-discriminatory-arbitrary-and-unreasonable\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/06\/25\/methodology-of-selection-by-prescribing-the-roster-points-is-discriminatory-arbitrary-and-unreasonable\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg","datePublished":"2015-06-25T10:06:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-10-14T07:24:36+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/06\/25\/methodology-of-selection-by-prescribing-the-roster-points-is-discriminatory-arbitrary-and-unreasonable\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/06\/25\/methodology-of-selection-by-prescribing-the-roster-points-is-discriminatory-arbitrary-and-unreasonable\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/06\/25\/methodology-of-selection-by-prescribing-the-roster-points-is-discriminatory-arbitrary-and-unreasonable\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg","width":1330,"height":887},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/06\/25\/methodology-of-selection-by-prescribing-the-roster-points-is-discriminatory-arbitrary-and-unreasonable\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Methodology of selection by prescribing the roster points is discriminatory, arbitrary and unreasonable"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa","name":"Sucheta","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Sucheta"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/legal_editor\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":159194,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/09\/26\/condition-of-furnishing-bank-guarantee-by-students-seeking-admission-to-mdms-courses-to-ensure-availability-of-best-medical-care-to-natives-residing-in-remote-areas\/","url_meta":{"origin":6674,"position":0},"title":"Condition of furnishing bank guarantee by students seeking admission to MD\/MS courses to ensure availability of best medical care to natives residing in remote areas","author":"Saba","date":"September 26, 2017","format":false,"excerpt":"High Court of Himachal Pradesh: While deciding a set of writ petitions, a two-Judge Bench comprising of Sanjay Karol, Acting CJ and Ajay Mohan Goel, J. held that it cannot be said that the condition of furnishing bank guarantee is illegal, or that it is violative of Articles 14 and\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":268815,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/06\/22\/delhi-high-court-upholds-denial-of-admission-where-aiims-declared-a-foreign-national-successful-in-exam-but-pgimer-denied-admission-for-lack-of-seats\/","url_meta":{"origin":6674,"position":1},"title":"Delhi High Court upholds denial of admission where AIIMS declared a foreign national successful in exam, but PGIMER denied admission for lack of seats","author":"Editor","date":"June 22, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court: Sanjeev Narula, J. upheld the denial of admission by AIIMS and PGIMER as mere mentioning of eligibility criteria for admission as a foreign national in its prospectus does not mean that PGIMER advertised seats for foreign nationals. AIIMS undertook to conduct the INI-SS Examination at the national\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/delhi_high_court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/delhi_high_court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/delhi_high_court.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/delhi_high_court.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/delhi_high_court.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":295815,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/03\/hp-high-court-upheld-nabard-guidelines-selection-auditors-cooperative-banks-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":6674,"position":2},"title":"Selection of Auditors for Cooperative banks: Himachal Pradesh High Court upholds NABARD’s guidelines","author":"Editor","date":"July 3, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Himachal Pradesh High Court said that to assist the respective State Governments to choose the right persons to conduct statutory audits, the NABARD had issued the impugned letter prescribing broad guidelines","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"himachal pradesh high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/himachal-pradesh-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/himachal-pradesh-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/himachal-pradesh-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/himachal-pradesh-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":257131,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/11\/16\/civil-services-sc-st-or-obc-candidate-selected-against-unreserved-vacancy-as-a-general-merit-candidate-cannot-make-a-grievance-for-allocation-of-cadre-sc\/","url_meta":{"origin":6674,"position":3},"title":"[Civil Services] SC\/ST or OBC candidate selected against unreserved vacancy as a general merit candidate cannot make a grievance for allocation of cadre: SC","author":"Editor","date":"November 16, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThe State has no discretion of allocation of a cadre at its whims and fancies.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-3-3.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-3-3.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-3-3.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-3-3.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-3-3.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":220912,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/10\/16\/del-hc-aiims-2019-candidate-producing-obc-certificate-even-one-day-prior-to-seat-allocation-should-be-able-to-get-a-seat-allocated\/","url_meta":{"origin":6674,"position":4},"title":"Del HC | AIIMS 2019 \u2014 Candidate producing OBC certificate even one day prior to seat allocation should be able to get a seat allocated","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"October 16, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court: Rajiv Shakdher, J. while addressing a petition filed by an AIIMS aspirant, ruled the decision in her favour by stating a very significant point in the Judgment, \u201cOne fact, one circumstance, can make all the difference while discerning the true ratio of a Judgment.\u201d In the present\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":206287,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/05\/child-prodigy-allowed-to-take-part-in-counselling-for-bams-course-even-when-age-criteria-prescribed-in-prospectus-not-fulfilled\/","url_meta":{"origin":6674,"position":5},"title":"\u2018Child prodigy\u2019 allowed to take part in counselling for BAMS course even when age criteria prescribed in prospectus not fulfilled","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"December 5, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Madras High Court: A Single Judge Bench comprising of T. Raja, J. disposed of a writ petition by allowing a \u2018child prodigy\u2019 of 16 years old to take part in the counselling for the BAMS Course, as in accordance to the old notification in regard to the admission eligibility, petitioner\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6674","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=6674"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6674\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/7321"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=6674"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=6674"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=6674"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}