{"id":6672,"date":"2015-06-25T10:06:00","date_gmt":"2015-06-25T10:06:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/localhost\/sccblog\/?p=6672"},"modified":"2015-10-15T15:33:31","modified_gmt":"2015-10-15T10:03:31","slug":"heavy-fine-imposed-upon-glaxosmithkline-pharmaceuticals-ltd-and-sanofi-pasteur-india-for-anti-competitive-practice","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/06\/25\/heavy-fine-imposed-upon-glaxosmithkline-pharmaceuticals-ltd-and-sanofi-pasteur-india-for-anti-competitive-practice\/","title":{"rendered":"Heavy fine imposed upon GlaxoSmithKline Pharmaceuticals Ltd. and Sanofi Pasteur India for anti-competitive practice"},"content":{"rendered":"

Competition Commission of India (CCI): <\/span><\/b>CCI imposed a total fine of about Rs 64 crore on GlaxoSmithKline Pharmaceuticals Ltd. and Sanofi Pasteur India for collusive bidding in supply of a meningitis vaccine to the government for Hajj pilgrims and subsequently plotting to charge higher prices in the government tender for the said vaccine. The order of Commission came upon an information filed by Bio-Med Pvt. Ltd., a pharma company, which also makes polysaccharide Quadrivalent Meningococcal Meningitis (QMMV) vaccines. The information was filed against GlaxoSmithKline Pharmaceuticals Ltd., Sanofi Pasteur India and Health and Family Welfare Ministry was also made party in the matter. It was alleged in the information that Government introduced and modified the turnover conditions for eligibility of the participating bidders to supply the particular vaccine without any reasonable rationale and explanation. It was further alleged that GlaxoSmithKline Pharmaceuticals Ltd. and Sanofi Pasteur India, also cartelized through bid rotations and geographical allocations. CCI in its investigation found that both companies were acting pursuant to an anti-competitive agreement and formed a cartel to get government tenders to supply meningitis vaccine which was required to be administered upon the pilgrims who wish to go on annual pilgrimage of Hajj. After perusal of material on record and hearing both the parties, CCI found GlaxoSmithKline Pharmaceuticals Ltd. and Sanofi Pasteur India liable for violation of the provisions of the Competition Act, 2002 and levied penalty to the extent of three per cent of the turnover both on GlaxoSmithKline Pharmaceuticals Ltd. and Sanofi Pasteur India (aggregating to Rs 60.49 crore and Rs 3.04 crore, respectively) and gave both companies sixty days to deposit the amount. Apart from imposing penalties, the Commission has directed GlaxoSmithKline and Sanofi to “cease and desist” from anti-competitive practices, In re: Bio-Med Pvt. Ltd. v. Union of India, 2015 CCI 11<\/a>, decided on 04.06.2015<\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Competition Commission of India (CCI): CCI imposed a total fine of about Rs 64 crore on GlaxoSmithKline Pharmaceuticals Ltd. and Sanofi Pasteur <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":7321,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[11],"tags":[2505],"class_list":["post-6672","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-tribunals_commissions_regulatorybodies","tag-Competition_Commission_of_India"],"yoast_head":"\nHeavy fine imposed upon GlaxoSmithKline Pharmaceuticals Ltd. and Sanofi Pasteur India for anti-competitive practice | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/06\/25\/heavy-fine-imposed-upon-glaxosmithkline-pharmaceuticals-ltd-and-sanofi-pasteur-india-for-anti-competitive-practice\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Heavy fine imposed upon GlaxoSmithKline Pharmaceuticals Ltd. and Sanofi Pasteur India for anti-competitive practice\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Competition Commission of India (CCI): CCI imposed a total fine of about Rs 64 crore on GlaxoSmithKline Pharmaceuticals Ltd. and Sanofi Pasteur\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/06\/25\/heavy-fine-imposed-upon-glaxosmithkline-pharmaceuticals-ltd-and-sanofi-pasteur-india-for-anti-competitive-practice\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2015-06-25T10:06:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2015-10-15T10:03:31+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Sucheta\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Sucheta\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"1 minute\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/06\/25\/heavy-fine-imposed-upon-glaxosmithkline-pharmaceuticals-ltd-and-sanofi-pasteur-india-for-anti-competitive-practice\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/06\/25\/heavy-fine-imposed-upon-glaxosmithkline-pharmaceuticals-ltd-and-sanofi-pasteur-india-for-anti-competitive-practice\/\",\"name\":\"Heavy fine imposed upon GlaxoSmithKline Pharmaceuticals Ltd. and Sanofi Pasteur India for anti-competitive practice | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/06\/25\/heavy-fine-imposed-upon-glaxosmithkline-pharmaceuticals-ltd-and-sanofi-pasteur-india-for-anti-competitive-practice\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/06\/25\/heavy-fine-imposed-upon-glaxosmithkline-pharmaceuticals-ltd-and-sanofi-pasteur-india-for-anti-competitive-practice\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2015-06-25T10:06:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-10-15T10:03:31+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/06\/25\/heavy-fine-imposed-upon-glaxosmithkline-pharmaceuticals-ltd-and-sanofi-pasteur-india-for-anti-competitive-practice\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/06\/25\/heavy-fine-imposed-upon-glaxosmithkline-pharmaceuticals-ltd-and-sanofi-pasteur-india-for-anti-competitive-practice\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/06\/25\/heavy-fine-imposed-upon-glaxosmithkline-pharmaceuticals-ltd-and-sanofi-pasteur-india-for-anti-competitive-practice\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg\",\"width\":1330,\"height\":887},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/06\/25\/heavy-fine-imposed-upon-glaxosmithkline-pharmaceuticals-ltd-and-sanofi-pasteur-india-for-anti-competitive-practice\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Heavy fine imposed upon GlaxoSmithKline Pharmaceuticals Ltd. and Sanofi Pasteur India for anti-competitive practice\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa\",\"name\":\"Sucheta\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Sucheta\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/legal_editor\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Heavy fine imposed upon GlaxoSmithKline Pharmaceuticals Ltd. and Sanofi Pasteur India for anti-competitive practice | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/06\/25\/heavy-fine-imposed-upon-glaxosmithkline-pharmaceuticals-ltd-and-sanofi-pasteur-india-for-anti-competitive-practice\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Heavy fine imposed upon GlaxoSmithKline Pharmaceuticals Ltd. and Sanofi Pasteur India for anti-competitive practice","og_description":"Competition Commission of India (CCI): CCI imposed a total fine of about Rs 64 crore on GlaxoSmithKline Pharmaceuticals Ltd. and Sanofi Pasteur","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/06\/25\/heavy-fine-imposed-upon-glaxosmithkline-pharmaceuticals-ltd-and-sanofi-pasteur-india-for-anti-competitive-practice\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2015-06-25T10:06:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2015-10-15T10:03:31+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Sucheta","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Sucheta","Est. reading time":"1 minute"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/06\/25\/heavy-fine-imposed-upon-glaxosmithkline-pharmaceuticals-ltd-and-sanofi-pasteur-india-for-anti-competitive-practice\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/06\/25\/heavy-fine-imposed-upon-glaxosmithkline-pharmaceuticals-ltd-and-sanofi-pasteur-india-for-anti-competitive-practice\/","name":"Heavy fine imposed upon GlaxoSmithKline Pharmaceuticals Ltd. and Sanofi Pasteur India for anti-competitive practice | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/06\/25\/heavy-fine-imposed-upon-glaxosmithkline-pharmaceuticals-ltd-and-sanofi-pasteur-india-for-anti-competitive-practice\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/06\/25\/heavy-fine-imposed-upon-glaxosmithkline-pharmaceuticals-ltd-and-sanofi-pasteur-india-for-anti-competitive-practice\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg","datePublished":"2015-06-25T10:06:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-10-15T10:03:31+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/06\/25\/heavy-fine-imposed-upon-glaxosmithkline-pharmaceuticals-ltd-and-sanofi-pasteur-india-for-anti-competitive-practice\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/06\/25\/heavy-fine-imposed-upon-glaxosmithkline-pharmaceuticals-ltd-and-sanofi-pasteur-india-for-anti-competitive-practice\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/06\/25\/heavy-fine-imposed-upon-glaxosmithkline-pharmaceuticals-ltd-and-sanofi-pasteur-india-for-anti-competitive-practice\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg","width":1330,"height":887},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/06\/25\/heavy-fine-imposed-upon-glaxosmithkline-pharmaceuticals-ltd-and-sanofi-pasteur-india-for-anti-competitive-practice\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Heavy fine imposed upon GlaxoSmithKline Pharmaceuticals Ltd. and Sanofi Pasteur India for anti-competitive practice"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa","name":"Sucheta","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Sucheta"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/legal_editor\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":86751,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/11\/21\/rs-64-crore-penalty-imposed-upon-glaxosmithkline-pharmaceuticals-and-sanofi-pasteur-india-by-cci-set-aside\/","url_meta":{"origin":6672,"position":0},"title":"Rs 64 crore penalty imposed upon GlaxoSmithKline Pharmaceuticals and Sanofi Pasteur India by CCI, set aside","author":"Saba","date":"November 21, 2016","format":false,"excerpt":"Competition Appellate Tribunal (COMPAT):\u00a0While declaring the fine of about Rs 64 crore imposed upon GlaxoSmithKline Pharmaceuticals Ltd. and Sanofi Pasteur India by CCI as \u201clegally unsustainable\u201d, the Competition Appellate Tribunal set aside the order of CCI imposing the penalties. Earlier in June 2015, CCI imposed a total fine of about\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/11\/COMPAT_1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/11\/COMPAT_1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/11\/COMPAT_1.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/11\/COMPAT_1.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/11\/COMPAT_1.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":6270,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2014\/11\/05\/penalty-of-rs-10-62-lakhs-imposed-upon-chemist-and-druggists-association-of-goa-for-adopting-anti-competitive-practices\/","url_meta":{"origin":6672,"position":1},"title":"Penalty of Rs 10.62 lakhs imposed upon Chemist and Druggists Association of Goa for adopting anti-competitive practices","author":"Sucheta","date":"November 5, 2014","format":false,"excerpt":"Competition Commission of India (CCI): A penalty of Rs 10.62 lakhs has been imposed upon Chemist and Druggists Association of Goa for adopting anti-competitive practices of directly or indirectly controlling the supply of drugs in a concerted manner in violation of Section 3(3)(a) and 3(3)(b) of the Competition Act, 2002.\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Tribunals\/Commissions\/Regulatory Bodies"","block_context":{"text":"Tribunals\/Commissions\/Regulatory Bodies","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/tribunals_commissions_regulatorybodies\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":6581,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/04\/22\/heavy-penalty-imposed-upon-verifone-india-sales-pvt-ltd-for-indulging-in-unfair-trade-practices\/","url_meta":{"origin":6672,"position":2},"title":"Heavy penalty imposed upon Verifone India Sales Pvt. Ltd. for indulging in unfair trade practices","author":"Sucheta","date":"April 22, 2015","format":false,"excerpt":"Competition Commission of India (CCI): While holding Verifone India Sales Pvt. Ltd. guilty of indulging in unfair trade practices and abuse of dominant market position in POS terminal market, CCI imposed a penalty of approximately Rs 4.5 crore on the Company. Verifone India Sales Pvt. Ltd. is a wholly-owned subsidiary\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Tribunals\/Commissions\/Regulatory Bodies"","block_context":{"text":"Tribunals\/Commissions\/Regulatory Bodies","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/tribunals_commissions_regulatorybodies\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":37631,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/02\/29\/imposition-of-penalties-by-cci-upon-three-airlines-for-concreted-action-in-fixing-and-revising-fuel-surcharge-fsc-for-transporting-cargo\/","url_meta":{"origin":6672,"position":3},"title":"Imposition of penalties by CCI upon three airlines for concerted action in fixing and revising fuel surcharge (FSC) for transporting cargo","author":"Sucheta","date":"February 29, 2016","format":false,"excerpt":"Competition Commission of India(CCI): CCI imposed penalties upon three Airlines for concerted action in fixing and revising fuel surcharge (FSC) for transporting cargo which was filed by Express Industry Council of India under section 19(1)(a) of the Competition Act, 2002 against Jet Airways(India) Ltd., InterGlobe Aviation Limited, Spice Jet Limited,\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Competition-Commission.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Competition-Commission.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Competition-Commission.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Competition-Commission.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Competition-Commission.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":116151,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/03\/25\/penalty-imposed-against-coal-india-ltd-its-subsidiaries-for-abusing-dominant-position\/","url_meta":{"origin":6672,"position":4},"title":"Penalty imposed against Coal India Ltd. & its subsidiaries for abusing dominant position","author":"Saba","date":"March 25, 2017","format":false,"excerpt":"Competition Commission of India:The Competition Commission of India (CCI) has found Coal India Limited (CIL) and its subsidiaries to be in contravention of the provisions of Section 4(2)(a)(i) of the Competition Act, 2002 for imposing unfair\/discriminatory conditions in Fuel Supply Agreements (FSAs) with the power producers for supply of non-coking\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Competition-Commission.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Competition-Commission.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Competition-Commission.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Competition-Commission.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Competition-Commission.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":136621,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/06\/15\/cci-imposes-penalty-of-rs-87-crore-against-hyundai-motor-india-ltd-for-anti-competitive-conduct\/","url_meta":{"origin":6672,"position":5},"title":"CCI imposes penalty of Rs. 87 crore\u00a0against Hyundai Motor India Ltd. for anti-competitive conduct","author":"Saba","date":"June 15, 2017","format":false,"excerpt":"Competition Commission of India: The Competition Commission of India (CCI) has found Hyundai Motor India Limited (HMIL) to be in contravention of the provisions of Section 3(4)(e) read with Section 3(1) of the Competition Act, 2002 for imposing arrangements upon its dealers which resulted into Resale Price Maintenance in sale\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Competition-Commission.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Competition-Commission.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Competition-Commission.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Competition-Commission.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Competition-Commission.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6672","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=6672"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6672\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/7321"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=6672"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=6672"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=6672"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}