{"id":6659,"date":"2015-05-28T15:05:00","date_gmt":"2015-05-28T15:05:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/localhost\/sccblog\/?p=6659"},"modified":"2015-11-23T18:02:20","modified_gmt":"2015-11-23T12:32:20","slug":"appeals-regarding-land-acquisition-in-villages-of-noida-and-greater-noida-dismissed","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/05\/28\/appeals-regarding-land-acquisition-in-villages-of-noida-and-greater-noida-dismissed\/","title":{"rendered":"Appeals regarding Land Acquisition in villages of Noida and Greater Noida, dismissed"},"content":{"rendered":"

Supreme Court: <\/span><\/b>Dismissing the present appeals filed on the issue of land acquisitions in several villages of Noida, Gautam Budh Nagar and Greater Noida, the 3 Judge Bench comprising of H.L.Dattu, C.J, A.K. Sikri and Arun Mishra, JJ., observed that the Allahabad High Court had studied the ground realities to come up with a practical solution by adequately compensating the land owners namely- <\/span>increasing the compensation by 64.7% is payable immediately without taking away the rights of the land owners to claim higher compensation under the machinery provided in the Land Acquisition Act; and directing allotment of developed <\/span>abadi <\/span><\/i>land to the extent of 10% of the land acquired of each of the land owners. <\/span>The Bench thus affirmed the decision of the Allahabad High Court. \u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

The case evolved from plethora of writ petitions filed challenging the validity of the Notification dated 12.03.2008 which was issued by the State of U.P under Section 4 read with Section 17 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, for colorful exercise of power by acquiring land arbitrarily and with mala fide intentions for the stated purpose of \u201cPlanned Industrial Development\u201d. The Notification issued had taken away the right of objection under Section 5A through Section 17(4).Various land owners also filed writ petitions against the decision of the Government to provide the land to a third party for development. The Notification was challenged before the full Bench of Allahabad High Court, wherein the High Court held that the State Government was wrong to invoke the urgency provisions of Section 17 (1); and (4) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894.<\/span><\/p>\n

The learned counsel for the appellants Amrendra Sharan, along with other counsels, pointed out the illegalities that were committed in issuing the Notification for acquisition, and argued that the Notification for the acquisition should be quashed due to fraud committed by the Government by not using the land acquired for the stated purpose. Whereas, counsel for the respondents, L.N. Rao contended that the appeals should be dismissed on the ground of inordinate delay and laches, since majority of the land owners have already accepted the compensation provided by the Government, thereby accepting the Government\u2019s proposition of acquiring the land.<\/span><\/p>\n

Upon perusing the contentions, the Court observed that <\/span>on one hand, invocation of urgency provisions under Section 17 of the 1894 Act and dispensing with the right to file objection under Section 5A of the Act, was found illegal; and on the other hand, there arose a situation where because of delay in challenging these acquisitions by the land owners, developments have took place in these villages and in most of the cases, third party rights have been created. The Court further observed that the present case does not call for the Court\u2019s interference under Article 136. <\/span>\u00a0Savitri Devi v. State of Uttar Pradesh, <\/i>2015 SCC OnLine SC 507<\/a>, decided on 14.05.2015<\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Supreme Court: Dismissing the present appeals filed on the issue of land acquisitions in several villages of Noida, Gautam Budh Nagar and <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":154914,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[9],"tags":[2723],"class_list":["post-6659","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-supremecourt","tag-Land_Acquisition"],"yoast_head":"\nAppeals regarding Land Acquisition in villages of Noida and Greater Noida, dismissed | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/05\/28\/appeals-regarding-land-acquisition-in-villages-of-noida-and-greater-noida-dismissed\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Appeals regarding Land Acquisition in villages of Noida and Greater Noida, dismissed\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Supreme Court: Dismissing the present appeals filed on the issue of land acquisitions in several villages of Noida, Gautam Budh Nagar and\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/05\/28\/appeals-regarding-land-acquisition-in-villages-of-noida-and-greater-noida-dismissed\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2015-05-28T15:05:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2015-11-23T12:32:20+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Sucheta\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Sucheta\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/05\/28\/appeals-regarding-land-acquisition-in-villages-of-noida-and-greater-noida-dismissed\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/05\/28\/appeals-regarding-land-acquisition-in-villages-of-noida-and-greater-noida-dismissed\/\",\"name\":\"Appeals regarding Land Acquisition in villages of Noida and Greater Noida, dismissed | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/05\/28\/appeals-regarding-land-acquisition-in-villages-of-noida-and-greater-noida-dismissed\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/05\/28\/appeals-regarding-land-acquisition-in-villages-of-noida-and-greater-noida-dismissed\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2015-05-28T15:05:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-11-23T12:32:20+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/05\/28\/appeals-regarding-land-acquisition-in-villages-of-noida-and-greater-noida-dismissed\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/05\/28\/appeals-regarding-land-acquisition-in-villages-of-noida-and-greater-noida-dismissed\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/05\/28\/appeals-regarding-land-acquisition-in-villages-of-noida-and-greater-noida-dismissed\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg\",\"width\":1330,\"height\":887},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/05\/28\/appeals-regarding-land-acquisition-in-villages-of-noida-and-greater-noida-dismissed\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Appeals regarding Land Acquisition in villages of Noida and Greater Noida, dismissed\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa\",\"name\":\"Sucheta\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Sucheta\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/legal_editor\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Appeals regarding Land Acquisition in villages of Noida and Greater Noida, dismissed | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/05\/28\/appeals-regarding-land-acquisition-in-villages-of-noida-and-greater-noida-dismissed\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Appeals regarding Land Acquisition in villages of Noida and Greater Noida, dismissed","og_description":"Supreme Court: Dismissing the present appeals filed on the issue of land acquisitions in several villages of Noida, Gautam Budh Nagar and","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/05\/28\/appeals-regarding-land-acquisition-in-villages-of-noida-and-greater-noida-dismissed\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2015-05-28T15:05:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2015-11-23T12:32:20+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Sucheta","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Sucheta","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/05\/28\/appeals-regarding-land-acquisition-in-villages-of-noida-and-greater-noida-dismissed\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/05\/28\/appeals-regarding-land-acquisition-in-villages-of-noida-and-greater-noida-dismissed\/","name":"Appeals regarding Land Acquisition in villages of Noida and Greater Noida, dismissed | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/05\/28\/appeals-regarding-land-acquisition-in-villages-of-noida-and-greater-noida-dismissed\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/05\/28\/appeals-regarding-land-acquisition-in-villages-of-noida-and-greater-noida-dismissed\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg","datePublished":"2015-05-28T15:05:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-11-23T12:32:20+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/05\/28\/appeals-regarding-land-acquisition-in-villages-of-noida-and-greater-noida-dismissed\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/05\/28\/appeals-regarding-land-acquisition-in-villages-of-noida-and-greater-noida-dismissed\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/05\/28\/appeals-regarding-land-acquisition-in-villages-of-noida-and-greater-noida-dismissed\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg","width":1330,"height":887},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/05\/28\/appeals-regarding-land-acquisition-in-villages-of-noida-and-greater-noida-dismissed\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Appeals regarding Land Acquisition in villages of Noida and Greater Noida, dismissed"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa","name":"Sucheta","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Sucheta"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/legal_editor\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":252214,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/08\/03\/land-acquisition-dispute\/","url_meta":{"origin":6659,"position":0},"title":"Supreme Court directs NOIDA to pay Rs 36 crore compensation in a land acquisition dispute for illegally taking over excess land","author":"Editor","date":"August 3, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: The Division Bench comprising of Rohinton Fali Nariman and B.R. Gavai, JJ., settled a decade-old land-acquisition dispute by directing NOIDA (New Okhla Industrial Development Authority) to pay compensation to the aggrieved land-owners who were dispossessed of their land by the authority without any land acquisition proceeding and without\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/MicrosoftTeams-image-13.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/MicrosoftTeams-image-13.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/MicrosoftTeams-image-13.png?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/MicrosoftTeams-image-13.png?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/MicrosoftTeams-image-13.png?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":285689,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/02\/28\/classification-of-pushtaini-and-gair-pushtaini-landholders-bad-in-law-creates-dissonance-between-object-and-effect-of-land-acquisition-act-says-supreme-court-legal-news-legal-research-updates\/","url_meta":{"origin":6659,"position":1},"title":"Classification of \u2018pushtaini\u2019 and \u2018gair-pushtaini\u2019 landholders bad in law, creates dissonance between Land Acquisition Act’s object and effect: Supreme Court","author":"Editor","date":"February 28, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The Supreme Court opined that even if such a classification had a rational nexus to the objective of the notification, the classification must also be legitimized by the parent statute.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-562.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-562.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-562.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-562.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":297937,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/28\/allahabad-hc-dismisses-contempt-proceedings-noida-ceo-gautam-budh-nagar-dm-land-acquisition\/","url_meta":{"origin":6659,"position":2},"title":"Read why Allahabad HC dismissed contempt proceedings against NOIDA CEO and Gautam Budh Nagar DM in land acquisition case","author":"Apoorva","date":"July 28, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Allahabad High Court said that as the compensation has already been assessed by the authorities to the tune of Rs. 1,33,05,600\/-, thus no question arises for interfering for awarding higher compensation","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"allahabad high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/allahabad-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/allahabad-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/allahabad-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/allahabad-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":313851,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/12\/calcutta-hc-upholds-the-co-owners-right-to-enhanced-compensation-in-land-acquisition-case-scc-blog\/","url_meta":{"origin":6659,"position":3},"title":"Calcutta High Court upholds the co-owners\u2019 right to enhanced compensation in Land Acquisition case","author":"Ritu","date":"February 12, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"Calcutta High Court: In a consolidated writ petitions challenging the Collector, Land Acquisition\u2019s order denying enhanced compensation to the petitioners based on a tribunal\u2019s order, a single-judge bench comprising of Suvra Ghosh,* J., upheld the principle of parity among co-owners in land acquisition cases and directed the Land Acquisition Collector,\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"calcutta high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":265647,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/04\/20\/land-owners-acquisition-compensation-supreme-court-legal-news-updates-research-law\/","url_meta":{"origin":6659,"position":4},"title":"Land owners cannot claim acquisition proceeding is lapsed u\/s. 24(2) of Right to Fair Compensation Act where stay was obtained by them vide interim orders: Supreme Court","author":"Editor","date":"April 20, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: The Division Bench comprising of M. R. Shah* and B.V. Nagarathna, JJ., reversed the impugned judgment of Karnataka High Court holding that land owners who approach the acquisition proceedings and obtain interim orders in their favour cannot take benefit under Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/04\/MicrosoftTeams-image-135.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/04\/MicrosoftTeams-image-135.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/04\/MicrosoftTeams-image-135.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/04\/MicrosoftTeams-image-135.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/04\/MicrosoftTeams-image-135.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":207319,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/28\/reference-court-under-land-acquisition-act-1894-is-duty-bound-to-hear-beneficiary-of-acquisition-in-proceedings-seeking-enhancement-of-compensation-payable-to-land-owner\/","url_meta":{"origin":6659,"position":5},"title":"Reference Court under Land Acquisition Act, 1894 is duty bound to hear beneficiary of acquisition","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"December 28, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Karnataka High Court: A Single Judge Bench comprising of Krishna S. Dixit, J. while hearing a civil writ petition, quashed Reference Court\u2019s order under Land Acquisition Act, 1894 enhancing compensation payable to land owners without affording a hearing to the beneficiary of acquisition. Petitioner, a beneficiary of land acquisition, challenged\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6659","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=6659"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6659\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/154914"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=6659"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=6659"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=6659"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}