{"id":6649,"date":"2015-06-02T18:06:00","date_gmt":"2015-06-02T18:06:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/localhost\/sccblog\/?p=6649"},"modified":"2015-10-14T12:59:23","modified_gmt":"2015-10-14T07:29:23","slug":"violation-of-right-of-freedom-of-speech-and-expression-and-arbitrary-decision-making-process-of-fcat","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/06\/02\/violation-of-right-of-freedom-of-speech-and-expression-and-arbitrary-decision-making-process-of-fcat\/","title":{"rendered":"Method for determining whether the censorship on a film is justified and reasonable, clarified"},"content":{"rendered":"<p ><b><span lang=\"EN-US\"  >Delhi High Court<\/span><\/b><span lang=\"EN-US\"  >: Dealing with the issue of violation of fundamental right of freedom of speech and expression by banning a film made by the petitioner &#8216;The Texture of the Loss&#8217;, Rajiv Shakdher, Jheld that while imposing censorship it must be taken into account that it is permissible to maintain values and standards of society. The objectionable part should be seen from the point of view of a reasonable, strong minded, firm and courageous man. Denying the accusation put by Gaurav Sarin, the advocate for the respondent, that the film resulted in the crime of sedition and put down the charge by explaining the provisions of Section 124 A of Penal Code, 1860, the Court stated that the Film Certificate Appellate Tribunal (FCAT) has completely misguided itself by not appreciating the context in which the statement under controversy, was made in the film.&nbsp;<\/span><\/p>\n<p ><span lang=\"EN-US\"  >The Court also acknowledged the facts put forth by Colin Gonsalves, the advocate for the petitioner, regarding the flawed decision making process of the Central Board of Film Certification (CBFC) which were in contravention to the scheme of the Cinematograph Act, 1952and the Rules framed under it. The Court was of the opinion that no opportunity was given to the petitioner under Section 4(2) of the Cinematograph Act which facilitates the applicant to represent his views regarding the issue. In addition to this, sub-rule (9) of Rule 22, which states that each member of the examination committee must record his\/her opinion for censoring the film, was not followed.<\/span><\/p>\n<p ><span lang=\"EN-US\"  >The order which was passed by the FCAT was a disclaimer had to be included in the beginning of the film and two scenes of the film had to be deleted in order for the permission to be granted for the exhibition of the film. The main issue which was raised was not only regarding the decision which was given by CBFC and FCAT but the decision making process which was followed by them.<\/span><\/p>\n<p ><span lang=\"EN-US\"  >In the lights of the given facts it was held that the decision given by the FCAT was flawed and a &#8216;U&#8217; certificate was issued to the subject film, without insertion of the disclaimer or the deletion\/excisions as ordered by FCAT. <i>Pankaj Butalia v. Central Board of Film Certification,<\/i>&nbsp;<\/span><span><a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/LoginForNewsLink\/2015_SCC_OnLine_Del_9694\">2015 SCC OnLine Del 9694<\/a>,&nbsp;<\/span><span>decided on 25.05.2015<\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Delhi High Court: Dealing with the issue of violation of fundamental right of freedom of speech and expression by banning a film <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":7321,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[10],"tags":[3483],"class_list":["post-6649","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-highcourts","tag-freedom_of_speech_and_expression"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Method for determining whether the censorship on a film is justified and reasonable, clarified | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/06\/02\/violation-of-right-of-freedom-of-speech-and-expression-and-arbitrary-decision-making-process-of-fcat\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Method for determining whether the censorship on a film is justified and reasonable, clarified\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Delhi High Court: Dealing with the issue of violation of fundamental right of freedom of speech and expression by banning a film\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/06\/02\/violation-of-right-of-freedom-of-speech-and-expression-and-arbitrary-decision-making-process-of-fcat\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2015-06-02T18:06:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2015-10-14T07:29:23+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Sucheta\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Sucheta\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/06\/02\/violation-of-right-of-freedom-of-speech-and-expression-and-arbitrary-decision-making-process-of-fcat\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/06\/02\/violation-of-right-of-freedom-of-speech-and-expression-and-arbitrary-decision-making-process-of-fcat\/\",\"name\":\"Method for determining whether the censorship on a film is justified and reasonable, clarified | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/06\/02\/violation-of-right-of-freedom-of-speech-and-expression-and-arbitrary-decision-making-process-of-fcat\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/06\/02\/violation-of-right-of-freedom-of-speech-and-expression-and-arbitrary-decision-making-process-of-fcat\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2015-06-02T18:06:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-10-14T07:29:23+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/06\/02\/violation-of-right-of-freedom-of-speech-and-expression-and-arbitrary-decision-making-process-of-fcat\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/06\/02\/violation-of-right-of-freedom-of-speech-and-expression-and-arbitrary-decision-making-process-of-fcat\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/06\/02\/violation-of-right-of-freedom-of-speech-and-expression-and-arbitrary-decision-making-process-of-fcat\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg\",\"width\":1330,\"height\":887},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/06\/02\/violation-of-right-of-freedom-of-speech-and-expression-and-arbitrary-decision-making-process-of-fcat\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Method for determining whether the censorship on a film is justified and reasonable, clarified\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa\",\"name\":\"Sucheta\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Sucheta\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/legal_editor\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Method for determining whether the censorship on a film is justified and reasonable, clarified | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/06\/02\/violation-of-right-of-freedom-of-speech-and-expression-and-arbitrary-decision-making-process-of-fcat\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Method for determining whether the censorship on a film is justified and reasonable, clarified","og_description":"Delhi High Court: Dealing with the issue of violation of fundamental right of freedom of speech and expression by banning a film","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/06\/02\/violation-of-right-of-freedom-of-speech-and-expression-and-arbitrary-decision-making-process-of-fcat\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2015-06-02T18:06:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2015-10-14T07:29:23+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Sucheta","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Sucheta","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/06\/02\/violation-of-right-of-freedom-of-speech-and-expression-and-arbitrary-decision-making-process-of-fcat\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/06\/02\/violation-of-right-of-freedom-of-speech-and-expression-and-arbitrary-decision-making-process-of-fcat\/","name":"Method for determining whether the censorship on a film is justified and reasonable, clarified | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/06\/02\/violation-of-right-of-freedom-of-speech-and-expression-and-arbitrary-decision-making-process-of-fcat\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/06\/02\/violation-of-right-of-freedom-of-speech-and-expression-and-arbitrary-decision-making-process-of-fcat\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg","datePublished":"2015-06-02T18:06:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-10-14T07:29:23+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/06\/02\/violation-of-right-of-freedom-of-speech-and-expression-and-arbitrary-decision-making-process-of-fcat\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/06\/02\/violation-of-right-of-freedom-of-speech-and-expression-and-arbitrary-decision-making-process-of-fcat\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/06\/02\/violation-of-right-of-freedom-of-speech-and-expression-and-arbitrary-decision-making-process-of-fcat\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg","width":1330,"height":887},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/06\/02\/violation-of-right-of-freedom-of-speech-and-expression-and-arbitrary-decision-making-process-of-fcat\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Method for determining whether the censorship on a film is justified and reasonable, clarified"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa","name":"Sucheta","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Sucheta"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/legal_editor\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":246204,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/03\/27\/judicial-censorship\/","url_meta":{"origin":6649,"position":0},"title":"A Case against Judicial Censorship","author":"Editor","date":"March 27, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"by Ritwik Tyagi*","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Op Eds&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Op Eds","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/op-ed\/legal-analysis\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/03\/Judicial-Censorship.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/03\/Judicial-Censorship.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/03\/Judicial-Censorship.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/03\/Judicial-Censorship.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/03\/Judicial-Censorship.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":294700,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/06\/15\/allahabad-hcputs-interim-stay-on-telecast-of-al-jazeera-documentary-india-who-lit-the-fuse\/","url_meta":{"origin":6649,"position":1},"title":"Allahabad High Court puts interim stay on telecast of Al Jazeera documentary \u2018India: Who lit the Fuse\u2019","author":"Apoorva","date":"June 15, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The apprehension expressed by the petitioner is that the telecast of film without adhering to the constitutional and statutory safeguards may result in injuring the public order and thereby the sovereignty and integrity of India","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"allahabad high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/allahabad-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/allahabad-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/allahabad-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/allahabad-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":201374,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/05\/ban-on-novel-meeshasubjective-perception-of-a-book-cannot-be-allowed-to-enter-legal-arena-for-censorship-petition-for-ban-dismissed-sc\/","url_meta":{"origin":6649,"position":2},"title":"Ban on novel &#8216;Meesha&#8217;| Subjective perception of a book cannot be allowed to enter legal arena for censorship; petition for ban dismissed: SC","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"September 5, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cEverything you can imagine is real\u201d \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0-Pablo Picasso \u201cA writer or an author, while choosing a mode of expression, be it a novel or a novella, an epic or an anthology of poems, a play or a playlet, a short story or a long one, an essay or a statement\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":6448,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/01\/16\/court-dismissed-the-petition-seeking-restrained-on-the-exhibition-of-movie-pk\/","url_meta":{"origin":6649,"position":3},"title":"Court dismissed the petition seeking restrained on the exhibition of movie \u201cPK\u201d","author":"Sucheta","date":"January 16, 2015","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court: Enforcing the rights of artist to portray social reality in all its forms, the Court dismissed the petition seeking restraint on the exhibition of the Hindi feature film titled \u201cPK\u201d, on the ground that it hurts the religious sentiments of all the communities and mainly of Hindus\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;High Courts&quot;","block_context":{"text":"High Courts","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/highcourts\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":213575,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/04\/12\/213575\/","url_meta":{"origin":6649,"position":4},"title":"Bhobishyoter Bhoot row: West Bengal Govt to pay Rs. 20 lakhs to the Producers for attempting to silence speech","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"April 12, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: The bench of Dr. DY Chandrachud and Hemant Gupta, JJ issued a Mandamus restraining the state of West Bengal from taking recourse to any form of extra constitutional means to prevent the lawful screening of the feature film Bhobishyoter Bhoot that was made to support meaningful Bengali cinema.\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":353940,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/20\/censorship-and-films-silencing-cinematic-voice\/","url_meta":{"origin":6649,"position":5},"title":"Censorship and Films: Silencing the Cinematic Voice","author":"Editor","date":"July 20, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"by C. George Thomas* and Ansh Mittal**","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Experts Corner&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Experts Corner","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/experts_corner\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Film censorship in India","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Film-censorship-in-India.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Film-censorship-in-India.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Film-censorship-in-India.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Film-censorship-in-India.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6649","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=6649"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6649\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/7321"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=6649"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=6649"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=6649"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}