{"id":6600,"date":"2015-05-02T14:05:00","date_gmt":"2015-05-02T14:05:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/localhost\/sccblog\/?p=6600"},"modified":"2015-10-14T13:08:12","modified_gmt":"2015-10-14T07:38:12","slug":"recovery-of-excess-amount-paid-held-violative-of-art-14-of-the-constitution","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/05\/02\/recovery-of-excess-amount-paid-held-violative-of-art-14-of-the-constitution\/","title":{"rendered":"Recovery of excess amount paid held violative of Art. 14 of the Constitution"},"content":{"rendered":"<p   ><b>Himachal Pradesh High Court:<\/b>&nbsp;In an interesting case where petitioner has filed a writ petition seeking quashing of order for recovery of vacation salary granted to the petitioner by the respondents, the division bench of Mansoor Ahmad Mir, C.J and Tarlok Singh Chauhan, J accordingly quashed the said order and directed the respondents not to effect the recovery of the said amount from the petitioner and if the recovery is already made, must be refunded to the petitioner. In the instant case the petitioner has not played any role, played fraud or misrepresentation in release of the vacation salary.<\/p>\n<p   >The Court while deciding the petition extensively relied on the judgment of the Supreme Court in <i>State of Punjab v. Rafiq Masih<\/i>&nbsp;<a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/LoginForNewsLink\/2015_4_SCC_334 \">(2015) 4 SCC 334<\/a>, wherein the Court laid down the parameters of fact situations such that employees, who are beneficiaries of wrongful monetary gains at the hands of the employer, may not be compelled to refund the same. The Court further observed in the abovestated case that an action of the State, ordering a recovery from an employee would be fair, so long as it is not rendered iniquitous to the extent, that the action of recovery would be more wrongful, improper and more unwarranted, than the corresponding right of the employer, to recover the amount. The Court also noted that the recovery would be permissible till such time as it would not have a harsh and arbitrary effect on the employee.<\/p>\n<p   >Court also delved into explaining the doctrine of equality found in Articles 14 to 18 of the Constitution and stated that such an action would breach the obligations of the State, to citizens of this country, and renders the action arbitrary, and therefore, violative of the mandate contained in Article 14 of the Constitution of India. <i>Seema Sharma v. State of Himachal Pradesh,<\/i> <b><span><a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/LoginForNewsLink\/2015_SCC_OnLine_HP_918 \">2015 SCC OnLine HP 918<\/a>, <\/span><\/b>decided on 20.04.2015<o:p><\/o:p><\/p>\n<p><i>&nbsp;<\/i><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Himachal Pradesh High Court:&nbsp;In an interesting case where petitioner has filed a writ petition seeking quashing of order for recovery of vacation <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":7321,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[10],"tags":[3009],"class_list":["post-6600","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-highcourts","tag-recovery"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Recovery of excess amount paid held violative of Art. 14 of the Constitution | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/05\/02\/recovery-of-excess-amount-paid-held-violative-of-art-14-of-the-constitution\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Recovery of excess amount paid held violative of Art. 14 of the Constitution\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Himachal Pradesh High Court:&nbsp;In an interesting case where petitioner has filed a writ petition seeking quashing of order for recovery of vacation\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/05\/02\/recovery-of-excess-amount-paid-held-violative-of-art-14-of-the-constitution\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2015-05-02T14:05:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2015-10-14T07:38:12+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Sucheta\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Sucheta\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/05\/02\/recovery-of-excess-amount-paid-held-violative-of-art-14-of-the-constitution\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/05\/02\/recovery-of-excess-amount-paid-held-violative-of-art-14-of-the-constitution\/\",\"name\":\"Recovery of excess amount paid held violative of Art. 14 of the Constitution | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/05\/02\/recovery-of-excess-amount-paid-held-violative-of-art-14-of-the-constitution\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/05\/02\/recovery-of-excess-amount-paid-held-violative-of-art-14-of-the-constitution\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2015-05-02T14:05:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-10-14T07:38:12+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/05\/02\/recovery-of-excess-amount-paid-held-violative-of-art-14-of-the-constitution\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/05\/02\/recovery-of-excess-amount-paid-held-violative-of-art-14-of-the-constitution\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/05\/02\/recovery-of-excess-amount-paid-held-violative-of-art-14-of-the-constitution\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg\",\"width\":1330,\"height\":887},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/05\/02\/recovery-of-excess-amount-paid-held-violative-of-art-14-of-the-constitution\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Recovery of excess amount paid held violative of Art. 14 of the Constitution\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa\",\"name\":\"Sucheta\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Sucheta\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/legal_editor\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Recovery of excess amount paid held violative of Art. 14 of the Constitution | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/05\/02\/recovery-of-excess-amount-paid-held-violative-of-art-14-of-the-constitution\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Recovery of excess amount paid held violative of Art. 14 of the Constitution","og_description":"Himachal Pradesh High Court:&nbsp;In an interesting case where petitioner has filed a writ petition seeking quashing of order for recovery of vacation","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/05\/02\/recovery-of-excess-amount-paid-held-violative-of-art-14-of-the-constitution\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2015-05-02T14:05:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2015-10-14T07:38:12+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Sucheta","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Sucheta","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/05\/02\/recovery-of-excess-amount-paid-held-violative-of-art-14-of-the-constitution\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/05\/02\/recovery-of-excess-amount-paid-held-violative-of-art-14-of-the-constitution\/","name":"Recovery of excess amount paid held violative of Art. 14 of the Constitution | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/05\/02\/recovery-of-excess-amount-paid-held-violative-of-art-14-of-the-constitution\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/05\/02\/recovery-of-excess-amount-paid-held-violative-of-art-14-of-the-constitution\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg","datePublished":"2015-05-02T14:05:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-10-14T07:38:12+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/05\/02\/recovery-of-excess-amount-paid-held-violative-of-art-14-of-the-constitution\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/05\/02\/recovery-of-excess-amount-paid-held-violative-of-art-14-of-the-constitution\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/05\/02\/recovery-of-excess-amount-paid-held-violative-of-art-14-of-the-constitution\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg","width":1330,"height":887},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/05\/02\/recovery-of-excess-amount-paid-held-violative-of-art-14-of-the-constitution\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Recovery of excess amount paid held violative of Art. 14 of the Constitution"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa","name":"Sucheta","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Sucheta"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/legal_editor\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":192144,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/02\/26\/delhi-hc-questions-deduction-80-salary-lieu-recovery-loan-taken-department\/","url_meta":{"origin":6600,"position":0},"title":"Delhi HC questions deduction of over 80% of salary in lieu of recovery of loan taken from department","author":"Saba","date":"February 26, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court: A Division Bench comprising of Hima Kohli and Pratibha Rani, JJ., listed a writ petition before it for next hearing on 14.03.2018. The petitioner was recruited in the SSB on the post of GD\/Ct on 01.02.2006 and while on employ had undergone a surgery for a kidney\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":256910,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/11\/10\/recovery-of-interest-not-justified-as-benefit-of-increment-was-faulty-at-the-part-of-the-department\/","url_meta":{"origin":6600,"position":1},"title":"MP HC | Recovery of interest not justified as benefit of increment was faulty at the part of the department; Court partly allows appeal","author":"Editor","date":"November 10, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Madhya Pradesh High Court: Subodh Abhyankar, J., partly allowed a petition which was filed aggrieved whereby respondent 3 had initiated the recovery of the amount paid in excess. The petitioner being a non-ministerial employee was given the benefit of increment and the Supreme Court had upheld that amount was wrongly\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":322416,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/18\/dhc-quashes-demand-for-recovery-of-differential-higher-salary-paid-after-demotion\/","url_meta":{"origin":6600,"position":2},"title":"&#8216;Worked on a higher post for more than 14 years&#8217;; Delhi HC quashes demand for recovery of differential higher salary paid after demotion","author":"Editor","date":"May 18, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"The Delhi High Court directed the respondents to consider releasing petitioner's terminal benefits by taking into account the higher salary which he was drawing during the 14 years when he was working as a Research Officer.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":266532,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/05\/06\/illicit-deduction-of-amount-from-the-retiral-dues\/","url_meta":{"origin":6600,"position":3},"title":"MP HC | Illicit deduction of amount from the retiral dues; Directions issued to refund the amount","author":"Editor","date":"May 6, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Madhya Pradesh High Court: Sushrut Arvind Dharmadhikari, J. allowed a writ petition which was filed assailing the legality, validity and propriety of the order dated 1-8-2018 whereby the excess amount of Rs.81,239\/- has been sought to be recovered from the gratuity payable to him. Petitioner was aggrieved by the order\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":216899,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/16\/all-hc-court-not-to-interfere-in-matters-where-petitioner-fails-to-furnish-any-explanation-to-challenge-inquiry-report\/","url_meta":{"origin":6600,"position":4},"title":"All HC | Court not to interfere in matters where petitioner fails to furnish any explanation to challenge inquiry report","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"July 16, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Allahabad High Court: Sunita Agarwal, J. disposed of the writ petition after giving various directions to the Board of Management to expeditiously look into the matter if in any case any representation is filed by the petitioner. A petition was directed against the inquiry report where the petitioner who was\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":223865,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/01\/06\/ker-hc-art-226-petition-against-sarfaesi-recovery-proceedings-entertained-court-gives-peremptory-orders-cannot-be-challenged-in-any-court-or-forum\/","url_meta":{"origin":6600,"position":5},"title":"Ker HC | Art. 226 petition against SARFAESI recovery proceedings entertained; Court gives peremptory orders, cannot be challenged in any Court or Forum","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"January 6, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Kerala High Court: C.S. Dias, J. disposed of a writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. The petitioner is the wife of one Senthil Kumar, accused under the Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002. The husband of the petitioner\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6600","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=6600"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6600\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/7321"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=6600"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=6600"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=6600"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}