{"id":65331,"date":"2016-08-31T16:12:12","date_gmt":"2016-08-31T10:42:12","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=65331"},"modified":"2016-09-05T17:44:57","modified_gmt":"2016-09-05T12:14:57","slug":"life-convict-ashiq-hussain-faktoos-prayer-of-hearing-review-petition-in-an-open-court-dismissed","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/08\/31\/life-convict-ashiq-hussain-faktoos-prayer-of-hearing-review-petition-in-an-open-court-dismissed\/","title":{"rendered":"Life convict Ashiq Hussain Faktoo\u2019s prayer of hearing review petition in an open court, dismissed"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Supreme Court<\/strong>: Rejecting the prayer of release of the petitioner who was convicted under under Section 3 of the Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987 (TADA Act) and under Section 302 read with Section 120-B of the Penal Code, 1860, the 3-Judge Bench of Ranjan Gogoi, Prafulla C. Pant and A.M. Khanwilkar, JJ held that merely because in the comprehension of the writ petitioner the judgment of this Court is erroneous, would not enable the Court to reopen the issue in departure to the established and settled norms and parameters of the extent of permissible exercise of jurisdiction as well as the procedural law governing such exercise.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Ram Jethmalani, appearing for the writ petitioner, had that the sole basis of the conviction of the writ petitioner is the alleged confession made by him and that the same is not a confession in law inasmuch as nowhere in the said statement the accused implicates himself with the alleged offence(s) in any manner. Neither the confession has been put to the accused in the course of his examination under the provisions of Section 313 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, nor there is any corroboration to the alleged confession. He hence, sought for the hearing of the review petition in an open court based on the principle of <em>ex debito justitiae<\/em>. The Court rejected the said prayer and held that the open Court hearing of the review petition as sought by the life convict in the case at hand is available as of right only in death sentence cases.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Regarding the principle of <em>ex debito justitiae<\/em> invoked on behalf of the accused writ petitioner to attract the jurisdiction of this Court under Article 32 of the Constitution of India to set the accused writ petitioner at liberty, the Court said that the doctrine of <em>ex debito justitiae<\/em> would prevail over procedural law but would be applicable only in a situation where the order of this Court had been passed without notice or where the order has the effect of eroding the public confidence in the justice delivery system. Frantic cries of injustice founded on perceived erroneous application of law or appreciation of facts will certainly not be enough to extend the frontiers of this jurisdiction. [Ashiq Hussain Faktoo v. Union of India, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/LoginForNewsLink\/2016_SCC_OnLine_SC_884\">2016 SCC OnLine SC 884<\/a>, decided on August 30, 2016]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Supreme Court: Rejecting the prayer of release of the petitioner who was convicted under under Section 3 of the Terrorist and Disruptive <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":27341,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,9],"tags":[8861,4841],"class_list":["post-65331","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-supremecourt","tag-open-court-hearing","tag-review-petition"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Life convict Ashiq Hussain Faktoo\u2019s prayer of hearing review petition in an open court, dismissed | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/08\/31\/life-convict-ashiq-hussain-faktoos-prayer-of-hearing-review-petition-in-an-open-court-dismissed\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Life convict Ashiq Hussain Faktoo\u2019s prayer of hearing review petition in an open court, dismissed\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Supreme Court: Rejecting the prayer of release of the petitioner who was convicted under under Section 3 of the Terrorist and Disruptive\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/08\/31\/life-convict-ashiq-hussain-faktoos-prayer-of-hearing-review-petition-in-an-open-court-dismissed\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2016-08-31T10:42:12+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-09-05T12:14:57+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/11\/DSC_5487.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1920\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"1280\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Sucheta\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Sucheta\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/08\/31\/life-convict-ashiq-hussain-faktoos-prayer-of-hearing-review-petition-in-an-open-court-dismissed\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/08\/31\/life-convict-ashiq-hussain-faktoos-prayer-of-hearing-review-petition-in-an-open-court-dismissed\/\",\"name\":\"Life convict Ashiq Hussain Faktoo\u2019s prayer of hearing review petition in an open court, dismissed | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/08\/31\/life-convict-ashiq-hussain-faktoos-prayer-of-hearing-review-petition-in-an-open-court-dismissed\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/08\/31\/life-convict-ashiq-hussain-faktoos-prayer-of-hearing-review-petition-in-an-open-court-dismissed\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/11\/DSC_5487.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2016-08-31T10:42:12+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-09-05T12:14:57+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/08\/31\/life-convict-ashiq-hussain-faktoos-prayer-of-hearing-review-petition-in-an-open-court-dismissed\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/08\/31\/life-convict-ashiq-hussain-faktoos-prayer-of-hearing-review-petition-in-an-open-court-dismissed\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/08\/31\/life-convict-ashiq-hussain-faktoos-prayer-of-hearing-review-petition-in-an-open-court-dismissed\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/11\/DSC_5487.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/11\/DSC_5487.jpg\",\"width\":1920,\"height\":1280},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/08\/31\/life-convict-ashiq-hussain-faktoos-prayer-of-hearing-review-petition-in-an-open-court-dismissed\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Life convict Ashiq Hussain Faktoo\u2019s prayer of hearing review petition in an open court, dismissed\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa\",\"name\":\"Sucheta\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Sucheta\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/legal_editor\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Life convict Ashiq Hussain Faktoo\u2019s prayer of hearing review petition in an open court, dismissed | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/08\/31\/life-convict-ashiq-hussain-faktoos-prayer-of-hearing-review-petition-in-an-open-court-dismissed\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Life convict Ashiq Hussain Faktoo\u2019s prayer of hearing review petition in an open court, dismissed","og_description":"Supreme Court: Rejecting the prayer of release of the petitioner who was convicted under under Section 3 of the Terrorist and Disruptive","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/08\/31\/life-convict-ashiq-hussain-faktoos-prayer-of-hearing-review-petition-in-an-open-court-dismissed\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2016-08-31T10:42:12+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-09-05T12:14:57+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1920,"height":1280,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/11\/DSC_5487.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Sucheta","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Sucheta","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/08\/31\/life-convict-ashiq-hussain-faktoos-prayer-of-hearing-review-petition-in-an-open-court-dismissed\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/08\/31\/life-convict-ashiq-hussain-faktoos-prayer-of-hearing-review-petition-in-an-open-court-dismissed\/","name":"Life convict Ashiq Hussain Faktoo\u2019s prayer of hearing review petition in an open court, dismissed | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/08\/31\/life-convict-ashiq-hussain-faktoos-prayer-of-hearing-review-petition-in-an-open-court-dismissed\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/08\/31\/life-convict-ashiq-hussain-faktoos-prayer-of-hearing-review-petition-in-an-open-court-dismissed\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/11\/DSC_5487.jpg","datePublished":"2016-08-31T10:42:12+00:00","dateModified":"2016-09-05T12:14:57+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/08\/31\/life-convict-ashiq-hussain-faktoos-prayer-of-hearing-review-petition-in-an-open-court-dismissed\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/08\/31\/life-convict-ashiq-hussain-faktoos-prayer-of-hearing-review-petition-in-an-open-court-dismissed\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/08\/31\/life-convict-ashiq-hussain-faktoos-prayer-of-hearing-review-petition-in-an-open-court-dismissed\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/11\/DSC_5487.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/11\/DSC_5487.jpg","width":1920,"height":1280},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/08\/31\/life-convict-ashiq-hussain-faktoos-prayer-of-hearing-review-petition-in-an-open-court-dismissed\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Life convict Ashiq Hussain Faktoo\u2019s prayer of hearing review petition in an open court, dismissed"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa","name":"Sucheta","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Sucheta"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/legal_editor\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/11\/DSC_5487.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":204135,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/24\/challenge-to-arbitrators-award-in-a-writ-court-not-maintainable-if-statutory-remedy-under-section-34-of-arbitration-act-not-exhausted\/","url_meta":{"origin":65331,"position":0},"title":"Challenge to Arbitrator\u2019s award in a writ court not maintainable if statutory remedy under Section 34 of A&#038;C Act not exhausted","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"October 24, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Patna High Court: A Single judge bench comprising of Birendra Kumar, J. while hearing a civil writ petition against an Arbitrator\u2019s order held that since the statutory remedy provided under Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 had not been exhausted, the High Court could not exercise its writ jurisdiction. The respondent\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":211346,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/05\/cal-hc-rejecting-adjournment-prayer-is-not-a-breach-of-principles-of-natural-justice\/","url_meta":{"origin":65331,"position":1},"title":"Cal HC | Rejecting adjournment prayer is not a breach of principles of natural justice","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"March 5, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Calcutta High Court:\u00a0Debangsu Basak, J., dismissed a petition filed by State Fisheries Development Corporation relating to a land dispute with the State. The petitioner was a Government of W.B. undertaking engaged in the business of pisciculture. It obtained land from the District Administration. According to the petitioner, the State was\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":232140,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/07\/13\/del-hc-remedy-regarding-service-matters-for-members-of-all-india-services-lies-only-with-cat-court-while-dismissing-writ-petition\/","url_meta":{"origin":65331,"position":2},"title":"Del HC | Remedy regarding service matters for members of All India Services lies only with CAT: Court while dismissing writ petition","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"July 13, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court:\u00a0Jyoti Singh, J., refused to entertain a writ petition filed by a member of All India Services holding that the remedy lies with Central Administrative Tribunal. Petitioner qualified the Civil Services Examination in the year 1986 and was allocated Indian Police Service (IPS) and assigned Haryana Cadre. Petitioner\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":243007,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/01\/29\/kar-hc-if-the-petitioner-unconditionally-withdraws-a-particular-matter-can-the-said-subject-matter-be-re-agitated-in-any-other-proceedings-hc-analyses\/","url_meta":{"origin":65331,"position":3},"title":"Kar HC | If the petitioner unconditionally withdraws a particular matter can the said subject matter be re agitated in any other proceedings? HC analyses","author":"Editor","date":"January 29, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Karnataka High Court: Suraj Govindraj J., dismissed the writ petition on grounds of maintainability. The facts of the case are such that the petitioner is a not for profit company registered under Section 8 of the Companies Act 2013 with the object of working in the areas of governance and\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":297998,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/29\/whether-slp-under-art-136-against-ncdrc-order-be-entertained-sc-answers-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":65331,"position":4},"title":"Consumer Dispute| Supreme Court explains the scope of maintainability of SLP under Art 136 against NCDRC orders","author":"Editor","date":"July 29, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The Court explained that the power to special leave is an exceptional and overriding power, naturally it must be exercised sparingly and with caution and only in very exceptional situations. It will only be used to advance the cause of justice and its exercise will be governed by well-established principles.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"slp under article 136 against ncdrc order","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/slp-under-article-136-against-ncdrc-order.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/slp-under-article-136-against-ncdrc-order.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/slp-under-article-136-against-ncdrc-order.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/slp-under-article-136-against-ncdrc-order.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":236038,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/09\/21\/del-hc-if-a-petition-involving-industrial-dispute-has-no-exceptional-circumstances-but-does-have-statutory-remedy-available-can-it-still-be-entertained-by-court-hc-discusses-scs-principles\/","url_meta":{"origin":65331,"position":5},"title":"Del HC | If a petition involving industrial dispute has no &#8216;exceptional circumstances &#8216; but does have statutory remedy available, can it still be entertained by Court? HC discusses SC&#8217;s principles","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"September 21, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court:\u00a0J.R. Midha, J., while addressing the present petition observed the principle laid down by the Supreme Court of India with regard to Industrial Disputes. Challenge in the Present petition Trade Union of PTI Employees and Federation of four PTI Employees' Unions have challenged the retrenchment of 297 employees\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/65331","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=65331"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/65331\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/27341"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=65331"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=65331"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=65331"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}