{"id":6452,"date":"2014-11-12T10:11:00","date_gmt":"2014-11-12T10:11:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/localhost\/sccblog\/?p=6452"},"modified":"2015-10-14T15:34:15","modified_gmt":"2015-10-14T10:04:15","slug":"courts-cannot-interfere-with-policy-decision-by-adding-something-to-the-policy-by-way-of-mandamus","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2014\/11\/12\/courts-cannot-interfere-with-policy-decision-by-adding-something-to-the-policy-by-way-of-mandamus\/","title":{"rendered":"Courts cannot interfere with policy decision by adding something to the policy by way of mandamus"},"content":{"rendered":"<p ><b><span>Supreme Court<\/span><\/b><span  >: Holding the decision of the Madras High Court where the authorities were directed to take measures to conduct caste-wise census in the country, the 3-judge bench of Dipak Misra, R.F. Nariman and U.U. Lalit held that the said direction was irrefragably against the power conferred on the court thereby amounting to a colossal transgression of power of judicial review. <o:p><\/o:p><\/span><\/p>\n<p ><span  >R.R. Suri, the counsel for the appellants, urged that the direction issued by the Division Bench tantamounts to interference in a policy decision as framed under Section 8 of the Census Act, 1940 (the Act) as the policy stipulates for carrying out the census which includes scheduled castes and scheduled tribes, but not the other castes. The Court hence held that the Act has conferred power on the Central Government to issue Notification regarding the manner in which the census has to be carried out and the Central Government has issued Notifications, and the competent authority has issued directions and that it is not within the domain of the Court to legislate. It further added that courts have the jurisdiction to declare the law unconstitutional where it is called for and may also fill up the gaps in certain spheres applying the doctrine of constitutional silence or abeyance. But, the courts are not to plunge into policy making by adding something to the policy by way of issuing a writ of mandamus.<o:p><\/o:p><\/span><\/p>\n<p ><span  >The Court was of the opinion that it is clear as noon day that it is not within the domain of the courts to embark upon an enquiry as to whether a particular public policy is wise and acceptable or whether a better policy could be evolved. The court can only interfere if the policy framed is absolutely capricious or not informed by reasons or totally arbitrary and founded ipse dixit offending the basic requirement of Article 14 of the Constitution. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/LoginForNewsLink.aspx?q=2014_SCC_OnLine_SC_880&amp;db=0  \">Census Commissioner v. R. Krishnamurthy<\/a>, decided on 07.11.2014<o:p><\/o:p><\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Supreme Court: Holding the decision of the Madras High Court where the authorities were directed to take measures to conduct caste-wise census <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":7321,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[9],"tags":[3043],"class_list":["post-6452","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-supremecourt","tag-Mandamus"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Courts cannot interfere with policy decision by adding something to the policy by way of mandamus | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2014\/11\/12\/courts-cannot-interfere-with-policy-decision-by-adding-something-to-the-policy-by-way-of-mandamus\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Courts cannot interfere with policy decision by adding something to the policy by way of mandamus\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Supreme Court: Holding the decision of the Madras High Court where the authorities were directed to take measures to conduct caste-wise census\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2014\/11\/12\/courts-cannot-interfere-with-policy-decision-by-adding-something-to-the-policy-by-way-of-mandamus\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2014-11-12T10:11:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2015-10-14T10:04:15+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Sucheta\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Sucheta\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2014\/11\/12\/courts-cannot-interfere-with-policy-decision-by-adding-something-to-the-policy-by-way-of-mandamus\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2014\/11\/12\/courts-cannot-interfere-with-policy-decision-by-adding-something-to-the-policy-by-way-of-mandamus\/\",\"name\":\"Courts cannot interfere with policy decision by adding something to the policy by way of mandamus | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2014\/11\/12\/courts-cannot-interfere-with-policy-decision-by-adding-something-to-the-policy-by-way-of-mandamus\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2014\/11\/12\/courts-cannot-interfere-with-policy-decision-by-adding-something-to-the-policy-by-way-of-mandamus\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2014-11-12T10:11:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-10-14T10:04:15+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2014\/11\/12\/courts-cannot-interfere-with-policy-decision-by-adding-something-to-the-policy-by-way-of-mandamus\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2014\/11\/12\/courts-cannot-interfere-with-policy-decision-by-adding-something-to-the-policy-by-way-of-mandamus\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2014\/11\/12\/courts-cannot-interfere-with-policy-decision-by-adding-something-to-the-policy-by-way-of-mandamus\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg\",\"width\":1330,\"height\":887},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2014\/11\/12\/courts-cannot-interfere-with-policy-decision-by-adding-something-to-the-policy-by-way-of-mandamus\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Courts cannot interfere with policy decision by adding something to the policy by way of mandamus\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa\",\"name\":\"Sucheta\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Sucheta\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/legal_editor\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Courts cannot interfere with policy decision by adding something to the policy by way of mandamus | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2014\/11\/12\/courts-cannot-interfere-with-policy-decision-by-adding-something-to-the-policy-by-way-of-mandamus\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Courts cannot interfere with policy decision by adding something to the policy by way of mandamus","og_description":"Supreme Court: Holding the decision of the Madras High Court where the authorities were directed to take measures to conduct caste-wise census","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2014\/11\/12\/courts-cannot-interfere-with-policy-decision-by-adding-something-to-the-policy-by-way-of-mandamus\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2014-11-12T10:11:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2015-10-14T10:04:15+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Sucheta","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Sucheta","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2014\/11\/12\/courts-cannot-interfere-with-policy-decision-by-adding-something-to-the-policy-by-way-of-mandamus\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2014\/11\/12\/courts-cannot-interfere-with-policy-decision-by-adding-something-to-the-policy-by-way-of-mandamus\/","name":"Courts cannot interfere with policy decision by adding something to the policy by way of mandamus | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2014\/11\/12\/courts-cannot-interfere-with-policy-decision-by-adding-something-to-the-policy-by-way-of-mandamus\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2014\/11\/12\/courts-cannot-interfere-with-policy-decision-by-adding-something-to-the-policy-by-way-of-mandamus\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg","datePublished":"2014-11-12T10:11:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-10-14T10:04:15+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2014\/11\/12\/courts-cannot-interfere-with-policy-decision-by-adding-something-to-the-policy-by-way-of-mandamus\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2014\/11\/12\/courts-cannot-interfere-with-policy-decision-by-adding-something-to-the-policy-by-way-of-mandamus\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2014\/11\/12\/courts-cannot-interfere-with-policy-decision-by-adding-something-to-the-policy-by-way-of-mandamus\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg","width":1330,"height":887},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2014\/11\/12\/courts-cannot-interfere-with-policy-decision-by-adding-something-to-the-policy-by-way-of-mandamus\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Courts cannot interfere with policy decision by adding something to the policy by way of mandamus"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa","name":"Sucheta","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Sucheta"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/legal_editor\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":215280,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/06\/03\/utt-hc-power-conferred-on-the-supreme-court-under-article-142-to-do-complete-justice-not-available-to-high-courts-under-article-226-of-the-constitution\/","url_meta":{"origin":6452,"position":0},"title":"Utt HC | Power conferred on the Supreme Court, under Article 142 to do complete justice, not available to High Courts under Article 226 of the Constitution","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"June 3, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Uttaranchal High Court: A Division Bench of Ramesh Ranganathan, CJ and N.S. Dhanik, J. entertained a PIL which sought mandamus to direct the respondents to constitute a Committee for management\/trust of the affairs of the \u2018Purnagiri Temple\u2019; to prepare a list of important temples in terms of the order passed\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":225329,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/02\/08\/state-not-bound-to-collect-quantifiable-data-relating-to-adequacy-of-representation-of-scs-sts-if-it-decides-to-provide-no-reservation\/","url_meta":{"origin":6452,"position":1},"title":"State not bound to collect quantifiable data relating to adequacy of representation of SCs &#038; STs if it decides to provide no reservation","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"February 8, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: The bench of L. Nageswara Rao and Hemant Gupta, JJ has held that no mandamus can be issued by the Court to the State to collect quantifiable data relating to adequacy of representation of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes in public services. The Court also held \u201cthe\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":236759,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/05\/ker-hc-no-writ-of-mandamus-can-be-issued-to-direct-the-legislature-to-enact-any-law-court-upholds-validity-of-state-commission-for-sc-st-act\/","url_meta":{"origin":6452,"position":2},"title":"Ker HC | No writ of mandamus can be issued to direct the legislature to enact any law; Court upholds validity of State Commission for SC\/ST Act","author":"Editor","date":"October 5, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Kerala High Court: A Division Bench of S. Manikumar and Shaji P. Chaly, JJ., while deciding the Constitutional validity of the Kerala State Commission for the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes Act, 2007, dismissed the writ petition making significant observations. Brief Facts Aggrieved by the inaction on the part\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":375060,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/02\/07\/constitution-amendment-bill-2026-judicial-diversity-reservation-caste-census\/","url_meta":{"origin":6452,"position":3},"title":"Constitution (Amendment) Bill, 2026 Proposes Judicial Diversity, Reservation in Promotion, SC Regional Benches &amp; Caste Census Reform","author":"Kriti","date":"February 7, 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"Introduced in the Rajya Sabha, the Bill proposes sweeping constitutional changes to judicial appointments, reservation in promotions, Supreme Court structure, High Court judges\u2019 retirement age, and caste-based census powers.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Legislation Updates&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Legislation Updates","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/legislationupdates\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Constitution Amendment Bill 2026","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/Constitution-Amendment-Bill-2026.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/Constitution-Amendment-Bill-2026.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/Constitution-Amendment-Bill-2026.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/Constitution-Amendment-Bill-2026.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":233738,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/08\/10\/courts-are-duty-bound-to-issue-a-writ-of-mandamus-for-enforcement-of-a-public-duty-sc\/","url_meta":{"origin":6452,"position":4},"title":"Courts are duty bound to issue a writ of Mandamus for enforcement of a public duty: SC","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"August 10, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: The bench of Indira Banjerjee and Indu Malhotra, JJ that the Courts are duty bound to issue a writ of Mandamus for enforcement of a public duty. \u201cThe High Courts exercising their jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, not only have the power to issue\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":255864,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/10\/21\/creation-and-or-sanction-of-the-posts-is-the-sole-prerogative-of-government-courts-cannot-interfere-supreme-court\/","url_meta":{"origin":6452,"position":5},"title":"Creation and\/or sanction of the posts is the sole prerogative of Government; Courts cannot interfere: Supreme Court","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"October 21, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Framing of any scheme is no function of the Court and is the sole prerogative of the Government.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-3-3.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-3-3.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-3-3.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-3-3.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-3-3.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6452","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=6452"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6452\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/7321"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=6452"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=6452"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=6452"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}