{"id":6446,"date":"2015-01-14T15:01:00","date_gmt":"2015-01-14T15:01:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/localhost\/sccblog\/?p=6446"},"modified":"2015-10-14T15:16:45","modified_gmt":"2015-10-14T09:46:45","slug":"builder-entitled-to-forfeit-the-earnest-money-in-default-of-payment-of-instalments","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/01\/14\/builder-entitled-to-forfeit-the-earnest-money-in-default-of-payment-of-instalments\/","title":{"rendered":"Builder entitled to forfeit the earnest money in default of payment of instalments"},"content":{"rendered":"<p ><b><span>National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC):<\/span><\/b><span>While reiterating that<\/span><span lang=\"EN\"  > builder would be entitled to forfeit the amount paid by way of installments in a case where the allottee defaults in making the payment of the remaining instalments, NCDRC set aside the orders of Consumer Forum and State Commission directing <\/span><span  >DLF Southern Towns Pvt. Ltd.<\/span><span lang=\"EN\"  > to refund the earnest amount. Earlier, <\/span><span  >Complainant applied for allotment of apartment in the project of DLF \u2018New Town Heights DLF, Kakkanad\u2019 for Rs.40,00,000\/-. They paid Rs.4,00,000\/- towards first installment. DLF promised to handover possession of the apartment by the end of 2009, but construction was delayed so, complainant did not remit subsequent installments. Later as DLF started construction, complainant expressed his willingness to remit the defaulted installments, but DLF demanded additional amount of Rs.1,70,000\/-, and further informed that otherwise they will forfeit amount of first installment of Rs.4,00,000\/-.&nbsp; Alleging deficiency on the part of DLF, complainant filed complaint before District Forum for delivering flat after receiving balance amount or to refund the deposited amount. DLF submitted that it agreed to deliver possession of flat within 36 months, but complainant failed to return signed agreement and did not pay subsequent installments in spite of repeated demands. District forum allowed complaint and directed DLF to refund Rs.4,00,000\/-. Appeal filed by DLF was also dismissed by State Commission. Before NCDRC, DLF submitted that as per terms and conditions of the application for provisional allotment, DLF was entitled to forfeit earnest money if allottee fails to sign and return agreement within 30 days and also as per Clause 17 of the agreement, if allottee fails in complying terms and conditions of the application DLF had the right to forfeit the entire amount of earnest money. After hearing the parties, Commission observed that as complainant failed to perform terms and conditions of the agreement in spite of repeated reminders, DLF was well within its rights to forfeit amount of earnest money. While referring to various judgments of Supreme Court and <\/span><span lang=\"EN\"  >NCDRC, Commission noted, \u201c<\/span><span  >In the light of aforesaid judgments, it becomes clear that as complainant has not paid any subsequent installments and committed default in making payments of installments and also committed default in returning back duly signed agreement, OP (DLF) had every right to forfeit amount of earnest money deposited by complainant and learned District forum committed error in allowing complaint and learned State Commission further committed error in dismissing appeal.\u201d(<\/span><span><font size=\"1\">DLF Southern Towns (P) Ltd. v. Dipu C. Seminlal,<\/font><\/span><span  >&nbsp;<\/span><span><a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/LoginForNewsLink\/2015_SCC_OnLine_NCDRC_1 \">2015 SCC OnLine NCDRC 1<\/a><\/span><span>, <\/span><span><font size=\"1\">decided on January 7, 2015<\/font><\/span><span>)<\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC):While reiterating that builder would be entitled to forfeit the amount paid by way of installments in <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":7321,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[11],"tags":[2728],"class_list":["post-6446","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-tribunals_commissions_regulatorybodies","tag-compensation"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Builder entitled to forfeit the earnest money in default of payment of instalments | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/01\/14\/builder-entitled-to-forfeit-the-earnest-money-in-default-of-payment-of-instalments\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Builder entitled to forfeit the earnest money in default of payment of instalments\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC):While reiterating that builder would be entitled to forfeit the amount paid by way of installments in\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/01\/14\/builder-entitled-to-forfeit-the-earnest-money-in-default-of-payment-of-instalments\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2015-01-14T15:01:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2015-10-14T09:46:45+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Sucheta\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Sucheta\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/01\/14\/builder-entitled-to-forfeit-the-earnest-money-in-default-of-payment-of-instalments\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/01\/14\/builder-entitled-to-forfeit-the-earnest-money-in-default-of-payment-of-instalments\/\",\"name\":\"Builder entitled to forfeit the earnest money in default of payment of instalments | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/01\/14\/builder-entitled-to-forfeit-the-earnest-money-in-default-of-payment-of-instalments\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/01\/14\/builder-entitled-to-forfeit-the-earnest-money-in-default-of-payment-of-instalments\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2015-01-14T15:01:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-10-14T09:46:45+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/01\/14\/builder-entitled-to-forfeit-the-earnest-money-in-default-of-payment-of-instalments\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/01\/14\/builder-entitled-to-forfeit-the-earnest-money-in-default-of-payment-of-instalments\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/01\/14\/builder-entitled-to-forfeit-the-earnest-money-in-default-of-payment-of-instalments\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg\",\"width\":1330,\"height\":887},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/01\/14\/builder-entitled-to-forfeit-the-earnest-money-in-default-of-payment-of-instalments\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Builder entitled to forfeit the earnest money in default of payment of instalments\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa\",\"name\":\"Sucheta\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Sucheta\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/legal_editor\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Builder entitled to forfeit the earnest money in default of payment of instalments | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/01\/14\/builder-entitled-to-forfeit-the-earnest-money-in-default-of-payment-of-instalments\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Builder entitled to forfeit the earnest money in default of payment of instalments","og_description":"National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC):While reiterating that builder would be entitled to forfeit the amount paid by way of installments in","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/01\/14\/builder-entitled-to-forfeit-the-earnest-money-in-default-of-payment-of-instalments\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2015-01-14T15:01:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2015-10-14T09:46:45+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Sucheta","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Sucheta","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/01\/14\/builder-entitled-to-forfeit-the-earnest-money-in-default-of-payment-of-instalments\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/01\/14\/builder-entitled-to-forfeit-the-earnest-money-in-default-of-payment-of-instalments\/","name":"Builder entitled to forfeit the earnest money in default of payment of instalments | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/01\/14\/builder-entitled-to-forfeit-the-earnest-money-in-default-of-payment-of-instalments\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/01\/14\/builder-entitled-to-forfeit-the-earnest-money-in-default-of-payment-of-instalments\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg","datePublished":"2015-01-14T15:01:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-10-14T09:46:45+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/01\/14\/builder-entitled-to-forfeit-the-earnest-money-in-default-of-payment-of-instalments\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/01\/14\/builder-entitled-to-forfeit-the-earnest-money-in-default-of-payment-of-instalments\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/01\/14\/builder-entitled-to-forfeit-the-earnest-money-in-default-of-payment-of-instalments\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg","width":1330,"height":887},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/01\/14\/builder-entitled-to-forfeit-the-earnest-money-in-default-of-payment-of-instalments\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Builder entitled to forfeit the earnest money in default of payment of instalments"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa","name":"Sucheta","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Sucheta"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/legal_editor\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":232897,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/07\/27\/ncdrc-possession-of-apartments-due-in-2016-not-handed-over-till-date-developers-directed-to-refund-amount-at-an-interest-of-9-per-annum\/","url_meta":{"origin":6446,"position":0},"title":"NCDRC | Possession of apartments due in 2016, not handed over till date: Developers directed to refund amount at an interest of 9% per annum","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"July 27, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC):\u00a0Prem Narain, Presiding Member, has directed the developers of \"Greenopolis\" to refund homebuyers their amount deposited at the interest rate of 9% p.a. and in a few complaints the bench has asked for the possession to be handed over by 30-09-2020 with the occupancy certificate\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/NCDRC_.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/NCDRC_.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/NCDRC_.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/NCDRC_.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/NCDRC_.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":224458,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/01\/23\/ncdrc-paltry-compensation-not-an-adequate-redressal-to-allottee-as-it-creates-no-pressure-created-on-developer-to-complete-construction-on-time\/","url_meta":{"origin":6446,"position":1},"title":"NCDRC | Paltry compensation not an adequate redressal to allottee as it creates no pressure created on Developer to complete construction on time\u00a0","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"January 23, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC):\u00a0Justice V.K. Jain (Presiding Member), while disposing of a complaint, directed the builder to provide compensation in the form of simple interest at 7 percent per annum from the expected date for delivery of possession till the date on which the possession was actually offered\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/NCDRC_.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/NCDRC_.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/NCDRC_.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/NCDRC_.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/NCDRC_.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":203371,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/10\/even-a-single-default-in-payment-can-be-a-ground-for-canceling-the-allotment-of-a-property-in-a-case-where-the-developer-is-a-private-company\/","url_meta":{"origin":6446,"position":2},"title":"Even a single default in payment can be a ground for cancelling the allotment of a property in a case where the developer is a private company","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"October 10, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC): A Single Member Bench of V.K. Jain, J., allowed an appeal filed against the order of the State Commission. The respondent was allotted a flat in a project which was to be developed by the appellant company. The respondent paid more than 50% of\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/NCDRC_.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/NCDRC_.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/NCDRC_.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/NCDRC_.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/NCDRC_.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":253179,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/08\/24\/refund-of-amount-from-builder\/","url_meta":{"origin":6446,"position":3},"title":"While seeking a refund of amount from builder, will he be liable to pay amount paid as EMIs towards loan sanctioned? Read detailed report on DSCDRC\u2019s decision","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"August 24, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (DSCDRC): Coram of Dr Justice Sangita Dhingra Sehgal (President) and Anil Srivastava (Member)ordered the builder to refund the money deposited by the complainant, as a consequence of not being able to deliver the possession of flat on time. However, it was held that the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/MicrosoftTeams-image-25.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/MicrosoftTeams-image-25.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/MicrosoftTeams-image-25.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/MicrosoftTeams-image-25.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/MicrosoftTeams-image-25.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":237706,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/19\/ncdrc-can-a-consumer-claim-refund-of-principal-amount-if-flat-not-delivered-on-time-commission-untangles-two-fundamentals-for-buyer-consumer\/","url_meta":{"origin":6446,"position":4},"title":"NCDRC | Can a consumer claim refund of principal amount if flat not delivered on time? Commission untangles two fundamentals for Buyer &#8212; Consumer","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"October 19, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC):\u00a0A Division Bench of Justice R.K. Agarwal (President) and Dr S.M. Kantikar (Member) decided three complaints in a combined order as the facts were similar. The complainant had booked three residential flats floated by Opposite Party -- Builder Co. Possession of these flats was to\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/NCDRC_.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/NCDRC_.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/NCDRC_.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/NCDRC_.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/NCDRC_.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":342499,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/02\/28\/forfeiture-clauses-in-agreements-must-be-reasonable-reaffirms-the-supreme-court\/","url_meta":{"origin":6446,"position":5},"title":"Forfeiture Clauses in Agreements Must Be Reasonable &mdash; Supreme Court reaffirms","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"February 28, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"by Saloni Kapadia* and Karan Gandhi**","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Cyril Amarchand Mangaldas&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Cyril Amarchand Mangaldas","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/experts_corner\/law-firm\/cam\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Agreements Must Be Reasonable","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/02\/Agreements-Must-Be-Reasonable.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/02\/Agreements-Must-Be-Reasonable.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/02\/Agreements-Must-Be-Reasonable.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/02\/Agreements-Must-Be-Reasonable.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6446","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=6446"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6446\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/7321"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=6446"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=6446"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=6446"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}