{"id":6370,"date":"2014-11-12T16:11:00","date_gmt":"2014-11-12T16:11:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/localhost\/sccblog\/?p=6370"},"modified":"2015-10-14T15:33:58","modified_gmt":"2015-10-14T10:03:58","slug":"mere-bald-assertion-not-to-be-made-against-directors-in-case-of-dishonour-of-cheque","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2014\/11\/12\/mere-bald-assertion-not-to-be-made-against-directors-in-case-of-dishonour-of-cheque\/","title":{"rendered":"Mere \u201cbald assertion\u201d not to be made against Directors in case of dishonour of cheque"},"content":{"rendered":"

Supreme Court: <\/b>While deciding as to whether mere \u201cbald assertion\u201d under Section 138 read with Section 141 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 that the directors were at the time when the offence was committed in charge of and responsible for the conduct and day-to-day business of the company is sufficient to maintain the said complaint, a bench of Ranjana P. Desai and N.V. Ramana, JJ ruled that company\u2019s directors are personally liable to be prosecuted for a bounced cheque unless they furnish \u201cincontrovertible evidence\u201d that they had no role in issuing it.<\/span><\/font><\/p>\n

In the instant case, on the default of repayment of the amount due by the accused company, the appellants filed a complaint in the Court of Chief Metropolitan Magistrate against the directors of the said company. Aggrieved with the order of the magistrate, the respondents moved to the High Court of Calcutta, which held that apart from making mere \u201cbald assertion\u201d, the complainant has as state as to what part was played by the directors and how they were responsible for the finances of the Company, issuance of cheques, and whether they has control over the funds of the company.<\/span><\/font><\/p>\n

Gurukrishna Kumar, the counsel for the appellant, contended that High Court erred in quashing the proceeding as it is not incumbent upon the complainant to elaborate the role played by each of the directors in the complaint. The Court stated that if any director wants the process to be quashed by filing a petition under Section 482 of the CrPC on the ground that only a \u201cbald assertion\u201d is made in the complaint and that he or she is not concerned with the issuance of the cheque, he or she must furnish \u201csterling incontrovertible material\u201d or \u201cacceptable circumstances\u201d to substantiate the contention and would have to make out a case that making him stand trial would be an abuse of the process of court. The Court upheld the appeal and remitted the matter to the High Court to hear the parties and consider the matter afresh. Gunmala Sales Pvt. Ltd. v. Anu Mehta, 2014 SCC OnLine SC 848<\/a>, decided on October 17, 2014.<\/span><\/font><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Supreme Court: While deciding as to whether mere \u201cbald assertion\u201d under Section 138 read with Section 141 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":7321,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[9],"tags":[2862],"class_list":["post-6370","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-supremecourt","tag-dishonour_of_cheque"],"yoast_head":"\nMere \u201cbald assertion\u201d not to be made against Directors in case of dishonour of cheque | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2014\/11\/12\/mere-bald-assertion-not-to-be-made-against-directors-in-case-of-dishonour-of-cheque\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Mere \u201cbald assertion\u201d not to be made against Directors in case of dishonour of cheque\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Supreme Court: While deciding as to whether mere \u201cbald assertion\u201d under Section 138 read with Section 141 of the Negotiable Instruments Act,\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2014\/11\/12\/mere-bald-assertion-not-to-be-made-against-directors-in-case-of-dishonour-of-cheque\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2014-11-12T16:11:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2015-10-14T10:03:58+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Sucheta\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Sucheta\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2014\/11\/12\/mere-bald-assertion-not-to-be-made-against-directors-in-case-of-dishonour-of-cheque\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2014\/11\/12\/mere-bald-assertion-not-to-be-made-against-directors-in-case-of-dishonour-of-cheque\/\",\"name\":\"Mere \u201cbald assertion\u201d not to be made against Directors in case of dishonour of cheque | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2014\/11\/12\/mere-bald-assertion-not-to-be-made-against-directors-in-case-of-dishonour-of-cheque\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2014\/11\/12\/mere-bald-assertion-not-to-be-made-against-directors-in-case-of-dishonour-of-cheque\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2014-11-12T16:11:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-10-14T10:03:58+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2014\/11\/12\/mere-bald-assertion-not-to-be-made-against-directors-in-case-of-dishonour-of-cheque\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2014\/11\/12\/mere-bald-assertion-not-to-be-made-against-directors-in-case-of-dishonour-of-cheque\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2014\/11\/12\/mere-bald-assertion-not-to-be-made-against-directors-in-case-of-dishonour-of-cheque\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg\",\"width\":1330,\"height\":887},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2014\/11\/12\/mere-bald-assertion-not-to-be-made-against-directors-in-case-of-dishonour-of-cheque\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Mere \u201cbald assertion\u201d not to be made against Directors in case of dishonour of cheque\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa\",\"name\":\"Sucheta\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Sucheta\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/legal_editor\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Mere \u201cbald assertion\u201d not to be made against Directors in case of dishonour of cheque | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2014\/11\/12\/mere-bald-assertion-not-to-be-made-against-directors-in-case-of-dishonour-of-cheque\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Mere \u201cbald assertion\u201d not to be made against Directors in case of dishonour of cheque","og_description":"Supreme Court: While deciding as to whether mere \u201cbald assertion\u201d under Section 138 read with Section 141 of the Negotiable Instruments Act,","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2014\/11\/12\/mere-bald-assertion-not-to-be-made-against-directors-in-case-of-dishonour-of-cheque\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2014-11-12T16:11:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2015-10-14T10:03:58+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Sucheta","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Sucheta","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2014\/11\/12\/mere-bald-assertion-not-to-be-made-against-directors-in-case-of-dishonour-of-cheque\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2014\/11\/12\/mere-bald-assertion-not-to-be-made-against-directors-in-case-of-dishonour-of-cheque\/","name":"Mere \u201cbald assertion\u201d not to be made against Directors in case of dishonour of cheque | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2014\/11\/12\/mere-bald-assertion-not-to-be-made-against-directors-in-case-of-dishonour-of-cheque\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2014\/11\/12\/mere-bald-assertion-not-to-be-made-against-directors-in-case-of-dishonour-of-cheque\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg","datePublished":"2014-11-12T16:11:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-10-14T10:03:58+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2014\/11\/12\/mere-bald-assertion-not-to-be-made-against-directors-in-case-of-dishonour-of-cheque\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2014\/11\/12\/mere-bald-assertion-not-to-be-made-against-directors-in-case-of-dishonour-of-cheque\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2014\/11\/12\/mere-bald-assertion-not-to-be-made-against-directors-in-case-of-dishonour-of-cheque\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg","width":1330,"height":887},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2014\/11\/12\/mere-bald-assertion-not-to-be-made-against-directors-in-case-of-dishonour-of-cheque\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Mere \u201cbald assertion\u201d not to be made against Directors in case of dishonour of cheque"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa","name":"Sucheta","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Sucheta"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/legal_editor\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":6376,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2014\/12\/29\/director-s-liability-in-case-of-dishonour-of-cheque-discussed\/","url_meta":{"origin":6370,"position":0},"title":"Director\u2019s liability in case of dishonour of cheque discussed","author":"Sucheta","date":"December 29, 2014","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: In the present appeal, under special leave, against the decision of the Bombay High Court which rejected the petition of the appellant for quashing complaints, filed against her under Section 138 read with Section 141 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 accruing vicarious liability for the dishonored cheques\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Supreme Court"","block_context":{"text":"Supreme Court","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/supremecourt\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":274559,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/09\/27\/supreme-court-calcutta-high-court-section-141negotiable-instruments-act-1881-dishonour-of-cheque-interest-of-justice-managing-director-criminal-liability-vicarious-liability-independent-non-executive\/","url_meta":{"origin":6370,"position":1},"title":"Explained| Dishonour of Cheques: Can non-executive Directors of the accused company be held vicariously liable under Section 141 NI Act?","author":"Editor","date":"September 27, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"\u00a0 \u00a0 Supreme Court: In an appeal against a judgment passed by the Calcutta High Court dismissing the Criminal Revision Application filed by the appellants for quashing the proceedings under Sections 138 and 141 of the Negotiable Instruments (NI) Act,1881, the division bench of Indira Banerjee* and J.K. Maheshwari has\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/Supreme-Court-1.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/Supreme-Court-1.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/Supreme-Court-1.png?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/Supreme-Court-1.png?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/Supreme-Court-1.png?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":273998,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/09\/19\/section-141-ni-act-dishonour-cheque-burden-proof-vicarious-liability-quashment-director-partner-complainant-supreme-court-legal-research-updates-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":6370,"position":2},"title":"Dishonour of Cheque – S. 141 NI Act| Complainant only supposed to have general knowledge of person(s) in charge of company\/firm; Burden on Director\/Partner to prove their innocence: SC\u00a0","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"September 19, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cQuashing of a complaint is a serious matter. Complaint cannot be quashed for the asking. For quashing of a complaint, it must be shown that no offence is made out at all against the Director or Partner.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/MicrosoftTeams-image-75-1-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/MicrosoftTeams-image-75-1-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/MicrosoftTeams-image-75-1-1.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/MicrosoftTeams-image-75-1-1.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/MicrosoftTeams-image-75-1-1.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":364270,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/17\/ori-hc-insolvency-no-defence-for-directors-in-cheque-dishonour\/","url_meta":{"origin":6370,"position":3},"title":"Insolvency proceedings no shield for Directors in cheque dishonour cases under S. 138 NI Act: Orissa HC","author":"Editor","date":"October 17, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cOn the request of the petitioner, the complainant waited and represented the cheque through its banker, but once again it got dishonoured with the same remark - refer to drawer.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Cheque dishonour","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/Cheque-dishonour.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/Cheque-dishonour.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/Cheque-dishonour.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/Cheque-dishonour.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":208575,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/22\/del-hc-independent-directors-can-be-summoned-in-s-138-ni-act-complaint-on-allegation-of-responsibility-for-day-to-day-functions-of-accused-company\/","url_meta":{"origin":6370,"position":4},"title":"Del HC | Independent directors can be summoned in S. 138 NI Act complaint on allegation of responsibility for day-to-day functions of accused company","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"January 22, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court:\u00a0The Bench of Sunil Gaur, J. held that the trial court did not commit any error while summoning the petitioners in relation to a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (dishonour of cheque). Petitioners were independent directors of the accused company. MIC Electronics Ltd.\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":295786,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/01\/delhi-high-court-sets-aside-summon-order-lack-of-specific-allegations-against-directors-legal-updates\/","url_meta":{"origin":6370,"position":5},"title":"Dishonour of Cheque: Delhi High Court sets aside summon order due to lack of specific allegations against directors in the complaint","author":"Arunima","date":"July 1, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The Delhi High Court observed that the wanton arraignment of directors without reference to their role in relation to a transaction, or to the issuance or dishonour of a cheque by the company, requires to be deprecated and discouraged, since it amounts to abuse of the salutary process of criminal\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"delhi high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6370","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=6370"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6370\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/7321"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=6370"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=6370"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=6370"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}