{"id":6370,"date":"2014-11-12T16:11:00","date_gmt":"2014-11-12T16:11:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/localhost\/sccblog\/?p=6370"},"modified":"2015-10-14T15:33:58","modified_gmt":"2015-10-14T10:03:58","slug":"mere-bald-assertion-not-to-be-made-against-directors-in-case-of-dishonour-of-cheque","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2014\/11\/12\/mere-bald-assertion-not-to-be-made-against-directors-in-case-of-dishonour-of-cheque\/","title":{"rendered":"Mere \u201cbald assertion\u201d not to be made against Directors in case of dishonour of cheque"},"content":{"rendered":"<p ><font face=\"Times New Roman, serif\" size=\"3\"><span><b>Supreme Court: <\/b>While deciding as to whether mere \u201cbald assertion\u201d under Section 138 read with Section 141 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 that the directors were at the time when the offence was committed in charge of and responsible for the conduct and day-to-day business of the company is sufficient to maintain the said complaint, a bench of Ranjana P. Desai and N.V. Ramana, JJ ruled that company\u2019s directors are personally liable to be prosecuted for a bounced cheque unless they furnish \u201cincontrovertible evidence\u201d that they had no role in issuing it.<\/span><\/font><\/p>\n<p ><font face=\"Times New Roman, serif\" size=\"3\"><span>In the instant case, on the default of repayment of the amount due by the accused company, the appellants filed a complaint in the Court of Chief Metropolitan Magistrate against the directors of the said company. Aggrieved with the order of the magistrate, the respondents moved to the High Court of Calcutta, which held that apart from making mere \u201cbald assertion\u201d, the complainant has as state as to what part was played by the directors and how they were responsible for the finances of the Company, issuance of cheques, and whether they has control over the funds of the company.<\/span><\/font><\/p>\n<p ><font face=\"Times New Roman, serif\" size=\"3\"><span>Gurukrishna Kumar, the counsel for the appellant, contended that High Court erred in quashing the proceeding as it is not incumbent upon the complainant to elaborate the role played by each of the directors in the complaint. The Court stated that if any director wants the process to be quashed by filing a petition under Section 482 of the CrPC on the ground that only a \u201cbald assertion\u201d is made in the complaint and that he or she is not concerned with the issuance of the cheque, he or she must furnish \u201csterling incontrovertible material\u201d or \u201cacceptable circumstances\u201d to substantiate the contention and would have to make out a case that making him stand trial would be an abuse of the process of court. The Court upheld the appeal and remitted the matter to the High Court to hear the parties and consider the matter afresh. Gunmala Sales Pvt. Ltd. v. Anu Mehta, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/LoginForNewsLink.aspx?q=2014_SCC_OnLine_SC_848&amp;db=0 \">2014 SCC OnLine SC 848<\/a>, decided on October 17, 2014.<\/span><\/font><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Supreme Court: While deciding as to whether mere \u201cbald assertion\u201d under Section 138 read with Section 141 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":7321,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[9],"tags":[2862],"class_list":["post-6370","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-supremecourt","tag-dishonour_of_cheque"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v27.4 (Yoast SEO v27.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Mere \u201cbald assertion\u201d not to be made against Directors in case of dishonour of cheque | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2014\/11\/12\/mere-bald-assertion-not-to-be-made-against-directors-in-case-of-dishonour-of-cheque\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Mere \u201cbald assertion\u201d not to be made against Directors in case of dishonour of cheque\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Supreme Court: While deciding as to whether mere \u201cbald assertion\u201d under Section 138 read with Section 141 of the Negotiable Instruments Act,\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2014\/11\/12\/mere-bald-assertion-not-to-be-made-against-directors-in-case-of-dishonour-of-cheque\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2014-11-12T16:11:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2015-10-14T10:03:58+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Sucheta\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Sucheta\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2014\\\/11\\\/12\\\/mere-bald-assertion-not-to-be-made-against-directors-in-case-of-dishonour-of-cheque\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2014\\\/11\\\/12\\\/mere-bald-assertion-not-to-be-made-against-directors-in-case-of-dishonour-of-cheque\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Sucheta\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa\"},\"headline\":\"Mere \u201cbald assertion\u201d not to be made against Directors in case of dishonour of cheque\",\"datePublished\":\"2014-11-12T16:11:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-10-14T10:03:58+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2014\\\/11\\\/12\\\/mere-bald-assertion-not-to-be-made-against-directors-in-case-of-dishonour-of-cheque\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":365,\"commentCount\":0,\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2014\\\/11\\\/12\\\/mere-bald-assertion-not-to-be-made-against-directors-in-case-of-dishonour-of-cheque\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2015\\\/10\\\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg\",\"keywords\":[\"dishonour of cheque\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Supreme Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2014\\\/11\\\/12\\\/mere-bald-assertion-not-to-be-made-against-directors-in-case-of-dishonour-of-cheque\\\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2014\\\/11\\\/12\\\/mere-bald-assertion-not-to-be-made-against-directors-in-case-of-dishonour-of-cheque\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2014\\\/11\\\/12\\\/mere-bald-assertion-not-to-be-made-against-directors-in-case-of-dishonour-of-cheque\\\/\",\"name\":\"Mere \u201cbald assertion\u201d not to be made against Directors in case of dishonour of cheque | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2014\\\/11\\\/12\\\/mere-bald-assertion-not-to-be-made-against-directors-in-case-of-dishonour-of-cheque\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2014\\\/11\\\/12\\\/mere-bald-assertion-not-to-be-made-against-directors-in-case-of-dishonour-of-cheque\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2015\\\/10\\\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2014-11-12T16:11:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-10-14T10:03:58+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2014\\\/11\\\/12\\\/mere-bald-assertion-not-to-be-made-against-directors-in-case-of-dishonour-of-cheque\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2014\\\/11\\\/12\\\/mere-bald-assertion-not-to-be-made-against-directors-in-case-of-dishonour-of-cheque\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2014\\\/11\\\/12\\\/mere-bald-assertion-not-to-be-made-against-directors-in-case-of-dishonour-of-cheque\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2015\\\/10\\\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2015\\\/10\\\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg\",\"width\":1330,\"height\":887},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2014\\\/11\\\/12\\\/mere-bald-assertion-not-to-be-made-against-directors-in-case-of-dishonour-of-cheque\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Mere \u201cbald assertion\u201d not to be made against Directors in case of dishonour of cheque\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa\",\"name\":\"Sucheta\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Sucheta\"},\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/author\\\/legal_editor\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Mere \u201cbald assertion\u201d not to be made against Directors in case of dishonour of cheque | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2014\/11\/12\/mere-bald-assertion-not-to-be-made-against-directors-in-case-of-dishonour-of-cheque\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Mere \u201cbald assertion\u201d not to be made against Directors in case of dishonour of cheque","og_description":"Supreme Court: While deciding as to whether mere \u201cbald assertion\u201d under Section 138 read with Section 141 of the Negotiable Instruments Act,","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2014\/11\/12\/mere-bald-assertion-not-to-be-made-against-directors-in-case-of-dishonour-of-cheque\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2014-11-12T16:11:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2015-10-14T10:03:58+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Sucheta","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Sucheta","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2014\/11\/12\/mere-bald-assertion-not-to-be-made-against-directors-in-case-of-dishonour-of-cheque\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2014\/11\/12\/mere-bald-assertion-not-to-be-made-against-directors-in-case-of-dishonour-of-cheque\/"},"author":{"name":"Sucheta","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa"},"headline":"Mere \u201cbald assertion\u201d not to be made against Directors in case of dishonour of cheque","datePublished":"2014-11-12T16:11:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-10-14T10:03:58+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2014\/11\/12\/mere-bald-assertion-not-to-be-made-against-directors-in-case-of-dishonour-of-cheque\/"},"wordCount":365,"commentCount":0,"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2014\/11\/12\/mere-bald-assertion-not-to-be-made-against-directors-in-case-of-dishonour-of-cheque\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg","keywords":["dishonour of cheque"],"articleSection":["Supreme Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2014\/11\/12\/mere-bald-assertion-not-to-be-made-against-directors-in-case-of-dishonour-of-cheque\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2014\/11\/12\/mere-bald-assertion-not-to-be-made-against-directors-in-case-of-dishonour-of-cheque\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2014\/11\/12\/mere-bald-assertion-not-to-be-made-against-directors-in-case-of-dishonour-of-cheque\/","name":"Mere \u201cbald assertion\u201d not to be made against Directors in case of dishonour of cheque | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2014\/11\/12\/mere-bald-assertion-not-to-be-made-against-directors-in-case-of-dishonour-of-cheque\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2014\/11\/12\/mere-bald-assertion-not-to-be-made-against-directors-in-case-of-dishonour-of-cheque\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg","datePublished":"2014-11-12T16:11:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-10-14T10:03:58+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2014\/11\/12\/mere-bald-assertion-not-to-be-made-against-directors-in-case-of-dishonour-of-cheque\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2014\/11\/12\/mere-bald-assertion-not-to-be-made-against-directors-in-case-of-dishonour-of-cheque\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2014\/11\/12\/mere-bald-assertion-not-to-be-made-against-directors-in-case-of-dishonour-of-cheque\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg","width":1330,"height":887},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2014\/11\/12\/mere-bald-assertion-not-to-be-made-against-directors-in-case-of-dishonour-of-cheque\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Mere \u201cbald assertion\u201d not to be made against Directors in case of dishonour of cheque"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa","name":"Sucheta","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Sucheta"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/legal_editor\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6370","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=6370"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6370\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/7321"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=6370"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=6370"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=6370"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}