{"id":6353,"date":"2014-11-19T15:11:00","date_gmt":"2014-11-19T15:11:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/localhost\/sccblog\/?p=6353"},"modified":"2015-10-14T15:58:28","modified_gmt":"2015-10-14T10:28:28","slug":"amendment-in-the-maharashtra-village-panchayats-taxes-and-fees-rules-1960-is-unconstitutional","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2014\/11\/19\/amendment-in-the-maharashtra-village-panchayats-taxes-and-fees-rules-1960-is-unconstitutional\/","title":{"rendered":"Amendment in the Maharashtra Village Panchayats Taxes and Fees Rules, 1960 is unconstitutional"},"content":{"rendered":"<p ><font size=\"3\" face=\"Times New Roman\"><b><span>Bombay High Court: <\/span><\/b><span>While allowing a writ petition challenging the constitutional validity of the provisions of the Maharashtra Village Panchayats Taxes and Fees (Amendment) Rules, 1999, a division bench of A.S. Oka and A.S. Chandurkar J., struck down Clauses 2, 3, 4 and 5(a) of the Amendment Rules, 1999 as unconstitutional for being discriminatory and violative of Article 14 of the Constitution.<o:p><\/o:p><\/span><\/font><\/p>\n<p ><span><font size=\"3\" face=\"Times New Roman\">In the instant case, S.S. Patwardhan, the counsel for the petitioner contended that Amendment Rule 1999 replaced the determination of the rate of tax from the capital value or annual letting value of the property to the value of the total area of the building or land in question, which ignored the depreciation in the value of the property and is arbitrary, violative of Article 14 of the Constitution and deserves to be quashed. <o:p><\/o:p><\/font><\/span><\/p>\n<p ><span><font size=\"3\" face=\"Times New Roman\">The Court observed that the annual letting value is a time based concept of levying such taxes and has been the most accepted method of determination of ratable value, as the age of the construction of the property cannot be ignored. The Court also observed that it is not just to tax two properties at the same rate when one is recently constructed and has more annual letting value than the one which is 25-30 year old in the same area. <o:p><\/o:p><\/font><\/span><\/p>\n<p ><span><font size=\"3\" face=\"Times New Roman\">The Court made clear that the unequals cannot be treated as equals by the amended method of determining ratable value. The Court held that the amendment made by the State of Maharashtra in the provisions of the Maharashtra Village Panchayats Taxes and Fees Rules, 1960 is discriminatory and violative of the Article 14 of the Constitution and therefore is liable to be stuck down as unconstitutional. <i>Vijay Dinkarrao Shinde v. State of Maharashtra,&nbsp;<\/i><\/font><\/span><span><a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/LoginForNewsLink.aspx?q=2014_SCC_OnLine_Bom_1667&amp;db=0 \">2014 SCC OnLine Bom 1667<\/a>,&nbsp;<\/span><font size=\"3\" face=\"Times New Roman\">decided on November 10, 2014<\/font><i><font size=\"3\"><font face=\"Times New Roman\">.<\/font><\/font><\/i><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Bombay High Court: While allowing a writ petition challenging the constitutional validity of the provisions of the Maharashtra Village Panchayats Taxes and <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":7321,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[10],"tags":[2829],"class_list":["post-6353","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-highcourts","tag-unconstitutional"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Amendment in the Maharashtra Village Panchayats Taxes and Fees Rules, 1960 is unconstitutional | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2014\/11\/19\/amendment-in-the-maharashtra-village-panchayats-taxes-and-fees-rules-1960-is-unconstitutional\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Amendment in the Maharashtra Village Panchayats Taxes and Fees Rules, 1960 is unconstitutional\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Bombay High Court: While allowing a writ petition challenging the constitutional validity of the provisions of the Maharashtra Village Panchayats Taxes and\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2014\/11\/19\/amendment-in-the-maharashtra-village-panchayats-taxes-and-fees-rules-1960-is-unconstitutional\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2014-11-19T15:11:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2015-10-14T10:28:28+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Sucheta\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Sucheta\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"1 minute\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2014\/11\/19\/amendment-in-the-maharashtra-village-panchayats-taxes-and-fees-rules-1960-is-unconstitutional\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2014\/11\/19\/amendment-in-the-maharashtra-village-panchayats-taxes-and-fees-rules-1960-is-unconstitutional\/\",\"name\":\"Amendment in the Maharashtra Village Panchayats Taxes and Fees Rules, 1960 is unconstitutional | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2014\/11\/19\/amendment-in-the-maharashtra-village-panchayats-taxes-and-fees-rules-1960-is-unconstitutional\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2014\/11\/19\/amendment-in-the-maharashtra-village-panchayats-taxes-and-fees-rules-1960-is-unconstitutional\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2014-11-19T15:11:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-10-14T10:28:28+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2014\/11\/19\/amendment-in-the-maharashtra-village-panchayats-taxes-and-fees-rules-1960-is-unconstitutional\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2014\/11\/19\/amendment-in-the-maharashtra-village-panchayats-taxes-and-fees-rules-1960-is-unconstitutional\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2014\/11\/19\/amendment-in-the-maharashtra-village-panchayats-taxes-and-fees-rules-1960-is-unconstitutional\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg\",\"width\":1330,\"height\":887},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2014\/11\/19\/amendment-in-the-maharashtra-village-panchayats-taxes-and-fees-rules-1960-is-unconstitutional\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Amendment in the Maharashtra Village Panchayats Taxes and Fees Rules, 1960 is unconstitutional\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa\",\"name\":\"Sucheta\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Sucheta\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/legal_editor\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Amendment in the Maharashtra Village Panchayats Taxes and Fees Rules, 1960 is unconstitutional | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2014\/11\/19\/amendment-in-the-maharashtra-village-panchayats-taxes-and-fees-rules-1960-is-unconstitutional\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Amendment in the Maharashtra Village Panchayats Taxes and Fees Rules, 1960 is unconstitutional","og_description":"Bombay High Court: While allowing a writ petition challenging the constitutional validity of the provisions of the Maharashtra Village Panchayats Taxes and","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2014\/11\/19\/amendment-in-the-maharashtra-village-panchayats-taxes-and-fees-rules-1960-is-unconstitutional\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2014-11-19T15:11:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2015-10-14T10:28:28+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Sucheta","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Sucheta","Est. reading time":"1 minute"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2014\/11\/19\/amendment-in-the-maharashtra-village-panchayats-taxes-and-fees-rules-1960-is-unconstitutional\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2014\/11\/19\/amendment-in-the-maharashtra-village-panchayats-taxes-and-fees-rules-1960-is-unconstitutional\/","name":"Amendment in the Maharashtra Village Panchayats Taxes and Fees Rules, 1960 is unconstitutional | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2014\/11\/19\/amendment-in-the-maharashtra-village-panchayats-taxes-and-fees-rules-1960-is-unconstitutional\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2014\/11\/19\/amendment-in-the-maharashtra-village-panchayats-taxes-and-fees-rules-1960-is-unconstitutional\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg","datePublished":"2014-11-19T15:11:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-10-14T10:28:28+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2014\/11\/19\/amendment-in-the-maharashtra-village-panchayats-taxes-and-fees-rules-1960-is-unconstitutional\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2014\/11\/19\/amendment-in-the-maharashtra-village-panchayats-taxes-and-fees-rules-1960-is-unconstitutional\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2014\/11\/19\/amendment-in-the-maharashtra-village-panchayats-taxes-and-fees-rules-1960-is-unconstitutional\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg","width":1330,"height":887},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2014\/11\/19\/amendment-in-the-maharashtra-village-panchayats-taxes-and-fees-rules-1960-is-unconstitutional\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Amendment in the Maharashtra Village Panchayats Taxes and Fees Rules, 1960 is unconstitutional"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa","name":"Sucheta","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Sucheta"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/legal_editor\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":351775,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/06\/28\/know-thy-judge-justice-a-s-chandurkar-new-appointed-supreme-court-of-india-scc-times-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":6353,"position":0},"title":"Know Thy Newly Appointed Supreme Court Judge: Justice A.S. Chandurkar","author":"Editor","date":"June 28, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"Justice Atul Sharachchandra Chandurkar\u2019s journey from Bombay High Court to the Supreme Court is a compelling narrative of dedication, legal prowess, and his profound commitment to justice.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Know thy Judge&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Know thy Judge","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/judges-information\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Justice A S Chandurkar","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/06\/image-89.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/06\/image-89.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/06\/image-89.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/06\/image-89.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":223873,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/01\/06\/kar-hc-challenge-to-the-constitutional-validity-of-the-amendment-in-karnataka-transparency-in-public-procurements-act-making-concessions-in-favour-of-sc-st-rejected\/","url_meta":{"origin":6353,"position":1},"title":"Kar HC | Challenge to constitutional validity of amendment in Karnataka Transparency in Public Procurements Act making concessions in favour of SC\/ST rejected","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"January 6, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Karnataka High Court: B. Veerappa, J. dismissed the writ petition filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India,\u00a0 by a Public Works Department Contractor. In this petition Section 6 of the Karnataka Transparency in Public Procurements (KTTP) Act, 1999, was upheld by this Court. It enabled to\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":380339,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/04\/07\/know-thy-judge-justice-a-s-chandurkar-supreme-court-of-india\/","url_meta":{"origin":6353,"position":2},"title":"Know Thy Judge| Supreme Court of India: Justice A.S. Chandurkar and His Defining Contribution to Indian Jurisprudence","author":"Ritu","date":"April 7, 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"Justice Atul Sharachchandra Chandurkar\u2019s journey from Bombay High Court to the Supreme Court is a compelling narrative of dedication, legal prowess, and his profound commitment to justice.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Know thy Judge&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Know thy Judge","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/judges-information\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Justice A S Chandurkar","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/Justice-A-S-Chandurkar.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/Justice-A-S-Chandurkar.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/Justice-A-S-Chandurkar.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/Justice-A-S-Chandurkar.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":46361,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/05\/09\/constitutional-validity-of-sections-5d-and-9b-of-maharashtra-animal-preservation-act-struck-down\/","url_meta":{"origin":6353,"position":3},"title":"Constitutional validity of Sections 5D and 9B of Maharashtra Animal Preservation Act, struck down","author":"Sucheta","date":"May 9, 2016","format":false,"excerpt":"Bombay High Court: Deciding a petition challenging various provisions of Maharashtra Animal Preservation Act 1976 as amended by Maharashtra\u00a0 Preservation Act 1995, a bench consisting A.S. Oka and S.C. Gupte, J.J., struck down two amendments of\u00a0 Maharashtra Animal Preservation Act 1976 and upheld the constitutional validity of rest of the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":6780,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/09\/11\/rule-prohibiting-women-to-serve-liquor-in-licensed-hotels-declared-unconstitutional\/","url_meta":{"origin":6353,"position":4},"title":"Rule prohibiting women to serve liquor in licensed hotels declared unconstitutional","author":"Sucheta","date":"September 11, 2015","format":false,"excerpt":"Kerala High Court: While deciding the constitutionality of the new Rule 27A and condition 9A under the head Conditions in Forms FL 3 introduced via amendment of the Kerala Foreign Liquor Rules dated 9-12-2013 which prohibits women from being employed \u201cin any capacity for serving liquor on the licensed premises\u2019,\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;High Courts&quot;","block_context":{"text":"High Courts","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/highcourts\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":297491,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/24\/burial-at-non-designated-land-contravenes-tn-village-panchayats-burial-rules-madras-hc\/","url_meta":{"origin":6353,"position":5},"title":"Burial at non-designated land contravenes TN Village Panchayats Burial Rules: Madras High Court","author":"Apoorva","date":"July 24, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"A person who defies the law and refuses to exhume the body cannot take umbrage in the delay of enforcing the law and make the Court 'fait accompli'.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"madras high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/madras-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/madras-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/madras-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/madras-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6353","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=6353"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6353\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/7321"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=6353"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=6353"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=6353"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}