{"id":6340,"date":"2014-05-30T15:05:00","date_gmt":"2014-05-30T09:35:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/localhost\/sccblog\/?p=6340"},"modified":"2016-09-20T15:41:38","modified_gmt":"2016-09-20T10:11:38","slug":"validity-of-u-p-urban-buildings-regulation-of-letting-rent-and-eviction-act-1972-upheld","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2014\/05\/30\/validity-of-u-p-urban-buildings-regulation-of-letting-rent-and-eviction-act-1972-upheld\/","title":{"rendered":"Validity of U.P. Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Act, 1972 upheld"},"content":{"rendered":"<p   ><b><span>Allahabad High Court<\/span><\/b><span>: While deciding a case relating to eviction of tenants who lived in the property of Petitioners which was regulated by the U.P. Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Act, 1972, the division bench of Sunil Ambwani and Mohd. Tahir JJ. discussed on the issue of constitutional validity of the aforesaid Act which regulates the conditions of tenancy rent and restricts unreasonable eviction of tenants. The Court held that the absence of provisions of increase of rent periodically and above the agreed rent, the whole Act would not become <i>ultra vires <\/i>and<i> <\/i>also does not amount to deprive a person of his right to property which is a constitutional right. <o:p><\/o:p><\/span><\/p>\n<p   ><span>The petitioners, in the present case, had referred to the case of this Court, <i>Milap Chandra Jain v. State of U.P.<\/i>, 2001 (2) ARC 488, which declared section 3(k), 4(2), 5, 6, 8 and 9 of the Act as <i>ultra vires <\/i>on the ground that freezing of rent of the buildings has become arbitrary and unreasonable being violative of Article 14 and 39-A of the Constitution of India and were held as unconstitutional. Whereas the respondents on the other hand said that declaration of some provisions of the Act as unconstitutional does not make the entire law as ultra vires and highlighted the importance of the said Act as welfare legislation. The Court declared aforesaid mentioned Allahabad High Court decision as bad in law and suggested State Legislature to take into account needs of the society with fair representation of class of persons and appoint a commission to make appropriate recommendations for making amendments to the Act.&nbsp; <i>Neena Jain v. State of U.P., Civil Misc. Writ Petition no. 50870 of 2004<\/i>, decided on April 4<sup>th<\/sup> of 2014<o:p><\/o:p><\/span><\/p>\n<p   ><span><br \/><\/span><\/p>\n<p   ><span>For the text of the judgment, <a href=\"http:\/\/2014.scconline.com\/LoginForNewsLink.aspx?q=Civil_Misc._Writ_Petition_No._50870_of_2004_and_Transfer_Application_(Civil)_No._-_301_of_2005&amp;db=0 \">click here<\/a><\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Allahabad High Court: While deciding a case relating to eviction of tenants who lived in the property of Petitioners which was regulated <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":7321,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[2510],"class_list":["post-6340","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-Allahabad_High_Court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Validity of U.P. Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Act, 1972 upheld | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2014\/05\/30\/validity-of-u-p-urban-buildings-regulation-of-letting-rent-and-eviction-act-1972-upheld\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Validity of U.P. Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Act, 1972 upheld\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Allahabad High Court: While deciding a case relating to eviction of tenants who lived in the property of Petitioners which was regulated\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2014\/05\/30\/validity-of-u-p-urban-buildings-regulation-of-letting-rent-and-eviction-act-1972-upheld\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2014-05-30T09:35:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-09-20T10:11:38+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Sucheta\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Sucheta\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"1 minute\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2014\/05\/30\/validity-of-u-p-urban-buildings-regulation-of-letting-rent-and-eviction-act-1972-upheld\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2014\/05\/30\/validity-of-u-p-urban-buildings-regulation-of-letting-rent-and-eviction-act-1972-upheld\/\",\"name\":\"Validity of U.P. Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Act, 1972 upheld | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2014\/05\/30\/validity-of-u-p-urban-buildings-regulation-of-letting-rent-and-eviction-act-1972-upheld\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2014\/05\/30\/validity-of-u-p-urban-buildings-regulation-of-letting-rent-and-eviction-act-1972-upheld\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2014-05-30T09:35:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-09-20T10:11:38+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2014\/05\/30\/validity-of-u-p-urban-buildings-regulation-of-letting-rent-and-eviction-act-1972-upheld\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2014\/05\/30\/validity-of-u-p-urban-buildings-regulation-of-letting-rent-and-eviction-act-1972-upheld\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2014\/05\/30\/validity-of-u-p-urban-buildings-regulation-of-letting-rent-and-eviction-act-1972-upheld\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg\",\"width\":1330,\"height\":887},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2014\/05\/30\/validity-of-u-p-urban-buildings-regulation-of-letting-rent-and-eviction-act-1972-upheld\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Validity of U.P. Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Act, 1972 upheld\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa\",\"name\":\"Sucheta\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Sucheta\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/legal_editor\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Validity of U.P. Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Act, 1972 upheld | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2014\/05\/30\/validity-of-u-p-urban-buildings-regulation-of-letting-rent-and-eviction-act-1972-upheld\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Validity of U.P. Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Act, 1972 upheld","og_description":"Allahabad High Court: While deciding a case relating to eviction of tenants who lived in the property of Petitioners which was regulated","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2014\/05\/30\/validity-of-u-p-urban-buildings-regulation-of-letting-rent-and-eviction-act-1972-upheld\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2014-05-30T09:35:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-09-20T10:11:38+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Sucheta","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Sucheta","Est. reading time":"1 minute"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2014\/05\/30\/validity-of-u-p-urban-buildings-regulation-of-letting-rent-and-eviction-act-1972-upheld\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2014\/05\/30\/validity-of-u-p-urban-buildings-regulation-of-letting-rent-and-eviction-act-1972-upheld\/","name":"Validity of U.P. Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Act, 1972 upheld | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2014\/05\/30\/validity-of-u-p-urban-buildings-regulation-of-letting-rent-and-eviction-act-1972-upheld\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2014\/05\/30\/validity-of-u-p-urban-buildings-regulation-of-letting-rent-and-eviction-act-1972-upheld\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg","datePublished":"2014-05-30T09:35:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-09-20T10:11:38+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2014\/05\/30\/validity-of-u-p-urban-buildings-regulation-of-letting-rent-and-eviction-act-1972-upheld\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2014\/05\/30\/validity-of-u-p-urban-buildings-regulation-of-letting-rent-and-eviction-act-1972-upheld\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2014\/05\/30\/validity-of-u-p-urban-buildings-regulation-of-letting-rent-and-eviction-act-1972-upheld\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg","width":1330,"height":887},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2014\/05\/30\/validity-of-u-p-urban-buildings-regulation-of-letting-rent-and-eviction-act-1972-upheld\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Validity of U.P. Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Act, 1972 upheld"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa","name":"Sucheta","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Sucheta"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/legal_editor\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":104841,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/02\/08\/married-female-tenants-sibling-is-neither-an-heir-nor-a-family-under-the-u-p-urban-buildings-regulation-of-letting-rent-and-eviction-act-1972\/","url_meta":{"origin":6340,"position":0},"title":"Married female tenant&#8217;s sibling is neither an \u201cheir\u201d nor a \u201cfamily\u201d under the U.P. Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Act, 1972","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"February 8, 2017","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: The bench of Dipak Misra and R. Banumathi, JJ held that the brother of a married female tenant is neither a \u2018heir\u2019 as visualized under Section 3(a) nor \u2018family\u2019 within the meaning of Section 3(g) of the U.P. Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Act, 1972.\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":222889,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/12\/05\/constitutional-validity-of-the-punjab-religious-premises-and-land-eviction-and-rent-recovery-act-1997-upheld\/","url_meta":{"origin":6340,"position":1},"title":"Constitutional validity of the Punjab Religious Premises and Land (Eviction and Rent Recovery) Act, 1997 upheld","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"December 5, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: Upholding the constitutional validity of the Punjab Religious Premises and Land (Eviction and Rent Recovery) Act, 1997 a bench comprising of NV Ramana, Sanjiv Khanna and Krishna Murar, JJ held that separate classification of properties of religious institutions for rent legislation will pass the test under Article 14\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":291076,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/05\/02\/supreme-court-stamp-duty-on-sale-deed-can-be-calculated-on-market-value-of-property\/","url_meta":{"origin":6340,"position":2},"title":"Whether stamp duty payable on sale deed to be calculated as per prevailing market value of property on execution date? Supreme Court answers","author":"Aastha","date":"May 2, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cStamp Act in its application to Uttar Pradesh has been amended by the UP (Stamp Amendment Act 1952) and Article 23 of Schedule IB as applicable to UP.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"stamp duty on sale deed","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/stamp-duty-on-sale-deed.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/stamp-duty-on-sale-deed.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/stamp-duty-on-sale-deed.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/stamp-duty-on-sale-deed.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":74071,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/09\/28\/any-female-having-a-legal-right-of-residence-in-the-building-is-entitled-to-seek-eviction-of-the-tenant-for-her-need\/","url_meta":{"origin":6340,"position":3},"title":"Any female having a legal right of residence in the building is entitled to seek eviction of the tenant for her need","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"September 28, 2016","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: In a matter relating to eviction of the tenant, the bench of J. Chelameswar and Abhay Manohar Sapre, JJ held that any female, if she is having a legal right of residence in the building, is entitled to seek eviction of the tenant from such building for her\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":222167,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/15\/sc-refuses-to-strike-down-provision-relating-to-an-nris-right-to-claim-eviction-under-the-east-punjab-urban-rent-restriction-act-1949\/","url_meta":{"origin":6340,"position":4},"title":"SC refuses to strike down provision relating to an NRI\u2019s right to claim eviction under the East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"November 15, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: The 3-judge bench of Ranjan Gogoi, CJ and L. Nageswara Rao and Sanjiv Khanna, JJ has refused to hold\u00a0 Section 13-B of the East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949 (Rent Act) merely because it grants a right to claim eviction for bona fide need by summary procedure\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":245438,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/03\/12\/legal-heirs\/","url_meta":{"origin":6340,"position":5},"title":"All HC | During his lifetime, tenant enters into compromise with landlord and enjoys benefits thereof. After such tenant&#8217;s demise, can his legal heirs challenge the compromise? HC uncovers legal position","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"March 12, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Allahabad High Court: Vivek Kumar Birla, J., expressed: \u201c\u2026a party cannot be permitted to blow hot \u2013 blow cold, where he knowingly accepts the benefit of a contract, or conveyance, or of an order, he is estopped from denying the validity of, or the binding effect of such contract, or\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6340","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=6340"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6340\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/7321"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=6340"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=6340"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=6340"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}