{"id":6330,"date":"2014-12-06T14:12:00","date_gmt":"2014-12-06T14:12:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/localhost\/sccblog\/?p=6330"},"modified":"2015-10-14T15:51:37","modified_gmt":"2015-10-14T10:21:37","slug":"state-of-haryana-v-s-l-arora-case-on-award-of-interest-on-interest-wrongly-decided-rules","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2014\/12\/06\/state-of-haryana-v-s-l-arora-case-on-award-of-interest-on-interest-wrongly-decided-rules\/","title":{"rendered":"State of Haryana v. S.L. Arora case on \u201cAward of Interest on Interest\u201d wrongly decided"},"content":{"rendered":"<p ><b>Supreme Court<\/b>: In one of the prominent decisions of Supreme Court, the 3 judge bench&nbsp; decided with a ratio of 2:1 that the decision given in &nbsp;<i>S.L. Arora Case,<\/i><span>&nbsp;<\/span><span><a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/LoginForNewsLink.aspx?q=(2010)_3_SCC_690&amp;db=0 \">(2010) 3 SCC 690,<\/a><\/span><span>&nbsp;was wrongly decided<\/span><span>. The question before the Court was that whether the decision of Supreme Court in <\/span><span>State of Haryana<\/span><span>&nbsp; <\/span><span>v. S.L. Arora <\/span><span>, wherein it was held that an award of interest on interest from the date of award is not permissible Section 31(7) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 , and is in consonance with earlier decisions of this Court. A<\/span><span>bhay Manohar Sapre, J opined with the view given by S.A Bobde, J while H.L Dattu, CJ dissented with the majority.<\/span><\/p>\n<p >It was decided in S.L Arora case that a &nbsp;sum directed to be paid by an Arbitral Tribunal and the reference to the Award on the substantive claim does not refer to interest during the actual progress of law suit<i> <\/i>awarded on the<span>\u201c<\/span>sum directed to be paid upon Award<span>\u201d<\/span>and that in the absence of any provision of interest upon interest in the contract, the Arbitral Tribunal does not have the power to award interest upon interest, or compound interest either for the pre-award period or for the post-award period.<\/p>\n<p >In this view of the matter, S.A Bobde, J said that it is clear that the interest, the sum directed to be paid by the Arbitral Award under clause (b) of sub-section (7) of Section 31 of the Act is inclusive of interest<i> <\/i>during the actual progress of a law suit.Critical of the view taken by Supreme Court in S.L Arora case, S.A Bobde, J said that the Parliament has the undoubted power to legislate on the subject and provide that the Arbitral Tribunal may award interest on the sum directed to be paid by the Award, meaning a sum inclusive of principal sum adjudged and the interest, and this has been done by Parliament in plain language.<\/p>\n<p >Dissenting from the majority, H.L Dattu, CJ concluded that the term<span  >\u201c<\/span>interest<span>\u201d<\/span>, appears to be distinct from the principal amount on which it is imposed. According to him, there was no infirmity with the <i>S.L. Arora <\/i>case, whereby it was held that if the arbitral award is silent about interest from the date of award till the date of payment, the person in whose favour the award is made will be entitled to interest at 18% per annum on the principal amount awarded, from the date of award till the date of payment.( <font size=\"1\">HYDER CONSULTING (UK) LTD v. GOVERNOR, STATE OF ORISSA<\/font><b>,&nbsp;<\/b><span><font face=\"Times New Roman\" size=\"3\"><a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/LoginForNewsLink.aspx?q=2014_SCC_OnLine_SC_940&amp;db=0\">2014 SCC OnLine SC 940<\/a><\/font><\/span><span>&nbsp;<\/span><font size=\"1\">Decided on-25\/11\/2014<\/font><span>)<\/span><\/p>\n<p ><o:p><\/o:p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Supreme Court: In one of the prominent decisions of Supreme Court, the 3 judge bench&nbsp; decided with a ratio of 2:1 that <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":7321,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[9],"tags":[2773],"class_list":["post-6330","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-supremecourt","tag-Award"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>State of Haryana v. S.L. Arora case on \u201cAward of Interest on Interest\u201d wrongly decided | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2014\/12\/06\/state-of-haryana-v-s-l-arora-case-on-award-of-interest-on-interest-wrongly-decided-rules\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"State of Haryana v. S.L. Arora case on \u201cAward of Interest on Interest\u201d wrongly decided\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Supreme Court: In one of the prominent decisions of Supreme Court, the 3 judge bench&nbsp; decided with a ratio of 2:1 that\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2014\/12\/06\/state-of-haryana-v-s-l-arora-case-on-award-of-interest-on-interest-wrongly-decided-rules\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2014-12-06T14:12:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2015-10-14T10:21:37+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Sucheta\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Sucheta\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2014\/12\/06\/state-of-haryana-v-s-l-arora-case-on-award-of-interest-on-interest-wrongly-decided-rules\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2014\/12\/06\/state-of-haryana-v-s-l-arora-case-on-award-of-interest-on-interest-wrongly-decided-rules\/\",\"name\":\"State of Haryana v. S.L. Arora case on \u201cAward of Interest on Interest\u201d wrongly decided | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2014\/12\/06\/state-of-haryana-v-s-l-arora-case-on-award-of-interest-on-interest-wrongly-decided-rules\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2014\/12\/06\/state-of-haryana-v-s-l-arora-case-on-award-of-interest-on-interest-wrongly-decided-rules\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2014-12-06T14:12:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-10-14T10:21:37+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2014\/12\/06\/state-of-haryana-v-s-l-arora-case-on-award-of-interest-on-interest-wrongly-decided-rules\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2014\/12\/06\/state-of-haryana-v-s-l-arora-case-on-award-of-interest-on-interest-wrongly-decided-rules\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2014\/12\/06\/state-of-haryana-v-s-l-arora-case-on-award-of-interest-on-interest-wrongly-decided-rules\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg\",\"width\":1330,\"height\":887},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2014\/12\/06\/state-of-haryana-v-s-l-arora-case-on-award-of-interest-on-interest-wrongly-decided-rules\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"State of Haryana v. S.L. Arora case on \u201cAward of Interest on Interest\u201d wrongly decided\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa\",\"name\":\"Sucheta\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Sucheta\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/legal_editor\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"State of Haryana v. S.L. Arora case on \u201cAward of Interest on Interest\u201d wrongly decided | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2014\/12\/06\/state-of-haryana-v-s-l-arora-case-on-award-of-interest-on-interest-wrongly-decided-rules\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"State of Haryana v. S.L. Arora case on \u201cAward of Interest on Interest\u201d wrongly decided","og_description":"Supreme Court: In one of the prominent decisions of Supreme Court, the 3 judge bench&nbsp; decided with a ratio of 2:1 that","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2014\/12\/06\/state-of-haryana-v-s-l-arora-case-on-award-of-interest-on-interest-wrongly-decided-rules\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2014-12-06T14:12:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2015-10-14T10:21:37+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Sucheta","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Sucheta","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2014\/12\/06\/state-of-haryana-v-s-l-arora-case-on-award-of-interest-on-interest-wrongly-decided-rules\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2014\/12\/06\/state-of-haryana-v-s-l-arora-case-on-award-of-interest-on-interest-wrongly-decided-rules\/","name":"State of Haryana v. S.L. Arora case on \u201cAward of Interest on Interest\u201d wrongly decided | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2014\/12\/06\/state-of-haryana-v-s-l-arora-case-on-award-of-interest-on-interest-wrongly-decided-rules\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2014\/12\/06\/state-of-haryana-v-s-l-arora-case-on-award-of-interest-on-interest-wrongly-decided-rules\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg","datePublished":"2014-12-06T14:12:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-10-14T10:21:37+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2014\/12\/06\/state-of-haryana-v-s-l-arora-case-on-award-of-interest-on-interest-wrongly-decided-rules\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2014\/12\/06\/state-of-haryana-v-s-l-arora-case-on-award-of-interest-on-interest-wrongly-decided-rules\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2014\/12\/06\/state-of-haryana-v-s-l-arora-case-on-award-of-interest-on-interest-wrongly-decided-rules\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg","width":1330,"height":887},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2014\/12\/06\/state-of-haryana-v-s-l-arora-case-on-award-of-interest-on-interest-wrongly-decided-rules\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"State of Haryana v. S.L. Arora case on \u201cAward of Interest on Interest\u201d wrongly decided"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa","name":"Sucheta","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Sucheta"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/legal_editor\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":276738,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/11\/05\/discretionary-powers-of-arbitrator-to-grant-post-award-interest\/","url_meta":{"origin":6330,"position":0},"title":"Discretionary Powers of Arbitrator to Grant Post-Award Interest","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"November 5, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"by Aditi Prabhu\u2020","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Op Eds&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Op Eds","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/op-ed\/legal-analysis\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/MicrosoftTeams-image-209-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/MicrosoftTeams-image-209-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/MicrosoftTeams-image-209-1.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/MicrosoftTeams-image-209-1.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/MicrosoftTeams-image-209-1.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":259968,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/01\/14\/is-arbitration-tribunal-empowered-to-award-compound-interest-supreme-court-answers\/","url_meta":{"origin":6330,"position":1},"title":"Is Arbitration Tribunal empowered to award compound interest? Supreme Court Answers","author":"Editor","date":"January 14, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: The 3-judge Bench comprising of N.V. Ramana, CJ., A.S. Bopanna and Hima Kohli*, JJ., held that Arbitral Tribunal is empowered to award interest on post award interest. The instant appeal was filed by UHL Power Co. Ltd. against the order of the Himachal Pradesh High Court disallowing it\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/MicrosoftTeams-image-37.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/MicrosoftTeams-image-37.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/MicrosoftTeams-image-37.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/MicrosoftTeams-image-37.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/MicrosoftTeams-image-37.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":245539,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/03\/14\/tale-of-two-judgments\/","url_meta":{"origin":6330,"position":2},"title":"In an interesting pursuit \u2015 Tale of two judgments","author":"Editor","date":"March 14, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"by Kajol A. Punjabi*","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Op Eds&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Op Eds","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/op-ed\/legal-analysis\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/03\/Supreme-Court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/03\/Supreme-Court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/03\/Supreme-Court.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/03\/Supreme-Court.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/03\/Supreme-Court.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":218276,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/08\/17\/ph-hc-amount-of-compensation-for-motor-accident-claim-to-be-calculated-according-to-minimum-wage-prevalent-in-the-state\/","url_meta":{"origin":6330,"position":3},"title":"P&#038;H HC | Amount of compensation for motor accident claim to be calculated according to minimum wage prevalent in the State","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"August 17, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Punjab and Haryana High Court: Ritu Bahri, J. allowed the petition and modified the award according to the prevalent rate in accordance with the decision by the Supreme Court. An appeal was made by the Claimant-Appellants to seek the enhancement of compensation awarded by Motor Accident Claim Tribunal on the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":290964,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/04\/29\/agreement-specifying-no-interest-to-be-granted-takes-away-arbitrators-power-to-deviate-and-grant-his-own-interest-rate-delhi-high-court-legal-research-updates-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":6330,"position":4},"title":"Agreement specifying \u2018no interest to be granted\u2019 takes away Arbitrator&#8217;s power to deviate and grant his own interest rate: Delhi High Court","author":"Simranjeet","date":"April 29, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Even if the Arbitrator is successful in justifying his reasons for deciding a rate of interest, the Agreement between the parties being the birth-giver, should be held at a higher stature when it concerns an issue that has been pre-decided and mutually agreed upon by the parties.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"delhi high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":236835,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/06\/del-hc-does-rule-35-of-scba-rules-has-application-to-suspension-termination-of-status-of-a-member-of-scba-as-an-office-bearer-of-its-association-hc-explains-in-view-of-ashoka-arora-secy-scbas\/","url_meta":{"origin":6330,"position":5},"title":"Del HC | Does Rule 35 of SCBA Rules apply to suspension\/termination of status of a member of SCBA as an office-bearer of its Association? HC explains in view of Ashoka Arora, Secy. SCBA&#8217;s removal","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"October 6, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court:\u00a0Mukta Gupta, J., refused to stay the suspension of Ashok Arora from the post of Secretary, Supreme Court Bar Association stating that no prima facie case was made out by the Secretary. Decree of Declaration Plaintiff by way of the present application sought an interim injunction staying the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6330","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=6330"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6330\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/7321"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=6330"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=6330"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=6330"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}