{"id":6319,"date":"2015-01-30T15:01:00","date_gmt":"2015-01-30T15:01:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/localhost\/sccblog\/?p=6319"},"modified":"2015-10-14T15:13:34","modified_gmt":"2015-10-14T09:43:34","slug":"new-definition-of-non-performing-assets-as-amended-in-2004-in-the-sarfaesi-act-2002-held-constitutionally-valid","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/01\/30\/new-definition-of-non-performing-assets-as-amended-in-2004-in-the-sarfaesi-act-2002-held-constitutionally-valid\/","title":{"rendered":"New definition of \u201cNon-Performing Assets\u201d as amended in 2004 in the SARFAESI Act, 2002 held constitutionally valid"},"content":{"rendered":"<p ><b>Supreme Court: <\/b>Dealing with the existing ambiguity as to the acceptability of definition of \u201cnon-performing assets\u201d in SARFAESI Act, 2002, a bench of Chelameswar and S.A. Bobde JJ. clarified that looking at the modern scenario where the NPA can be classified depending upon the nature of credit facilities extended by various creditors to different category of borrowers and on different terms and conditions, the definition of the \u201cnon-performing assets\u201d as amended in 2004 is held constitutionally valid.<\/p>\n<p >In the instant case, the Court dealt with an ambiguous situation where in <i>Mardia Chemicals Ltd. v. UOI <\/i><a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/LoginForNewsLink\/2004_4_SCC_311\">(2004) 4 SCC 311<\/a><b>,<\/b> the Court held the amended definition of \u201cNPA\u201d as constitutionally valid, as the guidelines laid down by the RBI for classifying the account of the borrower as NPA would eliminate the possibility of the Secured Creditor arbitrarily declaring the account of the borrower as NPA, whereas the Gujarat High Court, by a common judgment dated 24.4.2014 held that the amended Section 2(1)(o) of the Act is unconstitutional.<\/p>\n<p >The Court observed that prior to the amendment, only RBI has the authority to classify an account of the borrower as NPA as per the directions and guidelines issued by it, however after the amendment, the expression \u201cNPA\u201d created two classes of borrowers \u2013 one class of borrowers are governed by the guidelines issued by RBI, and the other class of borrowers are governed by the guidelines issued by the authority\/body\/regulator of the creditor.<\/p>\n<p >Learned Counsel appearing for the borrowers contended that amended Section 2(1)(o) is unconstitutional as it provides possibility for the creditors to arbitrarily or whimsically classify the account of any borrower as a NPA, which is violative of Article 14 of the Constitution and is excessive delegation of power. The Court agreed with the contention of the learned Counsel for the UOI, RBI and various creditors that the assessment of an account of borrower as NPA depends upon innumerable factors which constantly keeps changing, therefore the assessment be made in the light of guidelines made by either the RBI or various other regulators regulating the activities of various creditors. The Court noted that \u201cthe submission that the amended definition of the expression \u201dNPA\u201d is bad on account of excessive delegation of legislative function, is untenable and is required to be rejected\u201d, and \u201cthe amendment was necessary to cover the deficiencies noticed in the Act\u201d. &nbsp;Accordingly, the Court upheld the Constitutionality of the amended definition of the expression \u201cnon-performing assets\u201d under Section 2(1)(o) of the Act, and dismissed all the writ petitions either filed before this Court or filed before the Madras High Court and Gujarat High Court and the appeals of the borrowers. Keshavlal Khemchand and Sons Pvt. Ltd. v. UOI, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/LoginForNewsLink\/2015_SCC_OnLine_SC_68 \">2015 SCC OnLine SC 68<\/a>, decided on 28-01-2015.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Supreme Court: Dealing with the existing ambiguity as to the acceptability of definition of \u201cnon-performing assets\u201d in SARFAESI Act, 2002, a bench <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":7321,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[9],"tags":[2744],"class_list":["post-6319","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-supremecourt","tag-delegation"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>New definition of \u201cNon-Performing Assets\u201d as amended in 2004 in the SARFAESI Act, 2002 held constitutionally valid | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/01\/30\/new-definition-of-non-performing-assets-as-amended-in-2004-in-the-sarfaesi-act-2002-held-constitutionally-valid\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"New definition of \u201cNon-Performing Assets\u201d as amended in 2004 in the SARFAESI Act, 2002 held constitutionally valid\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Supreme Court: Dealing with the existing ambiguity as to the acceptability of definition of \u201cnon-performing assets\u201d in SARFAESI Act, 2002, a bench\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/01\/30\/new-definition-of-non-performing-assets-as-amended-in-2004-in-the-sarfaesi-act-2002-held-constitutionally-valid\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2015-01-30T15:01:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2015-10-14T09:43:34+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Sucheta\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Sucheta\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/01\/30\/new-definition-of-non-performing-assets-as-amended-in-2004-in-the-sarfaesi-act-2002-held-constitutionally-valid\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/01\/30\/new-definition-of-non-performing-assets-as-amended-in-2004-in-the-sarfaesi-act-2002-held-constitutionally-valid\/\",\"name\":\"New definition of \u201cNon-Performing Assets\u201d as amended in 2004 in the SARFAESI Act, 2002 held constitutionally valid | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/01\/30\/new-definition-of-non-performing-assets-as-amended-in-2004-in-the-sarfaesi-act-2002-held-constitutionally-valid\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/01\/30\/new-definition-of-non-performing-assets-as-amended-in-2004-in-the-sarfaesi-act-2002-held-constitutionally-valid\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2015-01-30T15:01:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-10-14T09:43:34+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/01\/30\/new-definition-of-non-performing-assets-as-amended-in-2004-in-the-sarfaesi-act-2002-held-constitutionally-valid\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/01\/30\/new-definition-of-non-performing-assets-as-amended-in-2004-in-the-sarfaesi-act-2002-held-constitutionally-valid\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/01\/30\/new-definition-of-non-performing-assets-as-amended-in-2004-in-the-sarfaesi-act-2002-held-constitutionally-valid\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg\",\"width\":1330,\"height\":887},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/01\/30\/new-definition-of-non-performing-assets-as-amended-in-2004-in-the-sarfaesi-act-2002-held-constitutionally-valid\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"New definition of \u201cNon-Performing Assets\u201d as amended in 2004 in the SARFAESI Act, 2002 held constitutionally valid\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa\",\"name\":\"Sucheta\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Sucheta\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/legal_editor\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"New definition of \u201cNon-Performing Assets\u201d as amended in 2004 in the SARFAESI Act, 2002 held constitutionally valid | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/01\/30\/new-definition-of-non-performing-assets-as-amended-in-2004-in-the-sarfaesi-act-2002-held-constitutionally-valid\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"New definition of \u201cNon-Performing Assets\u201d as amended in 2004 in the SARFAESI Act, 2002 held constitutionally valid","og_description":"Supreme Court: Dealing with the existing ambiguity as to the acceptability of definition of \u201cnon-performing assets\u201d in SARFAESI Act, 2002, a bench","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/01\/30\/new-definition-of-non-performing-assets-as-amended-in-2004-in-the-sarfaesi-act-2002-held-constitutionally-valid\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2015-01-30T15:01:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2015-10-14T09:43:34+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Sucheta","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Sucheta","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/01\/30\/new-definition-of-non-performing-assets-as-amended-in-2004-in-the-sarfaesi-act-2002-held-constitutionally-valid\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/01\/30\/new-definition-of-non-performing-assets-as-amended-in-2004-in-the-sarfaesi-act-2002-held-constitutionally-valid\/","name":"New definition of \u201cNon-Performing Assets\u201d as amended in 2004 in the SARFAESI Act, 2002 held constitutionally valid | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/01\/30\/new-definition-of-non-performing-assets-as-amended-in-2004-in-the-sarfaesi-act-2002-held-constitutionally-valid\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/01\/30\/new-definition-of-non-performing-assets-as-amended-in-2004-in-the-sarfaesi-act-2002-held-constitutionally-valid\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg","datePublished":"2015-01-30T15:01:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-10-14T09:43:34+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/01\/30\/new-definition-of-non-performing-assets-as-amended-in-2004-in-the-sarfaesi-act-2002-held-constitutionally-valid\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/01\/30\/new-definition-of-non-performing-assets-as-amended-in-2004-in-the-sarfaesi-act-2002-held-constitutionally-valid\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/01\/30\/new-definition-of-non-performing-assets-as-amended-in-2004-in-the-sarfaesi-act-2002-held-constitutionally-valid\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg","width":1330,"height":887},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/01\/30\/new-definition-of-non-performing-assets-as-amended-in-2004-in-the-sarfaesi-act-2002-held-constitutionally-valid\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"New definition of \u201cNon-Performing Assets\u201d as amended in 2004 in the SARFAESI Act, 2002 held constitutionally valid"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa","name":"Sucheta","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Sucheta"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/legal_editor\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":292670,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/05\/22\/npa-classification-%e2%80%95-whether-opportunity-of-prior-hearing-required\/","url_meta":{"origin":6319,"position":0},"title":"NPA Classification \u2015 Whether Opportunity of Prior Hearing Required?","author":"Editor","date":"May 22, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"by Prashant Tripathi\u2020","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Op Eds&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Op Eds","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/op-ed\/legal-analysis\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/MicrosoftTeams-image-135.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/MicrosoftTeams-image-135.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/MicrosoftTeams-image-135.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/MicrosoftTeams-image-135.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":344962,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/04\/03\/sole-proprietorship-firm-dont-fall-under-definition-of-debtor-under-s-94-of-ibc-mp-high-court-refuses-to-halt-recovery-proceedings-scc-times\/","url_meta":{"origin":6319,"position":1},"title":"Sole proprietorship firm don\u2019t fall under definition of \u201cdebtor\u201d under S. 94 of IBC; MP High Court refuses to halt recovery proceedings","author":"Ritu","date":"April 3, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cSection 94 of IBC gives remedy to \u201cdebtor' only to either apply personally or through a Resolution Professional to the Adjudicating Authority for initiating the insolvency resolution process.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Madhya Pradesh High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":358279,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/08\/29\/ph-hc-directs-execution-of-order-under-section-14-sarfaesi-act\/","url_meta":{"origin":6319,"position":2},"title":"Sitting on files due to non-prescription of time frame for execution of Section 14 order frustrates object of SARFAESI Act: Punjab &amp; Haryana HC","author":"Editor","date":"August 29, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cNon-Performing Assets are a huge burden on the public exchequer, banking and financial system, and, thus, prompt enforcement of recovery mechanism under the SARFAESI Act is paramount for liquidity in the system\u201d.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"execution of order under S. 14 SARFAESI Act","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/execution-of-order-under-S.-14-SARFAESI-Act.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/execution-of-order-under-S.-14-SARFAESI-Act.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/execution-of-order-under-S.-14-SARFAESI-Act.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/execution-of-order-under-S.-14-SARFAESI-Act.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":255489,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/10\/12\/diligence-by-purchaser-prior-to-acquisition-of-secured-assets-under-sarfaesi\/","url_meta":{"origin":6319,"position":3},"title":"Diligence by Purchaser Prior to Acquisition of Secured Assets under SARFAESI","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"October 12, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"by Bhoumick Vaidya\u2020 and Harshini Kotecha\u2020\u2020 Cite as: 2021 SCC OnLine Blog Exp 77","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Experts Corner&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Experts Corner","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/experts_corner\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/MicrosoftTeams-image-69.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/MicrosoftTeams-image-69.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/MicrosoftTeams-image-69.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/MicrosoftTeams-image-69.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/MicrosoftTeams-image-69.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":252857,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/08\/18\/rent-act-would-not-come-to-the-aid-of-a-tenant-in-sufferance\/","url_meta":{"origin":6319,"position":4},"title":"Rent Act would not come to the aid of a \u201ctenant-\u00adin-\u00adsufferance\u201d vis-\u00ad\u00e0-\u00advis SARFAESI Act due to operation of S. 13(2) read with S. 13(13) of SARFAESI Act: SC","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"August 18, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: The Division Bench of S. Abdul Nazeer and Krishna Murari, JJ., addressed a pertinent issue of whether the rent act would come to the aid of a \u201ctenant in sufferance\u201d. Instant appeals were directed against the Orders passed by the Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Esplanade, Mumbai rejecting the application\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/MicrosoftTeams-image-7-1.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/MicrosoftTeams-image-7-1.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/MicrosoftTeams-image-7-1.png?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/MicrosoftTeams-image-7-1.png?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/MicrosoftTeams-image-7-1.png?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":204778,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/11\/03\/considering-representation-under-s-133a-sarfaesi-act-mandatory-time-provided-to-communicate-response-thereon-is-not-del-hc\/","url_meta":{"origin":6319,"position":5},"title":"Considering representation under S. 13(3A) SARFAESI Act mandatory, time provided to communicate response thereon is not: Del HC","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"November 3, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court:\u00a0A Single Judge Bench comprising of Vibhu Bakhru, J. dismissed a petition seeking a writ to be issued to set aside the reply under Section 13 (3A) of\u00a0 Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 (SARFAESI Act) given by the respondent Bank\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6319","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=6319"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6319\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/7321"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=6319"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=6319"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=6319"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}