{"id":6308,"date":"2014-11-26T15:11:00","date_gmt":"2014-11-26T15:11:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/localhost\/sccblog\/?p=6308"},"modified":"2015-10-14T15:27:09","modified_gmt":"2015-10-14T09:57:09","slug":"validity-of-a-decree-passed-on-a-compromise-cannot-be-challenged-in-a-separate-suit","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2014\/11\/26\/validity-of-a-decree-passed-on-a-compromise-cannot-be-challenged-in-a-separate-suit\/","title":{"rendered":"Validity of a decree passed on a compromise cannot be challenged in a separate suit"},"content":{"rendered":"<p ><b>Supreme Court: <\/b>In a matter before the Court as to whether<b> <\/b>the validity of a decree passed on a compromise can be challenged in a separate suit, a bench comprising of T.S. Thakur and R. Banumathi JJ., upheld the decision of the Additional City Civil Judge that a separate suit was not maintainable and that the only remedy available to the aggrieved party is to approach the Court which had passed the compromise decree.<\/p>\n<p >In the instant case, the dispute arose as to the validity of a compromise between the parties with respect to alienation of property as a gift. The trial Court held that the suit holding the gift-deed in question is null and void and not binding on the plaintiff. Aggrieved with the decree of the trial Court, the respondent moved to the High Court which set aside the judgment and decree of the trial Court on the basis that a compromise had taken place between the parties. The aggrieved appellant appeared before the Additional City Civil Judge where the plaint filed by the plaintiff-appellant was rejected in the light of the proviso to Order 23 Rule 3 of CPC. The appellant then filed a miscellaneous application taking plea that no compromise had taken place nor was any compromise petition ever signed between the parties. The High Court declined to consider the prayer made by the appellant and held that the appellant may seek redressal in a separate suit against any such order of rejection.<\/p>\n<p >The question which arose before this Court was whether the High Court was right in directing the appellant to seek redress in separate suit. The Court observed that as soon as a question relating to the lawfulness of the agreement\/ compromise is raised before the Court that passed the decree on the basis of any such agreement or compromise, it is that Court and that Court alone who can examine and determine that question.<\/p>\n<p >The Court concluded that the High Court in the process remained oblivious of the provisions of the Order 23 of Rule 3 and 3 A of CPC, as it cannot direct the parties to file a separate suit on the subject for which no such suit will lie in view of the provision of Order 23 Rule 3 A of CPC.. The Court allowed the appeal and set aside the Order of the High Court and remitted the matter back to the High Court for disposal in accordance with the law. <i><font size=\"1\">R. Rajanna v. S.R. Ventakaswamy<\/font>,&nbsp;<\/i><span><a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/LoginForNewsLink.aspx?q=2014_SCC_OnLine_SC_920&amp;db=0 \">2014 SCC OnLine SC 920<\/a><\/span><i>,<\/i><span> <font size=\"1\">decided on <\/font><\/span><st1:date year=\"2014\" day=\"20\" month=\"11\" w:st=\"on\"><font size=\"1\">November 20, 2014<\/font><\/st1:date><i>.<\/i><\/p>\n<p ><o:p><\/o:p><\/p>\n<p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Supreme Court: In a matter before the Court as to whether the validity of a decree passed on a compromise can be <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":7321,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[9],"tags":[2713],"class_list":["post-6308","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-supremecourt","tag-decree"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Validity of a decree passed on a compromise cannot be challenged in a separate suit | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2014\/11\/26\/validity-of-a-decree-passed-on-a-compromise-cannot-be-challenged-in-a-separate-suit\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Validity of a decree passed on a compromise cannot be challenged in a separate suit\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Supreme Court: In a matter before the Court as to whether the validity of a decree passed on a compromise can be\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2014\/11\/26\/validity-of-a-decree-passed-on-a-compromise-cannot-be-challenged-in-a-separate-suit\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2014-11-26T15:11:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2015-10-14T09:57:09+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Sucheta\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Sucheta\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2014\/11\/26\/validity-of-a-decree-passed-on-a-compromise-cannot-be-challenged-in-a-separate-suit\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2014\/11\/26\/validity-of-a-decree-passed-on-a-compromise-cannot-be-challenged-in-a-separate-suit\/\",\"name\":\"Validity of a decree passed on a compromise cannot be challenged in a separate suit | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2014\/11\/26\/validity-of-a-decree-passed-on-a-compromise-cannot-be-challenged-in-a-separate-suit\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2014\/11\/26\/validity-of-a-decree-passed-on-a-compromise-cannot-be-challenged-in-a-separate-suit\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2014-11-26T15:11:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-10-14T09:57:09+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2014\/11\/26\/validity-of-a-decree-passed-on-a-compromise-cannot-be-challenged-in-a-separate-suit\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2014\/11\/26\/validity-of-a-decree-passed-on-a-compromise-cannot-be-challenged-in-a-separate-suit\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2014\/11\/26\/validity-of-a-decree-passed-on-a-compromise-cannot-be-challenged-in-a-separate-suit\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg\",\"width\":1330,\"height\":887},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2014\/11\/26\/validity-of-a-decree-passed-on-a-compromise-cannot-be-challenged-in-a-separate-suit\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Validity of a decree passed on a compromise cannot be challenged in a separate suit\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa\",\"name\":\"Sucheta\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Sucheta\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/legal_editor\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Validity of a decree passed on a compromise cannot be challenged in a separate suit | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2014\/11\/26\/validity-of-a-decree-passed-on-a-compromise-cannot-be-challenged-in-a-separate-suit\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Validity of a decree passed on a compromise cannot be challenged in a separate suit","og_description":"Supreme Court: In a matter before the Court as to whether the validity of a decree passed on a compromise can be","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2014\/11\/26\/validity-of-a-decree-passed-on-a-compromise-cannot-be-challenged-in-a-separate-suit\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2014-11-26T15:11:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2015-10-14T09:57:09+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Sucheta","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Sucheta","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2014\/11\/26\/validity-of-a-decree-passed-on-a-compromise-cannot-be-challenged-in-a-separate-suit\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2014\/11\/26\/validity-of-a-decree-passed-on-a-compromise-cannot-be-challenged-in-a-separate-suit\/","name":"Validity of a decree passed on a compromise cannot be challenged in a separate suit | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2014\/11\/26\/validity-of-a-decree-passed-on-a-compromise-cannot-be-challenged-in-a-separate-suit\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2014\/11\/26\/validity-of-a-decree-passed-on-a-compromise-cannot-be-challenged-in-a-separate-suit\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg","datePublished":"2014-11-26T15:11:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-10-14T09:57:09+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2014\/11\/26\/validity-of-a-decree-passed-on-a-compromise-cannot-be-challenged-in-a-separate-suit\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2014\/11\/26\/validity-of-a-decree-passed-on-a-compromise-cannot-be-challenged-in-a-separate-suit\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2014\/11\/26\/validity-of-a-decree-passed-on-a-compromise-cannot-be-challenged-in-a-separate-suit\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg","width":1330,"height":887},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2014\/11\/26\/validity-of-a-decree-passed-on-a-compromise-cannot-be-challenged-in-a-separate-suit\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Validity of a decree passed on a compromise cannot be challenged in a separate suit"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa","name":"Sucheta","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Sucheta"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/legal_editor\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":262733,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/02\/28\/is-independent-suit-questioning-a-compromise-decree-maintainable-or-one-has-to-approach-the-same-court-which-recorded-the-compromise-to-challenge-it-sc-answers\/","url_meta":{"origin":6308,"position":0},"title":"Is independent suit questioning a compromise decree maintainable or one has to approach the same Court which recorded the compromise to challenge it? SC answers","author":"Editor","date":"February 28, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cIf clever drafting of the plaint has created the illusion of a cause of action, the court will nip it in the bud at the earliest so that bogus litigation will end at the earlier stage.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Is-independent-suit-questioning-a-compromise-decree-maintainable-or-one-has-to-approach-the-same-Court-which-recorded-the-compromise-to-challenge-it-1.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Is-independent-suit-questioning-a-compromise-decree-maintainable-or-one-has-to-approach-the-same-Court-which-recorded-the-compromise-to-challenge-it-1.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Is-independent-suit-questioning-a-compromise-decree-maintainable-or-one-has-to-approach-the-same-Court-which-recorded-the-compromise-to-challenge-it-1.png?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Is-independent-suit-questioning-a-compromise-decree-maintainable-or-one-has-to-approach-the-same-Court-which-recorded-the-compromise-to-challenge-it-1.png?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Is-independent-suit-questioning-a-compromise-decree-maintainable-or-one-has-to-approach-the-same-Court-which-recorded-the-compromise-to-challenge-it-1.png?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":229181,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/05\/07\/bar-under-order-23-rule-3a-cpc-to-challenge-compromise-decree-extends-to-strangers-as-well\/","url_meta":{"origin":6308,"position":1},"title":"Bar under Order 23 Rule 3A CPC to challenge compromise decree extends to strangers as well","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"May 7, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: The bench of AM Khanwilkar and Ajay Rastogi, JJ has held that a decree passed on a compromise cannot be challenged by the stranger to the proceedings in a separate suit. Holding that the bar under Rule 3A to Order 23 CPC would extend to strangers as well,\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":290130,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/04\/20\/sc-explains-daughters-right-on-ancestral-property-and-validity-of-family-settlement-deed-legal-research-legal-news-updates\/","url_meta":{"origin":6308,"position":2},"title":"Supreme Court&#8217;s verdict on daughter&#8217;s right to inherit ancestral property before Hindu Succession Act 2005 Amendment and validity of settlement deed, explained","author":"Ridhi","date":"April 20, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Since the daughter had not signed the alleged settlement deed, the Supreme Court clarified that \u201cIn a suit for partition of joint property, a decree by consent amongst some of the parties cannot be maintained\u201d.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"daughters right on ancestral property","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/daughters-right-on-ancestral-property.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/daughters-right-on-ancestral-property.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/daughters-right-on-ancestral-property.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/daughters-right-on-ancestral-property.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":266381,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/05\/04\/karnataka-hc-issues-directions-in-matters-relating-to-compromise-before-the-lok-adalat\/","url_meta":{"origin":6308,"position":3},"title":"Kar HC issues general directions in matters relating to compromise before the Lok Adalat which are challenged by way of writ petitions","author":"Editor","date":"May 4, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Karnataka High Court: Suraj Govindaraj, J., allowed the petition and quashed the compromise decree in the original suit filed before Principal Senior Civil Judge at Hubballi in the Lok-Adalat proceedings. The facts of the case are such that a compromise petition was filed before Principal Senior Civil Judge at Hubballi\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Karnataka High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/04\/New_Karnataka.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/04\/New_Karnataka.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/04\/New_Karnataka.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/04\/New_Karnataka.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/04\/New_Karnataka.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":261236,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/02\/05\/consent-decree-cannot-be-modified-altered-unless-the-mistake-is-a-patent-or-obvious-one-sc\/","url_meta":{"origin":6308,"position":4},"title":"Consent decree cannot be modified\/ altered unless the mistake is a patent or obvious one: SC","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"February 5, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: The bench of MR Shah* and BV Nagarathna, JJ has held that a consent decree cannot be modified\/ altered unless the mistake is a patent or obvious mistake. The Court said that if held otherwise, there is a danger of every consent decree being sought to be altered\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-71.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-71.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-71.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-71.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-71.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":337309,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/12\/16\/sc-upholds-right-to-restore-appeal-challenging-compromise-decree\/","url_meta":{"origin":6308,"position":5},"title":"\u2018As a matter of public policy, Courts must not curtail statutory remedies\u2019; SC upholds right to restore appeal challenging compromise decree","author":"Editor","date":"December 16, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cOnly the Court that entertains the petition of compromise can determine its legality, at the time of recording the compromise or when it is questioned by way of a recall application. No other remedy is available to the party who is aggrieved by the compromise decree as an appeal and\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"challenge Compromise decree","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/12\/sc-193.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/12\/sc-193.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/12\/sc-193.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/12\/sc-193.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6308","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=6308"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6308\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/7321"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=6308"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=6308"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=6308"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}