{"id":6297,"date":"2015-01-12T10:01:00","date_gmt":"2015-01-12T10:01:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/localhost\/sccblog\/?p=6297"},"modified":"2015-10-14T15:58:56","modified_gmt":"2015-10-14T10:28:56","slug":"allahabad-hc-s-order-of-compulsory-retirement-from-service-to-lic-cashier-for-embezzling-insurance-premium-of-rs-533-upheld","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/01\/12\/allahabad-hc-s-order-of-compulsory-retirement-from-service-to-lic-cashier-for-embezzling-insurance-premium-of-rs-533-upheld\/","title":{"rendered":"Allahabad HC\u2019s order of compulsory retirement from service to LIC cashier for embezzling insurance premium of Rs. 533 upheld"},"content":{"rendered":"

Supreme Court: <\/b>While deciding the fate of a cashier employed in the Life Insurance Corporation of India (LIC) who was charged with embezzlement of Rs. 533 which was a half yearly insurance premium of a policy holder, the Division Bench of Vikramjit Sen and P.C. Pant, JJ. upheld the decision of the Allahabad High Court that substituted the punishment of removal from service to compulsory retirement from service. The Bench further observed that no sympathy is to be shown in while punishing a person guilty of corruption.<\/p>\n

In the instant case the appellant embezzled the half yearly insurance premium of the policy holder by neither crediting it to the account of the policy holder nor depositing it with the LIC. He further forged the entry of the amount in the ledger sheet. Upon the revelation of the offence after a departmental enquiry, the appellant was removed from the service. The Allahabad High Court on hearing upon the challenge against the appellant\u2019s removal held that appellant seemingly committed the forgery in the ledger books to cover up his mistake and substituted the order of removal with that of compulsory retirement. The appellant preferred the present appeal challenging the decision of the High Court.<\/p>\n

The counsel for the appellant Gaurav Agarwal argued that the present case is of temporary embezzlement of a small amount therefore should be awarded with minor punishments. The Court however reiterated its stand taken in Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation<\/i> v. Bajrangi Lal<\/i>, (2014) 4 SCC 693 <\/a>and held that irrespective of the fact that whether the amount embezzled is large or small sympathy shown in giving punishment in such cases is totally uncalled for and opposed to public interest. On this observation the Court refused to interfere with the order of compulsory retirement passed by the Allahabad High Court. Diwan Singh<\/i> v. <\/font>Life Insurance Corporation of India<\/st1:place><\/st1:country-region><\/font>, <\/i>2015 SCC OnLine SC 1<\/a><\/font><\/span>, decided on 05.01.2015<\/font><\/span>  <\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Supreme Court: While deciding the fate of a cashier employed in the Life Insurance Corporation of India (LIC) who was charged with <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":7321,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[9],"tags":[2673],"class_list":["post-6297","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-supremecourt","tag-corruption"],"yoast_head":"\nAllahabad HC\u2019s order of compulsory retirement from service to LIC cashier for embezzling insurance premium of Rs. 533 upheld | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/01\/12\/allahabad-hc-s-order-of-compulsory-retirement-from-service-to-lic-cashier-for-embezzling-insurance-premium-of-rs-533-upheld\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Allahabad HC\u2019s order of compulsory retirement from service to LIC cashier for embezzling insurance premium of Rs. 533 upheld\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Supreme Court: While deciding the fate of a cashier employed in the Life Insurance Corporation of India (LIC) who was charged with\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/01\/12\/allahabad-hc-s-order-of-compulsory-retirement-from-service-to-lic-cashier-for-embezzling-insurance-premium-of-rs-533-upheld\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2015-01-12T10:01:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2015-10-14T10:28:56+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Sucheta\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Sucheta\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/01\/12\/allahabad-hc-s-order-of-compulsory-retirement-from-service-to-lic-cashier-for-embezzling-insurance-premium-of-rs-533-upheld\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/01\/12\/allahabad-hc-s-order-of-compulsory-retirement-from-service-to-lic-cashier-for-embezzling-insurance-premium-of-rs-533-upheld\/\",\"name\":\"Allahabad HC\u2019s order of compulsory retirement from service to LIC cashier for embezzling insurance premium of Rs. 533 upheld | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/01\/12\/allahabad-hc-s-order-of-compulsory-retirement-from-service-to-lic-cashier-for-embezzling-insurance-premium-of-rs-533-upheld\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/01\/12\/allahabad-hc-s-order-of-compulsory-retirement-from-service-to-lic-cashier-for-embezzling-insurance-premium-of-rs-533-upheld\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2015-01-12T10:01:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-10-14T10:28:56+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/01\/12\/allahabad-hc-s-order-of-compulsory-retirement-from-service-to-lic-cashier-for-embezzling-insurance-premium-of-rs-533-upheld\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/01\/12\/allahabad-hc-s-order-of-compulsory-retirement-from-service-to-lic-cashier-for-embezzling-insurance-premium-of-rs-533-upheld\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/01\/12\/allahabad-hc-s-order-of-compulsory-retirement-from-service-to-lic-cashier-for-embezzling-insurance-premium-of-rs-533-upheld\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg\",\"width\":1330,\"height\":887},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/01\/12\/allahabad-hc-s-order-of-compulsory-retirement-from-service-to-lic-cashier-for-embezzling-insurance-premium-of-rs-533-upheld\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Allahabad HC\u2019s order of compulsory retirement from service to LIC cashier for embezzling insurance premium of Rs. 533 upheld\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa\",\"name\":\"Sucheta\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Sucheta\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/legal_editor\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Allahabad HC\u2019s order of compulsory retirement from service to LIC cashier for embezzling insurance premium of Rs. 533 upheld | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/01\/12\/allahabad-hc-s-order-of-compulsory-retirement-from-service-to-lic-cashier-for-embezzling-insurance-premium-of-rs-533-upheld\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Allahabad HC\u2019s order of compulsory retirement from service to LIC cashier for embezzling insurance premium of Rs. 533 upheld","og_description":"Supreme Court: While deciding the fate of a cashier employed in the Life Insurance Corporation of India (LIC) who was charged with","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/01\/12\/allahabad-hc-s-order-of-compulsory-retirement-from-service-to-lic-cashier-for-embezzling-insurance-premium-of-rs-533-upheld\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2015-01-12T10:01:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2015-10-14T10:28:56+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Sucheta","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Sucheta","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/01\/12\/allahabad-hc-s-order-of-compulsory-retirement-from-service-to-lic-cashier-for-embezzling-insurance-premium-of-rs-533-upheld\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/01\/12\/allahabad-hc-s-order-of-compulsory-retirement-from-service-to-lic-cashier-for-embezzling-insurance-premium-of-rs-533-upheld\/","name":"Allahabad HC\u2019s order of compulsory retirement from service to LIC cashier for embezzling insurance premium of Rs. 533 upheld | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/01\/12\/allahabad-hc-s-order-of-compulsory-retirement-from-service-to-lic-cashier-for-embezzling-insurance-premium-of-rs-533-upheld\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/01\/12\/allahabad-hc-s-order-of-compulsory-retirement-from-service-to-lic-cashier-for-embezzling-insurance-premium-of-rs-533-upheld\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg","datePublished":"2015-01-12T10:01:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-10-14T10:28:56+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/01\/12\/allahabad-hc-s-order-of-compulsory-retirement-from-service-to-lic-cashier-for-embezzling-insurance-premium-of-rs-533-upheld\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/01\/12\/allahabad-hc-s-order-of-compulsory-retirement-from-service-to-lic-cashier-for-embezzling-insurance-premium-of-rs-533-upheld\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/01\/12\/allahabad-hc-s-order-of-compulsory-retirement-from-service-to-lic-cashier-for-embezzling-insurance-premium-of-rs-533-upheld\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg","width":1330,"height":887},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/01\/12\/allahabad-hc-s-order-of-compulsory-retirement-from-service-to-lic-cashier-for-embezzling-insurance-premium-of-rs-533-upheld\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Allahabad HC\u2019s order of compulsory retirement from service to LIC cashier for embezzling insurance premium of Rs. 533 upheld"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa","name":"Sucheta","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Sucheta"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/legal_editor\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":360316,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/16\/scba-lic-group-term-insurance-10-lakh-cover-for-advocates\/","url_meta":{"origin":6297,"position":0},"title":"Supreme Court Bar Association proposes LIC Group Term Insurance of Rs. 10 lakhs for eligible members- No Premium Required","author":"Kriti","date":"September 16, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"All eligible members of Supreme Court Bar Association should submit declarations or opt out forms by 25-9-2025.","rel":"","context":"In "Legislation Updates"","block_context":{"text":"Legislation Updates","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/legislationupdates\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Supreme Court Bar Association LIC Insurance","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/Supreme-Court-Bar-Association-LIC-Insurance.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/Supreme-Court-Bar-Association-LIC-Insurance.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/Supreme-Court-Bar-Association-LIC-Insurance.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/Supreme-Court-Bar-Association-LIC-Insurance.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":288822,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/04\/08\/insurance-companies-have-right-to-repudiate-claim-on-non-disclosure-of-existence-of-previous-policies-during-taking-any-fresh-policy-allahabad-high-court-legal-research-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":6297,"position":1},"title":"Insurance Companies have right to repudiate claim on non-disclosure of existence of previous policies during taking any fresh policy: Allahabad High Court","author":"Apoorva","date":"April 8, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Allahabad High Court rejected the contention of the petitioner that since forms are filled up by the agents\/officers of LIC, anything omitted would not constitute ground for repudiation\/rejection of the claim.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Allahabad High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-476.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-476.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-476.png?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-476.png?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":280781,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/12\/31\/jammu-and-kashmir-ladakh-high-court-fir-not-sine-qua-non-processing-case-life-insurance-policy-sufficient-evidence-demonstrating-accidental-death-legal-updates\/","url_meta":{"origin":6297,"position":2},"title":"J&K and Ladakh High Court | FIR is not a sine qua non for processing a case under a life insurance policy if there are sufficient evidence demonstrating accidental death","author":"Editor","date":"December 31, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"J&K and Ladakh High Court upheld the decision of the J&K State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, allowing the respondents to claim the payment of double the sum assured, as per their deceased father's life insurance policy, which had a \u201cDouble Accident Benefit Cover\u201d clause","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/MicrosoftTeams-image-443.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":293733,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/06\/03\/lic-not-liable-for-false-information-on-insurance-application-filled-by-agent-kerala-high-court-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":6297,"position":3},"title":"LIC not liable for false information on insurance application filled by agent: Kerala High Court","author":"Ridhi","date":"June 3, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Kerala High Court concluded that false information or suppressed material facts while availing an insurance policy is decisive of the validity of such policy.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"kerala high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/kerala-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/kerala-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/kerala-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/kerala-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":319457,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/04\/05\/section-125-crpc-lic-premium-loan-not-deductions-maintainance\/","url_meta":{"origin":6297,"position":4},"title":"[Section 125 CrPC] LIC premium, loan instalments no reason to avoid maintenance; Allahabad HC upholds order granting maintenance to wife and children","author":"Editor","date":"April 5, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThe Court shall take only the present income of the husband and wife into consideration for determining maintenance payable to the wife and children.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Allahabad High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Allahabad-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Allahabad-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Allahabad-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Allahabad-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":266064,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/04\/28\/lic-temporary-employee-absorption-supreme-court-judgments-committee-service-law-legal-research-updates-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":6297,"position":5},"title":"‘Can’t allow mass absorption of over 11,000 workers based on a flawed Report’. SC forms new Committee to put an end to the long drawn LIC versus temporary employees battle","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"April 28, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme court: In a long ongoing battle between Life Insurance Corporation of India (LIC) and its temporary\/badli\/part-time employees over claim for absorption, the 3-judge bench of Dr. DY Chandrachud*, Surya Kant and Vikram Nath, JJ has appointed a two member committee to carry out fresh verification of the claims of\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/04\/MicrosoftTeams-image-147-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/04\/MicrosoftTeams-image-147-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/04\/MicrosoftTeams-image-147-1.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/04\/MicrosoftTeams-image-147-1.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/04\/MicrosoftTeams-image-147-1.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6297","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=6297"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6297\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/7321"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=6297"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=6297"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=6297"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}