{"id":62761,"date":"2016-08-23T09:09:57","date_gmt":"2016-08-23T03:39:57","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=62761"},"modified":"2016-09-06T12:28:08","modified_gmt":"2016-09-06T06:58:08","slug":"tribunal-whose-order-is-challenged-under-articles-226-and-227-is-not-a-necessary-party-in-a-special-civil-application","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/08\/23\/tribunal-whose-order-is-challenged-under-articles-226-and-227-is-not-a-necessary-party-in-a-special-civil-application\/","title":{"rendered":"Tribunal whose order is challenged under Articles 226 and 227 is not a necessary party in a Special Civil Application"},"content":{"rendered":"

Supreme Court<\/strong>: Deciding the question that whether a tribunal or court whose order is challenged in proceedings under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution is a necessary party to the proceedings, the Bench of A.M. Khanwilkar and Dr. D. Y. Chandrachud, JJ held that the tribunal is not a necessary party to the proceedings in a Special Civil Application.<\/p>\n

Earlier, in the matter where the dispute was between the management of an Educational society and a member of its teaching or non-teaching staff, the High Court of Gujarat had dismissed the petition filed by the appellant by relying upon the decision of the division bench of the Gujarat High Court in Gujarat State Road Transport Corporation v. Firoze M. Mogal, <\/em>[2014 GLH 1],<\/em> where it was held that a Special Civil Application under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution is not maintainable where the court or tribunal whose order is sought to be quashed is not impleaded as a party to the proceedings.<\/p>\n

In the present case, the appellant instituted a proceeding before the tribunal to challenge an order of dismissal passed against him in disciplinary proceedings. Before the tribunal, the legality of the order of dismissal was in question. The lawfulness of the punishment imposed upon the Appellant was a matter for the employer to defend against a challenge of illegality in the Special Civil Application. Considering the facts of the case, the Court held that the tribunal was not required to defend its order in the writ proceedings before the learned Single Judge.<\/p>\n

Holding the order of the High Court to be erroneous, the Court said that it is for the person aggrieved to pursue his or her remedies before the tribunal. Even if the High Court was to require the production of the record before the tribunal, there was no necessity of impleading the tribunal as a party to the proceedings. An order of the tribunal is capable of being tested in exercise of the power of judicial review under Articles 226 and 227. When the remedy is invoked, the tribunal is not required to step into arena of conflict for defending its order. [M. S. Kazi v. Muslim Education Society, 2016 SCC OnLine SC 841<\/a>, decided on 22.08.2016]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Supreme Court: Deciding the question that whether a tribunal or court whose order is challenged in proceedings under Articles 226 and 227 <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":154914,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,9],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-62761","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-supremecourt"],"yoast_head":"\nTribunal whose order is challenged under Articles 226 and 227 is not a necessary party in a Special Civil Application | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/08\/23\/tribunal-whose-order-is-challenged-under-articles-226-and-227-is-not-a-necessary-party-in-a-special-civil-application\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Tribunal whose order is challenged under Articles 226 and 227 is not a necessary party in a Special Civil Application\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Supreme Court: Deciding the question that whether a tribunal or court whose order is challenged in proceedings under Articles 226 and 227\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/08\/23\/tribunal-whose-order-is-challenged-under-articles-226-and-227-is-not-a-necessary-party-in-a-special-civil-application\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2016-08-23T03:39:57+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-09-06T06:58:08+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Sucheta\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Sucheta\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/08\/23\/tribunal-whose-order-is-challenged-under-articles-226-and-227-is-not-a-necessary-party-in-a-special-civil-application\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/08\/23\/tribunal-whose-order-is-challenged-under-articles-226-and-227-is-not-a-necessary-party-in-a-special-civil-application\/\",\"name\":\"Tribunal whose order is challenged under Articles 226 and 227 is not a necessary party in a Special Civil Application | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/08\/23\/tribunal-whose-order-is-challenged-under-articles-226-and-227-is-not-a-necessary-party-in-a-special-civil-application\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/08\/23\/tribunal-whose-order-is-challenged-under-articles-226-and-227-is-not-a-necessary-party-in-a-special-civil-application\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2016-08-23T03:39:57+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-09-06T06:58:08+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/08\/23\/tribunal-whose-order-is-challenged-under-articles-226-and-227-is-not-a-necessary-party-in-a-special-civil-application\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/08\/23\/tribunal-whose-order-is-challenged-under-articles-226-and-227-is-not-a-necessary-party-in-a-special-civil-application\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/08\/23\/tribunal-whose-order-is-challenged-under-articles-226-and-227-is-not-a-necessary-party-in-a-special-civil-application\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg\",\"width\":1330,\"height\":887},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/08\/23\/tribunal-whose-order-is-challenged-under-articles-226-and-227-is-not-a-necessary-party-in-a-special-civil-application\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Tribunal whose order is challenged under Articles 226 and 227 is not a necessary party in a Special Civil Application\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa\",\"name\":\"Sucheta\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Sucheta\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/legal_editor\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Tribunal whose order is challenged under Articles 226 and 227 is not a necessary party in a Special Civil Application | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/08\/23\/tribunal-whose-order-is-challenged-under-articles-226-and-227-is-not-a-necessary-party-in-a-special-civil-application\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Tribunal whose order is challenged under Articles 226 and 227 is not a necessary party in a Special Civil Application","og_description":"Supreme Court: Deciding the question that whether a tribunal or court whose order is challenged in proceedings under Articles 226 and 227","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/08\/23\/tribunal-whose-order-is-challenged-under-articles-226-and-227-is-not-a-necessary-party-in-a-special-civil-application\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2016-08-23T03:39:57+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-09-06T06:58:08+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Sucheta","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Sucheta","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/08\/23\/tribunal-whose-order-is-challenged-under-articles-226-and-227-is-not-a-necessary-party-in-a-special-civil-application\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/08\/23\/tribunal-whose-order-is-challenged-under-articles-226-and-227-is-not-a-necessary-party-in-a-special-civil-application\/","name":"Tribunal whose order is challenged under Articles 226 and 227 is not a necessary party in a Special Civil Application | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/08\/23\/tribunal-whose-order-is-challenged-under-articles-226-and-227-is-not-a-necessary-party-in-a-special-civil-application\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/08\/23\/tribunal-whose-order-is-challenged-under-articles-226-and-227-is-not-a-necessary-party-in-a-special-civil-application\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg","datePublished":"2016-08-23T03:39:57+00:00","dateModified":"2016-09-06T06:58:08+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/08\/23\/tribunal-whose-order-is-challenged-under-articles-226-and-227-is-not-a-necessary-party-in-a-special-civil-application\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/08\/23\/tribunal-whose-order-is-challenged-under-articles-226-and-227-is-not-a-necessary-party-in-a-special-civil-application\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/08\/23\/tribunal-whose-order-is-challenged-under-articles-226-and-227-is-not-a-necessary-party-in-a-special-civil-application\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg","width":1330,"height":887},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/08\/23\/tribunal-whose-order-is-challenged-under-articles-226-and-227-is-not-a-necessary-party-in-a-special-civil-application\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Tribunal whose order is challenged under Articles 226 and 227 is not a necessary party in a Special Civil Application"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa","name":"Sucheta","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Sucheta"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/legal_editor\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":318586,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/28\/orders-passed-by-tribunals-under-senior-citizens-act-2007-also-amenable-to-challenge-under-article-227-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":62761,"position":0},"title":"Orders passed by tribunals under Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007 also amenable to challenge under Article 227: Delhi High Court","author":"Simranjeet","date":"March 28, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"The orders passed by the tribunals and the judicial acts by administrative bodies or authorities or persons exercising quasi-judicial functions are all amenable to challenge under Article 226 of the Constitution.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":179164,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/12\/29\/award-passed-lok-adalat-can-challenged-limited-grounds-initiating-proceedings-art-226-227-constitution\/","url_meta":{"origin":62761,"position":1},"title":"Award passed by Lok Adalat can only be challenged on limited grounds by initiating proceedings under Art 226 or 227 of Constitution","author":"Saba","date":"December 29, 2017","format":false,"excerpt":"High Court of Judicature at Madras: The Bench of\u00a0V. M. Velumani, J. recently addressed a civil revision petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution which challenged the decree order of the Small Causes Court, dated 28\/10\/2010. The petitioner, also the claimant, had filed a case in the Motor Accident\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":331634,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/09\/24\/writ-jurisdiction-arbitral-autonomy-striking-right-balance-india-arbitration-landscape\/","url_meta":{"origin":62761,"position":2},"title":"Writ Jurisdiction and Arbitral Autonomy: Striking the Right Balance in India’s Arbitration Landscape","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"September 24, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"by Vasanth Rajasekaran* and Harshvardhan Korada**","rel":"","context":"In "Experts Corner"","block_context":{"text":"Experts Corner","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/experts_corner\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Arbitral Autonomy","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/Arbitral-Autonomy.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/Arbitral-Autonomy.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/Arbitral-Autonomy.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/Arbitral-Autonomy.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":357787,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/08\/25\/contours-writ-jurisdiction-in-arbitration-landscape\/","url_meta":{"origin":62761,"position":3},"title":"Balancing Fairness and Efficiency: Contours of Writ Jurisdiction in the Arbitration Landscape","author":"Editor","date":"August 25, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"by Arush Khanna* and Akarsh Pandey**","rel":"","context":"In "Experts Corner"","block_context":{"text":"Experts Corner","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/experts_corner\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Writ Jurisdiction in Arbitration","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/Writ-Jurisdiction-in-Arbitration.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/Writ-Jurisdiction-in-Arbitration.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/Writ-Jurisdiction-in-Arbitration.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/Writ-Jurisdiction-in-Arbitration.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":228449,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/04\/18\/the-arbitration-and-conciliation-act-1996-should-the-high-courts-exercise-the-powers-of-superintendence-over-arbitral-tribunals\/","url_meta":{"origin":62761,"position":4},"title":"The Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996: Should the High Courts exercise the powers of superintendence over arbitral tribunals?","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"April 18, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"by Abhinav Shrivastava* and Nirmal Prasad**","rel":"","context":"In "Op Eds"","block_context":{"text":"Op Eds","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/op-ed\/legal-analysis\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/11\/Arbitration.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/11\/Arbitration.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/11\/Arbitration.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/11\/Arbitration.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/11\/Arbitration.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":280459,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/12\/27\/arbitration-dossier-2021-22a-snapshot-of-major-developments-in-lex-arbitri\/","url_meta":{"origin":62761,"position":5},"title":"Arbitration Dossier (2021-22)| A Snapshot of Major Developments in Lex Arbitri","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"December 27, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"by Chakrapani Misra, Sameer Bindra and Varshini Sunder Cite as: 2022 SCC OnLine Blog Exp 88","rel":"","context":"In "Experts Corner"","block_context":{"text":"Experts Corner","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/experts_corner\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Arbitration Dossier","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/MicrosoftTeams-image122.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/62761","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=62761"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/62761\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/154914"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=62761"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=62761"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=62761"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}