{"id":6274,"date":"2014-12-23T11:12:00","date_gmt":"2014-12-23T11:12:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/localhost\/sccblog\/?p=6274"},"modified":"2015-10-14T15:21:38","modified_gmt":"2015-10-14T09:51:38","slug":"repeal-of-the-principal-act-shall-not-affect-the-possessions-which-have-been-taken-over-by-the-state-government","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2014\/12\/23\/repeal-of-the-principal-act-shall-not-affect-the-possessions-which-have-been-taken-over-by-the-state-government\/","title":{"rendered":"Repeal of the Principal Act shall not affect the possessions which have been taken over by the State Government"},"content":{"rendered":"<p ><b>SUPREME COURT: <\/b>In one of the prominent decisions, the Court while dealing with a Special Leave Petition regarding the possession of the land in question by the Government of Assam under the &nbsp;<span>Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976<\/span> decided in favour of State and ruled that despite the repeal of &nbsp;the Principal Act of 1976 by the <span>Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Repeal Act, 1999,&nbsp;<\/span>the possession that has been taken over by the State Government under the Principal Act will not be affected<\/p>\n<p ><span>The main issue raised by the appellant was that the possession of the declared entire surplus land was taken over by the Revenue Authority. Government of Assam on 27.11.2003 allotted a certain extent of land to Guwahati Metropolitan Development Authority (GMDA) for construction of an office building for itself and&nbsp; in the meanwhile the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Repeal Act, 1999 was notified which came into force in the State of Assam w.e.f. 06.08.2003. The respondents filed a petition before the Single Judge Bench of the Assam High Court challenging the possession of the allotted land which was handed over to GMDA. The Single Judge bench however dismissed the petition but subsequently it was allowed by the Division Bench of the same court and the possession of the disputed land to the given to the respondents.<\/span><\/p>\n<p >Affirming the judgment given by the Single Judge Bench, the Court set aside the judgment of the division Bench of the High Court stating that, according Section 3(b) of&nbsp; the Repeal Act of 1999 which states that<span> the repeal of the principal Act shall not affect the vesting of any vacant land under Section 10(3) the possession of which has been taken over by the State Government. Mr.P.K. Goswamy, appearing for the respondents argued that actual physical possession must be proved to have been taken over by the State Government and that it did not notify before taking over the possession. On this the court said that there was no prominent document to prove the actual possession and notifying before taking the possession was mere a academic exercise in this case.<\/span><span>&nbsp;<\/span><font size=\"1\"><i>State of Assam<\/i><b> <\/b><span>v<\/span><b><i>. <\/i><\/b><i>Bhaskar Jyoti Sarma<\/i><\/font><b><font size=\"1\">,<\/font>&nbsp;<\/b><span><a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/LoginForNewsLink\/2014_SCC_OnLine_SC_946 \">2014 SCC OnLine SC 946<\/a><\/span><span>, <font size=\"1\">Decided on 27\/11\/2014<\/font><\/span><\/p>\n<p ><o:p><\/o:p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>SUPREME COURT: In one of the prominent decisions, the Court while dealing with a Special Leave Petition regarding the possession of the <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":7321,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[9],"tags":[2634],"class_list":["post-6274","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-supremecourt","tag-possession"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Repeal of the Principal Act shall not affect the possessions which have been taken over by the State Government | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2014\/12\/23\/repeal-of-the-principal-act-shall-not-affect-the-possessions-which-have-been-taken-over-by-the-state-government\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Repeal of the Principal Act shall not affect the possessions which have been taken over by the State Government\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"SUPREME COURT: In one of the prominent decisions, the Court while dealing with a Special Leave Petition regarding the possession of the\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2014\/12\/23\/repeal-of-the-principal-act-shall-not-affect-the-possessions-which-have-been-taken-over-by-the-state-government\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2014-12-23T11:12:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2015-10-14T09:51:38+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Sucheta\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Sucheta\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2014\/12\/23\/repeal-of-the-principal-act-shall-not-affect-the-possessions-which-have-been-taken-over-by-the-state-government\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2014\/12\/23\/repeal-of-the-principal-act-shall-not-affect-the-possessions-which-have-been-taken-over-by-the-state-government\/\",\"name\":\"Repeal of the Principal Act shall not affect the possessions which have been taken over by the State Government | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2014\/12\/23\/repeal-of-the-principal-act-shall-not-affect-the-possessions-which-have-been-taken-over-by-the-state-government\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2014\/12\/23\/repeal-of-the-principal-act-shall-not-affect-the-possessions-which-have-been-taken-over-by-the-state-government\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2014-12-23T11:12:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-10-14T09:51:38+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2014\/12\/23\/repeal-of-the-principal-act-shall-not-affect-the-possessions-which-have-been-taken-over-by-the-state-government\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2014\/12\/23\/repeal-of-the-principal-act-shall-not-affect-the-possessions-which-have-been-taken-over-by-the-state-government\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2014\/12\/23\/repeal-of-the-principal-act-shall-not-affect-the-possessions-which-have-been-taken-over-by-the-state-government\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg\",\"width\":1330,\"height\":887},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2014\/12\/23\/repeal-of-the-principal-act-shall-not-affect-the-possessions-which-have-been-taken-over-by-the-state-government\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Repeal of the Principal Act shall not affect the possessions which have been taken over by the State Government\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa\",\"name\":\"Sucheta\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Sucheta\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/legal_editor\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Repeal of the Principal Act shall not affect the possessions which have been taken over by the State Government | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2014\/12\/23\/repeal-of-the-principal-act-shall-not-affect-the-possessions-which-have-been-taken-over-by-the-state-government\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Repeal of the Principal Act shall not affect the possessions which have been taken over by the State Government","og_description":"SUPREME COURT: In one of the prominent decisions, the Court while dealing with a Special Leave Petition regarding the possession of the","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2014\/12\/23\/repeal-of-the-principal-act-shall-not-affect-the-possessions-which-have-been-taken-over-by-the-state-government\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2014-12-23T11:12:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2015-10-14T09:51:38+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Sucheta","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Sucheta","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2014\/12\/23\/repeal-of-the-principal-act-shall-not-affect-the-possessions-which-have-been-taken-over-by-the-state-government\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2014\/12\/23\/repeal-of-the-principal-act-shall-not-affect-the-possessions-which-have-been-taken-over-by-the-state-government\/","name":"Repeal of the Principal Act shall not affect the possessions which have been taken over by the State Government | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2014\/12\/23\/repeal-of-the-principal-act-shall-not-affect-the-possessions-which-have-been-taken-over-by-the-state-government\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2014\/12\/23\/repeal-of-the-principal-act-shall-not-affect-the-possessions-which-have-been-taken-over-by-the-state-government\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg","datePublished":"2014-12-23T11:12:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-10-14T09:51:38+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2014\/12\/23\/repeal-of-the-principal-act-shall-not-affect-the-possessions-which-have-been-taken-over-by-the-state-government\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2014\/12\/23\/repeal-of-the-principal-act-shall-not-affect-the-possessions-which-have-been-taken-over-by-the-state-government\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2014\/12\/23\/repeal-of-the-principal-act-shall-not-affect-the-possessions-which-have-been-taken-over-by-the-state-government\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg","width":1330,"height":887},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2014\/12\/23\/repeal-of-the-principal-act-shall-not-affect-the-possessions-which-have-been-taken-over-by-the-state-government\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Repeal of the Principal Act shall not affect the possessions which have been taken over by the State Government"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa","name":"Sucheta","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Sucheta"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/legal_editor\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":305606,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/25\/vacant-land-meaning-authoritative-determination-supreme-court-refers-larger-bench\/","url_meta":{"origin":6274,"position":0},"title":"Supreme Court refers authoritative determination of meaning of &#8216;vacant land&#8217; to Larger Bench","author":"Ridhi","date":"October 25, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court opined that the interpretation, spirit and object of the Ceiling Act as envisaged during enactment and juxtaposed against the regressive impact experienced in different States as indicated in Statement of Objects and Reasons of the Repeal Act required authoritative determination of related issues by a Larger Bench.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Vacant land meaning-1","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/Vacant-land-meaning-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/Vacant-land-meaning-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/Vacant-land-meaning-1.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/Vacant-land-meaning-1.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":244193,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/02\/21\/will-a-partition-deed-effected-subsequent-to-commencement-of-the-urban-land-ceiling-and-regulation-act-prevent-vesting-of-land-with-the-state-sc-decides\/","url_meta":{"origin":6274,"position":1},"title":"Will a partition deed effected subsequent to commencement of the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act prevent vesting of land with the State? SC decides","author":"Editor","date":"February 21, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: The bench of Mohan M. Shantanagoudar* and Vineet Saran, JJ., addressed the instant appeal against the order of High Court of Karnataka whereby the Court had refused to engage with the matter and had ordered that the appellant may seek a remedy in accordance with law. The Bench\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-3-3.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-3-3.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-3-3.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-3-3.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-3-3.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":300596,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/02\/telangana-high-court-discusses-power-to-decide-suit-title-under-article-226-proceedings\/","url_meta":{"origin":6274,"position":2},"title":"Telangana High Court discusses High Court&#8217;s power in deciding suit title under Article 226 proceedings; restricts State from dispossessing parties","author":"Ridhi","date":"September 2, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The Division Bench said that the Single Judge ought to have appreciated the appellants' possession and the question of title could not have been examined.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"telangana high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/telangana-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/telangana-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/telangana-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/telangana-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":343047,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/06\/bomhc-rejects-plea-to-revive-maharashtra-casinos-control-and-tax-act-1976\/","url_meta":{"origin":6274,"position":3},"title":"\u2018Cannot direct legislature to unbury or re-legislate&#8217;; Bombay HC rejects plea to revive Maharashtra Casinos (Control and Tax) Act, 1976","author":"Simranjeet","date":"March 6, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"The Maharashtra Casinos (Control and Tax) Act, 1976 Act is \u201cstill born\u201d and thus, when the 1976 Act itself is a dead letter, no legal rights can accrue to the petitioner to maintain the present petition.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Bombay High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":300138,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/26\/allahabad-hc-orders-status-quo-land-development-authority-establishing-new-kanpur-city\/","url_meta":{"origin":6274,"position":4},"title":"Read why Allahabad HC ordered status quo on land held by Development Authority for establishing New Kanpur city","author":"Apoorva","date":"August 26, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Allahabad High Court said that Development Authority is only in possession of part of the land and the scheme for proposed 'New Kanpur City' as of now is not viable.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"allahabad high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/allahabad-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/allahabad-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/allahabad-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/allahabad-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":302814,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/03\/irrevocable-vesting-of-land-in-state-regardless-of-non-utilization-for-intended-purpose-calcutta-hc-scc-blog\/","url_meta":{"origin":6274,"position":5},"title":"Subsequent purchase of land acquired by State does not give purchaser right to challenge acquisition: Calcutta High Court","author":"Ritu","date":"October 3, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Calcutta High Court held that the issuance of a subsequent notification and the notice by the National Highway Authority did not affect the validity of the earlier acquisition.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"calcutta high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6274","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=6274"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6274\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/7321"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=6274"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=6274"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=6274"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}