{"id":6250,"date":"2014-07-30T18:07:00","date_gmt":"2014-07-30T18:07:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/localhost\/sccblog\/?p=6250"},"modified":"2014-07-30T18:06:30","modified_gmt":"2014-07-30T12:36:30","slug":"centre-s-2013-office-memorandum-not-in-compliance-with-supreme-court-guidelines","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2014\/07\/30\/centre-s-2013-office-memorandum-not-in-compliance-with-supreme-court-guidelines\/","title":{"rendered":"Centre&#8217;s 2013 office memorandum not in compliance with Supreme Court guidelines"},"content":{"rendered":"<p   ><b><span  >Delhi High Court<\/span><\/b><span  >: Where an NGO working for the protection of the rights of blind people, had prayed for modification of the Centre&#8217;s 2013 office memorandum (OM) to provide for computing the posts reserved for disabled persons in Group&#8217;s A, B, C and D of government departments, the Court has asked the Centre to modify the said OM as per the directions of the Supreme Court in judgment dt.08-10-2013. Counsel for the appellant S. K. Rungta contended that OM dt. 03-12-2013 had completely ignored the manner of computation and maintenance of vacancy based roster and the same not being in compliance with the directions of the Supreme Court, a fresh OM should be issued. Moreover, the Committee constituted as per order dt.19.12.2008 has to be revived for directing the establishments and Public Sector Undertakings to provide information with regard to the backlog vacancies upto 2013 and fill them by conducting special recruitment process.<\/span><span  ><o:p><\/o:p><\/span><\/p>\n<p   ><font color=\"#000000\" face=\"Times New Roman, serif\" size=\"3\"><span>Earlier petitioner had filed a PIL, citing illegality in the 2013 OM wherein reservation was not given to blind and low vision candidates under Section 33 of the Persons with Disabilities (Equal Opportunities, Protection of Rights and Full Participation) Act, 1995 in all&nbsp;<\/span><span>recruitments<\/span><span>&nbsp;in government departments from 1996 till date. The Court via order dt.19-12-2008 W.P.(C) No.15828\/2006&nbsp;directed computation of reservation on the basis of total cadre strength and formation of a Committee to get information on vacancy backlog in various departments and to carry special recruitment drives after making reservation provisions for disabled persons and obtaining Committee&#8217;s clearance on the same. However, the Supreme Court in CA No. 9096\/2013, altered the above manner of computation, holding that reservation should be computed on the basis of total number of vacancies in the cadre strength. Noting the above guidelines in judgment dt. 08-10-2013 the Court held that though the manner of computation of reservation was altered, the direction with regard to modification of OM remained intact and the respondents are bound to implement those guidelines. However, the relief sought by the petitioner for revival of the Committee and the other directions cannot be granted.<\/span><\/font><i>National Federation of Blind v. Union of India, CM. No. 230\/2014, decided on 17-07-14<\/i><\/p>\n<p   ><span>To read the full judgment, refer to<\/span><i> <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/LoginForNewsLink.aspx?q=CM._No._230%2f2014&amp;db=0 \">SCC OnLine<\/a><\/i><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Delhi High Court: Where an NGO working for the protection of the rights of blind people, had prayed for modification of the <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":7321,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[10],"tags":[2582],"class_list":["post-6250","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-highcourts","tag-Disability"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Centre&#039;s 2013 office memorandum not in compliance with Supreme Court guidelines | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2014\/07\/30\/centre-s-2013-office-memorandum-not-in-compliance-with-supreme-court-guidelines\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Centre&#039;s 2013 office memorandum not in compliance with Supreme Court guidelines\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Delhi High Court: Where an NGO working for the protection of the rights of blind people, had prayed for modification of the\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2014\/07\/30\/centre-s-2013-office-memorandum-not-in-compliance-with-supreme-court-guidelines\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2014-07-30T18:07:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Sucheta\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Sucheta\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2014\/07\/30\/centre-s-2013-office-memorandum-not-in-compliance-with-supreme-court-guidelines\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2014\/07\/30\/centre-s-2013-office-memorandum-not-in-compliance-with-supreme-court-guidelines\/\",\"name\":\"Centre's 2013 office memorandum not in compliance with Supreme Court guidelines | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2014\/07\/30\/centre-s-2013-office-memorandum-not-in-compliance-with-supreme-court-guidelines\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2014\/07\/30\/centre-s-2013-office-memorandum-not-in-compliance-with-supreme-court-guidelines\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2014-07-30T18:07:00+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2014\/07\/30\/centre-s-2013-office-memorandum-not-in-compliance-with-supreme-court-guidelines\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2014\/07\/30\/centre-s-2013-office-memorandum-not-in-compliance-with-supreme-court-guidelines\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2014\/07\/30\/centre-s-2013-office-memorandum-not-in-compliance-with-supreme-court-guidelines\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg\",\"width\":1330,\"height\":887},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2014\/07\/30\/centre-s-2013-office-memorandum-not-in-compliance-with-supreme-court-guidelines\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Centre&#8217;s 2013 office memorandum not in compliance with Supreme Court guidelines\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa\",\"name\":\"Sucheta\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Sucheta\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/legal_editor\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Centre's 2013 office memorandum not in compliance with Supreme Court guidelines | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2014\/07\/30\/centre-s-2013-office-memorandum-not-in-compliance-with-supreme-court-guidelines\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Centre's 2013 office memorandum not in compliance with Supreme Court guidelines","og_description":"Delhi High Court: Where an NGO working for the protection of the rights of blind people, had prayed for modification of the","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2014\/07\/30\/centre-s-2013-office-memorandum-not-in-compliance-with-supreme-court-guidelines\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2014-07-30T18:07:00+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Sucheta","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Sucheta","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2014\/07\/30\/centre-s-2013-office-memorandum-not-in-compliance-with-supreme-court-guidelines\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2014\/07\/30\/centre-s-2013-office-memorandum-not-in-compliance-with-supreme-court-guidelines\/","name":"Centre's 2013 office memorandum not in compliance with Supreme Court guidelines | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2014\/07\/30\/centre-s-2013-office-memorandum-not-in-compliance-with-supreme-court-guidelines\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2014\/07\/30\/centre-s-2013-office-memorandum-not-in-compliance-with-supreme-court-guidelines\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg","datePublished":"2014-07-30T18:07:00+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2014\/07\/30\/centre-s-2013-office-memorandum-not-in-compliance-with-supreme-court-guidelines\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2014\/07\/30\/centre-s-2013-office-memorandum-not-in-compliance-with-supreme-court-guidelines\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2014\/07\/30\/centre-s-2013-office-memorandum-not-in-compliance-with-supreme-court-guidelines\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg","width":1330,"height":887},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2014\/07\/30\/centre-s-2013-office-memorandum-not-in-compliance-with-supreme-court-guidelines\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Centre&#8217;s 2013 office memorandum not in compliance with Supreme Court guidelines"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa","name":"Sucheta","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Sucheta"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/legal_editor\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":225359,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/02\/14\/2020-scc-vol-1-january-28-2020-part-4\/","url_meta":{"origin":6250,"position":0},"title":"2020 SCC Vol. 1 January 28, 2020 Part 4","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"February 14, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Employees\u2019 Compensation Act, 1923 \u2014 S. 4 r\/w Sch. IV \u2014 Compensation \u2014 Quantum \u2014 Computation of \u2014 Functional disability \u2014 Estimation of: In this case, appellant driver of heavy vehicles, aged 33 yrs at time of accident, earning Rs 4000 p.m., was permanently incapacitated consequent to injury on his\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Cases Reported&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Cases Reported","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casesreported\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/01\/SCC-weekly-7-Jan-2018.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/01\/SCC-weekly-7-Jan-2018.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/01\/SCC-weekly-7-Jan-2018.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/01\/SCC-weekly-7-Jan-2018.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/01\/SCC-weekly-7-Jan-2018.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":265102,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/04\/06\/ministry-of-external-affairs-political-ministry-of-law-judges-foreign-visit\/","url_meta":{"origin":6250,"position":1},"title":"Judges required to seek political clearance qua private visits abroad: Did Del HC strike down Ministry of External Affairs\u2019 Office Memorandum requiring the same? Read decision","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"April 6, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court: The Division Bench of Rajiv Shakdher and Jasmeet Singh, JJ., strikes down the OM dated 13-7-2021, to the extent it requires Judges of the Supreme Court and the High Court to seek political clearance qua private visits abroad. Why was the present application filed? Set aside and\/or\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/Delhi_New-logo.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/Delhi_New-logo.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/Delhi_New-logo.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/Delhi_New-logo.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/Delhi_New-logo.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":378299,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/03\/13\/sc-creamy-layer-status-of-obc-candidates-parental-salary\/","url_meta":{"origin":6250,"position":2},"title":"Creamy layer status of OBC candidates can&#8217;t be decided on parental salary alone: Supreme Court","author":"Ritu","date":"March 13, 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThe exclusion of the creamy layer among the backward classes is not a matter of mere policy preference but a constitutional imperative intended to ensure that the benefits of reservation reach those who are socially and educationally backward in the true sense of the phrase.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Creamy layer status of OBC candidates","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/Creamy-layer-status-of-OBC-candidates.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/Creamy-layer-status-of-OBC-candidates.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/Creamy-layer-status-of-OBC-candidates.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/Creamy-layer-status-of-OBC-candidates.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":228219,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/04\/13\/mha-writes-to-all-states-uts-to-ensure-compliance-of-supreme-court-directions-on-welfare-of-migrant-labourers-housed-at-relief-shelters-camps\/","url_meta":{"origin":6250,"position":3},"title":"MHA writes to States\/ UTs to ensure compliance of SC directions on Welfare of Migrant Labourers housed at Relief Shelters\/Camps","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"April 13, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"In view of the Supreme Court of India directions regarding welfare of migrant labourers housed at relief shelters\/camps in different parts of country, Union Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA) has written to all States\/UTs to take necessary action in compliance of the directions of the Court, while implementing lockdown measures\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Hot Off The Press&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Hot Off The Press","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/news\/hot_off_the_press\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/04\/migrant-workers.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/04\/migrant-workers.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/04\/migrant-workers.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/04\/migrant-workers.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/04\/migrant-workers.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":329386,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/27\/delay-in-compliance-of-ngt-orders-not-wilful-sc-sets-aside-initiation-of-penal-proceedings-against-cecb-officers\/","url_meta":{"origin":6250,"position":4},"title":"\u2018Delay in compliance of NGT orders not wilful\u2019; SC sets aside initiation of penal proceedings against CECB officers","author":"Sucheta","date":"August 27, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"The Court emphasised that every State organ, and particularly the wings of the Government associated with environment protection, such as the CECB, must be even more diligent in ensuring timely compliance with the directions of the NGT.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"CECB officers NGT penal proceedings NGT Act","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/CECB-officers-NGT-penal-proceedings-NGT-Act.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/CECB-officers-NGT-penal-proceedings-NGT-Act.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/CECB-officers-NGT-penal-proceedings-NGT-Act.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/CECB-officers-NGT-penal-proceedings-NGT-Act.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":234705,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/08\/24\/irdai-pollution-under-control-certificate-puc-at-the-time-of-renewal-of-motor-insurance-mandatory\/","url_meta":{"origin":6250,"position":5},"title":"IRDAI | Pollution Under Control Certificate (PUC) at the time of renewal of motor insurance &#8212; Mandatory","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"August 24, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Pollution Under Control Certificate at the time of renewal of motor insurance mandatory Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority of India has advised all General Insurance Companies to comply with the directions issued by the Supreme Court of India in W.P. (Civil) 13029 of 1985, M.C. Mehta v. Union of India.\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Hot Off The Press&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Hot Off The Press","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/news\/hot_off_the_press\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/04\/irdai.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/04\/irdai.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/04\/irdai.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/04\/irdai.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/04\/irdai.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6250","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=6250"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6250\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/7321"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=6250"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=6250"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=6250"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}