{"id":62451,"date":"2016-08-20T12:08:58","date_gmt":"2016-08-20T06:38:58","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=62451"},"modified":"2016-09-13T15:12:17","modified_gmt":"2016-09-13T09:42:17","slug":"spouse-asserting-right-on-basis-of-interim-orders-in-child-custody-proceedings-cannot-be-allowed-to-withdraw-and-yet-continue-to-take-benefit-of-order","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/08\/20\/spouse-asserting-right-on-basis-of-interim-orders-in-child-custody-proceedings-cannot-be-allowed-to-withdraw-and-yet-continue-to-take-benefit-of-order\/","title":{"rendered":"Spouse asserting right on basis of interim orders in child custody proceedings cannot be allowed to withdraw and yet continue to take benefit of order"},"content":{"rendered":"

Delhi High Court:<\/strong> Hearing a child custody proceeding during which an interesting question arose for consideration, the Court observed that a spouse seeking custody of children under Section 25 of the Guardians and Wards Act, and obtaining interim orders cannot be allowed to withdraw from the proceedings and yet continue to take the benefit of the interim orders. If such a scenario occurs, then the other spouse can seek to be transposed as the petitioner.
\nThe respondent mother had filed a petition to be declared the sole guardian of her son and daughter, upon which interim order granting her custody was passed by the Family Court. On the strength of the same, she removed the children from their school in Gurgaon and got them admitted to a school in Dehradun. After the issues were settled, thereafter she moved an application to withdraw the petition filed. This was opposed by the appellant on the ground that having taken advantage of the interim orders, she could not simply walk out. The Family Court allowed her to withdraw the petition. The Court found from the documents filed that on the strength of the interim orders, the respondent had written to the school authorities to ensure that the appellant was not given any accesss to the children without her permission, during the pendency of the guardianship proceedings.
\nThe Division Bench of Pradeep Nandrajog and Pratibha Rani, JJ observed that an issue concerning appointment of a guardian focuses on the welfare of the child. The warring couple are not the parties affected. They may be parties interested. The affected party is the child. Thus, where one spouse files an application to be appointed as a guardian of the child which is opposed by the other and if the interim custody of the child is with the petitioner spouse, if the petitioner spouse seeks to withdraw the petition the respondent spouse can seek transposition, for the reason having taken advantage of interim orders the petitioner spouse cannot thumb the nose at the respondent spouse.
\nAllowing the appeal, the Court directed the restoration of the guardianship petition before the Family Court and the respondent to be transposed as a respondent therein. The interim orders obtained by the respondent were declared to have lapsed and on the strength thereof the respondent cannot assert any right. Concerning visitation by the appellant to meet his children in the boarding school, the Family Court was directed to pass appropriate orders after serving the respondent and interacting with the children. [Someshwar Dayal v. Anupama Dayal,\u00a02016 SCC OnLine Del 4585<\/a>,\u00a0decided on August 17, 2016]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Delhi High Court: Hearing a child custody proceeding during which an interesting question arose for consideration, the Court observed that a spouse <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-62451","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts"],"yoast_head":"\nSpouse asserting right on basis of interim orders in child custody proceedings cannot be allowed to withdraw and yet continue to take benefit of order | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/08\/20\/spouse-asserting-right-on-basis-of-interim-orders-in-child-custody-proceedings-cannot-be-allowed-to-withdraw-and-yet-continue-to-take-benefit-of-order\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Spouse asserting right on basis of interim orders in child custody proceedings cannot be allowed to withdraw and yet continue to take benefit of order\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Delhi High Court: Hearing a child custody proceeding during which an interesting question arose for consideration, the Court observed that a spouse\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/08\/20\/spouse-asserting-right-on-basis-of-interim-orders-in-child-custody-proceedings-cannot-be-allowed-to-withdraw-and-yet-continue-to-take-benefit-of-order\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2016-08-20T06:38:58+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-09-13T09:42:17+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Delhi-HC.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1329\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"888\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Sucheta\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Sucheta\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/08\/20\/spouse-asserting-right-on-basis-of-interim-orders-in-child-custody-proceedings-cannot-be-allowed-to-withdraw-and-yet-continue-to-take-benefit-of-order\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/08\/20\/spouse-asserting-right-on-basis-of-interim-orders-in-child-custody-proceedings-cannot-be-allowed-to-withdraw-and-yet-continue-to-take-benefit-of-order\/\",\"name\":\"Spouse asserting right on basis of interim orders in child custody proceedings cannot be allowed to withdraw and yet continue to take benefit of order | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2016-08-20T06:38:58+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-09-13T09:42:17+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/08\/20\/spouse-asserting-right-on-basis-of-interim-orders-in-child-custody-proceedings-cannot-be-allowed-to-withdraw-and-yet-continue-to-take-benefit-of-order\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/08\/20\/spouse-asserting-right-on-basis-of-interim-orders-in-child-custody-proceedings-cannot-be-allowed-to-withdraw-and-yet-continue-to-take-benefit-of-order\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/08\/20\/spouse-asserting-right-on-basis-of-interim-orders-in-child-custody-proceedings-cannot-be-allowed-to-withdraw-and-yet-continue-to-take-benefit-of-order\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Spouse asserting right on basis of interim orders in child custody proceedings cannot be allowed to withdraw and yet continue to take benefit of order\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa\",\"name\":\"Sucheta\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Sucheta\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/legal_editor\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Spouse asserting right on basis of interim orders in child custody proceedings cannot be allowed to withdraw and yet continue to take benefit of order | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/08\/20\/spouse-asserting-right-on-basis-of-interim-orders-in-child-custody-proceedings-cannot-be-allowed-to-withdraw-and-yet-continue-to-take-benefit-of-order\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Spouse asserting right on basis of interim orders in child custody proceedings cannot be allowed to withdraw and yet continue to take benefit of order","og_description":"Delhi High Court: Hearing a child custody proceeding during which an interesting question arose for consideration, the Court observed that a spouse","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/08\/20\/spouse-asserting-right-on-basis-of-interim-orders-in-child-custody-proceedings-cannot-be-allowed-to-withdraw-and-yet-continue-to-take-benefit-of-order\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2016-08-20T06:38:58+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-09-13T09:42:17+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1329,"height":888,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Delhi-HC.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Sucheta","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Sucheta","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/08\/20\/spouse-asserting-right-on-basis-of-interim-orders-in-child-custody-proceedings-cannot-be-allowed-to-withdraw-and-yet-continue-to-take-benefit-of-order\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/08\/20\/spouse-asserting-right-on-basis-of-interim-orders-in-child-custody-proceedings-cannot-be-allowed-to-withdraw-and-yet-continue-to-take-benefit-of-order\/","name":"Spouse asserting right on basis of interim orders in child custody proceedings cannot be allowed to withdraw and yet continue to take benefit of order | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2016-08-20T06:38:58+00:00","dateModified":"2016-09-13T09:42:17+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/08\/20\/spouse-asserting-right-on-basis-of-interim-orders-in-child-custody-proceedings-cannot-be-allowed-to-withdraw-and-yet-continue-to-take-benefit-of-order\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/08\/20\/spouse-asserting-right-on-basis-of-interim-orders-in-child-custody-proceedings-cannot-be-allowed-to-withdraw-and-yet-continue-to-take-benefit-of-order\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/08\/20\/spouse-asserting-right-on-basis-of-interim-orders-in-child-custody-proceedings-cannot-be-allowed-to-withdraw-and-yet-continue-to-take-benefit-of-order\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Spouse asserting right on basis of interim orders in child custody proceedings cannot be allowed to withdraw and yet continue to take benefit of order"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa","name":"Sucheta","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Sucheta"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/legal_editor\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":274178,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/09\/22\/madras-high-court-minor-custody-parental-alienation-welfare-of-the-child-fundamental-right-co-parenting-marriage-love-and-affection-legal-research-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":62451,"position":0},"title":"“To turn a child against a parent is to turn a child against himself; Parental alienation is inhuman, and it is a menace to a child”, says Madras High Court","author":"Editor","date":"September 22, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"\u00a0 \u00a0 Madras High Court: In an application seeking the appointment of the applicant as a fit and proper person to be guardian of the minor children and for grant of sole and permanent custody of the minor children, Krishnan Ramasamy, J. has directed the father\/respondent to hand over interim\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Madras High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Madras-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Madras-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Madras-HC.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Madras-HC.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Madras-HC.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":226029,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/02\/21\/breakdown-of-marriage-is-not-an-end-of-parental-responsibilities-sc\/","url_meta":{"origin":62451,"position":1},"title":"Breakdown of marriage is not an end of parental responsibilities: SC","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"February 21, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: Showing dismay over a case where two minors were forced to stay in a Boarding School due to an ongoing marital dispute between their parents, the bench of AM Khanwilkar and Ajay Rastogi, JJ has said, \u201cthe rights of the child need to be respected as he\/she is\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":222490,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/25\/custody-of-children\/","url_meta":{"origin":62451,"position":2},"title":"Custody of Children","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"November 25, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"by Tejaswi Pandit \u2020 Assisted by Manovi Mittra\u2020","rel":"","context":"In "Law made Easy"","block_context":{"text":"Law made Easy","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/law-made-easy\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/child-custody.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/child-custody.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/child-custody.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/child-custody.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/child-custody.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":6530,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/03\/14\/burden-to-prove-suitability-to-be-granted-interim-custody-of-the-child-is-not-on-the-mother\/","url_meta":{"origin":62451,"position":3},"title":"Burden to prove suitability to be granted interim custody of the child is not on the mother","author":"Sucheta","date":"March 14, 2015","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: Deciding on the issue of interim custody of the minor child, the Bench comprising of Vikramajit Sen and C. Nagappan, JJ transferred the custody of the child to Appellant\/Mother from Respondent\/Father and granted certain visitation rights to the father. The Bench while deciding the issue has dealt and\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Supreme Court"","block_context":{"text":"Supreme Court","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/supremecourt\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":339028,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/01\/15\/maintenance-under-the-guardians-wards-act-1890-an-interpretative-analysis\/","url_meta":{"origin":62451,"position":4},"title":"Maintenance Under the Guardians & Wards Act, 1890: An Interpretative Analysis","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"January 15, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"by Arjun Gaur*","rel":"","context":"In "Op Eds"","block_context":{"text":"Op Eds","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/op-ed\/legal-analysis\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Interpretative Analysis","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/Interpretative-Analysis.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/Interpretative-Analysis.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/Interpretative-Analysis.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/Interpretative-Analysis.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":347022,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/05\/02\/supreme-court-reverses-kerala-hc-order-granting-custody-father\/","url_meta":{"origin":62451,"position":5},"title":"Supreme Court reverses Kerala HC order granting children\u2019s custody to father, citing lack of home-cooked food and companionship","author":"Apoorva","date":"May 2, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cWe could even have considered giving an opportunity to the father to make suitable arrangements for providing home cooked food to the child but the fact that the child gets no company whatsoever except for that of the father during the interim custody period of 15 days is an additional\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Supreme Court custody ruling","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/05\/Supreme-Court-custody-ruling.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/05\/Supreme-Court-custody-ruling.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/05\/Supreme-Court-custody-ruling.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/05\/Supreme-Court-custody-ruling.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/62451","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=62451"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/62451\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=62451"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=62451"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=62451"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}