{"id":6211,"date":"2014-11-04T17:11:00","date_gmt":"2014-11-04T17:11:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/localhost\/sccblog\/?p=6211"},"modified":"2015-10-14T15:35:48","modified_gmt":"2015-10-14T10:05:48","slug":"restraining-order-passed-in-loreal-trade-mark-infringement-case-2","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2014\/11\/04\/restraining-order-passed-in-loreal-trade-mark-infringement-case-2\/","title":{"rendered":"Restraining order passed in Loreal trade mark infringement case"},"content":{"rendered":"

Delhi High Court: <\/b>In a recent case a major international cosmetic brand, namely, Loreal had filed a suit for permanent injunction on account of trade mark infringement against the defendants who were selling counterfeit products in the name of the said brand, on their internet website www.shopclues.com<\/span><\/span>. While recognising that the plaintiff had built a globally valuable trade mark and acquired immense goodwill, the Court has passed a restraining order against the defendants restraining them specifically from using, manufacturing, marketing, purveying, supplying, selling, soliciting, exporting, displaying and advertising the said trade mark on the online market place through their website or through any other mode.<\/p>\n

In the instant case the globally renowned cosmetic brand, Loreal had filed a suit for permanent injunction against the defendant from selling counterfeit products of the said brand over the internet. On account of the alleged trade mark infringement the plaintiff prayed for passing off, delivery up and rendition of accounts against the defendants. Counsel for the plaintiff S. K. Bansal submitted that plaintiff’s trade mark is registered inall major countries of the world and has a globally valuable trade mark with an enormous goodwill and reputation. It was also submitted that the goods and products being sold on the alleged internet website were purchased and sent for verification and were found to be counterfeit.<\/p>\n

Taking note of the submissions, the Court viewed that the plaintiff is the registered proprietor of the LOREAL AND LOREAL formative trade marks <\/span> <\/span>and is established in France. It has been using the said trade mark since 1910 and is not only registered in India but in all other major countries as well. It was further concluded that the balance of convenience being in favour of the plaintiff, the instant case is fit for grant of ex parte ad interim injunction. Holding, that if ex parte ad interim injunction is not granted the plaintiff would suffer irreparable loss, the Court has passed the restraining order till 15-12-2014, against the defendants as well as their directors, principal officers, partners, distributors, stockists etc. The Court has also directed that the provisions under Order 39 Rule 3 CPC be complied with, within four days of the date of passing of this order. <\/span>Loreal<\/i> v. <\/span>Brandworld<\/i><\/a>,  ordered on 14-10-2014<\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Delhi High Court: In a recent case a major international cosmetic brand, namely, Loreal had filed a suit for permanent injunction on <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":7321,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[43],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-6211","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-intellectual_property"],"yoast_head":"\nRestraining order passed in Loreal trade mark infringement case | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2014\/11\/04\/restraining-order-passed-in-loreal-trade-mark-infringement-case-2\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Restraining order passed in Loreal trade mark infringement case\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Delhi High Court: In a recent case a major international cosmetic brand, namely, Loreal had filed a suit for permanent injunction on\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2014\/11\/04\/restraining-order-passed-in-loreal-trade-mark-infringement-case-2\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2014-11-04T17:11:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2015-10-14T10:05:48+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Sucheta\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Sucheta\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2014\/11\/04\/restraining-order-passed-in-loreal-trade-mark-infringement-case-2\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2014\/11\/04\/restraining-order-passed-in-loreal-trade-mark-infringement-case-2\/\",\"name\":\"Restraining order passed in Loreal trade mark infringement case | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2014\/11\/04\/restraining-order-passed-in-loreal-trade-mark-infringement-case-2\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2014\/11\/04\/restraining-order-passed-in-loreal-trade-mark-infringement-case-2\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2014-11-04T17:11:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-10-14T10:05:48+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2014\/11\/04\/restraining-order-passed-in-loreal-trade-mark-infringement-case-2\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2014\/11\/04\/restraining-order-passed-in-loreal-trade-mark-infringement-case-2\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2014\/11\/04\/restraining-order-passed-in-loreal-trade-mark-infringement-case-2\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg\",\"width\":1330,\"height\":887},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2014\/11\/04\/restraining-order-passed-in-loreal-trade-mark-infringement-case-2\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Restraining order passed in Loreal trade mark infringement case\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa\",\"name\":\"Sucheta\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Sucheta\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/legal_editor\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Restraining order passed in Loreal trade mark infringement case | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2014\/11\/04\/restraining-order-passed-in-loreal-trade-mark-infringement-case-2\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Restraining order passed in Loreal trade mark infringement case","og_description":"Delhi High Court: In a recent case a major international cosmetic brand, namely, Loreal had filed a suit for permanent injunction on","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2014\/11\/04\/restraining-order-passed-in-loreal-trade-mark-infringement-case-2\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2014-11-04T17:11:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2015-10-14T10:05:48+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Sucheta","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Sucheta","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2014\/11\/04\/restraining-order-passed-in-loreal-trade-mark-infringement-case-2\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2014\/11\/04\/restraining-order-passed-in-loreal-trade-mark-infringement-case-2\/","name":"Restraining order passed in Loreal trade mark infringement case | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2014\/11\/04\/restraining-order-passed-in-loreal-trade-mark-infringement-case-2\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2014\/11\/04\/restraining-order-passed-in-loreal-trade-mark-infringement-case-2\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg","datePublished":"2014-11-04T17:11:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-10-14T10:05:48+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2014\/11\/04\/restraining-order-passed-in-loreal-trade-mark-infringement-case-2\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2014\/11\/04\/restraining-order-passed-in-loreal-trade-mark-infringement-case-2\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2014\/11\/04\/restraining-order-passed-in-loreal-trade-mark-infringement-case-2\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg","width":1330,"height":887},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2014\/11\/04\/restraining-order-passed-in-loreal-trade-mark-infringement-case-2\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Restraining order passed in Loreal trade mark infringement case"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa","name":"Sucheta","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Sucheta"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/legal_editor\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":6526,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2014\/11\/04\/restraining-order-passed-in-loreal-trade-mark-infringement-case\/","url_meta":{"origin":6211,"position":0},"title":"Restraining order passed in Loreal trade mark infringement case","author":"Sucheta","date":"November 4, 2014","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court: In a recent case a major international cosmetic brand, namely, Loreal had filed a suit for permanent injunction on account of trade mark infringement against the defendants who were selling counterfeit products in the name of the said brand, on their internet website www.shopclues.com. While recognising that\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "High Courts"","block_context":{"text":"High Courts","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/highcourts\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":291234,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/05\/04\/delhi-hc-grants-permanent-injunction-to-volvo-mark-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":6211,"position":1},"title":"Delhi High Court grants permanent injunction to the mark \u2018VOLVO’ and awards Rs. 10 lakhs damages and costs","author":"Simranjeet","date":"May 4, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The Delhi High Court observed that \u2018VOLVO' mark was blatantly infringed as branded stickers and infringing products bearing the said mark were found on the premises of the defendant.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"delhi high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":278667,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/11\/21\/delhi-high-court-grants-ex-parte-ad-interim-injunction-to-american-eagle-against-ektarfa-garments-in-a-trademark-and-copyright-infringement-suit\/","url_meta":{"origin":6211,"position":2},"title":"Delhi High Court grants ex-parte ad-interim injunction to American Eagle against Ektarfa Garments in a trademark and copyright infringement suit","author":"Editor","date":"November 21, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"\u00a0 \u00a0 Delhi High Court: In a case where application was filed under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 read with Section 51 of the Civil Procedure Code, 1908 (Code) in a trademark and copyright infringement suit, the Single Judge Bench of Jyoti Singh, J. Passed an Order granting ex-parte\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/delhi_high_court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/delhi_high_court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/delhi_high_court.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/delhi_high_court.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/delhi_high_court.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":280659,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/12\/29\/delhi-high-court-grants-ad-interim-injunction-to-new-bharat-overseas-for-its-mark-taj-mahal-in-a-trademark-infringement-suit\/","url_meta":{"origin":6211,"position":3},"title":"Delhi High Court grants ad-interim injunction to New Bharat Overseas for its mark \u2018TAJ MAHAL\u2019 in a trademark infringement suit","author":"Editor","date":"December 29, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"The Delhi High Court granted ad-interim injunction to New Bharat Overseas for its mark \u2018TAJ MAHAL\u2019 and restrained Kian Agro Processing (P) Ltd. from affixing the mark \u2018TAJ MAHAL\u2019 or any other mark deceptively similar to the registered marks for the purposes of selling or marketing rice in India or\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/MicrosoftTeams-image-418.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":280579,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/12\/29\/delhi-high-court-grants-permanent-injunction-to-rpg-enterprises-ltd-for-its-mark-rpg-in-a-trade-mark-infringement-suit-awards-rs-3-lakhs-as-damages\/","url_meta":{"origin":6211,"position":4},"title":"Delhi High Court grants permanent injunction to RPG Enterprises Ltd. for its mark \u2018RPG\u2019 in a trade mark infringement suit; awards Rs. 3 lakhs as damages","author":"Editor","date":"December 29, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"The Delhi High Court granted permanent injunction to RPG Enterprises Ltd. for its mark \u2018RPG\u2019. Further, RPG Developers (P) Ltd. were restrained from offering\/rendering any services using the impugned trade mark \u2018RPG\u2019 and\/or \u2018RPG DEVELOPERS\u2019 and\/or artistic work which was a colourable imitation of the plaintiff's artistic work or any\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/MicrosoftTeams-image-418.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":278074,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/11\/26\/delhi-high-court-grants-ex-parte-ad-interim-injunction-to-tata-sia-airlines-limited-in-a-trade-mark-infringement-suit-restrains-vistara-media-private-limited-from-using-the-mark-vistara\/","url_meta":{"origin":6211,"position":5},"title":"Delhi High Court grants ex-parte ad-interim injunction to Tata Sia Airlines Limited in a trade mark infringement suit; restrains Vistara Media Private Limited from using the mark \u2018VISTARA\u2019","author":"Editor","date":"November 26, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"\u00a0 \u00a0 Delhi High Court: In a case where Tata Sia Airlines Limited filed an application under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 of CPC for grant of an ex-parte ad-interim injunction, the Single Judge Bench of Jyoti Singh, J. passed an interim order restraining Vistara Media Private Limited from\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/Delhi-High-Court-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6211","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=6211"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6211\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/7321"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=6211"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=6211"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=6211"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}