{"id":6206,"date":"2014-06-13T17:06:00","date_gmt":"2014-06-13T17:06:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/localhost\/sccblog\/?p=6206"},"modified":"2015-10-14T17:14:29","modified_gmt":"2015-10-14T11:44:29","slug":"transfer-of-a-business-against-share-or-bond-issue-is-exchange-and-not-slump-sale-2","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2014\/06\/13\/transfer-of-a-business-against-share-or-bond-issue-is-exchange-and-not-slump-sale-2\/","title":{"rendered":"Transfer of a business against share or bond issue is exchange and not \u2018slump sale\u2019"},"content":{"rendered":"<p   ><b><span  >Bombay High Court<\/span><\/b><span  >: Upholding the decision of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, a division bench comprising of SC Dharamadhikari and GC Kulkarni, JJ held that transfer of a business undertaking as a going concern against bonds and preference shares issued was not a sale, but an exchange. Subsequently, section 2(42C) and section 50B of the Income Tax Act, 1961 relating to the computation of capital gains were not applicable to such a transfer. In the present case, the&nbsp; respondent company had transferred its lift division to another company by way of a slump sale and as consideration for the transfer, preference shares and bonds were allotted by that company to the respondent. The taxpayer claimed that the transfer was an &#8216;exchange&#8217; and not a &#8216;sale&#8217; and therefore, was not taxable as slump sale. However, this was not accepted by the Tax Officer. The company then appealed to the Tribunal which accepted its contentions. Aggrieved by the decision of the Tribunal, CIT moved the High Court. The Bombay High Court relying on the findings and observations of the Tribunal, also concluded that the entire scheme of arrangement envisaged that the transfer of the lift division was not for any monetary consideration, thus it was a case of exchange and not sale. The Court distinguished the facts of this case with the&nbsp; Delhi High Court ruling of SREI Infrastructure&nbsp; Finance Limited (SIFL) vs. <\/span><span  >Income Tax Settlement Commission, Writ Petition Civil No. 1592\/2012 where<\/span><span  > the consideration was in terms of&nbsp; money as well as shares, thus the transfer could not be termed as an exchange in that case. <\/span><i><span  >Commissioner of Income Tax vs. B<\/span><\/i><i><span  >harat Bijlee Limited, Income Tax Appeal No. 2153 of 2011, decided on May 9, 2014<o:p><\/o:p><\/span><\/i><\/p>\n<p   ><span>To read the full judgment,<i> <a href=\"http:\/\/2014.scconline.com\/LoginForNewsLink.aspx?q=2014_SCC_OnLine_Bom_572&amp;db=0 \">click here<\/a><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Bombay High Court: Upholding the decision of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, a division bench comprising of SC Dharamadhikari and GC Kulkarni, <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":7321,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[42],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-6206","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-Business_Law"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Transfer of a business against share or bond issue is exchange and not \u2018slump sale\u2019 | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2014\/06\/13\/transfer-of-a-business-against-share-or-bond-issue-is-exchange-and-not-slump-sale-2\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Transfer of a business against share or bond issue is exchange and not \u2018slump sale\u2019\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Bombay High Court: Upholding the decision of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, a division bench comprising of SC Dharamadhikari and GC Kulkarni,\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2014\/06\/13\/transfer-of-a-business-against-share-or-bond-issue-is-exchange-and-not-slump-sale-2\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2014-06-13T17:06:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2015-10-14T11:44:29+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Sucheta\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Sucheta\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"1 minute\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2014\/06\/13\/transfer-of-a-business-against-share-or-bond-issue-is-exchange-and-not-slump-sale-2\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2014\/06\/13\/transfer-of-a-business-against-share-or-bond-issue-is-exchange-and-not-slump-sale-2\/\",\"name\":\"Transfer of a business against share or bond issue is exchange and not \u2018slump sale\u2019 | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2014\/06\/13\/transfer-of-a-business-against-share-or-bond-issue-is-exchange-and-not-slump-sale-2\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2014\/06\/13\/transfer-of-a-business-against-share-or-bond-issue-is-exchange-and-not-slump-sale-2\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2014-06-13T17:06:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-10-14T11:44:29+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2014\/06\/13\/transfer-of-a-business-against-share-or-bond-issue-is-exchange-and-not-slump-sale-2\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2014\/06\/13\/transfer-of-a-business-against-share-or-bond-issue-is-exchange-and-not-slump-sale-2\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2014\/06\/13\/transfer-of-a-business-against-share-or-bond-issue-is-exchange-and-not-slump-sale-2\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg\",\"width\":1330,\"height\":887},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2014\/06\/13\/transfer-of-a-business-against-share-or-bond-issue-is-exchange-and-not-slump-sale-2\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Transfer of a business against share or bond issue is exchange and not \u2018slump sale\u2019\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa\",\"name\":\"Sucheta\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Sucheta\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/legal_editor\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Transfer of a business against share or bond issue is exchange and not \u2018slump sale\u2019 | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2014\/06\/13\/transfer-of-a-business-against-share-or-bond-issue-is-exchange-and-not-slump-sale-2\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Transfer of a business against share or bond issue is exchange and not \u2018slump sale\u2019","og_description":"Bombay High Court: Upholding the decision of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, a division bench comprising of SC Dharamadhikari and GC Kulkarni,","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2014\/06\/13\/transfer-of-a-business-against-share-or-bond-issue-is-exchange-and-not-slump-sale-2\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2014-06-13T17:06:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2015-10-14T11:44:29+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Sucheta","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Sucheta","Est. reading time":"1 minute"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2014\/06\/13\/transfer-of-a-business-against-share-or-bond-issue-is-exchange-and-not-slump-sale-2\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2014\/06\/13\/transfer-of-a-business-against-share-or-bond-issue-is-exchange-and-not-slump-sale-2\/","name":"Transfer of a business against share or bond issue is exchange and not \u2018slump sale\u2019 | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2014\/06\/13\/transfer-of-a-business-against-share-or-bond-issue-is-exchange-and-not-slump-sale-2\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2014\/06\/13\/transfer-of-a-business-against-share-or-bond-issue-is-exchange-and-not-slump-sale-2\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg","datePublished":"2014-06-13T17:06:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-10-14T11:44:29+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2014\/06\/13\/transfer-of-a-business-against-share-or-bond-issue-is-exchange-and-not-slump-sale-2\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2014\/06\/13\/transfer-of-a-business-against-share-or-bond-issue-is-exchange-and-not-slump-sale-2\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2014\/06\/13\/transfer-of-a-business-against-share-or-bond-issue-is-exchange-and-not-slump-sale-2\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg","width":1330,"height":887},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2014\/06\/13\/transfer-of-a-business-against-share-or-bond-issue-is-exchange-and-not-slump-sale-2\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Transfer of a business against share or bond issue is exchange and not \u2018slump sale\u2019"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa","name":"Sucheta","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Sucheta"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/legal_editor\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":6637,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2014\/06\/13\/transfer-of-a-business-against-share-or-bond-issue-is-exchange-and-not-slump-sale\/","url_meta":{"origin":6206,"position":0},"title":"Transfer of a business against share or bond issue is exchange and not \u2018slump sale\u2019","author":"Sucheta","date":"June 13, 2014","format":false,"excerpt":"Bombay High Court: Upholding the decision of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, a division bench comprising of SC Dharamadhikari and GC Kulkarni, JJ held that transfer of a business undertaking as a going concern against bonds and preference shares issued was not a sale, but an exchange. Subsequently, section 2(42C)\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;High Courts&quot;","block_context":{"text":"High Courts","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/highcourts\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":248685,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/05\/25\/cbdt-notifies-computation-of-fair-market-value-of-capital-assets-under-income-tax-16th-amendment-rules-2021\/","url_meta":{"origin":6206,"position":1},"title":"CBDT notifies computation of Fair Market Value of Capital Assets under Income Tax (16th Amendment) Rules, 2021","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"May 25, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"The Central Board of Direct Taxes vide Notification No. 68\/2021 dated 24.05.2021 has notified Income tax (16th Amendment) Rules, 2021 to further to amend the Income tax Rules, 1962. The Amendment inserts Rule 11UAE in Income-tax Rules which prescribes the method to compute fair market value of capital asset for\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Legislation Updates&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Legislation Updates","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/legislationupdates\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":316072,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/04\/itat-allows-vodafone-claim-depreciation-goodwill-acquired-pursuant-slump-sale-acquisition-call-centre-business-from-vegl\/","url_meta":{"origin":6206,"position":2},"title":"ITAT allows Vodafone&#8217;s claim of depreciation on goodwill acquired pursuant to slump sale acquisition of Call Centre Business from VEGL","author":"Apoorva","date":"March 4, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"ITAT noted that Parliament had taken due note that the Supreme Court had held that the goodwill arising on business reorganization i.e. amalgamation, slump sales, demerger etc. is a depreciable intangible asset under Section 32 of the Act.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Income Tax Appellate Tribunal","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Income-Tax-Appellate-Tribunal.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Income-Tax-Appellate-Tribunal.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Income-Tax-Appellate-Tribunal.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Income-Tax-Appellate-Tribunal.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":233797,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/08\/12\/nclat-rejects-corporate-creditors-demand-of-payment-of-outstanding-operational-debt-worth-rs-58-crores-after-finding-plausible-contention-in-debtors-arguments\/","url_meta":{"origin":6206,"position":3},"title":"NCLAT rejects Corporate Creditor\u2019s demand of payment of outstanding operational debt worth Rs 58 crores, after finding \u2018plausible contention\u2019 in debtor\u2019s arguments","author":"Editor","date":"August 12, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"National Company Law Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi: The 3-Member Bench of Justice Bansi Lal Bhat (Acting Chairperson), V.P. Singh, Member (Technical) and Shreesha Merla, Member (Technical), rejected the appeal filed by the Operational Creditor against the order of NCLT, after finding a need for \u2018further investigation\u2019 in the case. The\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":246246,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/03\/29\/finance-act-2021-receives-presidents-assent\/","url_meta":{"origin":6206,"position":4},"title":"Finance Act, 2021 receives President&#8217;s assent","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"March 29, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"On March 28, 2021, the Finance Act received President's assent in order to give effect to the financial proposals of the Central Government for the financial year 2021-2022 INCOME TAX Income-tax shall be charged at the rates specified in Part I of the First Schedule and such tax shall be\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Legislation Updates&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Legislation Updates","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/legislationupdates\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/03\/FINANCE-ACT.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/03\/FINANCE-ACT.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/03\/FINANCE-ACT.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/03\/FINANCE-ACT.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/03\/FINANCE-ACT.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":213961,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/04\/25\/aar-business-transfer-agreement-as-a-going-concern-held-exempted-from-the-levy-of-gst-in-terms-of-the-relevant-notification\/","url_meta":{"origin":6206,"position":5},"title":"AAR | Business Transfer Agreement as a going concern held exempted from the levy of GST in terms of the relevant Notification","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"April 25, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Authority for Advance Rulings (GST), Uttarakhand: Vipin Chandra and Amit Gupta (Members), addressed an application stating the following question: \u201cWhether \u201cBusiness Transfer Agreement\u201d as a going concern on slump sale basis is exempted from the levy of GST?\u201d The present application was filed by Innovative Textiles Limited under sub-section (1)\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/03\/GST.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/03\/GST.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/03\/GST.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/03\/GST.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/03\/GST.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6206","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=6206"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6206\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/7321"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=6206"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=6206"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=6206"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}