{"id":6140,"date":"2015-08-05T10:08:00","date_gmt":"2015-08-05T10:08:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/localhost\/sccblog\/?p=6140"},"modified":"2015-10-14T12:47:25","modified_gmt":"2015-10-14T07:17:25","slug":"application-of-settlement-criterion-is-a-breach-of-rights-under-article-14-of-echr-read-with-article-2-of-first-protocol","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/08\/05\/application-of-settlement-criterion-is-a-breach-of-rights-under-article-14-of-echr-read-with-article-2-of-first-protocol\/","title":{"rendered":"Application of settlement criterion is a breach of rights under Article 14 of ECHR read with Article 2 of First Protocol"},"content":{"rendered":"<p ><b><span lang=\"EN-US\">Supreme Court of United Kingdom<\/span><\/b><span lang=\"EN-US\">&#8211; <font face=\"Times New Roman\" size=\"3\">Deciding on whether the lawful residence criterion or settlement criterion breaches the appellant\u2019s right to education under Article 2 of the First Protocol (A2P1) to the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) and Article 14 ECHR, the Court by a majority of 3:2 made a <\/font><\/span><span lang=\"EN-US\"><font face=\"Times New Roman\" size=\"3\">declaration that the application of the settlement criterion to the appellant is a breach of her rights under article 14, read with article A2P1, of the Convention. The Court held that the declaration makes it clear that the appellant is entitled to a student loan while leaving it open to the Secretary of State to devise a more carefully tailored criterion which will avoid breaching the Convention rights of present and future applicants.<\/font><\/span><\/p>\n<p ><span lang=\"EN-US\"><font face=\"Times New Roman\" size=\"3\">According to the facts, the appellant, a Zambian national, came to the <st1:country-region w:st=\"on\"><st1:place w:st=\"on\">UK<\/st1:place><\/st1:country-region> in 2001 at the age of six. Her mother overstayed and the appellant was unlawfully present in the country until 2012. The appellant presently has discretionary leave to remain in the <st1:country-region w:st=\"on\"><st1:place w:st=\"on\">UK<\/st1:place><\/st1:country-region>. The appellant has received her entire education in the <st1:country-region w:st=\"on\"><st1:place w:st=\"on\">UK<\/st1:place><\/st1:country-region> and wishes to go to university for further education. Due to her immigration status which makes the appellant ineligible for a student loan, the appellant had been unable to take up the university places offered to her. In the UK, in order to qualify for a loan, student must be resident in England when the academic year begins; have been lawfully ordinarily resident in the United Kingdom for the three years before then; and be settled in the United Kingdom on that day.<\/font><\/span><\/p>\n<p ><span lang=\"EN-US\"><font face=\"Times New Roman\" size=\"3\">Giving reasons, Lady Hale observed that if the loan is not provided students like the appellant may be left in the dilemma as they are allowed access to all the public services including cash welfare benefits, but are denied access to this one benefit of a repayable loan. The Court also noted that if the benefit of loan is denied, it will be a loss to the community as a whole. Regarding the issue of lawful residence, the Court held that the appellant cannot be blamed for this fact because it was the result of the decisions taken by her parents over which she had no control. Lastly, the Court held that \u201clawful ordinary residence\u201d criterion was compatible with the appellant\u2019s Convention Rights. <i>R v. Secretary of State for Business, Innovation and skills<\/i>, 2015 UKSC 57, decided on 29.07.2015<\/font><span><o:p><\/o:p><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<p ><span lang=\"EN-US\">&nbsp;<\/span><\/p>\n<p ><span lang=\"EN-US\">&nbsp;<\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Supreme Court of United Kingdom&#8211; Deciding on whether the lawful residence criterion or settlement criterion breaches the appellant\u2019s right to education under <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":7321,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[12],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-6140","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-foreigncourts"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Application of settlement criterion is a breach of rights under Article 14 of ECHR read with Article 2 of First Protocol | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/08\/05\/application-of-settlement-criterion-is-a-breach-of-rights-under-article-14-of-echr-read-with-article-2-of-first-protocol\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Application of settlement criterion is a breach of rights under Article 14 of ECHR read with Article 2 of First Protocol\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Supreme Court of United Kingdom&#8211; Deciding on whether the lawful residence criterion or settlement criterion breaches the appellant\u2019s right to education under\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/08\/05\/application-of-settlement-criterion-is-a-breach-of-rights-under-article-14-of-echr-read-with-article-2-of-first-protocol\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2015-08-05T10:08:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2015-10-14T07:17:25+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Sucheta\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Sucheta\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/08\/05\/application-of-settlement-criterion-is-a-breach-of-rights-under-article-14-of-echr-read-with-article-2-of-first-protocol\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/08\/05\/application-of-settlement-criterion-is-a-breach-of-rights-under-article-14-of-echr-read-with-article-2-of-first-protocol\/\",\"name\":\"Application of settlement criterion is a breach of rights under Article 14 of ECHR read with Article 2 of First Protocol | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/08\/05\/application-of-settlement-criterion-is-a-breach-of-rights-under-article-14-of-echr-read-with-article-2-of-first-protocol\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/08\/05\/application-of-settlement-criterion-is-a-breach-of-rights-under-article-14-of-echr-read-with-article-2-of-first-protocol\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2015-08-05T10:08:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-10-14T07:17:25+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/08\/05\/application-of-settlement-criterion-is-a-breach-of-rights-under-article-14-of-echr-read-with-article-2-of-first-protocol\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/08\/05\/application-of-settlement-criterion-is-a-breach-of-rights-under-article-14-of-echr-read-with-article-2-of-first-protocol\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/08\/05\/application-of-settlement-criterion-is-a-breach-of-rights-under-article-14-of-echr-read-with-article-2-of-first-protocol\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg\",\"width\":1330,\"height\":887},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/08\/05\/application-of-settlement-criterion-is-a-breach-of-rights-under-article-14-of-echr-read-with-article-2-of-first-protocol\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Application of settlement criterion is a breach of rights under Article 14 of ECHR read with Article 2 of First Protocol\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa\",\"name\":\"Sucheta\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Sucheta\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/legal_editor\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Application of settlement criterion is a breach of rights under Article 14 of ECHR read with Article 2 of First Protocol | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/08\/05\/application-of-settlement-criterion-is-a-breach-of-rights-under-article-14-of-echr-read-with-article-2-of-first-protocol\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Application of settlement criterion is a breach of rights under Article 14 of ECHR read with Article 2 of First Protocol","og_description":"Supreme Court of United Kingdom&#8211; Deciding on whether the lawful residence criterion or settlement criterion breaches the appellant\u2019s right to education under","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/08\/05\/application-of-settlement-criterion-is-a-breach-of-rights-under-article-14-of-echr-read-with-article-2-of-first-protocol\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2015-08-05T10:08:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2015-10-14T07:17:25+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Sucheta","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Sucheta","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/08\/05\/application-of-settlement-criterion-is-a-breach-of-rights-under-article-14-of-echr-read-with-article-2-of-first-protocol\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/08\/05\/application-of-settlement-criterion-is-a-breach-of-rights-under-article-14-of-echr-read-with-article-2-of-first-protocol\/","name":"Application of settlement criterion is a breach of rights under Article 14 of ECHR read with Article 2 of First Protocol | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/08\/05\/application-of-settlement-criterion-is-a-breach-of-rights-under-article-14-of-echr-read-with-article-2-of-first-protocol\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/08\/05\/application-of-settlement-criterion-is-a-breach-of-rights-under-article-14-of-echr-read-with-article-2-of-first-protocol\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg","datePublished":"2015-08-05T10:08:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-10-14T07:17:25+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/08\/05\/application-of-settlement-criterion-is-a-breach-of-rights-under-article-14-of-echr-read-with-article-2-of-first-protocol\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/08\/05\/application-of-settlement-criterion-is-a-breach-of-rights-under-article-14-of-echr-read-with-article-2-of-first-protocol\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/08\/05\/application-of-settlement-criterion-is-a-breach-of-rights-under-article-14-of-echr-read-with-article-2-of-first-protocol\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg","width":1330,"height":887},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/08\/05\/application-of-settlement-criterion-is-a-breach-of-rights-under-article-14-of-echr-read-with-article-2-of-first-protocol\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Application of settlement criterion is a breach of rights under Article 14 of ECHR read with Article 2 of First Protocol"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa","name":"Sucheta","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Sucheta"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/legal_editor\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":221527,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/10\/26\/echr-holocaust-denial-not-protected-by-european-convention-on-human-rights-interference-with-rights-under-arts-10-6-must-be-examined-in-context-of-special-moral-responsibility\/","url_meta":{"origin":6140,"position":0},"title":"ECHR | Holocaust denial not protected by European Convention on Human Rights; interference with rights under Arts. 10 &#038; 6 must be examined in context of special moral responsibility","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"October 26, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"European Court of Human Rights: The Seven-Judge Bench comprising of Yonko Grozev (President), Angelika Nu\u00dfberger, Andr\u00e9 Potocki, S\u00edofra O\u2019Leary, M?rti?\u0161 Mits, Gabriele Kucsko-Stadlmayer, and Lado Chanturia held that there was no violation of Article 10 and 6 of European Convention on Human Rights as claimed by the complainant in the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/02\/C03HBD_2320723b.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/02\/C03HBD_2320723b.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/02\/C03HBD_2320723b.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/02\/C03HBD_2320723b.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/02\/C03HBD_2320723b.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":222386,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/22\/echr-flash-mobs-are-peaceful-assembly-of-people-staging-demonstration-without-prior-authorisation-does-not-necessarily-justify-interfering-with-a-persons-right-to-freedom\/","url_meta":{"origin":6140,"position":1},"title":"ECHR | Flash mobs are \u201cpeaceful assembly\u201d of people; staging demonstration without prior authorisation does not necessarily justify interfering with a person\u2019s right to freedom of assembly","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"November 22, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"European Court of Human Rights (ECHR): A Seven Judge Bench of Paul Lemmens (President), Georgios A. Serghides, Helen Keller, Dmitry Dedov, Mar\u00eda El\u00f3segui, Gilberto Felici, and Erik Wennerstr\u00f6m unanimously held that the respondent was in violation of Article 11 (freedom of assembly) of the European Convention on Human Rights.\u00a0 The\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/02\/C03HBD_2320723b.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/02\/C03HBD_2320723b.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/02\/C03HBD_2320723b.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/02\/C03HBD_2320723b.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/02\/C03HBD_2320723b.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":243634,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/02\/10\/13-years-later-echr-holds-russia-responsible-for-human-rights-violations-in-the-august-war-of-2008-with-georgia-detailed-report\/","url_meta":{"origin":6140,"position":2},"title":"13 years later, ECHR holds Russia responsible for human rights violations in the \u201cAugust War\u201d of 2008 with Georgia || Detailed Report","author":"Editor","date":"February 10, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"European Court of Human Rights (Grand Chamber): In its judgment delivered on 21st January, the Grand Chamber of ECHR, after detailed deliberation and appreciation of evidences, found Russia to be guilty of human rights violations in the 2008 \u201cAugust War\u201d with Georgia. The said violations included killing and torturing of\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/02\/C03HBD_2320723b.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/02\/C03HBD_2320723b.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/02\/C03HBD_2320723b.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/02\/C03HBD_2320723b.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/02\/C03HBD_2320723b.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":204742,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/11\/02\/addressing-prophet-mohammad-as-a-paedophile-has-the-potential-to-incite-religious-intolerance-echr\/","url_meta":{"origin":6140,"position":3},"title":"Addressing Prophet Mohammad as a \u2018paedophile\u2019 has the potential to incite religious intolerance: ECHR","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"November 2, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"European Court of Human Rights (ECHR): A Seven Judge Bench comprising of Angelika Nu\u00dfberger (Germany), President, Andr\u00e9 Potocki (France), S\u00edofra O\u2019Leary (Ireland), Martin\u0161 Mits (Latvia), Gabriele Kucsko-Stadlmayer (Austria), Letif H\u00fcseynov (Azerbaijan), Lado Chanturia (Georgia), and Claudia Westerdiek, Section Registrar, held that the Austrian courts did not overstep their margin in\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/02\/C03HBD_2320723b.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/02\/C03HBD_2320723b.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/02\/C03HBD_2320723b.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/02\/C03HBD_2320723b.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/02\/C03HBD_2320723b.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":232353,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/07\/17\/uk-sc-interests-of-children-have-priority-over-any-interest-a-paedophile-could-have-in-being-allowed-to-engage-in-criminal-conduct\/","url_meta":{"origin":6140,"position":4},"title":"UK SC | \u201cInterests of children have priority over any interest a paedophile could have in being allowed to engage in criminal conduct\u201d","author":"Editor","date":"July 17, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Sucheta Sarkar, Editorial Assistant has put this story together","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/07\/DSC_7472-2-e1476682323502.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/07\/DSC_7472-2-e1476682323502.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/07\/DSC_7472-2-e1476682323502.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/07\/DSC_7472-2-e1476682323502.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/07\/DSC_7472-2-e1476682323502.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":320436,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/04\/21\/trade-union-strikes-penalty-tulrca-echr-incompatible-uk-sc-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":6140,"position":5},"title":"Imposing penalties to discourage Trade Union members to participate in lawful strikes; UKSC declares S. 146 of TULRCA to be incompatible with Art. 11 of ECHR","author":"Sucheta","date":"April 21, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"The Court held that S. 146 of TULRCA is incompatible with ECHR Convention insofar as it fails to provide any protection against penalties, intended to deter trade union members from taking part in lawful strike action organised by their trade unions.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"146 of TULRCA incompatible with Art","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/146-of-TULRCA-incompatible-with-Art.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/146-of-TULRCA-incompatible-with-Art.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/146-of-TULRCA-incompatible-with-Art.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/146-of-TULRCA-incompatible-with-Art.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6140","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=6140"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6140\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/7321"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=6140"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=6140"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=6140"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}