{"id":6139,"date":"2015-07-14T11:07:00","date_gmt":"2015-07-14T11:07:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/localhost\/sccblog\/?p=6139"},"modified":"2015-10-14T12:52:20","modified_gmt":"2015-10-14T07:22:20","slug":"use-of-execution-drug-allowed","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/07\/14\/use-of-execution-drug-allowed\/","title":{"rendered":"Use of execution drug, allowed"},"content":{"rendered":"

Supreme Court of United States<\/span><\/b>– In a significant decision wherein four Oklahoma death-row inmates (petitioners) filed for preliminary injunction contending that the method of execution involving midazolam as the first drug, used by the State of Oklahoma violates the Eighth Amendment because it creates an unacceptable risk of severe pain, the Court by a majority of 5:4 affirmed the Tenth Circuit and District Court finding stating that the petitioners failed to establish that the use of a massive dose of midazolam by Oklahoma in its lethal injection protocol involves a substantial risk of severe pain associated with the administration of second and third drug during execution. Alito J., giving a majority judgment also observed that the claims made by the petitioners cannot succeed as in an execution claim, it must be established that the method used creates a demonstrated risk of severe pain and that the risk is substantial when compared to the known and available alternatives, which the petitioners failed to establish in the instant case.<\/font><\/font><\/span><\/p>\n

According to the facts Oklahoma used a three drug protocol to carry out executions which involved sodium thiopental as the first drug. Due to pressure from anti-death-penalty advocates, the pharmaceutical companies stopped manufacturing the drug. As a result Oklahoma decided to use 500-mg of midazolam, a sedative, as the first drug in its three-drug protocol. Petitioners, thus argue that midazolam, employed in three-drug protocol, fails to render a person insensitive to pain associated with the administration of second and third drug.<\/font><\/span><\/p>\n

\n

The Court further held that the argument of the petitioner that the Eighth Amendment does not require them to identify an alternative for the controversial drug, cannot stand as it is inconsistent with the opinion formulated in Baze v. Rees<\/i>, 553 U. S. 35, 61 (2008), which imposed a requirement of identifying a known and available alternative. Sonia Sotomayor J., giving the dissenting opinion said, \u201cThe court\u2019s available-alternative requirement leads to patently absurd consequences\u201d. Breyer J., forwarding another dissenting opinion asked the Court for a full briefing on a more basic question i.e., whether the death penalty violates the Constitution. Richard<\/i> E. Glossip v. Kelvin J. Gross<\/i>, <\/font><\/span>2015 SCC OnLine US SC 5<\/a><\/span>, decided on 29.06.2015<\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Supreme Court of United States– In a significant decision wherein four Oklahoma death-row inmates (petitioners) filed for preliminary injunction contending that the <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":7321,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[12],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-6139","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-foreigncourts"],"yoast_head":"\nUse of execution drug, allowed | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/07\/14\/use-of-execution-drug-allowed\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Use of execution drug, allowed\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Supreme Court of United States– In a significant decision wherein four Oklahoma death-row inmates (petitioners) filed for preliminary injunction contending that the\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/07\/14\/use-of-execution-drug-allowed\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2015-07-14T11:07:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2015-10-14T07:22:20+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Sucheta\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Sucheta\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/07\/14\/use-of-execution-drug-allowed\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/07\/14\/use-of-execution-drug-allowed\/\",\"name\":\"Use of execution drug, allowed | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/07\/14\/use-of-execution-drug-allowed\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/07\/14\/use-of-execution-drug-allowed\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2015-07-14T11:07:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-10-14T07:22:20+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/07\/14\/use-of-execution-drug-allowed\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/07\/14\/use-of-execution-drug-allowed\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/07\/14\/use-of-execution-drug-allowed\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg\",\"width\":1330,\"height\":887},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/07\/14\/use-of-execution-drug-allowed\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Use of execution drug, allowed\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa\",\"name\":\"Sucheta\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Sucheta\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/legal_editor\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Use of execution drug, allowed | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/07\/14\/use-of-execution-drug-allowed\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Use of execution drug, allowed","og_description":"Supreme Court of United States– In a significant decision wherein four Oklahoma death-row inmates (petitioners) filed for preliminary injunction contending that the","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/07\/14\/use-of-execution-drug-allowed\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2015-07-14T11:07:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2015-10-14T07:22:20+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Sucheta","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Sucheta","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/07\/14\/use-of-execution-drug-allowed\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/07\/14\/use-of-execution-drug-allowed\/","name":"Use of execution drug, allowed | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/07\/14\/use-of-execution-drug-allowed\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/07\/14\/use-of-execution-drug-allowed\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg","datePublished":"2015-07-14T11:07:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-10-14T07:22:20+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/07\/14\/use-of-execution-drug-allowed\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/07\/14\/use-of-execution-drug-allowed\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/07\/14\/use-of-execution-drug-allowed\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg","width":1330,"height":887},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/07\/14\/use-of-execution-drug-allowed\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Use of execution drug, allowed"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa","name":"Sucheta","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Sucheta"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/legal_editor\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":258901,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/12\/23\/law-on-alternative-jurisdictions-for-institution-of-application-and-execution-of-maintenance-orders-under-s-125-crpc\/","url_meta":{"origin":6139,"position":0},"title":"Del HC discusses law on alternative jurisdictions for institution of application and execution of maintenance orders under S. 125 CrPC, directs fresh adjudication of execution petition","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"December 23, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court: Chandra Dhari Singh, J., while addressed an issue with regard to maintenance and stated that, There may be alternative jurisdictions available to the person seeking execution of order of maintenance and it is upon the meeting of the requirements of the provisions that the person \u201cmay\u201d approach\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":263283,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/03\/08\/ph-hc-application-for-rescission-of-contract-mandatory-to-avail-the-relief-as-s-28-specific-relief-act-1963-doesnt-confer-indefeasible-right\/","url_meta":{"origin":6139,"position":1},"title":"P&H HC | Application for rescission of contract ‘mandatory’ to avail the relief, as S. 28, Specific Relief Act, 1963 doesn’t confer indefeasible right","author":"Editor","date":"March 8, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Punjab and Haryana High Court:\u00a0 Sudhir Mittal, J. dismissed the revision petition filed by the petitioners (in this case the judgment-debtors) against the action of the Executing Court for refusing to recall the impugned order. According to the petitioners, the execution order was passed, ex parte hence, the fundamental principle\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":6491,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/01\/14\/anticipatory-bail-granted-to-the-hooligans-responsible-for-moral-policing-which-triggered-kiss-of-love-campaign-an-immoral-activity-by-youngsters\/","url_meta":{"origin":6139,"position":2},"title":"Anticipatory Bail granted to the hooligans responsible for moral policing which triggered \u201cKiss of Love\u201d campaign -an immoral activity by youngsters","author":"Sucheta","date":"January 14, 2015","format":false,"excerpt":"Kerala High Court: In a recent case of atrocities staged by some hooligans under the guise of moral policing in Kozhikode District- Kerala, a bench of B. Kemal Pasha J, granted anticipatory bail to the petitioners with stringent conditions, and directed them to pay compensation for the severe loss sustained\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "High Courts"","block_context":{"text":"High Courts","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/highcourts\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":263412,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/03\/11\/lower-courts-to-deal-with-entire-process-expeditiously-after-receipt-of-the-application-under-s-151-read-with-or-20-r-6-a-cpc\/","url_meta":{"origin":6139,"position":3},"title":"Megh HC | Lower Courts to deal with entire process expeditiously after receipt of the application under S. 151 read with Or. 20 R. 6-A CPC","author":"Editor","date":"March 11, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Meghalaya High Court: H.S. Thangkhiew, J. while hearing a revision application allowed the same and directed the lower court to deal with the entire process expeditiously immediately on receipt of the application under Section 151 read with Order 20 Rule 6-A CPC. The revision application under Article 227 of the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":301048,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/08\/andhra-pradesh-hc-relief-for-separate-possession-is-inherent-in-relief-of-specific-performance-of-contract-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":6139,"position":4},"title":"Granting relief for delivery of possession separately is not required, it is inherent in the decree of specific performance of contract: Andhra Pradesh High Court","author":"Editor","date":"September 8, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cIn case where the language of the decree is capable of two interpretations, the interpretation which favours the advancement of the decree by getting its execution is to be preferred.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"andhra pradesh high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/andhra-pradesh-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/andhra-pradesh-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/andhra-pradesh-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/andhra-pradesh-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":280644,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/12\/29\/madras-high-court-when-public-officials-have-committed-an-act-of-negligence-lapses-or-dereliction-of-duty-financial-loss-caused-to-the-state-exchequer-must-be-recovered-from\/","url_meta":{"origin":6139,"position":5},"title":"Madras High Court | When public officials have committed an act of negligence, lapses or dereliction of duty, financial loss caused to the State exchequer must be recovered from them","author":"Editor","date":"December 29, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"When the public officials have committed an act of negligence, lapses or dereliction of duty, the financial loss caused to the State exchequer are to be recovered from such public servants, who are responsible and accountable for the financial losses.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Madras High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/Madras-High-Court-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6139","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=6139"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6139\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/7321"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=6139"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=6139"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=6139"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}