{"id":6130,"date":"2015-05-28T16:05:00","date_gmt":"2015-05-28T16:05:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/localhost\/sccblog\/?p=6130"},"modified":"2015-10-14T13:00:11","modified_gmt":"2015-10-14T07:30:11","slug":"rule-of-proportionate-recovery-established-in-barker-case-continues-to-represent-the-common-law-position","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/05\/28\/rule-of-proportionate-recovery-established-in-barker-case-continues-to-represent-the-common-law-position\/","title":{"rendered":"Rule of proportionate recovery established in Barker case continues to represent the common law position"},"content":{"rendered":"

Supreme Court of United Kingdom<\/span><\/b>– The appeal before the Court from Guernsey concerns the special rules of liability and causation for claims by victims of mesothelioma, caused by exposure to asbestos, developed in and since the House of Lords\u2019 decision in Fairchild v Glenhaven Funeral Services Ltd <\/i>2003 1 AC 32<\/span> <\/span>wherein the <\/b><\/span>main issues were whether the proportionate recovery rule in Barker v Corus UK Ltd <\/i>2006 2 AC 572 <\/i>still exists at common law as Guernsey has not passed any law equivalent to the United Kingdom\u2019s Compensation Act 2006, and if Barker <\/i>does not apply and the position in Guernsey is now the same as in the UK under the 2006 Act, whether such an insurer is liable in the first instance for the whole of the employer\u2019s liability to the victim, and if so, whether the insurer has pro rata rights to contribution from any other insurer of that employer or from the employer in respect of any periods not covered by the insurer.<\/span><\/font><\/p>\n

The Court in order to reach any conclusion discussed the principles explained in Fairchild <\/i>wherein it was held that a victim can hold liable all employers who negligently exposed him to asbestos, the Barker<\/i> case where it was held that each such employer was only liable pro rata to the period which exposure by it bore to the total of all periods of exposure and also Trigger case (Durham v BAI (Run-Off) Ltd <\/i>2012 UKSC 14, 2012 1 WLR 867) where again it was held that an employer\u2019s liability insurer must indemnify the employer against exposure-based liability incurred under the principle in Fairchild<\/i>. The Court also highlighted the fact that the parliament reversed Barker <\/i>in the UK<\/st1:place><\/st1:country-region> by the 2006 Act, making each employer liable in full, with rights of contribution among themselves.<\/font><\/span><\/p>\n

Keeping in mind the legal position created by the abovestated cases such that neither the 2006 Act nor Trigger <\/i>is inconsistent with or undermines the decision in Barker<\/i>, the Court while deciding the present appeal unanimously upheld the trial judge\u2019s order stating that rule of proportionate recovery established in Barker <\/i>continues to represent the common law position which applies in Guernsey and allowed the appeal in respect of compensation but dismissed the appeal in relation to defence costs. Zurich<\/i><\/st1:place><\/st1:city> Insurance v. International Energy Group Ltd<\/i>., 2015 UKSC 33, decided on 20.05.2015<\/font><\/span><\/o:p><\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Supreme Court of United Kingdom– The appeal before the Court from Guernsey concerns the special rules of liability and causation for claims <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":7321,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[12],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-6130","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-foreigncourts"],"yoast_head":"\nRule of proportionate recovery established in Barker case continues to represent the common law position | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/05\/28\/rule-of-proportionate-recovery-established-in-barker-case-continues-to-represent-the-common-law-position\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Rule of proportionate recovery established in Barker case continues to represent the common law position\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Supreme Court of United Kingdom– The appeal before the Court from Guernsey concerns the special rules of liability and causation for claims\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/05\/28\/rule-of-proportionate-recovery-established-in-barker-case-continues-to-represent-the-common-law-position\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2015-05-28T16:05:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2015-10-14T07:30:11+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Sucheta\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Sucheta\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/05\/28\/rule-of-proportionate-recovery-established-in-barker-case-continues-to-represent-the-common-law-position\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/05\/28\/rule-of-proportionate-recovery-established-in-barker-case-continues-to-represent-the-common-law-position\/\",\"name\":\"Rule of proportionate recovery established in Barker case continues to represent the common law position | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/05\/28\/rule-of-proportionate-recovery-established-in-barker-case-continues-to-represent-the-common-law-position\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/05\/28\/rule-of-proportionate-recovery-established-in-barker-case-continues-to-represent-the-common-law-position\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2015-05-28T16:05:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-10-14T07:30:11+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/05\/28\/rule-of-proportionate-recovery-established-in-barker-case-continues-to-represent-the-common-law-position\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/05\/28\/rule-of-proportionate-recovery-established-in-barker-case-continues-to-represent-the-common-law-position\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/05\/28\/rule-of-proportionate-recovery-established-in-barker-case-continues-to-represent-the-common-law-position\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg\",\"width\":1330,\"height\":887},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/05\/28\/rule-of-proportionate-recovery-established-in-barker-case-continues-to-represent-the-common-law-position\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Rule of proportionate recovery established in Barker case continues to represent the common law position\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa\",\"name\":\"Sucheta\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Sucheta\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/legal_editor\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Rule of proportionate recovery established in Barker case continues to represent the common law position | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/05\/28\/rule-of-proportionate-recovery-established-in-barker-case-continues-to-represent-the-common-law-position\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Rule of proportionate recovery established in Barker case continues to represent the common law position","og_description":"Supreme Court of United Kingdom– The appeal before the Court from Guernsey concerns the special rules of liability and causation for claims","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/05\/28\/rule-of-proportionate-recovery-established-in-barker-case-continues-to-represent-the-common-law-position\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2015-05-28T16:05:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2015-10-14T07:30:11+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Sucheta","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Sucheta","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/05\/28\/rule-of-proportionate-recovery-established-in-barker-case-continues-to-represent-the-common-law-position\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/05\/28\/rule-of-proportionate-recovery-established-in-barker-case-continues-to-represent-the-common-law-position\/","name":"Rule of proportionate recovery established in Barker case continues to represent the common law position | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/05\/28\/rule-of-proportionate-recovery-established-in-barker-case-continues-to-represent-the-common-law-position\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/05\/28\/rule-of-proportionate-recovery-established-in-barker-case-continues-to-represent-the-common-law-position\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg","datePublished":"2015-05-28T16:05:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-10-14T07:30:11+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/05\/28\/rule-of-proportionate-recovery-established-in-barker-case-continues-to-represent-the-common-law-position\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/05\/28\/rule-of-proportionate-recovery-established-in-barker-case-continues-to-represent-the-common-law-position\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/05\/28\/rule-of-proportionate-recovery-established-in-barker-case-continues-to-represent-the-common-law-position\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg","width":1330,"height":887},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/05\/28\/rule-of-proportionate-recovery-established-in-barker-case-continues-to-represent-the-common-law-position\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Rule of proportionate recovery established in Barker case continues to represent the common law position"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa","name":"Sucheta","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Sucheta"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/legal_editor\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":232120,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/07\/13\/corporations-legal-fiction-or-an-unborn-predator\/","url_meta":{"origin":6130,"position":0},"title":"Corporations: Legal Fiction or An Unborn Predator?","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"July 13, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"by Ankoosh Mehta*, Smruti Shah**, Neham Tayal***, Durga Agarwal\u2020, King Dungerwal\u2021","rel":"","context":"In "Cyril Amarchand Mangaldas"","block_context":{"text":"Cyril Amarchand Mangaldas","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/experts_corner\/law-firm\/cam\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/07\/Cyril-Amarchand-CAM.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/07\/Cyril-Amarchand-CAM.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/07\/Cyril-Amarchand-CAM.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/07\/Cyril-Amarchand-CAM.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/07\/Cyril-Amarchand-CAM.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":277264,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/11\/11\/supreme-court-msmed-act-2006-has-an-overriding-effect-over-the-provisions-of-the-arbitration-act-1996-legal-research-legal-news-updates\/","url_meta":{"origin":6130,"position":1},"title":"Supreme Court| Existence of arbitration agreement does not bar reference to Facilitation Council; MSMED Act has an overriding effect over the provisions of the Arbitration Act, 1996","author":"Editor","date":"November 11, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"\u00a0 \u00a0 Supreme Court: The division bench of Uday Umesh Lalit, C.J. and Bela M. Trivedi*, J. has held that the provisions of Chapter-V of the Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Development Act, 2006 (\u2018 MSMED Act\u2019) have an overriding effect over the provisions of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act,\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/MicrosoftTeams-image-236-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/MicrosoftTeams-image-236-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/MicrosoftTeams-image-236-1.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/MicrosoftTeams-image-236-1.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/MicrosoftTeams-image-236-1.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":200639,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/26\/public-servant-does-not-include-retired-employee-notice-of-enquiry-against-retired-public-servant-held-sans-jurisdiction\/","url_meta":{"origin":6130,"position":2},"title":"\u2018Public servant\u2019 does not include retired employee; notice of enquiry against retired public servant held sans jurisdiction","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"August 26, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Manipur High Court: A Single Judge Bench comprising of Kh. Nobin Singh, J. allowed a writ petition filed by a retired public servant challenging the notice of enquiry issued against him under Rule 9(7) of the Manipur Public Servants\u2019 Personal Liability Rules, 2006. The petitioner had retired from the post\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/manipurHC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/manipurHC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/manipurHC.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/manipurHC.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/manipurHC.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":207067,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/20\/section-692-of-partnership-act-does-not-bar-unregistered-firm-from-filing-suit-under-ni-act\/","url_meta":{"origin":6130,"position":3},"title":"Section 69(2) of Partnership Act does not bar unregistered firm from filing suit under NI Act","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"December 20, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court:\u00a0A Single Judge Bench comprising of Vinod Goel, J. dismissed a revision petition filed against the order of Additional District Judge whereby petitioners application under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC was dismissed. The respondents, an unregistered partnership firm, had filed a suit against the petitioners for recovery of\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":239268,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/11\/17\/cestat-procedural-lapse-is-condonable-and-denial-of-substantive-right-is-unjustified-tribunal-allows-appeal-under-r-6-3a-ii-of-cenvat-credit-rules-2004\/","url_meta":{"origin":6130,"position":4},"title":"CESTAT | Procedural lapse is condonable and denial of substantive right is unjustified; Tribunal allows appeal under R. 6 (3A) (ii) of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004","author":"Editor","date":"November 17, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Customs, Excise and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT): The Coram of Sulekha Beevi (Judicial Member) and P. Anjani Kumar (Technical Member) allowed an appeal which was filed aggrieved by the judgment and order of the Commissioner (Appeals). The appellants had entered into a Business Solutions Agreement and another Business Promotion\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/09\/CESTAT-Taxscan.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/09\/CESTAT-Taxscan.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/09\/CESTAT-Taxscan.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/09\/CESTAT-Taxscan.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/09\/CESTAT-Taxscan.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":239323,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/11\/18\/ker-hc-if-a-particular-income-is-not-taxable-under-the-income-tax-act-it-cannot-be-taxed-on-the-basis-of-estoppel-or-any-other-equitable-doctrine-court-reiterates-principles-for-recovery-under-inc\/","url_meta":{"origin":6130,"position":5},"title":"Ker HC | If a particular income is not taxable under Income Tax Act, it cannot be taxed on basis of estoppel or any other equitable doctrine; Court reiterates principles for recovery under Income Tax Act","author":"Editor","date":"November 18, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Kerala High Court: Vinod Chandran J., while answering the law points in favour of the Revenue department, restrained from any recovery of the amounts refunded, \u201c(\u2026)since as of now the levy of service tax on the payment in lieu of foreign agency commission will not be leviable as 'Business Auxiliary\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6130","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=6130"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6130\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/7321"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=6130"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=6130"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=6130"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}