{"id":6109,"date":"2014-06-19T17:06:00","date_gmt":"2014-06-19T17:06:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/localhost\/sccblog\/?p=6109"},"modified":"2014-06-19T17:58:20","modified_gmt":"2014-06-19T12:28:20","slug":"new-form-of-evidence-not-to-be-rendered-inadmissible-in-the-absence-of-any-specific-provision-regarding-the-same","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2014\/06\/19\/new-form-of-evidence-not-to-be-rendered-inadmissible-in-the-absence-of-any-specific-provision-regarding-the-same\/","title":{"rendered":"New form of evidence not to be rendered inadmissible in the absence of any specific provision regarding the same"},"content":{"rendered":"

Supreme Court of United Kingdom: <\/b>In an appeal concerning admissibility of linguistic analysis reports called the Sprakab reports for the purpose of determining the nationality of a person in order to grant asylum, a five judge bench emphasized that it was the duty of the Tribunals in any future case to determine what justice requires, in the light of the evidence and submissions made to them. Stating that the Practice Directions should not be rigidly applied, the Court held that the absence of any specific provision in the Practice Directions for evidence in the form of the Sprakab reports was not in itself a bar to their admission. The Court was of the opinion that the Upper Tribunal was entitled to <\/span>address questions relating to Sprakab, its methodology and the presentation of its reports as where the tribunals were faced with a new form of evidence, of potential value in resolving issues of common occurrence, it was entirely appropriate for the Upper Tribunal to select a suitable case with a view to giving general guidance. Secretary of State for Home Department v. MN and KY , on appeal from 2014 UKSC 30, <\/i>decided on 21 May, 2014  <\/span><\/p>\n

To read the full judgment, click here <\/a><\/i><\/o:p><\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Supreme Court of United Kingdom: In an appeal concerning admissibility of linguistic analysis reports called the Sprakab reports for the purpose of <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":7321,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[12],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-6109","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-foreigncourts"],"yoast_head":"\nNew form of evidence not to be rendered inadmissible in the absence of any specific provision regarding the same | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2014\/06\/19\/new-form-of-evidence-not-to-be-rendered-inadmissible-in-the-absence-of-any-specific-provision-regarding-the-same\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"New form of evidence not to be rendered inadmissible in the absence of any specific provision regarding the same\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Supreme Court of United Kingdom: In an appeal concerning admissibility of linguistic analysis reports called the Sprakab reports for the purpose of\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2014\/06\/19\/new-form-of-evidence-not-to-be-rendered-inadmissible-in-the-absence-of-any-specific-provision-regarding-the-same\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2014-06-19T17:06:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Sucheta\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Sucheta\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"1 minute\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2014\/06\/19\/new-form-of-evidence-not-to-be-rendered-inadmissible-in-the-absence-of-any-specific-provision-regarding-the-same\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2014\/06\/19\/new-form-of-evidence-not-to-be-rendered-inadmissible-in-the-absence-of-any-specific-provision-regarding-the-same\/\",\"name\":\"New form of evidence not to be rendered inadmissible in the absence of any specific provision regarding the same | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2014\/06\/19\/new-form-of-evidence-not-to-be-rendered-inadmissible-in-the-absence-of-any-specific-provision-regarding-the-same\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2014\/06\/19\/new-form-of-evidence-not-to-be-rendered-inadmissible-in-the-absence-of-any-specific-provision-regarding-the-same\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2014-06-19T17:06:00+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2014\/06\/19\/new-form-of-evidence-not-to-be-rendered-inadmissible-in-the-absence-of-any-specific-provision-regarding-the-same\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2014\/06\/19\/new-form-of-evidence-not-to-be-rendered-inadmissible-in-the-absence-of-any-specific-provision-regarding-the-same\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2014\/06\/19\/new-form-of-evidence-not-to-be-rendered-inadmissible-in-the-absence-of-any-specific-provision-regarding-the-same\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg\",\"width\":1330,\"height\":887},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2014\/06\/19\/new-form-of-evidence-not-to-be-rendered-inadmissible-in-the-absence-of-any-specific-provision-regarding-the-same\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"New form of evidence not to be rendered inadmissible in the absence of any specific provision regarding the same\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa\",\"name\":\"Sucheta\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Sucheta\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/legal_editor\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"New form of evidence not to be rendered inadmissible in the absence of any specific provision regarding the same | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2014\/06\/19\/new-form-of-evidence-not-to-be-rendered-inadmissible-in-the-absence-of-any-specific-provision-regarding-the-same\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"New form of evidence not to be rendered inadmissible in the absence of any specific provision regarding the same","og_description":"Supreme Court of United Kingdom: In an appeal concerning admissibility of linguistic analysis reports called the Sprakab reports for the purpose of","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2014\/06\/19\/new-form-of-evidence-not-to-be-rendered-inadmissible-in-the-absence-of-any-specific-provision-regarding-the-same\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2014-06-19T17:06:00+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Sucheta","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Sucheta","Est. reading time":"1 minute"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2014\/06\/19\/new-form-of-evidence-not-to-be-rendered-inadmissible-in-the-absence-of-any-specific-provision-regarding-the-same\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2014\/06\/19\/new-form-of-evidence-not-to-be-rendered-inadmissible-in-the-absence-of-any-specific-provision-regarding-the-same\/","name":"New form of evidence not to be rendered inadmissible in the absence of any specific provision regarding the same | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2014\/06\/19\/new-form-of-evidence-not-to-be-rendered-inadmissible-in-the-absence-of-any-specific-provision-regarding-the-same\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2014\/06\/19\/new-form-of-evidence-not-to-be-rendered-inadmissible-in-the-absence-of-any-specific-provision-regarding-the-same\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg","datePublished":"2014-06-19T17:06:00+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2014\/06\/19\/new-form-of-evidence-not-to-be-rendered-inadmissible-in-the-absence-of-any-specific-provision-regarding-the-same\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2014\/06\/19\/new-form-of-evidence-not-to-be-rendered-inadmissible-in-the-absence-of-any-specific-provision-regarding-the-same\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2014\/06\/19\/new-form-of-evidence-not-to-be-rendered-inadmissible-in-the-absence-of-any-specific-provision-regarding-the-same\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg","width":1330,"height":887},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2014\/06\/19\/new-form-of-evidence-not-to-be-rendered-inadmissible-in-the-absence-of-any-specific-provision-regarding-the-same\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"New form of evidence not to be rendered inadmissible in the absence of any specific provision regarding the same"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa","name":"Sucheta","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Sucheta"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/legal_editor\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":214483,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/09\/gau-hc-husband-bound-to-maintain-wife-and-child-under-s-125-crpc-in-absence-of-specific-evidence-as-to-the-income-of-wife\/","url_meta":{"origin":6109,"position":0},"title":"Gau HC | Husband bound to maintain wife and child under S. 125 CrPC in absence of specific evidence as to the income of wife","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"May 9, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Gauhati High Court:\u00a0Hitesh Kumar Sarma, J. dismissed a revision petition filed against the order of the family court whereby the petitioner was directed to pay a monthly sum of Rs 2000 each to his wife and child towards their maintenance under Section 125 CrPC. The wife had left petitioner's home\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":6417,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/02\/06\/extent-of-allowing-stipulated-liquidated-damages-by-way-of-penalty-in-absence-of-evidence-of-actual-loss-discussed\/","url_meta":{"origin":6109,"position":1},"title":"Extent of allowing stipulated liquidated damages by way of penalty in absence of evidence of actual loss, discussed","author":"Sucheta","date":"February 6, 2015","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: Deciding the pivotal question as to when and to what extent can the stipulated liquidated damages for breach of a contract be held to be in the nature of penalty in absence of evidence of actual loss and to what extent the stipulation be taken to be the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Supreme Court"","block_context":{"text":"Supreme Court","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/supremecourt\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":377605,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/03\/07\/bom-hc-disability-certificate-issued-by-non-treating-doctor\/","url_meta":{"origin":6109,"position":2},"title":"Bombay HC: Employee\u2019s compensation claim cannot be denied solely because disability certificate was issued by non-treating doctor","author":"Soumya Yadav","date":"March 7, 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cA qualified medical practitioner who has not treated the injured can always give evidence on the basis of the medical reports of the injured and give a certificate on the loss of earning capacity or disability.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"disability certificate issued by non-treating doctor","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/disability-certificate-issued-by-non-treating-doctor.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/disability-certificate-issued-by-non-treating-doctor.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/disability-certificate-issued-by-non-treating-doctor.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/disability-certificate-issued-by-non-treating-doctor.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":258272,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/12\/09\/accused-cannot-be-convicted-for-conspiracy-only-on-the-basis-of-co-accuseds-confession-sc\/","url_meta":{"origin":6109,"position":3},"title":"Accused cannot be convicted for conspiracy only on the basis of co-accused’s confession: SC","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"December 9, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cA few bits here and a few bits there on which prosecution relies, cannot be held to be adequate for connecting the accused with the commission of crime of criminal conspiracy.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/MicrosoftTeams-image-7-1.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/MicrosoftTeams-image-7-1.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/MicrosoftTeams-image-7-1.png?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/MicrosoftTeams-image-7-1.png?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/MicrosoftTeams-image-7-1.png?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":369994,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/12\/16\/sc-directions-on-systematic-presentation-of-evidence-before-courts\/","url_meta":{"origin":6109,"position":4},"title":"Supreme Court issues directions to Trial Courts for ensuring systematic presentation of evidence for efficient appreciation of record","author":"Sucheta","date":"December 16, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"The directions were issued with the aim to institutionalize a standardized format for cataloguing witnesses, documentary evidence, and material objects, in order to facilitate better comprehension and immediate reference for all stakeholders, including the Appellate Courts","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"systematic presentation of evidence before courts","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/systematic-presentation-of-evidence-before-courts.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/systematic-presentation-of-evidence-before-courts.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/systematic-presentation-of-evidence-before-courts.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/systematic-presentation-of-evidence-before-courts.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":203241,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/06\/unsigned-closure-report-held-to-be-admissible-in-evidence-under-section-14-of-family-courts-act\/","url_meta":{"origin":6109,"position":5},"title":"Unsigned closure report held to be admissible in evidence under Section 14 of Family Courts Act","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"October 6, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court: A Division Bench comprising of G.S. Sistani and Sangita Dhingra Sehgal, JJ. dismissed an appeal challenging the admission of an unsigned document in the Family Court. The complaint of the appellant was that an unsigned document in the absence of original being available was exhibited in the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6109","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=6109"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6109\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/7321"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=6109"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=6109"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=6109"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}