{"id":60971,"date":"2016-08-10T15:38:54","date_gmt":"2016-08-10T10:08:54","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=60971"},"modified":"2016-09-13T15:07:59","modified_gmt":"2016-09-13T09:37:59","slug":"single-judges-order-directing-blocking-of-73-pirate-websites-restored","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/08\/10\/single-judges-order-directing-blocking-of-73-pirate-websites-restored\/","title":{"rendered":"Single Judge’s order directing blocking of 73 pirate websites, restored"},"content":{"rendered":"

Delhi High Court<\/strong>: Deciding the issue of online piracy in review, the Division Bench of Pradeep Nandrajog and A.K.Pathak, JJ.\u00a0 restored the order of the Single Bench directing the blocking of 73 pirate websites and further directing the Government of India,\u00a0 Department of Electronics and Information Technology to ensure compliance with the injunction order.<\/p>\n

The respondent, a leading sports broadcaster had prayed for an injunction against Defendants 1-73 by blocking their websites and direct the internet service providers to block the rogue websites. The Single Bench while issuing an ex parte ad interim injunction had directed the appellant Department to ensure compliance with the order.\u00a0 The Court in appeal had restricted the span of the impugned order directing that only the specified URLs identified would be blocked and not the entire website on the ground that the right of a person to carry on trade and business had to be justified and such restriction as was reasonable could be imposed by a court. The appellant challenged this order on the ground that the Court had erred in issuing directions to the Department and that the sweep of the order was too wide.<\/p>\n

The respondent had urged that the URLs of Defendants 1 to 73 varied between 2 to 2026 and\u00a0 the restrictive injunction granted would render the injunction infructuous because it is very easy to change a URL, but relatively difficult to change a domain name. If the URL of a rogue website is blocked, the operator can simply log into the website source code and change the URL akin to a person changing one\u2019s password. But, if a domain name itself is blocked, to continue with the infringing activity becomes a cumbersome, time consuming and money spending exercise. A new domain name has to be created and purchased apart from purchase of a fresh hosting server space.<\/p>\n

The Court observed that the respondent has placed enough material in the suit to show that the rogue websites were indulging in rank piracy and thus prima facie the stringent measure to block the website as a whole was justified because blocking a URL may not suffice due to the ease with which a URL can be changed. The number of URLs of the rogue websites ranged between 2 to 2026 and cumulatively would be approximately 20,000. It would be a gargantuan task for the respondent to keep on identifying each offending URL and especially keeping in view that as and when the respondent identifies the URL and it is blocked by the ISP, the rogue website, within seconds can change the URL thereby frustrating the very act of blocking the URL.<\/p>\n

On the issue of whether the appellant could be directed with ensuring compliance with the blocking order directed against the service providers, the Court held that it is the duty of the Government, its instrumentalities and agencies to assist in the enforcement of orders passed by the courts, the Court noted that the appellant had complied with the directions of the Single Judge.<\/p>\n

The Court held that the concern of the appellant, a wing of the Government of India with the issue of freedom of trade on the internet may be well founded but on the facts of the instant case, it is misplaced. Allowing the review petition, the Court recalled its order dated March 10, 2016 which restricted the span of the ex parte ad interim injunction by directing that the specific URL should be blocked and restored the ex parte order granted by the Single Judge that the entire website of Defendants 1 to 73 be blocked. However, the Court noted that if any of the defendant made out a case for vacating the ex parte ad interim injunction by showing that its dominant activity was lawful, the trial Judge would consider modification thereof to block a URL.\u00a0[Department of Electronics & Information Technology<\/em>\u00a0 v.\u00a0 Star India Pvt. Ltd<\/em>., 2016 SCC OnLine Del 4160<\/a>, decided on July 29, 2016]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Delhi High Court: Deciding the issue of online piracy in review, the Division Bench of Pradeep Nandrajog and A.K.Pathak, JJ.\u00a0 restored the <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":60981,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-60971","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts"],"yoast_head":"\nSingle Judge's order directing blocking of 73 pirate websites, restored | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/08\/10\/single-judges-order-directing-blocking-of-73-pirate-websites-restored\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Single Judge's order directing blocking of 73 pirate websites, restored\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Delhi High Court: Deciding the issue of online piracy in review, the Division Bench of Pradeep Nandrajog and A.K.Pathak, JJ.\u00a0 restored the\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/08\/10\/single-judges-order-directing-blocking-of-73-pirate-websites-restored\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2016-08-10T10:08:54+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-09-13T09:37:59+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/08\/onlinepiracy.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Sucheta\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Sucheta\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/08\/10\/single-judges-order-directing-blocking-of-73-pirate-websites-restored\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/08\/10\/single-judges-order-directing-blocking-of-73-pirate-websites-restored\/\",\"name\":\"Single Judge's order directing blocking of 73 pirate websites, restored | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/08\/10\/single-judges-order-directing-blocking-of-73-pirate-websites-restored\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/08\/10\/single-judges-order-directing-blocking-of-73-pirate-websites-restored\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/08\/onlinepiracy.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2016-08-10T10:08:54+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-09-13T09:37:59+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/08\/10\/single-judges-order-directing-blocking-of-73-pirate-websites-restored\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/08\/10\/single-judges-order-directing-blocking-of-73-pirate-websites-restored\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/08\/10\/single-judges-order-directing-blocking-of-73-pirate-websites-restored\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/08\/onlinepiracy.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/08\/onlinepiracy.jpg\",\"width\":1330,\"height\":887},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/08\/10\/single-judges-order-directing-blocking-of-73-pirate-websites-restored\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Single Judge’s order directing blocking of 73 pirate websites, restored\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa\",\"name\":\"Sucheta\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Sucheta\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/legal_editor\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Single Judge's order directing blocking of 73 pirate websites, restored | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/08\/10\/single-judges-order-directing-blocking-of-73-pirate-websites-restored\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Single Judge's order directing blocking of 73 pirate websites, restored","og_description":"Delhi High Court: Deciding the issue of online piracy in review, the Division Bench of Pradeep Nandrajog and A.K.Pathak, JJ.\u00a0 restored the","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/08\/10\/single-judges-order-directing-blocking-of-73-pirate-websites-restored\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2016-08-10T10:08:54+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-09-13T09:37:59+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/08\/onlinepiracy.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Sucheta","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Sucheta","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/08\/10\/single-judges-order-directing-blocking-of-73-pirate-websites-restored\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/08\/10\/single-judges-order-directing-blocking-of-73-pirate-websites-restored\/","name":"Single Judge's order directing blocking of 73 pirate websites, restored | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/08\/10\/single-judges-order-directing-blocking-of-73-pirate-websites-restored\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/08\/10\/single-judges-order-directing-blocking-of-73-pirate-websites-restored\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/08\/onlinepiracy.jpg","datePublished":"2016-08-10T10:08:54+00:00","dateModified":"2016-09-13T09:37:59+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/08\/10\/single-judges-order-directing-blocking-of-73-pirate-websites-restored\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/08\/10\/single-judges-order-directing-blocking-of-73-pirate-websites-restored\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/08\/10\/single-judges-order-directing-blocking-of-73-pirate-websites-restored\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/08\/onlinepiracy.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/08\/onlinepiracy.jpg","width":1330,"height":887},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/08\/10\/single-judges-order-directing-blocking-of-73-pirate-websites-restored\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Single Judge’s order directing blocking of 73 pirate websites, restored"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa","name":"Sucheta","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Sucheta"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/legal_editor\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/08\/onlinepiracy.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":352117,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/02\/delhi-high-court-dynamic-injunction-jiostar-india-england-2025-streaming-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":60971,"position":0},"title":"Delhi High Court grants Dynamic+ Injunction to JioStar against rogue websites for streaming India-England 2025 series without authorization","author":"Arunima","date":"July 2, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"The present cause of action arose on 26-05-2025 when the plaintiff discovered that rogue websites were unlawfully streaming IPL 2025 matches without authorization. Given the plaintiff\u2019s exclusive rights over such content, the plaintiff reasonably apprehends similar unlawful streaming during the upcoming India Tour of England 2025.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Dynamic+ Injunction JioStar India","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Dynamic-Injunction-JioStar-India.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Dynamic-Injunction-JioStar-India.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Dynamic-Injunction-JioStar-India.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Dynamic-Injunction-JioStar-India.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":197177,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/06\/19\/uk-supreme-court-orders-the-right-holders-to-indemnify-the-isps-for-compliance-of-website-blocking-order\/","url_meta":{"origin":60971,"position":1},"title":"UK Supreme Court orders the right-holders to indemnify the ISPs for compliance of website blocking order","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"June 19, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"United Kingdom Supreme Court: Lord Sumpton, speaking for himself and Lord Mance, Lord Kerr, Lord Reed and Lord Hodge, decided an appeal in favour of the Internet Service Providers (ISPs) directing the respondents- Cartier International AG, to pay the expenses for implementing the order of injunction passed against the ISPs.\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/07\/DSC_7472-2-e1476682323502.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/07\/DSC_7472-2-e1476682323502.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/07\/DSC_7472-2-e1476682323502.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/07\/DSC_7472-2-e1476682323502.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/07\/DSC_7472-2-e1476682323502.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":357484,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/08\/22\/del-hc-grants-interim-relief-to-premji-invest-in-trade-mark-case\/","url_meta":{"origin":60971,"position":2},"title":"Delhi High Court grants interim relief to Premji Invest, orders blocking of fake Apps and websites misusing its trade mark","author":"Editor","date":"August 22, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"The Defendants were operating several websites and applications to trick the general public into believing that they were associated with Premji Invest so as to scam them into illegal and fraudulent investments.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Premji Invest trade mark infringement","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/Premji-Invest-trade-mark-infringement.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/Premji-Invest-trade-mark-infringement.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/Premji-Invest-trade-mark-infringement.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/Premji-Invest-trade-mark-infringement.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":372415,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/13\/del-hc-grants-dynamic-injunction-in-warner-bros-copyright-case\/","url_meta":{"origin":60971,"position":3},"title":"Inside Delhi HC Order: Piracy webites illegally streaming ‘Friends’, ‘Stranger Things’, ‘Batman’ taken down; Warner Bros wins Dynamic+ Injunction","author":"Prarthana Gupta","date":"January 13, 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThe need for immediate relief is particularly pressing in this case as the infringing websites are making available the plaintiffs\u2019 copyrighted works, which could lead to significant financial losses for the plaintiffs.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Warner bros. copyright case","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Warner-bros.-copyright-case.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Warner-bros.-copyright-case.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Warner-bros.-copyright-case.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Warner-bros.-copyright-case.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":324475,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/06\/15\/delhi-hc-grants-dynamic-injunction-to-protect-broadcast-rights-star-india-icc-t20-world-cup-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":60971,"position":4},"title":"[ICC T20 World Cup 2024] Delhi High Court grants dynamic + injunction to protect broadcast rights of Star India","author":"Editor","date":"June 15, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"The Delhi High Court said that the dynamic nature of the digital landscape necessitates that court orders are not static but evolve in tandem with technological advancements and challenges posed by the virtual domain.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":344507,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/28\/delhi-high-court-dynamic-injunction-rogue-websites-undekhi-applause-entertainment-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":60971,"position":5},"title":"Delhi High Court grants dynamic injunction against rogue websites for streaming \u2018Applause Entertainment’s \u2018UNDEKHI\u2019","author":"Arunima","date":"March 28, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"The defendants are websites that are making the plaintiff\u2019s series\/show available to the public without procuring any valid license or authorization from the plaintiff. These defendants\u2019 websites unlawfully provide access to infringing content free of charge, without requiring users to register. The availability of such content is monetized through advertisements\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/60971","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=60971"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/60971\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/60981"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=60971"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=60971"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=60971"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}