{"id":60951,"date":"2016-08-10T14:34:10","date_gmt":"2016-08-10T09:04:10","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=60951"},"modified":"2016-09-13T15:07:37","modified_gmt":"2016-09-13T09:37:37","slug":"constitutionality-of-section-66b-of-the-finance-act-1994-upheld","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/08\/10\/constitutionality-of-section-66b-of-the-finance-act-1994-upheld\/","title":{"rendered":"Constitutionality of Section 66B of the Finance Act, 1994, upheld"},"content":{"rendered":"

Delhi High Court<\/strong>: While dealing with the issue relating to challenge to the constitutional validity of Section 66B of the Finance Act, 1994 read with 65B(40) and Section 66D as amended by Clause (f) of Section 107 and Clause (2) of Section 109 of Finance Act, 2015 respectively, along with Notification No. 14\/2015\/-ST dated 19th May 2015, which levies service tax with effect from 1st June 2015, on persons who manufacture alcoholic liquor for human consumption on job work basis, the division bench comprising of S. Muralidhar and Vibhu Bakhru JJ.,\u00a0 dismissed challenges made by the liquor manufactures.<\/p>\n

In the present case, Petitioners filed the petition on the ground that Parliament lacks the legislative competence to enact the said amendments since the activity of manufacture of alcoholic liquor for consumption, whether for oneself or for another person, lies exclusively within the domain of the State Legislature under Entry 51 of List II of Schedule VII to the Constitution. The case of the Respondents on the other hand was that the service tax introduced by way of Chapter V to the 1994 Act is within the legislative competence of the Parliament to levy and collect. The Respondents contended that service tax is not levied on the manufacture of alcohol but on the service aspect of the contract of manufacturing of alcohol on behalf of the principal manufacturer\/brand owner<\/p>\n

The Court upon being satisfied with the contentions laid down by Respondent\u2019s held that what is sought to be made amenable to service tax is the activity of contract manufacturing of alcoholic liquors fit for human consumption by one entity for another. Such provision of service which is in pith and substance not covered under Entry 51 of List II of the Seventh Schedule to the Constitution of India is certainly amenable to levy of service tax by Parliament which is competent to legislate on that aspect with reference to Entry 97 of List I. The Court, therefore dismissed the challenge to the validity of Section 113(A) (1) of the \u00a02009 Act by which Section 65(19) of the FA 1994 stood amended and the challenge to the validity of Section 66B of the 1994 Act read with 65B(40) and Section 66D of the 1994 Act \u00a0as amended by Clause (f) of Section 107 and Clause (2) of Section 109 of 2015 Act. Carlsberg India Pvt. Ltd. \u00a0v. Union of India, 2016 SCC OnLine Del 4359<\/a>, decided on 5.08.2016]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Delhi High Court: While dealing with the issue relating to challenge to the constitutional validity of Section 66B of the Finance Act, <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-60951","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts"],"yoast_head":"\nConstitutionality of Section 66B of the Finance Act, 1994, upheld | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/08\/10\/constitutionality-of-section-66b-of-the-finance-act-1994-upheld\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Constitutionality of Section 66B of the Finance Act, 1994, upheld\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Delhi High Court: While dealing with the issue relating to challenge to the constitutional validity of Section 66B of the Finance Act,\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/08\/10\/constitutionality-of-section-66b-of-the-finance-act-1994-upheld\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2016-08-10T09:04:10+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-09-13T09:37:37+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Delhi-HC.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1329\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"888\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Sucheta\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Sucheta\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/08\/10\/constitutionality-of-section-66b-of-the-finance-act-1994-upheld\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/08\/10\/constitutionality-of-section-66b-of-the-finance-act-1994-upheld\/\",\"name\":\"Constitutionality of Section 66B of the Finance Act, 1994, upheld | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2016-08-10T09:04:10+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-09-13T09:37:37+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/08\/10\/constitutionality-of-section-66b-of-the-finance-act-1994-upheld\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/08\/10\/constitutionality-of-section-66b-of-the-finance-act-1994-upheld\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/08\/10\/constitutionality-of-section-66b-of-the-finance-act-1994-upheld\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Constitutionality of Section 66B of the Finance Act, 1994, upheld\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa\",\"name\":\"Sucheta\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Sucheta\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/legal_editor\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Constitutionality of Section 66B of the Finance Act, 1994, upheld | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/08\/10\/constitutionality-of-section-66b-of-the-finance-act-1994-upheld\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Constitutionality of Section 66B of the Finance Act, 1994, upheld","og_description":"Delhi High Court: While dealing with the issue relating to challenge to the constitutional validity of Section 66B of the Finance Act,","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/08\/10\/constitutionality-of-section-66b-of-the-finance-act-1994-upheld\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2016-08-10T09:04:10+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-09-13T09:37:37+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1329,"height":888,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Delhi-HC.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Sucheta","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Sucheta","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/08\/10\/constitutionality-of-section-66b-of-the-finance-act-1994-upheld\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/08\/10\/constitutionality-of-section-66b-of-the-finance-act-1994-upheld\/","name":"Constitutionality of Section 66B of the Finance Act, 1994, upheld | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2016-08-10T09:04:10+00:00","dateModified":"2016-09-13T09:37:37+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/08\/10\/constitutionality-of-section-66b-of-the-finance-act-1994-upheld\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/08\/10\/constitutionality-of-section-66b-of-the-finance-act-1994-upheld\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/08\/10\/constitutionality-of-section-66b-of-the-finance-act-1994-upheld\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Constitutionality of Section 66B of the Finance Act, 1994, upheld"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa","name":"Sucheta","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Sucheta"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/legal_editor\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":246456,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/04\/03\/abuse-of-dominance\/","url_meta":{"origin":60951,"position":0},"title":"[Monopoly] CCI | State of Uttarakhand created monopolies by canalising liquor procurement || Detailed Order on Abuse of dominance by Uttarakhand Agricultural Produce Marketing Board denying market access to others","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"April 3, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Competition Commission of India (CCI): The Coram of Ashok Kumar Gupta (Chairperson) and Sangeeta Verma and Bhagwant Singh Bishnoi, (Members) expressed that: State of Uttarakhand formulated the Liquor Wholesale Order in a manner through which State officials were vested with exclusive powers which included discretion to dictate as to what\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Competition-Commission.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Competition-Commission.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Competition-Commission.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Competition-Commission.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Competition-Commission.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":327895,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/02\/experts-corner-taxability-of-ena-closing-the-chapter-or-opening-new-frontier\/","url_meta":{"origin":60951,"position":1},"title":"Taxability of ENA: Closing the Chapter or Opening a New Frontier?","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"August 2, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"by Shivam Mehta\u2020, Tanya Garg \u2020\u2020 and Srijita Chakraborty\u2020\u2020\u2020","rel":"","context":"In "Experts Corner"","block_context":{"text":"Experts Corner","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/experts_corner\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Taxability of ENA","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/Taxability-of-ENA.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/Taxability-of-ENA.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/Taxability-of-ENA.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/Taxability-of-ENA.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":264783,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/03\/31\/cbdt-notifies-exemption-under-section-206c1g-of-the-income-tax-act-1961\/","url_meta":{"origin":60951,"position":2},"title":"CBDT notifies exemption under section 206C(1G) of the Income tax Act, 1961","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"March 31, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"The Central Government hereby notifies that the provisions of sub-section (1G) of section 206C shall not apply to an individual who is not a resident in India in terms of clause (1) and clause (1A) of section 6 of the Act, and who is visiting India. \u00a0 [206-C. Profits and\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Legislation Updates"","block_context":{"text":"Legislation Updates","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/legislationupdates\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"CBDT","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/08\/MicrosoftTeams-image-159-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/08\/MicrosoftTeams-image-159-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/08\/MicrosoftTeams-image-159-1.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/08\/MicrosoftTeams-image-159-1.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/08\/MicrosoftTeams-image-159-1.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":369830,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/12\/15\/cci-directs-maharashtra-liquor-trade-associations\/","url_meta":{"origin":60951,"position":3},"title":"CCI Directs Maharashtra Liquor Associations to Halt Anti-Competitive Practices","author":"Shubhi","date":"December 15, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"CCI issues a cease and desist order against anti-competitive trade practices against Maharashtra Liquor Associations and holds their office-bearers accountable for violating the rules of Competition Act.","rel":"","context":"In "Legislation Updates"","block_context":{"text":"Legislation Updates","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/legislationupdates\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Maharashtra liquor trade associations","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/Maharashtra-liquor-trade-associations.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/Maharashtra-liquor-trade-associations.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/Maharashtra-liquor-trade-associations.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/Maharashtra-liquor-trade-associations.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":209859,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/02\/12\/haryanas-single-l-1bf-license-rule-for-imported-foreign-liquor-struck-down-in-a-21-majority-verdict\/","url_meta":{"origin":60951,"position":4},"title":"Haryana\u2019s single L-1BF license rule for imported foreign liquor struck down in a 2:1 majority verdict","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"February 12, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: Rule 24(i-eeee) of the Haryana Liquor License Rules 1970 that provides for a single L-1BF license for the entire State to deal in imported foreign liquor, bottled outside India and imported into the country in a bottled, has been struck down by a 2:1 majority verdict by the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":51101,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/06\/09\/rule-5-a2-of-service-tax-rules-1994-struck-down-as-ultra-vires-the-finance-act-1994\/","url_meta":{"origin":60951,"position":5},"title":"Rule 5-A(2) of Service Tax Rules, 1994 struck down as ultra vires the Finance Act, 1994","author":"Sucheta","date":"June 9, 2016","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court: Disposing of the petition, wherein the challenge was to Rule 5-A(2) of the Service Tax Rules, 1994 [as amended by the Service Tax (Third Amendment) Rules, 2014] to the extent that the amended Rule 5-A(2) empowered departmental officers or audit party deputed by the Commissioner or the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/60951","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=60951"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/60951\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=60951"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=60951"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=60951"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}