{"id":60811,"date":"2016-08-09T16:16:33","date_gmt":"2016-08-09T10:46:33","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=60811"},"modified":"2016-09-05T15:18:09","modified_gmt":"2016-09-05T09:48:09","slug":"no-discretion-is-vested-in-the-prescribed-authority-to-re-determine-surplus-land-by-means-of-section-31-of-the-1976-amendment-act","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/08\/09\/no-discretion-is-vested-in-the-prescribed-authority-to-re-determine-surplus-land-by-means-of-section-31-of-the-1976-amendment-act\/","title":{"rendered":"No discretion is vested in the prescribed authority to re-determine surplus land by means of Section 31 of the 1976 Amendment Act"},"content":{"rendered":"

Supreme Court<\/strong>: The Court was called upon to the decide the question as to whether ceiling proceedings under U.P. Imposition of Ceiling on Land Holdings Act, 1960 in respect of the land in question have lapsed owing to Section 31 of the 1976 Amendment Act by which a wholesale substitution of various Sections of the principal Act was carried out and the erstwhile scheme of determining surplus \u201cfair quality land\u201d was now substituted by a scheme which determined surplus irrigated land.<\/p>\n

Interpreting the expression \u201cmay at any time within a period of two years\u201d occurring in Section 31(3) of the U.P. Imposition of Ceiling on Land Holdings (Amendment) Act, 1976, it was held that the expression \u201cmay\u201d goes along with the words \u201cat any time within a period of two years\u201d as it is clear that on a correct reading of the sub-Section, the prescribed authority has, in every case, to re-determine surplus land if an order determining surplus land has been made before 10.10.1975. A period of two years is given to re-determine surplus land in accordance with the principal Act as amended by the U.P. Imposition of Ceiling on Land Holdings (Amendment) Act, 1974 & hence, it is clear that no discretion is vested in the prescribed authority to re-determine surplus land. Surplus land has, in all cases, to be re-determined, as a completely different and new scheme applicable to all lands has replaced the existing scheme.<\/p>\n

The bench of Dipak Misra and R.F. Nariman, JJ noticed that the language of Section 31(2) of the 1976 Act makes it clear that every appeal preferred against such orders and pending immediately before the 10.10.1975, shall be deemed to have abated on the said date. Considering the fact that the appeal in the present case was filed prior to the aforementioned date, it was held that it was necessary for the prescribed authority to re-determine surplus land under Section 31(3) in accordance with the principal Act as amended by the 1976 Act, for which purpose, the provisions of section 13 of the principal Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to every order re-determining surplus land under sub-section 3 of this Section or Section 9 of the 1974 Amendment Act vide Section 31(4) of the 1976 Amendment Act. [Arvind Kumar v. State of UP,\u00a02016 SCC OnLine SC 780<\/a>, decided on 08.08.2016]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Supreme Court: The Court was called upon to the decide the question as to whether ceiling proceedings under U.P. Imposition of Ceiling <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":154914,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,9],"tags":[5363,8551],"class_list":["post-60811","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-supremecourt","tag-supreme-court","tag-surplus"],"yoast_head":"\nNo discretion is vested in the prescribed authority to re-determine surplus land by means of Section 31 of the 1976 Amendment Act | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/08\/09\/no-discretion-is-vested-in-the-prescribed-authority-to-re-determine-surplus-land-by-means-of-section-31-of-the-1976-amendment-act\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"No discretion is vested in the prescribed authority to re-determine surplus land by means of Section 31 of the 1976 Amendment Act\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Supreme Court: The Court was called upon to the decide the question as to whether ceiling proceedings under U.P. Imposition of Ceiling\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/08\/09\/no-discretion-is-vested-in-the-prescribed-authority-to-re-determine-surplus-land-by-means-of-section-31-of-the-1976-amendment-act\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2016-08-09T10:46:33+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-09-05T09:48:09+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Sucheta\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Sucheta\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/08\/09\/no-discretion-is-vested-in-the-prescribed-authority-to-re-determine-surplus-land-by-means-of-section-31-of-the-1976-amendment-act\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/08\/09\/no-discretion-is-vested-in-the-prescribed-authority-to-re-determine-surplus-land-by-means-of-section-31-of-the-1976-amendment-act\/\",\"name\":\"No discretion is vested in the prescribed authority to re-determine surplus land by means of Section 31 of the 1976 Amendment Act | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/08\/09\/no-discretion-is-vested-in-the-prescribed-authority-to-re-determine-surplus-land-by-means-of-section-31-of-the-1976-amendment-act\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/08\/09\/no-discretion-is-vested-in-the-prescribed-authority-to-re-determine-surplus-land-by-means-of-section-31-of-the-1976-amendment-act\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2016-08-09T10:46:33+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-09-05T09:48:09+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/08\/09\/no-discretion-is-vested-in-the-prescribed-authority-to-re-determine-surplus-land-by-means-of-section-31-of-the-1976-amendment-act\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/08\/09\/no-discretion-is-vested-in-the-prescribed-authority-to-re-determine-surplus-land-by-means-of-section-31-of-the-1976-amendment-act\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/08\/09\/no-discretion-is-vested-in-the-prescribed-authority-to-re-determine-surplus-land-by-means-of-section-31-of-the-1976-amendment-act\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg\",\"width\":1330,\"height\":887},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/08\/09\/no-discretion-is-vested-in-the-prescribed-authority-to-re-determine-surplus-land-by-means-of-section-31-of-the-1976-amendment-act\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"No discretion is vested in the prescribed authority to re-determine surplus land by means of Section 31 of the 1976 Amendment Act\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa\",\"name\":\"Sucheta\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Sucheta\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/legal_editor\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"No discretion is vested in the prescribed authority to re-determine surplus land by means of Section 31 of the 1976 Amendment Act | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/08\/09\/no-discretion-is-vested-in-the-prescribed-authority-to-re-determine-surplus-land-by-means-of-section-31-of-the-1976-amendment-act\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"No discretion is vested in the prescribed authority to re-determine surplus land by means of Section 31 of the 1976 Amendment Act","og_description":"Supreme Court: The Court was called upon to the decide the question as to whether ceiling proceedings under U.P. Imposition of Ceiling","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/08\/09\/no-discretion-is-vested-in-the-prescribed-authority-to-re-determine-surplus-land-by-means-of-section-31-of-the-1976-amendment-act\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2016-08-09T10:46:33+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-09-05T09:48:09+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Sucheta","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Sucheta","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/08\/09\/no-discretion-is-vested-in-the-prescribed-authority-to-re-determine-surplus-land-by-means-of-section-31-of-the-1976-amendment-act\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/08\/09\/no-discretion-is-vested-in-the-prescribed-authority-to-re-determine-surplus-land-by-means-of-section-31-of-the-1976-amendment-act\/","name":"No discretion is vested in the prescribed authority to re-determine surplus land by means of Section 31 of the 1976 Amendment Act | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/08\/09\/no-discretion-is-vested-in-the-prescribed-authority-to-re-determine-surplus-land-by-means-of-section-31-of-the-1976-amendment-act\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/08\/09\/no-discretion-is-vested-in-the-prescribed-authority-to-re-determine-surplus-land-by-means-of-section-31-of-the-1976-amendment-act\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg","datePublished":"2016-08-09T10:46:33+00:00","dateModified":"2016-09-05T09:48:09+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/08\/09\/no-discretion-is-vested-in-the-prescribed-authority-to-re-determine-surplus-land-by-means-of-section-31-of-the-1976-amendment-act\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/08\/09\/no-discretion-is-vested-in-the-prescribed-authority-to-re-determine-surplus-land-by-means-of-section-31-of-the-1976-amendment-act\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/08\/09\/no-discretion-is-vested-in-the-prescribed-authority-to-re-determine-surplus-land-by-means-of-section-31-of-the-1976-amendment-act\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg","width":1330,"height":887},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/08\/09\/no-discretion-is-vested-in-the-prescribed-authority-to-re-determine-surplus-land-by-means-of-section-31-of-the-1976-amendment-act\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"No discretion is vested in the prescribed authority to re-determine surplus land by means of Section 31 of the 1976 Amendment Act"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa","name":"Sucheta","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Sucheta"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/legal_editor\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":305606,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/25\/vacant-land-meaning-authoritative-determination-supreme-court-refers-larger-bench\/","url_meta":{"origin":60811,"position":0},"title":"Supreme Court refers authoritative determination of meaning of ‘vacant land’ to Larger Bench","author":"Ridhi","date":"October 25, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court opined that the interpretation, spirit and object of the Ceiling Act as envisaged during enactment and juxtaposed against the regressive impact experienced in different States as indicated in Statement of Objects and Reasons of the Repeal Act required authoritative determination of related issues by a Larger Bench.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Vacant land meaning-1","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/Vacant-land-meaning-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/Vacant-land-meaning-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/Vacant-land-meaning-1.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/Vacant-land-meaning-1.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":6274,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2014\/12\/23\/repeal-of-the-principal-act-shall-not-affect-the-possessions-which-have-been-taken-over-by-the-state-government\/","url_meta":{"origin":60811,"position":1},"title":"Repeal of the Principal Act shall not affect the possessions which have been taken over by the State Government","author":"Sucheta","date":"December 23, 2014","format":false,"excerpt":"SUPREME COURT: In one of the prominent decisions, the Court while dealing with a Special Leave Petition regarding the possession of the land in question by the Government of Assam under the \u00a0Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976 decided in favour of State and ruled that despite the repeal\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Supreme Court"","block_context":{"text":"Supreme Court","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/supremecourt\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":242874,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/01\/27\/right-to-property-is-still-a-constitutional-right-under-article-300a-of-constitution-deprivation-of-this-right-can-only-be-in-accordance-with-the-procedure-established-by-law-sc-cla\/","url_meta":{"origin":60811,"position":2},"title":"“Right to property is still a constitutional right under Article 300A of the Constitution”; SC reminds in a case where State took possession of surplus land in absence of surplus land","author":"Editor","date":"January 27, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cRight to property is still a constitutional right under Article 300A of the Constitution of India though not a fundamental right. The deprivation of the right can only be in accordance with the procedure established by law.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":290156,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/04\/20\/bombay-high-court-settles-the-ulc-premium-conundrum-in-maharashtra\/","url_meta":{"origin":60811,"position":3},"title":"Bombay High Court Settles the ULC Premium Conundrum in Maharashtra","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"April 20, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"by Abhiraj Gandhi\u2020 and Nirali Shah\u2020\u2020 Cite as: 2023 SCC OnLine Blog Exp 34","rel":"","context":"In "Experts Corner"","block_context":{"text":"Experts Corner","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/experts_corner\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"ulc premium in maharashtra","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/ulc-premium-in-maharashtra.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/ulc-premium-in-maharashtra.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/ulc-premium-in-maharashtra.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/ulc-premium-in-maharashtra.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":84361,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/11\/04\/2016-scc-vol-9-october-28-2016-part-2\/","url_meta":{"origin":60811,"position":4},"title":"2016 SCC Vol. 9 October 28, 2016 Part 2","author":"Saba","date":"November 4, 2016","format":false,"excerpt":"Constitution of India \u2014 Art. 137 \u2014 Review: Reagitation of decided issue, not permissible. [T.N. Terminated Full Time Temporary LIC Employees Assn. v. S.K. Roy,\u00a0(2016) 9 SCC 366] Constitution of India \u2014 Art. 233(2) \u2014 District Judges \u2014 Eligibility for appointment as: Candidate already in service of Central\/State Government, is\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Cases Reported"","block_context":{"text":"Cases Reported","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casesreported\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/01\/scccover-28.1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/01\/scccover-28.1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/01\/scccover-28.1.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/01\/scccover-28.1.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/01\/scccover-28.1.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":300596,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/02\/telangana-high-court-discusses-power-to-decide-suit-title-under-article-226-proceedings\/","url_meta":{"origin":60811,"position":5},"title":"Telangana High Court discusses High Court’s power in deciding suit title under Article 226 proceedings; restricts State from dispossessing parties","author":"Ridhi","date":"September 2, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The Division Bench said that the Single Judge ought to have appreciated the appellants' possession and the question of title could not have been examined.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"telangana high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/telangana-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/telangana-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/telangana-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/telangana-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/60811","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=60811"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/60811\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/154914"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=60811"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=60811"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=60811"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}