{"id":60611,"date":"2016-08-09T09:37:01","date_gmt":"2016-08-09T04:07:01","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=60611"},"modified":"2016-09-16T12:22:39","modified_gmt":"2016-09-16T06:52:39","slug":"question-regarding-validity-of-s-2p-of-pndt-act-and-r-331b-of-the-pndt-rules-left-open-for-the-supreme-court-to-answer","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/08\/09\/question-regarding-validity-of-s-2p-of-pndt-act-and-r-331b-of-the-pndt-rules-left-open-for-the-supreme-court-to-answer\/","title":{"rendered":"Question regarding validity of S. 2(p) of PNDT Act and R. 3(3)(1)(b) of the PNDT Rules, left open for the Supreme Court to answer"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Madras High Court: <\/strong>While deciding upon the present writ petition whereby it was prayed that a Writ of Declaration be issued, declaring that the Pre-conception and Prenatal Diagnostic Techniques (Prohibition of Sex Selection) (Six Months Training) Rules, 2014 is beyond the scope of the Pre-conceptional and Pre-natal Diagnostic Techniques (Prohibition of Sex Selection) Act, 1994, and inconsistent with the Medical Council of India Act, 1956 and Regulations, the Division Bench of S.K. Kaul, C.J., and R. Mahadevan, J., \u00a0held that once any High Court has declared the invalidity of a Central Act, it cannot be applied selectively in other States because in absence of a final decision by the Supreme Court on the validity of the provisions of PNDT Act and Rules, there is no question of applicability of the provisions struck down by the Delhi High Court.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The present issue concerned the Order of the Delhi High Court dated 17.02.2016 striking down Section 2(p) of Pre-natal Diagnostic Techniques (Prohibition of Sex Selection) Act, 1994 and Rule 3(3)(1)(b) of the PNDT Rules, 2014. The question was regarding the status\/ applicability of the struck down provisions till the time the Supreme Court does not take any decision regarding it.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Perusing the question, the Court observed that since the Supreme Court has not stayed the operation of the Delhi High Court Order declaring the aforementioned provisions to be invalid, so no question rises regarding the applicability of the provisions. If the Supreme Court had decided to stay the operation of the High Court order, then only the provisions in question would have come back in force. The Bench therefore held that it is now upon the Supreme Court to decide upon the vires of the provisions of PNDT Act and PNDT Rules. [<em>T. Rajakumari <\/em>v. <em>The Govt. of Tamil Nadu, <\/em><a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/LoginForNewsLink\/2016_SCC_OnLine_Mad_8992\">2016 SCC OnLine Mad 8992<\/a>, decided on 03.08.2016]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Madras High Court: While deciding upon the present writ petition whereby it was prayed that a Writ of Declaration be issued, declaring <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-60611","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Question regarding validity of S. 2(p) of PNDT Act and R. 3(3)(1)(b) of the PNDT Rules, left open for the Supreme Court to answer | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/08\/09\/question-regarding-validity-of-s-2p-of-pndt-act-and-r-331b-of-the-pndt-rules-left-open-for-the-supreme-court-to-answer\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Question regarding validity of S. 2(p) of PNDT Act and R. 3(3)(1)(b) of the PNDT Rules, left open for the Supreme Court to answer\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Madras High Court: While deciding upon the present writ petition whereby it was prayed that a Writ of Declaration be issued, declaring\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/08\/09\/question-regarding-validity-of-s-2p-of-pndt-act-and-r-331b-of-the-pndt-rules-left-open-for-the-supreme-court-to-answer\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2016-08-09T04:07:01+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-09-16T06:52:39+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/11\/madras-high-court1.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Sucheta\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Sucheta\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"1 minute\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/08\/09\/question-regarding-validity-of-s-2p-of-pndt-act-and-r-331b-of-the-pndt-rules-left-open-for-the-supreme-court-to-answer\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/08\/09\/question-regarding-validity-of-s-2p-of-pndt-act-and-r-331b-of-the-pndt-rules-left-open-for-the-supreme-court-to-answer\/\",\"name\":\"Question regarding validity of S. 2(p) of PNDT Act and R. 3(3)(1)(b) of the PNDT Rules, left open for the Supreme Court to answer | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2016-08-09T04:07:01+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-09-16T06:52:39+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/08\/09\/question-regarding-validity-of-s-2p-of-pndt-act-and-r-331b-of-the-pndt-rules-left-open-for-the-supreme-court-to-answer\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/08\/09\/question-regarding-validity-of-s-2p-of-pndt-act-and-r-331b-of-the-pndt-rules-left-open-for-the-supreme-court-to-answer\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/08\/09\/question-regarding-validity-of-s-2p-of-pndt-act-and-r-331b-of-the-pndt-rules-left-open-for-the-supreme-court-to-answer\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Question regarding validity of S. 2(p) of PNDT Act and R. 3(3)(1)(b) of the PNDT Rules, left open for the Supreme Court to answer\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa\",\"name\":\"Sucheta\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Sucheta\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/legal_editor\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Question regarding validity of S. 2(p) of PNDT Act and R. 3(3)(1)(b) of the PNDT Rules, left open for the Supreme Court to answer | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/08\/09\/question-regarding-validity-of-s-2p-of-pndt-act-and-r-331b-of-the-pndt-rules-left-open-for-the-supreme-court-to-answer\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Question regarding validity of S. 2(p) of PNDT Act and R. 3(3)(1)(b) of the PNDT Rules, left open for the Supreme Court to answer","og_description":"Madras High Court: While deciding upon the present writ petition whereby it was prayed that a Writ of Declaration be issued, declaring","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/08\/09\/question-regarding-validity-of-s-2p-of-pndt-act-and-r-331b-of-the-pndt-rules-left-open-for-the-supreme-court-to-answer\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2016-08-09T04:07:01+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-09-16T06:52:39+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/11\/madras-high-court1.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Sucheta","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Sucheta","Est. reading time":"1 minute"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/08\/09\/question-regarding-validity-of-s-2p-of-pndt-act-and-r-331b-of-the-pndt-rules-left-open-for-the-supreme-court-to-answer\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/08\/09\/question-regarding-validity-of-s-2p-of-pndt-act-and-r-331b-of-the-pndt-rules-left-open-for-the-supreme-court-to-answer\/","name":"Question regarding validity of S. 2(p) of PNDT Act and R. 3(3)(1)(b) of the PNDT Rules, left open for the Supreme Court to answer | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2016-08-09T04:07:01+00:00","dateModified":"2016-09-16T06:52:39+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/08\/09\/question-regarding-validity-of-s-2p-of-pndt-act-and-r-331b-of-the-pndt-rules-left-open-for-the-supreme-court-to-answer\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/08\/09\/question-regarding-validity-of-s-2p-of-pndt-act-and-r-331b-of-the-pndt-rules-left-open-for-the-supreme-court-to-answer\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/08\/09\/question-regarding-validity-of-s-2p-of-pndt-act-and-r-331b-of-the-pndt-rules-left-open-for-the-supreme-court-to-answer\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Question regarding validity of S. 2(p) of PNDT Act and R. 3(3)(1)(b) of the PNDT Rules, left open for the Supreme Court to answer"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa","name":"Sucheta","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Sucheta"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/legal_editor\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":293421,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/05\/30\/can-ayush-doctors-perform-ultrasonogram-techniques-on-pregnant-women-without-qualification-under-pc-pndt-act-madras-high-court-answers-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":60611,"position":0},"title":"Are AYUSH Doctors eligible to perform ultrasonogram techniques on pregnant women without qualifications under PC-PNDT Act? Madras High Court answers","author":"Apoorva","date":"May 30, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Madras High Court held that the AYUSH Doctors, if at all qualified under the provisions of the PC & PNDT Act 1994 and Rules framed thereunder, are entitled to be construed as qualified Doctors within the meaning of the Central Act for carrying out various diagnostic procedures and ultra sonogram\/ultrasound\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"madras high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/madras-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/madras-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/madras-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/madras-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":243516,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/02\/07\/role-of-judiciary-to-implement-the-pre-conception-and-pre-natal-diagnostic-techniques-prohibition-of-sex-selection-act-1994\/","url_meta":{"origin":60611,"position":1},"title":"Role of Judiciary to Implement the Pre-Conception and Pre-Natal Diagnostic Techniques (Prohibition of Sex Selection) Act, 1994","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"February 7, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"by Dr. Kaushal J. Thaker\u2020","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Op Eds&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Op Eds","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/op-ed\/legal-analysis\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/impliment-3.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/impliment-3.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/impliment-3.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/impliment-3.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/impliment-3.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":265883,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/04\/25\/can-a-single-member-appropriate-authority-take-cognizance-of-a-complaint-filed-under-pcpndt-act-sex-determination\/","url_meta":{"origin":60611,"position":2},"title":"Can Court take cognizance of complaint filed by single-member Appropriate Authority for offences under PC&#038;PNDT Act, 1994? Del HC elaborates","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"April 25, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court: Mukta Gupta, J., held that, the Metropolitan Magistrate\/ Judicial Magistrate of the first class is competent to take cognizance and try the offence punishable under the PC&PNDT Act on the complaint of an Appropriate Authority or any officer authorised on this behalf by the Central Government or\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/Delhi_New-logo.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/Delhi_New-logo.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/Delhi_New-logo.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/Delhi_New-logo.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/Delhi_New-logo.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":228117,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/04\/10\/mohfw-has-not-suspended-the-pc-pndt-act-which-prohibits-sex-selection-before-or-after-conception\/","url_meta":{"origin":60611,"position":3},"title":"MoHFW has not suspended the PC &#038; PNDT Act, which prohibits sex selection before or after conception","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"April 10, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"A section of the media is speculating that the PC&PNDT (Pre Conception and Pre Natal Diagnostic Techniques (Prohibition of Sex Selection) Act 1994 has been suspended by the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare. It is clarified that MoHFW has not suspended the PC&PNDT Act, which prohibits sex selection before\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Hot Off The Press&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Hot Off The Press","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/news\/hot_off_the_press\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":290811,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/04\/28\/delhi-high-court-refuses-to-quash-fir-against-doctor-accused-of-carrying-out-illegal-sex-determination-issues-direction-for-proper-implementation-of-pcpndt-act-legal-research-updates-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":60611,"position":4},"title":"Delhi High Court refuses to quash FIR against doctor accused of carrying out illegal sex determination; issues direction for proper implementation of PCPNDT (Prohibition of Sex Selection) Act","author":"Simranjeet","date":"April 28, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The Delhi High Court observed that it was aware of the conflict that plagued women who were torn between societal and familial pressure to bear sons and the emotional stress and moral uncertainty they experienced for not bearing a male child.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"delhi high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":6607,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/05\/14\/directions-given-to-the-concerned-states-to-create-awareness-regarding-female-foeticide-via-publicity-through-print-and-electronic-media\/","url_meta":{"origin":60611,"position":5},"title":"Directions given to the concerned States to create awareness regarding female foeticide via publicity through print and electronic media","author":"Sucheta","date":"May 14, 2015","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court:, In pursuance of the Order dated 15.04.2015, where it was directed that the said Order should be translated in local languages and be given wide publicity through newspapers, All India Radio and Doordarshan so that people realise the sacroanctity of the Pre-Conception and Pre-Natal Diagnostic Techniques (Prohibition of\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Supreme Court&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Supreme Court","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/supremecourt\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/60611","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=60611"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/60611\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=60611"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=60611"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=60611"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}