{"id":60301,"date":"2016-08-06T12:02:47","date_gmt":"2016-08-06T06:32:47","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=60301"},"modified":"2016-09-13T15:04:47","modified_gmt":"2016-09-13T09:34:47","slug":"single-judge-bound-by-judicial-discipline-and-propriety-to-follow-division-benchs-decision","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/08\/06\/single-judge-bound-by-judicial-discipline-and-propriety-to-follow-division-benchs-decision\/","title":{"rendered":"Single Judge bound by judicial discipline and propriety to follow Division Bench’s decision"},"content":{"rendered":"

Delhi High Court: <\/strong>Deciding an appeal wherein the Single Judge of this Court had ruled that the plaint filed by the appellant-plaintiff was liable to be returned under Order 7 Rule 10 CPC as the Court lacked the territorial jurisdiction to entertain the suit and that no part of the cause of action had arisen in Delhi, the Court observed that it is not open to a Single Judge (and more particularly a trial court) to differ from or critically appraise a decision of a Division Bench (and more particularly of an appellate court).<\/p>\n

The appellant had sought a permanent injunction against infringement of its trade mark GHARI\/GHADI label as well as the copyright on its artistic work in the said trade mark against the respondent who was a lawyer and proprietor of a law firm GHARI TRADEMARK COMPANY. The Single Judge however, was of the view that no part of the cause of action arose in Delhi, the averments in the plaint were vague and bereft of any particulars and did not amount to a statement of material facts under Order 6 Rule 2 CPC. Also that the plaintiff had not made any specific averment as to\u00a0 how the defendant is carrying on its business and inter alia soliciting work within the jurisdiction of this Court.<\/p>\n

Holding that the Single Judge’s observations were contrary to the interpretation of the Division Bench in Ultra Home Construction Pvt. Ltd.<\/em> v. Purushottam Kumar Chaubey<\/em>, FAO (OS) No. 494 of 2016 which it was bound to follow instead of criticising the same, the Bench of Badar Durrez Ahmed and Sanjeev Sachdeva, JJ. observed that \u201cJudicial discipline and propriety requires that a Single Bench should follow the decision of a Division Bench without demur as the Single Bench is bound by it.\u00a0 It is all the more so when the Division Bench decision is of an appellate court and the Single Bench happens to be the trial court. It is a matter of judicial propriety that the hierarchical system is followed.\u00a0 A decision of an appellate court may in the view of the trial court be right or wrong, but the trial court has no option but to follow it. In fact, a Single Judge cannot even refer a matter for decision by a Bench comprising of more than two judges. Furthermore, the Single Judge can only refer a matter to be placed before a Division Bench of two judges if the Single Judge finds that there is a conflict of decisions of Single Benches. If there are conflicting decisions of Division Benches of co-equal strength, it is, of course, open to the Single Judge to follow the later decision. But, in such a situation, the learned Single Judge cannot seek a reference to a Full Bench of three or more Judges. That would fall within the domain of a Division Bench.\u201d<\/p>\n

Setting aside the impugned judgment, the Court observed that \u201cit is indeed unfortunate that the learned Single Judge has embarked upon an adventure to disagree with the decision of a Division Bench in Ultra Home<\/em>, albeit as ‘a student of law’. Once it is recognized that the decision of the Division Bench is binding on the Single Judge, there is no need to express any difference of opinion or disagreement or purport to give reasons for the said difference of opinion or to even suggest that the decision of the Division Bench may need reconsideration.\u201d [RSPL Ltd<\/em>.\u00a0 v.\u00a0 Mukesh Sharma<\/em>, \u00a02016 SCC OnLine Del 4285<\/a>, decided on August 3, 2016]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Delhi High Court: Deciding an appeal wherein the Single Judge of this Court had ruled that the plaint filed by the appellant-plaintiff <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-60301","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts"],"yoast_head":"\nSingle Judge bound by judicial discipline and propriety to follow Division Bench's decision | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/08\/06\/single-judge-bound-by-judicial-discipline-and-propriety-to-follow-division-benchs-decision\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Single Judge bound by judicial discipline and propriety to follow Division Bench's decision\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Delhi High Court: Deciding an appeal wherein the Single Judge of this Court had ruled that the plaint filed by the appellant-plaintiff\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/08\/06\/single-judge-bound-by-judicial-discipline-and-propriety-to-follow-division-benchs-decision\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2016-08-06T06:32:47+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-09-13T09:34:47+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Delhi-HC.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1329\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"888\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Sucheta\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Sucheta\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/08\/06\/single-judge-bound-by-judicial-discipline-and-propriety-to-follow-division-benchs-decision\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/08\/06\/single-judge-bound-by-judicial-discipline-and-propriety-to-follow-division-benchs-decision\/\",\"name\":\"Single Judge bound by judicial discipline and propriety to follow Division Bench's decision | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2016-08-06T06:32:47+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-09-13T09:34:47+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/08\/06\/single-judge-bound-by-judicial-discipline-and-propriety-to-follow-division-benchs-decision\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/08\/06\/single-judge-bound-by-judicial-discipline-and-propriety-to-follow-division-benchs-decision\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/08\/06\/single-judge-bound-by-judicial-discipline-and-propriety-to-follow-division-benchs-decision\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Single Judge bound by judicial discipline and propriety to follow Division Bench’s decision\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa\",\"name\":\"Sucheta\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Sucheta\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/legal_editor\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Single Judge bound by judicial discipline and propriety to follow Division Bench's decision | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/08\/06\/single-judge-bound-by-judicial-discipline-and-propriety-to-follow-division-benchs-decision\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Single Judge bound by judicial discipline and propriety to follow Division Bench's decision","og_description":"Delhi High Court: Deciding an appeal wherein the Single Judge of this Court had ruled that the plaint filed by the appellant-plaintiff","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/08\/06\/single-judge-bound-by-judicial-discipline-and-propriety-to-follow-division-benchs-decision\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2016-08-06T06:32:47+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-09-13T09:34:47+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1329,"height":888,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Delhi-HC.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Sucheta","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Sucheta","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/08\/06\/single-judge-bound-by-judicial-discipline-and-propriety-to-follow-division-benchs-decision\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/08\/06\/single-judge-bound-by-judicial-discipline-and-propriety-to-follow-division-benchs-decision\/","name":"Single Judge bound by judicial discipline and propriety to follow Division Bench's decision | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2016-08-06T06:32:47+00:00","dateModified":"2016-09-13T09:34:47+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/08\/06\/single-judge-bound-by-judicial-discipline-and-propriety-to-follow-division-benchs-decision\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/08\/06\/single-judge-bound-by-judicial-discipline-and-propriety-to-follow-division-benchs-decision\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/08\/06\/single-judge-bound-by-judicial-discipline-and-propriety-to-follow-division-benchs-decision\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Single Judge bound by judicial discipline and propriety to follow Division Bench’s decision"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa","name":"Sucheta","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Sucheta"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/legal_editor\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":340193,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/01\/31\/rohini-court-injuncts-counterfeiter-from-infringing-ghadi-trade-mark-packaging-and-tagline\/","url_meta":{"origin":60301,"position":0},"title":"Rohini Court injuncts counterfeiter from infringing Ghadi\u2019s packaging and tagline \u2018Pahle Istemal Karen Fir Viswash Karen\u2019","author":"Editor","date":"January 31, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"The Court held that the defendant had no real prospect of successfully defending their claim for tagline \u201cHamesha Istemaal Kare or Kapde Me Chamak Paaye\u201d; and there was no other compelling reason as to why the Ghadi\u2019s claim should not be disposed of before recording of oral evidence vide a\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Ghadi trade mark infringement","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/Ghadi-trade-mark-infringement.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/Ghadi-trade-mark-infringement.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/Ghadi-trade-mark-infringement.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/Ghadi-trade-mark-infringement.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":284203,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/02\/17\/kfc-cannot-have-exclusive-right-in-the-word-chicken-delhi-high-court-directs-trade-mark-registry-to-consider-application-for-advertisement-of-mark-chicken-zinger-in-class-29\/","url_meta":{"origin":60301,"position":1},"title":"KFC cannot have exclusive right in the word \u201cCHICKEN\u201d; Delhi High Court directs Trade Mark Registry to instead consider application for advertisement of the mark \u201cCHICKEN ZINGER\u201d in Class 29","author":"Editor","date":"February 17, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The Delhi High Court held that KFC cannot have any exclusive right in the word \u201cCHICKEN\u201d, but the Court directed the Trade Mark Registry to proceed for advertisement of application for the mark \u201cCHICKEN ZINGER\u201d in Class 29.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/MicrosoftTeams-image-418.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":349199,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/05\/30\/even-momentary-confusion-in-customers-mind-sufficient-to-establish-trade-mark-infringement-dhc\/","url_meta":{"origin":60301,"position":2},"title":"Duration of confusion in customer\u2019s mind not material, even momentary confusion sufficient to establish trade mark infringement: Delhi HC","author":"Arushi","date":"May 30, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThe fact that the customer may on a closer examination of products and enquiries find that the impugned trade marks are not associated with the appellant\u2019s trade marks would not take away from the fact that the impugned marks bear a similarity with the appellants trade mark, which led to\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":280279,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/12\/23\/rooh-afza-v-dil-afza-delhi-high-court-restrains-sadar-laboratories-from-manufacturing-or-selling-products-containing-trademark-dil-afza-till-final-disposal\/","url_meta":{"origin":60301,"position":3},"title":"[Rooh Afza v Dil Afza] Delhi High Court restrains Sadar Laboratories from manufacturing or selling products containing trademark \u2018DIL AFZA\u2019 till final disposal","author":"Editor","date":"December 23, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"The three tests of sound, sight and meaning are now well accepted for determining the similarity between competing marks and, similarity in any of the three aspects - visual impression, verbal sound, and meaning - may be sufficient to result in confusion. The question of similarity and the likelihood of\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/MicrosoftTeams-image-418.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":277576,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/11\/16\/application-for-registration-of-trade-mark-brazzers-to-proceed-for-advertisement-on-the-claim-of-the-mark-being-proposed-to-be-used-delhi-high-court-directs\/","url_meta":{"origin":60301,"position":4},"title":"Application for registration of trade mark \u201cBRAZZERS\u201d to proceed for advertisement on the claim of the mark being \u201cproposed to be used\u201d; Delhi High Court directs","author":"Editor","date":"November 16, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"\u00a0 \u00a0 Delhi High Court: While deciding a case in which an appeal was filed challenging the order passed by the Senior Examiner of Trade Marks (Senior Examiner), wherein the application of the appellant seeking registration of its mark \u201cBRAZZERS\u201d in Class 35 was rejected, the Single Judge Bench of\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"competitive exam","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/delhi_high_court-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/delhi_high_court-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/delhi_high_court-1.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/delhi_high_court-1.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/delhi_high_court-1.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":294968,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/06\/19\/cruzoil-being-composite-mark-is-excluded-from-section-91b-trade-marks-act-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":60301,"position":5},"title":"\u2018CruzOil\u2019 being a composite mark is excluded from Section 9(1)(b) of the Trade Marks Act and is registrable: Delhi High Court","author":"Simranjeet","date":"June 19, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The mark having a combination of words and devices had to be considered as a whole for the purposes of grant of registration.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"delhi high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/60301","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=60301"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/60301\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=60301"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=60301"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=60301"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}