{"id":59111,"date":"2016-07-30T16:05:06","date_gmt":"2016-07-30T10:35:06","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=59111"},"modified":"2016-09-13T14:52:46","modified_gmt":"2016-09-13T09:22:46","slug":"family-courts-cautioned-not-to-sit-with-a-preoccupied-mind-and-extract-reasonings-from-the-void-while-deciding-divorce-cases","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/07\/30\/family-courts-cautioned-not-to-sit-with-a-preoccupied-mind-and-extract-reasonings-from-the-void-while-deciding-divorce-cases\/","title":{"rendered":"Family Courts cautioned not to sit with a \u2018preoccupied mind and extract reasonings from the void\u2019 while deciding divorce cases"},"content":{"rendered":"

Karnataka High Court: <\/strong>Expressing concern over the insensitive approach of the Family Court, Bellary in the present case wherein it had granted a decree of divorce in favour of the respondent\/ husband without properly analyzing the medical evidences ascertaining the medical condition of the appellant\/wife, the Division Bench of H.G. Ramesh and Rathnakala, JJ., observed that the Family Court acted with extreme insensitivity by branding the appellant wife to be a complete paranoid schizophrenic when the medical evidences were clearly indicating that she was capable to lead a normal life with regular medication and family support. The Court observing the negative impact of the \u2018condemnation\u2019 by the Family Court upon the sentiments of the wife, cautioned the Family Courts in future to be alert and alive in each case that comes before it. The Court went on to say that the Family Courts must understand the distinction that each case carries due to its facts and circumstances, therefore a Judge cannot afford to \u201csit with a preoccupied mind and extract reasoning’s from the void, when the record before him is bereft of legal evidence\u201d.<\/p>\n

In the present case, the respondent husband had been granted a divorce decree under Section 13(1) (iii) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, as according to his pleadings, his wife (appellant) was suffering from \u2018Auditory Hallucinations\u2019. The Family Court had allowed the petition both on the grounds of mental cruelty and incurable unsoundness of mind. Challenging the decree, V. Vidya Iyer, representing the wife, contended that though the appellant was suffering from paranoid schizophrenia, the doctors of NIMHANS had made it clear that regular check ups and medication can control her suffering and she can ably discharge her marital responsibilities, however the condition is incurable.<\/p>\n

The Court upon perusing the evidences and the opinions of various psychiatrists observed that no case was made out under Section 13(1) (iii) of the Hindu Marriage Act, because the appellant falls under the category of those schizophrenic patients who can be kept under control with regular medication. The Court further noticed that the appellant had successfully completed her education without any hassles related to her mental health. The Court even gave the example of renowned mathematician John Forbes Nash Jr. who was also a paranoid schizophrenic, but went on to win the Nobel Prize. The Court highlighted that how his wife stood by him during his trying times. The Court further expressed its anguish over the fact that the Family Court, in the absence of any pleading or proof by the husband, itself comprehended the case to be of violation of Section 5 of Hindu Marriage Act and declared the wife to be unfit for marriage and procreation, thereby transgressing its propriety and jurisdiction. The Court with the above observations, set aside the divorce decree. [Shilpa<\/em> v. Praveen S.R., <\/em>2016 SCC OnLine Kar 2642<\/b><\/a>\u00a0decided on 20.07.2016]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Karnataka High Court: Expressing concern over the insensitive approach of the Family Court, Bellary in the present case wherein it had granted <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[2846,8391],"class_list":["post-59111","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-divorce","tag-mental-cruelty"],"yoast_head":"\nFamily Courts cautioned not to sit with a \u2018preoccupied mind and extract reasonings from the void\u2019 while deciding divorce cases | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/07\/30\/family-courts-cautioned-not-to-sit-with-a-preoccupied-mind-and-extract-reasonings-from-the-void-while-deciding-divorce-cases\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Family Courts cautioned not to sit with a \u2018preoccupied mind and extract reasonings from the void\u2019 while deciding divorce cases\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Karnataka High Court: Expressing concern over the insensitive approach of the Family Court, Bellary in the present case wherein it had granted\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/07\/30\/family-courts-cautioned-not-to-sit-with-a-preoccupied-mind-and-extract-reasonings-from-the-void-while-deciding-divorce-cases\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2016-07-30T10:35:06+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-09-13T09:22:46+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/02\/IMG_3499-e1487871967209.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Sucheta\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Sucheta\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/07\/30\/family-courts-cautioned-not-to-sit-with-a-preoccupied-mind-and-extract-reasonings-from-the-void-while-deciding-divorce-cases\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/07\/30\/family-courts-cautioned-not-to-sit-with-a-preoccupied-mind-and-extract-reasonings-from-the-void-while-deciding-divorce-cases\/\",\"name\":\"Family Courts cautioned not to sit with a \u2018preoccupied mind and extract reasonings from the void\u2019 while deciding divorce cases | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2016-07-30T10:35:06+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-09-13T09:22:46+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/07\/30\/family-courts-cautioned-not-to-sit-with-a-preoccupied-mind-and-extract-reasonings-from-the-void-while-deciding-divorce-cases\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/07\/30\/family-courts-cautioned-not-to-sit-with-a-preoccupied-mind-and-extract-reasonings-from-the-void-while-deciding-divorce-cases\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/07\/30\/family-courts-cautioned-not-to-sit-with-a-preoccupied-mind-and-extract-reasonings-from-the-void-while-deciding-divorce-cases\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Family Courts cautioned not to sit with a \u2018preoccupied mind and extract reasonings from the void\u2019 while deciding divorce cases\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa\",\"name\":\"Sucheta\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Sucheta\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/legal_editor\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Family Courts cautioned not to sit with a \u2018preoccupied mind and extract reasonings from the void\u2019 while deciding divorce cases | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/07\/30\/family-courts-cautioned-not-to-sit-with-a-preoccupied-mind-and-extract-reasonings-from-the-void-while-deciding-divorce-cases\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Family Courts cautioned not to sit with a \u2018preoccupied mind and extract reasonings from the void\u2019 while deciding divorce cases","og_description":"Karnataka High Court: Expressing concern over the insensitive approach of the Family Court, Bellary in the present case wherein it had granted","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/07\/30\/family-courts-cautioned-not-to-sit-with-a-preoccupied-mind-and-extract-reasonings-from-the-void-while-deciding-divorce-cases\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2016-07-30T10:35:06+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-09-13T09:22:46+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/02\/IMG_3499-e1487871967209.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Sucheta","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Sucheta","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/07\/30\/family-courts-cautioned-not-to-sit-with-a-preoccupied-mind-and-extract-reasonings-from-the-void-while-deciding-divorce-cases\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/07\/30\/family-courts-cautioned-not-to-sit-with-a-preoccupied-mind-and-extract-reasonings-from-the-void-while-deciding-divorce-cases\/","name":"Family Courts cautioned not to sit with a \u2018preoccupied mind and extract reasonings from the void\u2019 while deciding divorce cases | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2016-07-30T10:35:06+00:00","dateModified":"2016-09-13T09:22:46+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/07\/30\/family-courts-cautioned-not-to-sit-with-a-preoccupied-mind-and-extract-reasonings-from-the-void-while-deciding-divorce-cases\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/07\/30\/family-courts-cautioned-not-to-sit-with-a-preoccupied-mind-and-extract-reasonings-from-the-void-while-deciding-divorce-cases\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/07\/30\/family-courts-cautioned-not-to-sit-with-a-preoccupied-mind-and-extract-reasonings-from-the-void-while-deciding-divorce-cases\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Family Courts cautioned not to sit with a \u2018preoccupied mind and extract reasonings from the void\u2019 while deciding divorce cases"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa","name":"Sucheta","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Sucheta"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/legal_editor\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":217007,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/17\/utt-hc-denial-of-mental-illness-has-to-be-supported-by-evidence-to-rebut-allegations-divorce-upheld-as-wife-was-unable-to-produce-any-substantial-evidence\/","url_meta":{"origin":59111,"position":0},"title":"Utt HC | Denial of mental illness has to be supported by evidence to rebut allegations; Divorce upheld as wife was unable to produce any substantial evidence","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"July 17, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Uttaranchal High Court: A Division Bench of Alok Singh and Ravindra Maithani, JJ. entertained an appeal filed by the appellant-wife who challenged the judgment passed by the Family Court, dissolving the marriage of the appellant and respondent. In the initial case, the respondent-husband had alleged that the appellant was mentally\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":219994,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/09\/26\/utt-hc-cruelty-can-never-be-defined-with-exactitude-and-mental-cruelty-cannot-be-established-by-direct-evidence-divorce-granted-as-husbands-narration-proved-mental-cruelty\/","url_meta":{"origin":59111,"position":1},"title":"Utt HC | \u2018Cruelty can never be defined with exactitude and mental cruelty cannot be established by direct evidence\u2019 Divorce granted as husband\u2019s narration proved mental cruelty against him","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"September 26, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Uttaranchal High Court: A Division Bench of Alok Singh and Narayan Singh Dhanik, JJ. contemplated an appeal filed against the judgment passed by Additional Judge, Family Court, where the suit filed by the petitioner under Section 13 of Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 was dismissed. The background of the appeal was\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":216782,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/12\/ker-hc-photographs-of-husband-and-wife-showing-them-happy-not-a-proof-of-happy-married-life-or-no-demand-for-patrimony\/","url_meta":{"origin":59111,"position":2},"title":"Ker HC | Photographs of husband and wife showing them happy \u2013 not a proof of happy married life or no demand for patrimony","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"July 12, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Kerala High Court: A Division Bench of A.M. Shaffique and N. Anil Kumar, JJ. dismissed a matrimonial appeal filed by the husband of a lady who was granted a divorce by the Family Court on the grounds of cruelty and desertion. Respondent herein had filed a petition against her husband\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":218087,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/08\/14\/utt-hc-voluntarily-depriving-husband-of-wifes-company-and-comfort-of-matrimonial-life-amounts-to-cruelty-divorce-granted\/","url_meta":{"origin":59111,"position":3},"title":"Utt HC | Voluntarily depriving husband of wife\u2019s company and comfort of matrimonial life amounts to cruelty; Divorce granted\u00a0","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"August 14, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Uttaranchal High Court: A Division Bench of Sudhanshu Dhulia and Narayan Singh Dhanik, JJ. contemplated the special appeals preferred against the judgment of Family Court, where the divorce petition was filed under Section 13 of Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 and was subsequently dismissed but the counterclaim of the wife-respondent for\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":233111,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/07\/30\/utt-hc-wife-not-eligible-for-medical-examination-of-whether-she-can-conceive-or-not-during-divorce-proceedings-court-allows-appeal\/","url_meta":{"origin":59111,"position":4},"title":"Utt HC | Wife not eligible for medical examination of whether she can conceive or not during Divorce proceedings; Court allows appeal","author":"Editor","date":"July 30, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Suchita Shukla, Editorial Assistant has put this story together","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":274508,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/09\/26\/evidence-not-adduced-maintenance-application-not-decided-bombay-high-court-remands-divorce-matter-to-family-court\/","url_meta":{"origin":59111,"position":5},"title":"Evidence not adduced; Maintenance application not decided: Bombay High Court remands divorce matter to Family Court","author":"Editor","date":"September 26, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"\u00a0 \u00a0 Bombay High Court: In a case filed by a wife (\u2018appellant') challenging the Family Court order that granted decree of divorce without giving her opportunity to adduce evidence and without deciding her interim application for maintenance, a Division Bench of A S Chandurkar and Urmila Joshi Phalke, JJ.,\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Bombay High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/59111","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=59111"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/59111\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=59111"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=59111"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=59111"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}