{"id":59071,"date":"2016-07-30T15:56:25","date_gmt":"2016-07-30T10:26:25","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=59071"},"modified":"2016-09-13T14:52:41","modified_gmt":"2016-09-13T09:22:41","slug":"appeal-against-cancellation-of-tender-was-dismissed-as-decision-constituted-executive-function-and-not-administrative-function","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/07\/30\/appeal-against-cancellation-of-tender-was-dismissed-as-decision-constituted-executive-function-and-not-administrative-function\/","title":{"rendered":"Appeal against cancellation of tender was dismissed as decision constituted executive function and not administrative function"},"content":{"rendered":"

Supreme Court of Appeal of South Africa:<\/strong> In an appeal against the cancellation of the tender by the South African Police Services (SAPS) and legality and rationality of the decision, the Court held that the decision was in regard to the executive function and not in the administrative function and therefore Promotion of Administrative Justice Act 3 of 2000(PAJA) could not be applied in the appeal for review of decision. Further, on the question of legality, rationality or reasonableness, the Court found no reasons in support of the appeal, and therefore it was dismissed.<\/p>\n

The tender in question dated 13.2.2009 was published by the State Information Technology Agency(SITS) on behalf of the South African Police Service (SAPS) for an integrated mobile data command and control system. The recommendation committee and the procurement committee had recommended the tender to be awarded to the appellant-company. By 26.6.2012 the company received no indication from SITA or SAPS concerning the tender and sent a letter to both in the same regard. On 8.8.2012 it was notified that the tender had been canceled due to the time lapse in the evaluation process and the business requirements of SAPS has changed in the mean time. The appellant questioned the cancellation on grounds of validity of the cancellation of the tender, the substantive grounds for the cancellation and fairness of the procedure.<\/p>\n

The Court relying on Tshwane City & others v. Nambiti Technologies (Pty) Ltd <\/em>[2015] ZASCA 167 held that the decision of cancellation was not administrative action and was not susceptible of review in terms of Promotion of Administrative Justice Act. Therefore, the level of scrutiny for irrationality under principle of legality required only a connection between the action and the reason given for it. In further deliberation it was held the cancellation was not fraught due to procedural irregularity, and an argument of non-publication of cancellation could not be entertained at that instant as the same was not raised in the affidavit and would be prejudicing the respondents. Further it was held that while a reason of the time lag would not be reasonable ground for cancellation, it was not the only ground as the change in the business requirements of the SAPS was the reason for cancellation, which demonstrated a change of circumstance and there was no longer a need for the command solution. Therefore, the appeal was dismissed. [SAAB Grintek Defence v. South African Police Service (316\/2015) [2016] ZASCA 104, decided on 5 July 2016]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Supreme Court of Appeal of South Africa: In an appeal against the cancellation of the tender by the South African Police Services <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":39761,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,12],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-59071","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-foreigncourts"],"yoast_head":"\nAppeal against cancellation of tender was dismissed as decision constituted executive function and not administrative function | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/07\/30\/appeal-against-cancellation-of-tender-was-dismissed-as-decision-constituted-executive-function-and-not-administrative-function\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Appeal against cancellation of tender was dismissed as decision constituted executive function and not administrative function\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Supreme Court of Appeal of South Africa: In an appeal against the cancellation of the tender by the South African Police Services\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/07\/30\/appeal-against-cancellation-of-tender-was-dismissed-as-decision-constituted-executive-function-and-not-administrative-function\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2016-07-30T10:26:25+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-09-13T09:22:41+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/03\/Supreme-Court-of-Appeals.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Sucheta\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Sucheta\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/07\/30\/appeal-against-cancellation-of-tender-was-dismissed-as-decision-constituted-executive-function-and-not-administrative-function\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/07\/30\/appeal-against-cancellation-of-tender-was-dismissed-as-decision-constituted-executive-function-and-not-administrative-function\/\",\"name\":\"Appeal against cancellation of tender was dismissed as decision constituted executive function and not administrative function | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/07\/30\/appeal-against-cancellation-of-tender-was-dismissed-as-decision-constituted-executive-function-and-not-administrative-function\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/07\/30\/appeal-against-cancellation-of-tender-was-dismissed-as-decision-constituted-executive-function-and-not-administrative-function\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/03\/Supreme-Court-of-Appeals.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2016-07-30T10:26:25+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-09-13T09:22:41+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/07\/30\/appeal-against-cancellation-of-tender-was-dismissed-as-decision-constituted-executive-function-and-not-administrative-function\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/07\/30\/appeal-against-cancellation-of-tender-was-dismissed-as-decision-constituted-executive-function-and-not-administrative-function\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/07\/30\/appeal-against-cancellation-of-tender-was-dismissed-as-decision-constituted-executive-function-and-not-administrative-function\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/03\/Supreme-Court-of-Appeals.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/03\/Supreme-Court-of-Appeals.jpg\",\"width\":1330,\"height\":887},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/07\/30\/appeal-against-cancellation-of-tender-was-dismissed-as-decision-constituted-executive-function-and-not-administrative-function\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Appeal against cancellation of tender was dismissed as decision constituted executive function and not administrative function\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa\",\"name\":\"Sucheta\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Sucheta\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/legal_editor\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Appeal against cancellation of tender was dismissed as decision constituted executive function and not administrative function | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/07\/30\/appeal-against-cancellation-of-tender-was-dismissed-as-decision-constituted-executive-function-and-not-administrative-function\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Appeal against cancellation of tender was dismissed as decision constituted executive function and not administrative function","og_description":"Supreme Court of Appeal of South Africa: In an appeal against the cancellation of the tender by the South African Police Services","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/07\/30\/appeal-against-cancellation-of-tender-was-dismissed-as-decision-constituted-executive-function-and-not-administrative-function\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2016-07-30T10:26:25+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-09-13T09:22:41+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/03\/Supreme-Court-of-Appeals.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Sucheta","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Sucheta","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/07\/30\/appeal-against-cancellation-of-tender-was-dismissed-as-decision-constituted-executive-function-and-not-administrative-function\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/07\/30\/appeal-against-cancellation-of-tender-was-dismissed-as-decision-constituted-executive-function-and-not-administrative-function\/","name":"Appeal against cancellation of tender was dismissed as decision constituted executive function and not administrative function | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/07\/30\/appeal-against-cancellation-of-tender-was-dismissed-as-decision-constituted-executive-function-and-not-administrative-function\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/07\/30\/appeal-against-cancellation-of-tender-was-dismissed-as-decision-constituted-executive-function-and-not-administrative-function\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/03\/Supreme-Court-of-Appeals.jpg","datePublished":"2016-07-30T10:26:25+00:00","dateModified":"2016-09-13T09:22:41+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/07\/30\/appeal-against-cancellation-of-tender-was-dismissed-as-decision-constituted-executive-function-and-not-administrative-function\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/07\/30\/appeal-against-cancellation-of-tender-was-dismissed-as-decision-constituted-executive-function-and-not-administrative-function\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/07\/30\/appeal-against-cancellation-of-tender-was-dismissed-as-decision-constituted-executive-function-and-not-administrative-function\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/03\/Supreme-Court-of-Appeals.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/03\/Supreme-Court-of-Appeals.jpg","width":1330,"height":887},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/07\/30\/appeal-against-cancellation-of-tender-was-dismissed-as-decision-constituted-executive-function-and-not-administrative-function\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Appeal against cancellation of tender was dismissed as decision constituted executive function and not administrative function"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa","name":"Sucheta","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Sucheta"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/legal_editor\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/03\/Supreme-Court-of-Appeals.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":224235,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/01\/15\/canada-sc-person-born-in-canada-to-a-couple-who-were-undercover-russian-spies-held-to-be-a-canadian-citizen\/","url_meta":{"origin":59071,"position":0},"title":"Canada SC | Person born in Canada to a couple who were undercover Russian spies held to be a Canadian citizen\u00a0","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"January 15, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court of Canada: A Full Bench of Wagner, CJ. and Moldaver, Grason, Cote, Brown, Rowe and Martin, JJ. is pertaining to the validity of Registrar\u2019s decision in a case of withdrawal of citizenship. The petition has been filed by Ministry of Citizenship and Immigration against the orders of Court\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Canada SC","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/01\/supreme_court_of_canada.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/01\/supreme_court_of_canada.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/01\/supreme_court_of_canada.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/01\/supreme_court_of_canada.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/01\/supreme_court_of_canada.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":246659,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/04\/07\/contract-3\/","url_meta":{"origin":59071,"position":1},"title":"Bom HC | Is Navi Mumbai Municipal Corporation entitled in law to impose pre-qualification criteria \u201ccontractors whose contract was terminated for unsatisfactory services are ineligible to participate in tender\u201d? Judicial Review, Blacklisting & more. Read on","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"April 7, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"\"Government must have freedom of contract.\"","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":245149,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/03\/06\/judicial-power\/","url_meta":{"origin":59071,"position":2},"title":"Ori HC | Power of judicial review will not be permitted to be invoked to protect private interest at the cost of public interest or to decide contractual disputes","author":"Editor","date":"March 6, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Orissa High Court: B.P. Routray J. dismissed the petition on the ground that cancellation of the tender cannot be said to have attracted the doctrine of lis pendens. The facts of the case are such that the petitioners are registered small scale industrial units who participated in the tender process\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":275823,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/10\/18\/judicial-restraint-in-tender-matters-a-perspective\/","url_meta":{"origin":59071,"position":3},"title":"Judicial Restraint in Tender Matters: A Perspective","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"October 18, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"by Naveen Kumar\u2020","rel":"","context":"In "Op Eds"","block_context":{"text":"Op Eds","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/op-ed\/legal-analysis\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/MicrosoftTeams-image-145-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/MicrosoftTeams-image-145-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/MicrosoftTeams-image-145-1.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/MicrosoftTeams-image-145-1.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/MicrosoftTeams-image-145-1.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":197229,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/06\/19\/court-declines-to-sit-in-appeal-over-the-decision-taken-by-a-committee-of-experts\/","url_meta":{"origin":59071,"position":4},"title":"Court declines to sit in appeal over the decision taken by a committee of experts \u00a0","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"June 19, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Madhya Pradesh High Court: The petitioner, who challenged the eligibility of Respondent 5 to participate in the Tender process, was left high and dry when the Division Bench comprising of Hemant Gupta, CJ and Vijay Kumar Shukla, J. held that the Court in exercise of judicial review, will not sit\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":198708,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/07\/19\/hc-cannot-interfere-in-administrative-decision-of-dealership-termination-by-indian-oil-corporation-sc\/","url_meta":{"origin":59071,"position":5},"title":"HC cannot interfere in administrative decision of dealership termination by Indian Oil Corporation: SC","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"July 19, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: Abhay Manohar Sapre, J. speaking for himself and Uday U. Lalit, J. allowed the appeal filed by Indian Oil Corpn. against the judgment passed by the Madras High Court whereby the appellant was directed to resume the fuel supply to respondent\u2019s fuel station. The parties entered into a\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/59071","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=59071"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/59071\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/39761"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=59071"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=59071"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=59071"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}