{"id":58611,"date":"2016-07-28T13:03:57","date_gmt":"2016-07-28T07:33:57","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=58611"},"modified":"2016-09-13T14:48:59","modified_gmt":"2016-09-13T09:18:59","slug":"2016-scc-vol-6-july-14-2016-part-3","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/07\/28\/2016-scc-vol-6-july-14-2016-part-3\/","title":{"rendered":"2016 SCC Vol. 6 July 14, 2016 Part 3"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 \u2014 Ss. 31(7)(a) and (b) \u2014 Compound interest:<\/strong> Amount awarded under S. 31(7)(a) whether with interest or without interest, constitutes a \u201csum\u201d for which the award is made. Thus, computation of amount has to be done by executing court on such basis. [Hyder Consulting (UK) Ltd. v. State of Orissa, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/LoginForNewsLink\/2016_6_SCC_362\">(2016) 6 SCC 362<\/a>]<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Constitution of India \u2014 Arts. 14 and 32 \u2014 Allocation of State largesse \u2014 Judicial review \u2014 Delinking of radio spectrum allocation from licence and migration of existing licences \u2014 Validity: <\/strong>Government policy decision of 2012 allowing migration of existing licences to new telecom service i.e. from UASL to UL (unified licence) and from ISP to UL regime was taken after thorough examination of pros and cons. Held, policy decision concerned is neither arbitrary, nor discriminatory, nor based on irrelevant consideration and favouritism, nor mala fide, nor against statutory provisions, as alleged by petitioner. [Centre for Public Interest Litigation v. Union of India, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/LoginForNewsLink\/2016_6_SCC_408\">(2016) 6 SCC 408<\/a>]<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Family and Personal Laws \u2014 Succession and Inheritance \u2014 Generally: <\/strong>Modes of succession to property, are only two: (1) by will, or (2) intestate succession. Statutory nomination of a person to an interest in property such as in a flat in a cooperative housing society or interest in insurance policy only bind the cooperative society and insurer, respectively but not the other heirs\/successors. Title to such property has to be established as per law. [Indrani Wahi v. Registrar of Coop. Societies, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/LoginForNewsLink\/2016_6_SCC_440\">(2016) 6 SCC 440<\/a>]<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>International Law \u2014 Extradition:<\/strong> Extradition Treaty, 1898 between India and Chile, is existing and binding in terms of S. 2(d) of Extradition Act, 1962. [Marie-Emmanuelle, Verhoeven v. Union of India, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/LoginForNewsLink\/2016_6_SCC_456\">(2016) 6 SCC 456<\/a>]<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Labour Law \u2014 Reinstatement\/Back Wages\/Arrears \u2014 Compensation in lieu of reinstatement:<\/strong> As the appellant workman had worked for about 14 yrs he was awarded Rs 2.5 lakhs as compensation in lieu of reinstatement and back wages. [Tota Ram v. Belliss India (P) Ltd., <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/LoginForNewsLink\/2016_6_SCC_406\">(2016) 6 SCC 406<\/a>]<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992 \u2014 Ss. 12-A, 15-HA, 15-J and 24 \u2014 Manipulative\/Fraudulent practice by stockbrokers: <\/strong>In the absence of direct proof, the courts are not helpless and it is the judicial duty to take note of the immediate and proximate facts and circumstances surrounding the events on which the charges\/allegations are founded and to reach what would appear to the court to be a reasonable conclusion therefrom. Further, the test would always be as to what inferential process a reasonable\/prudent man would adopt to arrive at a conclusion. [SEBI v. Kishore R. Ajmera, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/LoginForNewsLink\/2016_6_SCC_368\">(2016) 6 SCC 368<\/a>]<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>U.P. Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Rules, 1952 \u2014 Rr. 285-A to 285-G and 285-L \u2014 Auction-sale of property for recovery of arrears due to State (ESI dues) as arrears of land revenue:<\/strong> As there was non-deposit of purchase price in compliance with mandatory Rr. 285-D to 285-G and also as per auction notice and non-compliance with auction procedure prescribed under Rr. 285-A to 285-C by competent authority, auction-sale is invalid. However, direction issued under R. 285-L for refund of money deposited by purchaser with interest @ 5% p.a. to appellant purchaser. [Nirmal Singh v. Bhatia Safe Works, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/LoginForNewsLink\/2016_6_SCC_397\">(2016) 6 SCC 397<\/a>]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 \u2014 Ss. 31(7)(a) and (b) \u2014 Compound interest: Amount awarded under S. 31(7)(a) whether with interest or <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":102451,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[5,16],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-58611","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casesreported","category-supremecourtcases"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>2016 SCC Vol. 6 July 14, 2016 Part 3 | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/07\/28\/2016-scc-vol-6-july-14-2016-part-3\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"2016 SCC Vol. 6 July 14, 2016 Part 3\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 \u2014 Ss. 31(7)(a) and (b) \u2014 Compound interest: Amount awarded under S. 31(7)(a) whether with interest or\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/07\/28\/2016-scc-vol-6-july-14-2016-part-3\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2016-07-28T07:33:57+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-09-13T09:18:59+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/01\/scccover-28.1.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Sucheta\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Sucheta\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/07\/28\/2016-scc-vol-6-july-14-2016-part-3\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/07\/28\/2016-scc-vol-6-july-14-2016-part-3\/\",\"name\":\"2016 SCC Vol. 6 July 14, 2016 Part 3 | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/07\/28\/2016-scc-vol-6-july-14-2016-part-3\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/07\/28\/2016-scc-vol-6-july-14-2016-part-3\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/01\/scccover-28.1.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2016-07-28T07:33:57+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-09-13T09:18:59+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/07\/28\/2016-scc-vol-6-july-14-2016-part-3\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/07\/28\/2016-scc-vol-6-july-14-2016-part-3\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/07\/28\/2016-scc-vol-6-july-14-2016-part-3\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/01\/scccover-28.1.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/01\/scccover-28.1.jpg\",\"width\":1330,\"height\":887},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/07\/28\/2016-scc-vol-6-july-14-2016-part-3\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"2016 SCC Vol. 6 July 14, 2016 Part 3\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa\",\"name\":\"Sucheta\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Sucheta\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/legal_editor\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"2016 SCC Vol. 6 July 14, 2016 Part 3 | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/07\/28\/2016-scc-vol-6-july-14-2016-part-3\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"2016 SCC Vol. 6 July 14, 2016 Part 3","og_description":"Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 \u2014 Ss. 31(7)(a) and (b) \u2014 Compound interest: Amount awarded under S. 31(7)(a) whether with interest or","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/07\/28\/2016-scc-vol-6-july-14-2016-part-3\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2016-07-28T07:33:57+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-09-13T09:18:59+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/01\/scccover-28.1.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Sucheta","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Sucheta","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/07\/28\/2016-scc-vol-6-july-14-2016-part-3\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/07\/28\/2016-scc-vol-6-july-14-2016-part-3\/","name":"2016 SCC Vol. 6 July 14, 2016 Part 3 | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/07\/28\/2016-scc-vol-6-july-14-2016-part-3\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/07\/28\/2016-scc-vol-6-july-14-2016-part-3\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/01\/scccover-28.1.jpg","datePublished":"2016-07-28T07:33:57+00:00","dateModified":"2016-09-13T09:18:59+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/07\/28\/2016-scc-vol-6-july-14-2016-part-3\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/07\/28\/2016-scc-vol-6-july-14-2016-part-3\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/07\/28\/2016-scc-vol-6-july-14-2016-part-3\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/01\/scccover-28.1.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/01\/scccover-28.1.jpg","width":1330,"height":887},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/07\/28\/2016-scc-vol-6-july-14-2016-part-3\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"2016 SCC Vol. 6 July 14, 2016 Part 3"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa","name":"Sucheta","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Sucheta"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/legal_editor\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/01\/scccover-28.1.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":43091,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/04\/09\/no-undue-favour-done-by-the-government-towards-reliance-jio-by-allowing-it-voice-telephony-at-rs-1658-crores\/","url_meta":{"origin":58611,"position":0},"title":"No undue favour done by the Government towards Reliance Jio by allowing it voice telephony at Rs. 1,658 crores","author":"Sucheta","date":"April 9, 2016","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: In the matter where the decision of the Government of India allowing voice telephony to Reliance Jio Infocomm Ltd. on payment of Rs.1, 658 crores entry fee was challenged on account of undue favour being given to the respondents, it was alleged that\u00a0 in normal course grant of\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/11\/DSC_5487.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/11\/DSC_5487.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/11\/DSC_5487.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/11\/DSC_5487.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/11\/DSC_5487.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/11\/DSC_5487.jpg?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":312756,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/02\/cal-hc-directs-central-government-to-formulate-policy-on-kerosene-oil-allocation-scc-blog\/","url_meta":{"origin":58611,"position":1},"title":"\u2018Duty of Welfare State to devise beneficial schemes for common people\u2019; Calcutta High Court directs Centre to formulate policy on Kerosene Oil allocation","author":"Ritu","date":"February 2, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"Calcutta High Court rejected the idea of directing a specific allocation but highlighted the duty of the government to formulate a policy.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"calcutta high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":304943,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/16\/dhc-upholds-asis-selection-procedure-for-obtaining-new-license-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":58611,"position":2},"title":"Delhi High Court upholds ASI\u2019s selection procedure for obtaining new licence to work as photographers in protected monuments","author":"Simranjeet","date":"October 16, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cPrimary aim of refresher course is to strengthen knowledge of old photographer in the light of advancement that has occurred in field of photography, equipment and related techniques, digital mode, etc. The refresher course is intended to upgrade all old school photographers and enhance their knowledge and skill, as digital\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"delhi high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":44521,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/04\/21\/2016-scc-vol-3-march-07-2016-part-4\/","url_meta":{"origin":58611,"position":3},"title":"2016 SCC Vol. 3 April 07, 2016 Part 4","author":"Sucheta","date":"April 21, 2016","format":false,"excerpt":"Sales Tax and VAT \u2014 Concession\/Exemption\/Incentive\/Rebate \u2014 Incentive: Gujarat Capital Incentives to Premier\/Prestigious Unit Scheme 1995-2000 was introduced with a view to accelerate the development of backward areas of Gujarat and to create employment opportunities. Three criteria were required to be satisfied for a unit to be identified as a\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Cases Reported&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Cases Reported","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casesreported\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/01\/scccover-28.1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/01\/scccover-28.1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/01\/scccover-28.1.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/01\/scccover-28.1.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/01\/scccover-28.1.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":265855,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/04\/25\/2g-spectrum-fraud-refund-entry-fee-supreme-court-judgments-legal-law-news-reserach-updates\/","url_meta":{"origin":58611,"position":4},"title":"2G Spectrum Scam| Supreme Court rejects ex-licensee\u2019s refund demand of Rs 1454.94 crores Entry Fee, holding him faulty as a confederate of fraud","author":"Editor","date":"April 25, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: The 3-Judge Bench comprising of Dr. Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud*, Surya Kant and Vikram Nath, JJ., affirmed the impugned order of the Telecom Disputes Settlement and Appellate Tribunal whereby the Tribunal had dismissed appellant\u2019s claim for refund of Rs 1454.94 crores Entry Fee paid by it for 2G licences.\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/04\/2G-Spectrum-Scam-Supreme-Court-rejects-ex-licensees-refund-demand-of-Rs-1454.94-crores-Entry-Fee-holding-him-faulty-as-a-confederate-of-fraud.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/04\/2G-Spectrum-Scam-Supreme-Court-rejects-ex-licensees-refund-demand-of-Rs-1454.94-crores-Entry-Fee-holding-him-faulty-as-a-confederate-of-fraud.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/04\/2G-Spectrum-Scam-Supreme-Court-rejects-ex-licensees-refund-demand-of-Rs-1454.94-crores-Entry-Fee-holding-him-faulty-as-a-confederate-of-fraud.png?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/04\/2G-Spectrum-Scam-Supreme-Court-rejects-ex-licensees-refund-demand-of-Rs-1454.94-crores-Entry-Fee-holding-him-faulty-as-a-confederate-of-fraud.png?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/04\/2G-Spectrum-Scam-Supreme-Court-rejects-ex-licensees-refund-demand-of-Rs-1454.94-crores-Entry-Fee-holding-him-faulty-as-a-confederate-of-fraud.png?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":376715,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/02\/25\/sc-reserve-price-payable-from-date-of-2g-spectrum-judgment\/","url_meta":{"origin":58611,"position":5},"title":"Telecom Operator liable to pay reserve price for continued operation from date of 2G spectrum judgment: Supreme Court","author":"Ritu","date":"February 25, 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cHaving slept over the matter for that length of time, the DoT cannot take advantage of its own lassitude and seek to mulct upon the respondent interest liability for that period.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Telecom operators to pay Reserve price","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/Telecom-operators-to-pay-Reserve-price.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/Telecom-operators-to-pay-Reserve-price.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/Telecom-operators-to-pay-Reserve-price.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/Telecom-operators-to-pay-Reserve-price.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/58611","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=58611"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/58611\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/102451"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=58611"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=58611"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=58611"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}