{"id":55511,"date":"2016-07-11T14:33:51","date_gmt":"2016-07-11T09:03:51","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=55511"},"modified":"2016-09-13T12:15:54","modified_gmt":"2016-09-13T06:45:54","slug":"tenant-can-continue-to-occupy-the-leased-premises-even-after-expiration-of-agricultural-lease-on-the-basis-of-holding-over-principle","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/07\/11\/tenant-can-continue-to-occupy-the-leased-premises-even-after-expiration-of-agricultural-lease-on-the-basis-of-holding-over-principle\/","title":{"rendered":"Tenant can continue to occupy the leased premises even after expiration of agricultural lease on the basis of \u2018holding over\u2019 principle"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Supreme Court<\/strong>: The 3-judge bench of Ranjan Gogoi, Arun Mishra and P.C.Pant, JJ, were hearing a reference to decide the question as to whether after the expiry of the fixed term tenancy in respect of an agricultural lease under the Punjab Security of Land Tenure Act, 1953, the tenancy gets automatically terminated and the person occupying the leased premises ceases to be a tenant, as a 2-judge bench did not agree with the decision of a coordinate bench in Sukhdev Singh v. Puran , <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/LoginForNewsLink\/2015_12_SCC_344\">(2015) 12 SCC 344<\/a> where it was held that tenant under the 1953 Act ceases to be one on expiry of the fixed term tenancy under the contract whereafter he is not entitled to the statutory protection from eviction as envisaged under the Act.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The Court held that to be entitled to protection from eviction under the 1953 Act any person claiming such protection has to come within the fold of the expression \u201ctenant\u201d under the 1953 Act read with the relevant provisions of the Punjab tenancy Act, 1887 Act. Statutory protection would be available only to a statutory tenant, namely, a tenant under the Act. The 1953 Act read with the relevant provisions of the 1887 Act does not include a tenant whose lease has expired. Nevertheless, retention\/continuance of possession after expiry of the duration of the lease with the consent of the landlord will continue to vest in the erstwhile tenant the same status on the principle of holding over.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The Court, further held that such continuance even after expiry of the deemed period of the lease under Section 106 of the Transfer of Property Act, 1888 would clothe the occupant with the status of a tenant under the Act in view of Section 116 of the Transfer of Property Act which deals with the consequences of holding over. The operation of Section 116 of the Transfer of Property Act would confer legitimacy to the possession of the tenant even after the termination or expiration of the deemed period of the lease so as to confer on him a status akin to that of a statutory tenant and hence protection from eviction as envisaged by the provisions of the Act of 1953. [Shyam Lal v. Deepa Dass Chela Ram Chela Garib Dass, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/LoginForNewsLink\/2016_SCC_OnLine_SC_661\"><b>2016 SCC OnLine SC 661<\/b><\/a>, decided on 05.07.2016]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Supreme Court: The 3-judge bench of Ranjan Gogoi, Arun Mishra and P.C.Pant, JJ, were hearing a reference to decide the question as <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":154914,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,9],"tags":[2634,5363,7921],"class_list":["post-55511","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-supremecourt","tag-possession","tag-supreme-court","tag-tenant"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Tenant can continue to occupy the leased premises even after expiration of agricultural lease on the basis of \u2018holding over\u2019 principle | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/07\/11\/tenant-can-continue-to-occupy-the-leased-premises-even-after-expiration-of-agricultural-lease-on-the-basis-of-holding-over-principle\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Tenant can continue to occupy the leased premises even after expiration of agricultural lease on the basis of \u2018holding over\u2019 principle\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Supreme Court: The 3-judge bench of Ranjan Gogoi, Arun Mishra and P.C.Pant, JJ, were hearing a reference to decide the question as\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/07\/11\/tenant-can-continue-to-occupy-the-leased-premises-even-after-expiration-of-agricultural-lease-on-the-basis-of-holding-over-principle\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2016-07-11T09:03:51+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-09-13T06:45:54+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Sucheta\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Sucheta\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/07\/11\/tenant-can-continue-to-occupy-the-leased-premises-even-after-expiration-of-agricultural-lease-on-the-basis-of-holding-over-principle\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/07\/11\/tenant-can-continue-to-occupy-the-leased-premises-even-after-expiration-of-agricultural-lease-on-the-basis-of-holding-over-principle\/\",\"name\":\"Tenant can continue to occupy the leased premises even after expiration of agricultural lease on the basis of \u2018holding over\u2019 principle | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/07\/11\/tenant-can-continue-to-occupy-the-leased-premises-even-after-expiration-of-agricultural-lease-on-the-basis-of-holding-over-principle\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/07\/11\/tenant-can-continue-to-occupy-the-leased-premises-even-after-expiration-of-agricultural-lease-on-the-basis-of-holding-over-principle\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2016-07-11T09:03:51+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-09-13T06:45:54+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/07\/11\/tenant-can-continue-to-occupy-the-leased-premises-even-after-expiration-of-agricultural-lease-on-the-basis-of-holding-over-principle\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/07\/11\/tenant-can-continue-to-occupy-the-leased-premises-even-after-expiration-of-agricultural-lease-on-the-basis-of-holding-over-principle\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/07\/11\/tenant-can-continue-to-occupy-the-leased-premises-even-after-expiration-of-agricultural-lease-on-the-basis-of-holding-over-principle\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg\",\"width\":1330,\"height\":887},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/07\/11\/tenant-can-continue-to-occupy-the-leased-premises-even-after-expiration-of-agricultural-lease-on-the-basis-of-holding-over-principle\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Tenant can continue to occupy the leased premises even after expiration of agricultural lease on the basis of \u2018holding over\u2019 principle\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa\",\"name\":\"Sucheta\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Sucheta\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/legal_editor\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Tenant can continue to occupy the leased premises even after expiration of agricultural lease on the basis of \u2018holding over\u2019 principle | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/07\/11\/tenant-can-continue-to-occupy-the-leased-premises-even-after-expiration-of-agricultural-lease-on-the-basis-of-holding-over-principle\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Tenant can continue to occupy the leased premises even after expiration of agricultural lease on the basis of \u2018holding over\u2019 principle","og_description":"Supreme Court: The 3-judge bench of Ranjan Gogoi, Arun Mishra and P.C.Pant, JJ, were hearing a reference to decide the question as","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/07\/11\/tenant-can-continue-to-occupy-the-leased-premises-even-after-expiration-of-agricultural-lease-on-the-basis-of-holding-over-principle\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2016-07-11T09:03:51+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-09-13T06:45:54+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Sucheta","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Sucheta","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/07\/11\/tenant-can-continue-to-occupy-the-leased-premises-even-after-expiration-of-agricultural-lease-on-the-basis-of-holding-over-principle\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/07\/11\/tenant-can-continue-to-occupy-the-leased-premises-even-after-expiration-of-agricultural-lease-on-the-basis-of-holding-over-principle\/","name":"Tenant can continue to occupy the leased premises even after expiration of agricultural lease on the basis of \u2018holding over\u2019 principle | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/07\/11\/tenant-can-continue-to-occupy-the-leased-premises-even-after-expiration-of-agricultural-lease-on-the-basis-of-holding-over-principle\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/07\/11\/tenant-can-continue-to-occupy-the-leased-premises-even-after-expiration-of-agricultural-lease-on-the-basis-of-holding-over-principle\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg","datePublished":"2016-07-11T09:03:51+00:00","dateModified":"2016-09-13T06:45:54+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/07\/11\/tenant-can-continue-to-occupy-the-leased-premises-even-after-expiration-of-agricultural-lease-on-the-basis-of-holding-over-principle\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/07\/11\/tenant-can-continue-to-occupy-the-leased-premises-even-after-expiration-of-agricultural-lease-on-the-basis-of-holding-over-principle\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/07\/11\/tenant-can-continue-to-occupy-the-leased-premises-even-after-expiration-of-agricultural-lease-on-the-basis-of-holding-over-principle\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg","width":1330,"height":887},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/07\/11\/tenant-can-continue-to-occupy-the-leased-premises-even-after-expiration-of-agricultural-lease-on-the-basis-of-holding-over-principle\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Tenant can continue to occupy the leased premises even after expiration of agricultural lease on the basis of \u2018holding over\u2019 principle"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa","name":"Sucheta","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Sucheta"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/legal_editor\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":324938,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/06\/23\/mere-deposit-of-rent-not-sufficient-to-establish-landlord-tenant-relationship-between-tenants-mortgagee-landlord-of-leased-property-sc\/","url_meta":{"origin":55511,"position":0},"title":"Never Reported Judgment | Mere deposit of monthly rent by mortgagee not sufficient to establish landlord-tenant relationship between tenant\u2019s mortgagee and landlord of leased property [(1953) 1 SCC 603]","author":"Simranjeet","date":"June 23, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"This report covers the Supreme Court\u2019s Never Reported Judgment dating back to the year 1953 on landlord-tenant relationship.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Cases Reported&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Cases Reported","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casesreported\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"landlord-tenant relationship","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/NRJ-1-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/NRJ-1-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/NRJ-1-1.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/NRJ-1-1.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":55191,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/07\/08\/consent-of-the-owner-of-the-premises-not-necessary-for-renewal-of-tenants-valid-licence-under-the-section-4923-of-the-kerala-municipality-act-1994\/","url_meta":{"origin":55511,"position":1},"title":"Consent of the owner of the premises not necessary for renewal of tenant\u2019s valid licence under the Section 492(3) of the Kerala Municipality Act, 1994","author":"Sucheta","date":"July 8, 2016","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: The bench of V. Gopala Gowda and A.K. Goel, JJ, while deciding the question as to whether the consent of the owner of the premises is necessary for renewal of tenant\u2019s licence under the Section 492(3) of the Kerala Municipality Act, 1994, held that the requirement of consent\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":296630,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/12\/sc-limitation-section-143-rajasthan-premises-rent-control-eviction-act-1950-tenants-landlord\/","url_meta":{"origin":55511,"position":2},"title":"Does Section 14(3) of the Rajasthan Premises (Control of Rent and Eviction) Act, 1950 completely bar institution of suit within 5 years? SC answers","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"July 12, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court held that not putting a quietus to the prolonged dispute at hand, spanning 38 years, on something as simple as tenancy issue, would be a travesty of justice.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"limitation under section 14(3) of rajasthan premises (control of rent and eviction) act","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/limitation-under-section-143-of-rajasthan-premises-control-of-rent-and-eviction-act.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/limitation-under-section-143-of-rajasthan-premises-control-of-rent-and-eviction-act.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/limitation-under-section-143-of-rajasthan-premises-control-of-rent-and-eviction-act.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/limitation-under-section-143-of-rajasthan-premises-control-of-rent-and-eviction-act.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":325145,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/06\/26\/mesne-profits-payable-continuation-possession-tenant-after-expiry-determination-forfeiture-termination-lease\/","url_meta":{"origin":55511,"position":3},"title":"Mesne Profits on continuation of possession payable only after \u2018expiry of lease\u2019 or even after \u2018determination, forfeiture or termination\u2019? SC answers","author":"Editor","date":"June 26, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"In the matter at hand, the Court directed the tenant to deposit Rs.5,15,05,512\/-, considering the location of the demised premises in the heart of Kolkata, the rent, the alleged non-payment of rent, the default in payment of interest, as alleged.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Mesne Profits on continuation of possession","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/Mesne-Profits-on-continuation-of-possession.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/Mesne-Profits-on-continuation-of-possession.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/Mesne-Profits-on-continuation-of-possession.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/Mesne-Profits-on-continuation-of-possession.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":240987,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/12\/20\/why-are-landlord-tenant-disputes-under-tp-act-arbitrable-but-those-under-rent-acts-non-arbitrable-vidya-drolia-explainer-by-supreme-court\/","url_meta":{"origin":55511,"position":4},"title":"Why are Landlord-tenant disputes under TP Act arbitrable but those under Rent Acts non-arbitrable? [&#8216;Vidya Drolia&#8217; explainer by Supreme Court]","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"December 20, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: Three days after the Court overruled the ratio in\u00a0Himangni Enterprises v. Kamaljeet Singh Ahluwalia,\u00a0(2017) 10 SCC 706\u00a0wherein it was held that landlord-tenant disputes governed by the provisions of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882, are not arbitrable as this would be contrary to public policy, the 3-judge bench\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":308752,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/12\/08\/calcutta-high-court-upholds-right-to-challenge-non-arbitrability-in-landlord-tenant-dispute-scc-blog\/","url_meta":{"origin":55511,"position":5},"title":"Calcutta High Court upholds right to challenge non-arbitrability in landlord-tenant dispute; sets asides Arbitral Award","author":"Ritu","date":"December 8, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Applying Section 3 of the West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act, 1956, the Calcutta High Court determined that the dispute is governed by the tenancy act.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"calcutta high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/55511","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=55511"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/55511\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/154914"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=55511"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=55511"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=55511"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}