{"id":54661,"date":"2016-07-05T16:21:49","date_gmt":"2016-07-05T10:51:49","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=54661"},"modified":"2016-09-13T12:08:07","modified_gmt":"2016-09-13T06:38:07","slug":"wife-of-the-complainants-brother-not-a-relative-of-the-husband-under-s-498-a-ipc","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/07\/05\/wife-of-the-complainants-brother-not-a-relative-of-the-husband-under-s-498-a-ipc\/","title":{"rendered":"Wife of the Complainant\u2019s brother not a \u2018relative of the husband\u2019 under S. 498-A IPC"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Andhra Pradesh High<\/strong> <strong>Court<\/strong>: While interpreting the definition of \u2018Husband\u2019s relatives under Section 498A Penal Code, 1860, the Bench comprising of U. Durga Prasad Rao, J. held that the definition could not be stretched to include the wife of one&#8217;s elder brother.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">In the present petition, the Complainant and her husband went to live at the home of the Complainant&#8217;s eldest brother in London, who lived with his wife. It was alleged that the complainant\u2019s husband and her sister-in-law entered into an illicit relationship, and that after the Complainant observed them in a compromising position, following which the sister-in-law started spreading rumours that husband of the Complainant did not like the Complainant and that she was unsuited to him.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The Court cited U. Suvetha v. State by Inspector of Police, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/LoginForNewsLink\/2009_6_SCC_757\">(2009) 6 SCC 757<\/a> whereby it was held that the girlfriend or concubine of the husband could not be held to be the relative of the husband and Vijeta Gujra v. State of N.C.T. Of Delhi, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/LoginForNewsLink\/2010_11_SCC_618\">(2010) 11 SCC 618<\/a>, which quashed proceedings against a foster sister having an illicit relation with the husband, to highlight the Supreme Court&#8217;s view that the term \u2018relative of the husband\u2019 meant related by blood, marriage or adoption. The Court stated that penal provisions required strict construction, and in the absence of definition of phrases by statute, they are to be understood in the natural, ordinary or popular sense. The Court, hence, quashed the proceedings against the sister-in-law of the Complainant as she was not a relative by blood, marriage or adoption to the husband but to the Complainant, and additionally because no allegations touching other provisions or of cruelty as defined by Section 498 A were made against her. [Shaik Riayazun Bee v. State of Andhra Pradesh,<a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/LoginForNewsLink\/2016_SCC_OnLine_Hyd_130\">2016 SCC OnLine Hyd 130<\/a>, decided on 01-06-2016]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Andhra Pradesh High Court: While interpreting the definition of \u2018Husband\u2019s relatives under Section 498A Penal Code, 1860, the Bench comprising of U. <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[2570,2526,7781],"class_list":["post-54661","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-Cruelty","tag-Interpretation","tag-section-498-a"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Wife of the Complainant\u2019s brother not a \u2018relative of the husband\u2019 under S. 498-A IPC | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/07\/05\/wife-of-the-complainants-brother-not-a-relative-of-the-husband-under-s-498-a-ipc\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Wife of the Complainant\u2019s brother not a \u2018relative of the husband\u2019 under S. 498-A IPC\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Andhra Pradesh High Court: While interpreting the definition of \u2018Husband\u2019s relatives under Section 498A Penal Code, 1860, the Bench comprising of U.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/07\/05\/wife-of-the-complainants-brother-not-a-relative-of-the-husband-under-s-498-a-ipc\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2016-07-05T10:51:49+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-09-13T06:38:07+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/High-Court-Of-Andhra-Pradesh.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Sucheta\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Sucheta\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"1 minute\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/07\/05\/wife-of-the-complainants-brother-not-a-relative-of-the-husband-under-s-498-a-ipc\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/07\/05\/wife-of-the-complainants-brother-not-a-relative-of-the-husband-under-s-498-a-ipc\/\",\"name\":\"Wife of the Complainant\u2019s brother not a \u2018relative of the husband\u2019 under S. 498-A IPC | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2016-07-05T10:51:49+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-09-13T06:38:07+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/07\/05\/wife-of-the-complainants-brother-not-a-relative-of-the-husband-under-s-498-a-ipc\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/07\/05\/wife-of-the-complainants-brother-not-a-relative-of-the-husband-under-s-498-a-ipc\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/07\/05\/wife-of-the-complainants-brother-not-a-relative-of-the-husband-under-s-498-a-ipc\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Wife of the Complainant\u2019s brother not a \u2018relative of the husband\u2019 under S. 498-A IPC\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa\",\"name\":\"Sucheta\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Sucheta\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/legal_editor\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Wife of the Complainant\u2019s brother not a \u2018relative of the husband\u2019 under S. 498-A IPC | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/07\/05\/wife-of-the-complainants-brother-not-a-relative-of-the-husband-under-s-498-a-ipc\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Wife of the Complainant\u2019s brother not a \u2018relative of the husband\u2019 under S. 498-A IPC","og_description":"Andhra Pradesh High Court: While interpreting the definition of \u2018Husband\u2019s relatives under Section 498A Penal Code, 1860, the Bench comprising of U.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/07\/05\/wife-of-the-complainants-brother-not-a-relative-of-the-husband-under-s-498-a-ipc\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2016-07-05T10:51:49+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-09-13T06:38:07+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/High-Court-Of-Andhra-Pradesh.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Sucheta","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Sucheta","Est. reading time":"1 minute"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/07\/05\/wife-of-the-complainants-brother-not-a-relative-of-the-husband-under-s-498-a-ipc\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/07\/05\/wife-of-the-complainants-brother-not-a-relative-of-the-husband-under-s-498-a-ipc\/","name":"Wife of the Complainant\u2019s brother not a \u2018relative of the husband\u2019 under S. 498-A IPC | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2016-07-05T10:51:49+00:00","dateModified":"2016-09-13T06:38:07+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/07\/05\/wife-of-the-complainants-brother-not-a-relative-of-the-husband-under-s-498-a-ipc\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/07\/05\/wife-of-the-complainants-brother-not-a-relative-of-the-husband-under-s-498-a-ipc\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/07\/05\/wife-of-the-complainants-brother-not-a-relative-of-the-husband-under-s-498-a-ipc\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Wife of the Complainant\u2019s brother not a \u2018relative of the husband\u2019 under S. 498-A IPC"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa","name":"Sucheta","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Sucheta"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/legal_editor\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":243478,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/02\/06\/jhar-hc-when-can-the-second-wife-be-convicted-for-abetting-the-offence-of-bigamy-under-s-494-ipc-what-are-essential-ingredient-of-such-offence-court-examines-while-acquitting-the-second-wife\/","url_meta":{"origin":54661,"position":0},"title":"Jhar HC | When can the second wife be convicted for abetting the offence of bigamy under S. 494 IPC? What are the essential ingredients of such offence? Court examines while acquitting the second wife","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"February 6, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Jharkhand High Court: Anubha Rawat Choudhary, J., inter alia, reversed the conviction of the second wife (of the husband of the complainant-first wife) for abetting the offence under Section 494 IPC. Criminal Appeal was preferred against the Judgment of conviction and order of sentence passed by the Judicial Magistrate, 1st\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":229693,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/05\/18\/ph-hc-disgruntled-wives-use-provisions-of-s-498-a-ipc-as-a-weapon-rather-than-shield\/","url_meta":{"origin":54661,"position":1},"title":"P&#038;H HC | Disgruntled wives use provisions of S. 498- A IPC as a weapon rather than shield","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"May 18, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Punjab and Haryana High Court:\u00a0Jaishree Thakur, J., allowed a petition filed under Section 482 CrPC and held that, \"Disgruntled wives use the provisions of Section 498- A IPC as a weapon rather than shield.\" Petitioners have been summoned to face trial under Sections 498-A, 506, 120-B Penal Code, 1860 an\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":292767,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/05\/22\/punjab-haryana-hc-grants-anticipatory-bail-to-husband-accused-of-making-and-sharing-obscene-video-of-wife-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":54661,"position":2},"title":"Husband accused of sharing wife&#8217;s \u2018obscene videos&#8217; with partner in extra-marital affair; Punjab and Haryana High Court grants anticipatory bail","author":"Ridhi","date":"May 22, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"the Inquiry Officer found during pre-registration inquiry that the obscene videos were prepared by the complainant herself, but after registration of FIR, the Investigating Officer viewed that the videos and photographs were prepared by the husband on his own mobile in connivance with the co-accused.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Punjab and Haryana High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-13-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-13-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-13-1.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-13-1.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":297718,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/26\/second-wife-complaint-section-498-a-penal-code-not-maintainable-karnataka-high-court\/","url_meta":{"origin":54661,"position":3},"title":"Complaint under S. 498-A, IPC filed by the second wife against the husband and in-laws cannot be maintainable: Karnataka High Court","author":"Sucheta","date":"July 26, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The Court pointed out that \u2018woman\u2019 as per S. 498-A, IPC means and includes a legally wedded wife.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"karnataka high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/karnataka-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/karnataka-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/karnataka-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/karnataka-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":209547,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/02\/06\/del-hc-in-laws-discharged-of-s-498-ipc-where-complainant-roped-in-all-family-members-without-ascribing-specific-rules\/","url_meta":{"origin":54661,"position":4},"title":"Del HC | In-laws discharged of S. 498-A IPC where complainant roped in all family members without ascribing specific roles","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"February 6, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court:\u00a0Sanjeev Sachdeva, J. dismissed a petition filed against the judgment of Revisional Court whereby petitioner's \/ complainant's in-laws were discharged of the offences under \u00a0Sections 498-A and 34 IPC. In 2013, petitioner had filed an FIR against her husband and in-laws alleging harassment. It was alleged that her\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":253468,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/08\/31\/wife-commits-suicide-after-speaking-to-husband-on-mobile-phone\/","url_meta":{"origin":54661,"position":5},"title":"Wife commits suicide after speaking to husband on mobile phone, husband suspicioned to have instigated wife| Read whether Del HC grants bail to husband","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"August 31, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court: Mukta Gupta, J., decided a bail matter wherein the husband suspicioned to have instigated the wife to commit suicide. In the instant petition, the petitioner sought bail under Sections 304B, 498A, 34 Penal Code, 1860 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. Petitioner\u2019s counsel contended that in\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/54661","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=54661"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/54661\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=54661"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=54661"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=54661"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}