{"id":54641,"date":"2016-07-05T10:21:57","date_gmt":"2016-07-05T04:51:57","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=54641"},"modified":"2016-09-13T12:07:51","modified_gmt":"2016-09-13T06:37:51","slug":"advocates-maintaining-offices-in-their-residences-does-not-come-under-the-purview-of-commercial-venture","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/07\/05\/advocates-maintaining-offices-in-their-residences-does-not-come-under-the-purview-of-commercial-venture\/","title":{"rendered":"Advocates maintaining offices in their residences does not come under the purview of Commercial venture"},"content":{"rendered":"

Kerala High Court<\/strong>: The bench comprising of Justice Shaji P. Chaly, allowed the writ petition and issued a mandamus directing the Kerala State Housing Board and others to ensure that various flats constructed under a housing scheme for residential purposes at the Chinnakkada Housing Accomodation Scheme Site II of the Housing Board, Kollam, are not being used for other commercial purposes.<\/p>\n

The Housing scheme in question was meant for residential purposes. Further, Clause 19 of the Hire Purchase Agreement for those who opted for hire purchase also restricted use to residential purposes as does Regulation 6 (1) of the Kerala State Housing Board (Formation of Allottees Associations) Regulations, 2000). Nevertheless, various flats in the complex for being used as offices, godowns, training centres etc. Earlier alottees had raised the issue with the Board, whose inaction triggered O.P. No. 28612\/2000 before the same court, wherein respondents 1 to 3 had been directed to see that flats were not used for any purpose other than those mentioned under the scheme and clause 19 of the Hire Purchase Agreement.<\/p>\n

This Court characterized as undeniable \u00a0fact that owners and representatives-in-interest would be bound to obey the restrictive clause, and the housing scheme. The Court noted R.K. Mittal v. State of Uttar Pradesh \u00a0(2012) 2 SCC 232<\/a>, wherein the Supreme Court held that a scheme which comprised a master plan and zoning plan specified as residential by the allotment by the Delhi Development Authority under the Industrial Development Area Act of 1976, must be implemented strictly.<\/p>\n

The Court thereby held the Respondents bound to ensure the residential character of the flats and remove all commercial ventures within a period of three months, excepting an advocate who resided and maintained his office in the same flat because it is \u00a0not exactly constituting a commercial venture.\u00a0 [Darelene Carmelita D’Cruz v. Kerala State Housing Board, 2016 SCC OnLine Ker 5341<\/a>, decided 08-04-2016]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Kerala High Court: The bench comprising of Justice Shaji P. Chaly, allowed the writ petition and issued a mandamus directing the Kerala <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[2656,7761,2523,7771],"class_list":["post-54641","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-advocate","tag-commercial-venture","tag-Kerala_High_Court","tag-office"],"yoast_head":"\nAdvocates maintaining offices in their residences does not come under the purview of Commercial venture | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/07\/05\/advocates-maintaining-offices-in-their-residences-does-not-come-under-the-purview-of-commercial-venture\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Advocates maintaining offices in their residences does not come under the purview of Commercial venture\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Kerala High Court: The bench comprising of Justice Shaji P. Chaly, allowed the writ petition and issued a mandamus directing the Kerala\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/07\/05\/advocates-maintaining-offices-in-their-residences-does-not-come-under-the-purview-of-commercial-venture\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2016-07-05T04:51:57+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-09-13T06:37:51+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/03\/KeralaHC-e1521442636157.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Sucheta\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Sucheta\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/07\/05\/advocates-maintaining-offices-in-their-residences-does-not-come-under-the-purview-of-commercial-venture\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/07\/05\/advocates-maintaining-offices-in-their-residences-does-not-come-under-the-purview-of-commercial-venture\/\",\"name\":\"Advocates maintaining offices in their residences does not come under the purview of Commercial venture | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2016-07-05T04:51:57+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-09-13T06:37:51+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/07\/05\/advocates-maintaining-offices-in-their-residences-does-not-come-under-the-purview-of-commercial-venture\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/07\/05\/advocates-maintaining-offices-in-their-residences-does-not-come-under-the-purview-of-commercial-venture\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/07\/05\/advocates-maintaining-offices-in-their-residences-does-not-come-under-the-purview-of-commercial-venture\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Advocates maintaining offices in their residences does not come under the purview of Commercial venture\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa\",\"name\":\"Sucheta\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Sucheta\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/legal_editor\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Advocates maintaining offices in their residences does not come under the purview of Commercial venture | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/07\/05\/advocates-maintaining-offices-in-their-residences-does-not-come-under-the-purview-of-commercial-venture\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Advocates maintaining offices in their residences does not come under the purview of Commercial venture","og_description":"Kerala High Court: The bench comprising of Justice Shaji P. Chaly, allowed the writ petition and issued a mandamus directing the Kerala","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/07\/05\/advocates-maintaining-offices-in-their-residences-does-not-come-under-the-purview-of-commercial-venture\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2016-07-05T04:51:57+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-09-13T06:37:51+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/03\/KeralaHC-e1521442636157.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Sucheta","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Sucheta","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/07\/05\/advocates-maintaining-offices-in-their-residences-does-not-come-under-the-purview-of-commercial-venture\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/07\/05\/advocates-maintaining-offices-in-their-residences-does-not-come-under-the-purview-of-commercial-venture\/","name":"Advocates maintaining offices in their residences does not come under the purview of Commercial venture | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2016-07-05T04:51:57+00:00","dateModified":"2016-09-13T06:37:51+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/07\/05\/advocates-maintaining-offices-in-their-residences-does-not-come-under-the-purview-of-commercial-venture\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/07\/05\/advocates-maintaining-offices-in-their-residences-does-not-come-under-the-purview-of-commercial-venture\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/07\/05\/advocates-maintaining-offices-in-their-residences-does-not-come-under-the-purview-of-commercial-venture\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Advocates maintaining offices in their residences does not come under the purview of Commercial venture"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa","name":"Sucheta","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Sucheta"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/legal_editor\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":336899,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/12\/09\/delhi-high-court-dismisses-petition-kashmiri-migrants-dda-special-housing-scheme-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":54641,"position":0},"title":"Delhi High Court dismisses petition by Kashmiri migrants challenging DDA\u2019s Special Housing Scheme for Retired\/Retiring J&K Migrants","author":"Arunima","date":"December 9, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"These petitioners, who had not even applied under the second scheme cannot be permitted to challenge the same, that too, at a belated stage i.e. after four years of the closure of such scheme.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":369915,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/12\/16\/ph-hc-sets-aside-rejection-of-flat-allotment-to-jhuggi-dwellers\/","url_meta":{"origin":54641,"position":1},"title":"‘Right to housing is a fundamental right’: Punjab and Haryana HC sets aside rejection of jhuggi dwellers’ claims under Small Flats Scheme, 2006","author":"Editor","date":"December 16, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"In the case at hand, the Chandigarh Housing Board rejected jhuggi dwellers\u2019 claim for allotment of flat under the Chandigarh Small Flats Scheme, 2006 without giving them opportunity to be heard.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"flat allotment to jhuggi dwellers","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/flat-allotment-to-jhuggi-dwellers.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/flat-allotment-to-jhuggi-dwellers.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/flat-allotment-to-jhuggi-dwellers.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/flat-allotment-to-jhuggi-dwellers.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":302446,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/27\/calcutta-hc-invalidates-state-governments-regulation-service-conditions-wb-housing-boards-employees-scc-blog\/","url_meta":{"origin":54641,"position":2},"title":"Calcutta High Court upholds West Bengal Housing Board\u2019s autonomy; invalidates State\u2019s regulation of service conditions of Board\u2019s employees","author":"Ritu","date":"September 27, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The Calcutta High Court set aside the orders dated 17.10.2017 and the communication dated 28.11.2017 as the same is without jurisdiction, along with consequential steps taken by the West Bengal Housing Board.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"calcutta high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":294279,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/06\/09\/determination-of-gratuity-from-date-termination-of-employment-kerala-high-court\/","url_meta":{"origin":54641,"position":3},"title":"Gratuity determined as per date of termination of employment, not the date of sanction or actual disbursement: Kerala High Court","author":"Ridhi","date":"June 9, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Kerala High Court suggested the petitioner to choose between Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 and Kerala State Housing Board Employees' (Pension and other Retirement Benefits) Regulations, 1990 for claim of gratuity or DCRG, since he cannot have gratuity under one with the ceiling limit payable under another Act.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"kerala high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/kerala-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/kerala-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/kerala-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/kerala-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":307531,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/11\/21\/delhi-hc-directs-supreme-court-bar-association-multi-state-cooperative-housing-society-conduct-fresh-elections-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":54641,"position":4},"title":"Delhi High Court directs Supreme Court Bar Association Housing Society to conduct fresh elections; Appoints Justice Dhingra as the Returning Officer to conduct the elections of the Board","author":"Arunima","date":"November 21, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"As there cannot be a vacuum in law, the process of election cannot be stalled specially, when a provision exists, whereby, fresh election has to be conducted in a particular manner.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Supreme Court Bar Association Housing Society elections","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/Supreme-Court-Bar-Association-Housing-Society-elections.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/Supreme-Court-Bar-Association-Housing-Society-elections.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/Supreme-Court-Bar-Association-Housing-Society-elections.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/Supreme-Court-Bar-Association-Housing-Society-elections.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":312814,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/02\/stamp-duty-amnesty-scheme-2023\/","url_meta":{"origin":54641,"position":5},"title":"Stamp Duty Amnesty Scheme, 2023","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"February 2, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"by Abhiraj Gandhi\u2020 and Nirali Shah\u2020\u2020 Cite as: 2024 SCC OnLine Blog Exp 12","rel":"","context":"In "Experts Corner"","block_context":{"text":"Experts Corner","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/experts_corner\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Stamp Duty Amnesty Scheme","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/stamp-duty.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/stamp-duty.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/stamp-duty.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/stamp-duty.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/54641","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=54641"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/54641\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=54641"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=54641"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=54641"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}