{"id":54611,"date":"2016-07-04T15:53:32","date_gmt":"2016-07-04T10:23:32","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=54611"},"modified":"2016-09-13T12:07:18","modified_gmt":"2016-09-13T06:37:18","slug":"revisional-power-of-high-court-under-crpc-held-intact-under-the-protection-of-women-from-domestic-violence-act-2005","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/07\/04\/revisional-power-of-high-court-under-crpc-held-intact-under-the-protection-of-women-from-domestic-violence-act-2005\/","title":{"rendered":"Revisional power of High Court under CrPC held intact under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Allahabad High Court:<\/strong> Allowing the revision, the Court observed that the supervisory power or revisional jurisdiction of the High Court provided for under Sections 397(1) and 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 is not negated or affected by the absence of a provision for appeal to the High Court under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005. It was observed that the 2005 Act provided no finality to the order passed under Section 29 and there was no specific exclusion of the CrPC.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The revision was filed by the aggrieved husband against the order of the Additional District and Sessions Judge under Section 29 of the DV Act for payment of maintenance at Rs 30,000 per month towards his wife. The counsel for the opposite party relying on the judgment of the Apex Court in Shalu Ojha v. Prashant Ojha, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/LoginForNewsLink\/2015_2_SCC_99\">(2015) 2 SCC 99 <\/a>submitted that the revision was not maintainable.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Upholding the view of Manoj Misra, J. in Prabhunath Tiwari v. State of UP, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/LoginForNewsLink\/2012_SCC_OnLine_All_3172\">2012 SCC Online All 3172<\/a> the Court said that the revisional power of the High Court against the order passed under Section 29 of the Domestic Violence Act are \u201cintact and unaffected\u201d. The supervisory power of the High Court \u201chas not been excluded expressly or impliedly\u201d by the Act. Therefore, the Sessions Court was subject to the revisionary power of the High Court.\u00a0Moreover, while examining the merits of the case, it was revealed that the wife was a practicing advocate and she was in a position to maintain herself. In the light of the documents presented, the Court held that the petition filed under Section 12 of the Act was filed under concealment of facts and hence shall be considered afresh.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Taking a serious note of the unethical practice by certain advocates of using the identity of another advocate using his name and enrolment number, the Court observed that an advocate has an independent identity and personality. It takes years to shape the personality and build an image. This image works all through his life. Lot of dedication, commitment, sincerity and impeccable integrity is required to generate and sustain an image. Using somebody else&#8217;s identity and name is most sacrilegious act. Supplementary investigation was ordered against Advocate Pal Singh Yadav, for impersonation, stealing and using the identity of another advocate by using his name and enrollment number. The Court issued restraining orders against him from entering the premises of the High Court, Lucknow Bench, the Family Court, the Court of District Judge, Lucknow and other courts subordinate to him. [Chiranjeev Kumar Arya v. State of UP, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/LoginForNewsLink\/2016_SCC_OnLine_All_486\">2016 SCC OnLine All 486<\/a>, decided on June 29, 2016]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Allahabad High Court: Allowing the revision, the Court observed that the supervisory power or revisional jurisdiction of the High Court provided for <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[2698,7742,2630],"class_list":["post-54611","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-Domestic_Violence","tag-protection-of-women","tag-Revisional_power"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Revisional power of High Court under CrPC held intact under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/07\/04\/revisional-power-of-high-court-under-crpc-held-intact-under-the-protection-of-women-from-domestic-violence-act-2005\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Revisional power of High Court under CrPC held intact under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Allahabad High Court: Allowing the revision, the Court observed that the supervisory power or revisional jurisdiction of the High Court provided for\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/07\/04\/revisional-power-of-high-court-under-crpc-held-intact-under-the-protection-of-women-from-domestic-violence-act-2005\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2016-07-04T10:23:32+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-09-13T06:37:18+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/Allahabad-High-Court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Sucheta\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Sucheta\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/07\/04\/revisional-power-of-high-court-under-crpc-held-intact-under-the-protection-of-women-from-domestic-violence-act-2005\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/07\/04\/revisional-power-of-high-court-under-crpc-held-intact-under-the-protection-of-women-from-domestic-violence-act-2005\/\",\"name\":\"Revisional power of High Court under CrPC held intact under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2016-07-04T10:23:32+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-09-13T06:37:18+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/07\/04\/revisional-power-of-high-court-under-crpc-held-intact-under-the-protection-of-women-from-domestic-violence-act-2005\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/07\/04\/revisional-power-of-high-court-under-crpc-held-intact-under-the-protection-of-women-from-domestic-violence-act-2005\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/07\/04\/revisional-power-of-high-court-under-crpc-held-intact-under-the-protection-of-women-from-domestic-violence-act-2005\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Revisional power of High Court under CrPC held intact under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa\",\"name\":\"Sucheta\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Sucheta\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/legal_editor\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Revisional power of High Court under CrPC held intact under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/07\/04\/revisional-power-of-high-court-under-crpc-held-intact-under-the-protection-of-women-from-domestic-violence-act-2005\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Revisional power of High Court under CrPC held intact under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005","og_description":"Allahabad High Court: Allowing the revision, the Court observed that the supervisory power or revisional jurisdiction of the High Court provided for","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/07\/04\/revisional-power-of-high-court-under-crpc-held-intact-under-the-protection-of-women-from-domestic-violence-act-2005\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2016-07-04T10:23:32+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-09-13T06:37:18+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/Allahabad-High-Court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Sucheta","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Sucheta","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/07\/04\/revisional-power-of-high-court-under-crpc-held-intact-under-the-protection-of-women-from-domestic-violence-act-2005\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/07\/04\/revisional-power-of-high-court-under-crpc-held-intact-under-the-protection-of-women-from-domestic-violence-act-2005\/","name":"Revisional power of High Court under CrPC held intact under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2016-07-04T10:23:32+00:00","dateModified":"2016-09-13T06:37:18+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/07\/04\/revisional-power-of-high-court-under-crpc-held-intact-under-the-protection-of-women-from-domestic-violence-act-2005\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/07\/04\/revisional-power-of-high-court-under-crpc-held-intact-under-the-protection-of-women-from-domestic-violence-act-2005\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/07\/04\/revisional-power-of-high-court-under-crpc-held-intact-under-the-protection-of-women-from-domestic-violence-act-2005\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Revisional power of High Court under CrPC held intact under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa","name":"Sucheta","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Sucheta"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/legal_editor\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":352674,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/07\/inherent-powers-dv-act-interim-order-kerala-high-court\/","url_meta":{"origin":54611,"position":0},"title":"No Scope for inherent powers to interfere with interim orders passed under DV Act without manifest illegality: Kerala High Court","author":"Apoorva","date":"July 7, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cAs far as the present case is concerned, the interim order passed by the Magistrate cannot be said to be gross illegality or irregularity. The petitioner could very well approach the same court seeking order, modifying or vacating the aforesaid order if there are sufficient reasons. That apart, appeal is\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"inherent powers DV Act","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/inherent-powers-DV-Act.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/inherent-powers-DV-Act.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/inherent-powers-DV-Act.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/inherent-powers-DV-Act.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":343965,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/20\/paradox-of-the-protection-order\/","url_meta":{"origin":54611,"position":1},"title":"Paradox of the Protection Order","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"March 20, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"by Vilasini Balasubramanian*","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Op Eds&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Op Eds","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/op-ed\/legal-analysis\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Paradox of the Protection Order","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/03\/Paradox-of-the-Protection-Order.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/03\/Paradox-of-the-Protection-Order.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/03\/Paradox-of-the-Protection-Order.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/03\/Paradox-of-the-Protection-Order.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":196050,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/05\/16\/women-governed-under-muslim-personal-law-have-right-to-recourse-under-the-protection-of-women-from-domestic-violence-act-2005\/","url_meta":{"origin":54611,"position":2},"title":"Women governed under Muslim Personal Law have right to recourse under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005","author":"Saba","date":"May 16, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Bombay High Court: A Single Judge Bench comprising of Bharati H. Dangre, J., has held that the Muslim Personal Law can in no way curtail the protection granted under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act 2005, from being available to a Muslim woman. Brief facts of the case\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":233038,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/07\/29\/del-hc-no-exception-to-remedy-against-orders-of-custody-under-domestic-violence-act-court-dismisses-s-482-crpc-petition-in-view-of-s-29-dv-act\/","url_meta":{"origin":54611,"position":3},"title":"Del HC | &#8220;No exception to remedy against orders of custody under Domestic Violence Act&#8221;: Court dismisses S. 482 CrPC petition in view of S. 29 DV Act","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"July 29, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court:\u00a0Jyoti Singh, J., while addressing the maintainability and legality of a petition filed under Section 482 of Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 held that, legislature in its wisdom has provided for Appeal under Section 29 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 against all \"orders\" and\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":239278,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/11\/17\/kar-hc-is-petition-under-s-125-crpc-maintainable-when-an-order-of-compensation-has-been-granted-under-protection-of-women-from-domestic-violence-act-2005-petition-allowed\/","url_meta":{"origin":54611,"position":4},"title":"Kar HC | Is petition under S. 125 CrPC maintainable when an order of compensation has been granted under Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005; Petition allowed","author":"Editor","date":"November 17, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Karnataka High Court: Jyoti Mulmani J., allowed the revision petition on grounds of failure to ascertain and understand the material propositions involved in the case. The facts of the case are that the petitioner is a legally wedded wife of respondent and their marriage was solemnized on 28-02-2007 at Gayathri\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":316261,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/06\/delhi-court-application-under-section-12-domestic-violence-act-cannot-transferred-family-court-section-408-crpc-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":54611,"position":5},"title":"Application under Section 12 DV Act cannot be transferred to Family Court u\/S 408 CrPC; Delhi Court reiterates","author":"Arunima","date":"March 6, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"The Court affirms the exclusive jurisdiction of Magistrates in adjudicating applications under Section 12 of the Act, thereby ensuring clarity and coherence in the administration of justice.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Saket Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Saket-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Saket-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Saket-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Saket-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/54611","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=54611"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/54611\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=54611"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=54611"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=54611"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}