{"id":53721,"date":"2016-06-29T16:54:21","date_gmt":"2016-06-29T11:24:21","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=53721"},"modified":"2016-08-20T15:03:54","modified_gmt":"2016-08-20T09:33:54","slug":"prior-sanction-of-state-government-is-a-condition-precedent-for-taking-cognizance-against-police-officer-discharging-official-duty","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/06\/29\/prior-sanction-of-state-government-is-a-condition-precedent-for-taking-cognizance-against-police-officer-discharging-official-duty\/","title":{"rendered":"Prior sanction of State Government is a condition precedent for taking cognizance against police officer discharging official duty"},"content":{"rendered":"

Patna High Court:<\/strong> The 3-judge bench of I. A. Ansari ACJ, Chakradhari Sharan Singh and Navaniti Prasad Singh, JJ upheld the validity of Invoking the provisions as contained in Sub-section (3) of Section 197 , the Notification dated 16.05.1980 issued by Bihar Government, invoking the provisions as contained in Sub-section (3) of Section 197 CrPC, which direct which declared that the provisions of sub-section (2) shall apply to no court can take cognizance of the offence committed by \u201cOfficers and men\u201d wherever they may serving the State of Bihar or the Bihar Police Force, such class or category of the members of the Forces charged with the maintenance of public order of the Code of Criminal Procedure, while performing his official duty, except by the prior sanction of the State Government. , a notification of Bihar Government, issued in 1980. The bench of three judges I. A. Ansari ACJ, Chakradhari Sharan Singh and Navaniti Prasad Singh, J J upheld the order of Chief Judicial Magistrate.<\/p>\n

The petitioner who was posted as Officer-in-charge of Government Rail Road Station, in Muzaffarpur was charged under offences punishable under Sections 147, 323, 353, 342 and 379 of the Penal Code, 1860 by and the Chief Judicial Magistrate took the cognizance of the matter without prior sanction. The petitioner, relying on the impugned Notification, under section 482 of the Cr.PC moved to Patna High Court where the Single Judge referred the matter to the Division Bench which was later transferred to a larger bench. The Court took reliance with of the case of ruling in of Om Prakash and others v. State of Jharkhand, (2012) 12 SCC 72<\/a> and held that The notification, dated 16.05.1980, cannot be held to be beyond the scope and\/or powers conferred on the State Government under Sub-section (3) of Section 197 CrPC of the Code of Criminal Procedure, the same having been applied by Supreme Court in case of Om Prakash vs. State of Jharkhand (supra) and criminal prosecution having been quashed against police personnel on that ground. We are mindful of the fact that the question of jurisdiction of the State Government to issue notification, granting protection to police personnel in exercise of power under section 197(3) of the CrPC., was neither raised nor decided. The Court further said that in view of the said notification, the previous sanction of the offences alleged to have been committed by the Police Officers, while acting or purporting to act in discharge of his official duty, is a condition precedent.
\nHence, the Court held that the Chief Judicial Magistrate erred by taking cognizance of the matter without the prior sanction of the State Government and hence, quashed the impugned order. the Court held that under Section 197 (2) of CrPC that any member of the Armed Forces of the Union while acting or purporting to act in the discharge of his official duty, except with the previous sanction of the Central Government uphold the Bihar Notification and quashed the order of the Chief Judicial Magistrate. [Ram Rekha Pandey vs. State of Bihar, 2016 SCC OnLine Pat 2130<\/a>, dated on 26th June,26.06. 2016]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Patna High Court: The 3-judge bench of I. A. Ansari ACJ, Chakradhari Sharan Singh and Navaniti Prasad Singh, JJ upheld the validity <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[3726,7441,2694,7431],"class_list":["post-53721","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-cognizance","tag-patna-high-court","tag-Sanction","tag-state-government"],"yoast_head":"\nPrior sanction of State Government is a condition precedent for taking cognizance against police officer discharging official duty | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/06\/29\/prior-sanction-of-state-government-is-a-condition-precedent-for-taking-cognizance-against-police-officer-discharging-official-duty\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Prior sanction of State Government is a condition precedent for taking cognizance against police officer discharging official duty\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Patna High Court: The 3-judge bench of I. A. Ansari ACJ, Chakradhari Sharan Singh and Navaniti Prasad Singh, JJ upheld the validity\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/06\/29\/prior-sanction-of-state-government-is-a-condition-precedent-for-taking-cognizance-against-police-officer-discharging-official-duty\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2016-06-29T11:24:21+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-08-20T09:33:54+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/02\/patna-high-court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Sucheta\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Sucheta\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/06\/29\/prior-sanction-of-state-government-is-a-condition-precedent-for-taking-cognizance-against-police-officer-discharging-official-duty\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/06\/29\/prior-sanction-of-state-government-is-a-condition-precedent-for-taking-cognizance-against-police-officer-discharging-official-duty\/\",\"name\":\"Prior sanction of State Government is a condition precedent for taking cognizance against police officer discharging official duty | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2016-06-29T11:24:21+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-08-20T09:33:54+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/06\/29\/prior-sanction-of-state-government-is-a-condition-precedent-for-taking-cognizance-against-police-officer-discharging-official-duty\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/06\/29\/prior-sanction-of-state-government-is-a-condition-precedent-for-taking-cognizance-against-police-officer-discharging-official-duty\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/06\/29\/prior-sanction-of-state-government-is-a-condition-precedent-for-taking-cognizance-against-police-officer-discharging-official-duty\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Prior sanction of State Government is a condition precedent for taking cognizance against police officer discharging official duty\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa\",\"name\":\"Sucheta\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Sucheta\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/legal_editor\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Prior sanction of State Government is a condition precedent for taking cognizance against police officer discharging official duty | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/06\/29\/prior-sanction-of-state-government-is-a-condition-precedent-for-taking-cognizance-against-police-officer-discharging-official-duty\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Prior sanction of State Government is a condition precedent for taking cognizance against police officer discharging official duty","og_description":"Patna High Court: The 3-judge bench of I. A. Ansari ACJ, Chakradhari Sharan Singh and Navaniti Prasad Singh, JJ upheld the validity","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/06\/29\/prior-sanction-of-state-government-is-a-condition-precedent-for-taking-cognizance-against-police-officer-discharging-official-duty\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2016-06-29T11:24:21+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-08-20T09:33:54+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/02\/patna-high-court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Sucheta","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Sucheta","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/06\/29\/prior-sanction-of-state-government-is-a-condition-precedent-for-taking-cognizance-against-police-officer-discharging-official-duty\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/06\/29\/prior-sanction-of-state-government-is-a-condition-precedent-for-taking-cognizance-against-police-officer-discharging-official-duty\/","name":"Prior sanction of State Government is a condition precedent for taking cognizance against police officer discharging official duty | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2016-06-29T11:24:21+00:00","dateModified":"2016-08-20T09:33:54+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/06\/29\/prior-sanction-of-state-government-is-a-condition-precedent-for-taking-cognizance-against-police-officer-discharging-official-duty\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/06\/29\/prior-sanction-of-state-government-is-a-condition-precedent-for-taking-cognizance-against-police-officer-discharging-official-duty\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/06\/29\/prior-sanction-of-state-government-is-a-condition-precedent-for-taking-cognizance-against-police-officer-discharging-official-duty\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Prior sanction of State Government is a condition precedent for taking cognizance against police officer discharging official duty"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa","name":"Sucheta","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Sucheta"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/legal_editor\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":244053,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/02\/19\/sedition\/","url_meta":{"origin":53721,"position":0},"title":"J&K HC | \u201cObjectionable conversation, demeaning armed forces in the backdrop of Galwan Valley clashes\u201d, HC acquits the person behind viral audio clip","author":"Editor","date":"February 19, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Jammu and Kashmir High Court: Sanjeev Kumar, J., addressed the instant petition whereby the petitioner was charged for sedition under Sections 124-A, 153-A, 153-B and 505(2), 120-B of IPC in connection with a viral audio clip containing demeaning content regarding armed forces. The Bench said, \u201c\u2026unless the conversation has the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":276877,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/11\/07\/sanction-reasonable-nexus-section-197-seizure-criminal-procedure-cognizance-discharge-of-duty-legal-updates-legal-news-research\/","url_meta":{"origin":53721,"position":1},"title":"Orissa High Court| Sanction must be issued under Section 197 of CrPC for taking cognizance on having \u2018reasonable nexus\u2019 with official duty","author":"Editor","date":"November 7, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Orissa High Court: In a criminal miscellaneous petition filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (\u2018Code\u2019) challenging the legality and judicial propriety of the impugned order of cognizance, on the ground that it is not tenable in law and hence, liable to be quashed in the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Orissa High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/orissa_high_court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/orissa_high_court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/orissa_high_court.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/orissa_high_court.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/orissa_high_court.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":290479,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/04\/25\/orissa-hc-quashes-criminal-proceedings-against-nesco-orissa-officials-legal-research-legal-news-updates\/","url_meta":{"origin":53721,"position":2},"title":"Orissa HC quashes Criminal proceedings against NESCO Orissa Officials on grounds of absence of Sanction under Section 197 CrPC","author":"Editor","date":"April 25, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The officers on duty cannot be subjected to undue harassment in the hands of unscrupulous litigants, to prevent malicious prosecution provisions such as Section 168 of the Electricity Act, 2003, are put in place.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Orissa High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-508.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-508.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-508.png?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-508.png?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":253791,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/09\/07\/no-prosecution-against-public-servants\/","url_meta":{"origin":53721,"position":3},"title":"Ker HC | No prosecution against public servants without prior approval of government; HC dismisses CBI\u2019s revision petition","author":"Editor","date":"September 7, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Kerala High Court: Narayana Pisharadi, J., dismissed the revision petition filed by CBI due to its failure to obtain prior sanction of government before prosecuting public servants. The Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) had filed the instant revision petition to assail the order of the Special Judge for CBI Cases,\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":309730,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/12\/20\/section-197-crpc-sanction-required-for-criminal-complaint-against-police-officer-phhc\/","url_meta":{"origin":53721,"position":4},"title":"Sanction required under Section 197 CrPC for criminal complaint against Police Officer: Punjab and Haryana HC","author":"Ridhi","date":"December 20, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"It was contended on part of the State that since the complaint was filed by the Court itself, no sanction under Section 197 of CrPC was required.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"punjab and haryana high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/punjab-and-haryana-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/punjab-and-haryana-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/punjab-and-haryana-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/punjab-and-haryana-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":79981,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/10\/19\/private-complaint-against-public-servant-under-pc-act-1988-need-not-necessarily-be-accompanied-by-sanction-order-but-is-pre-requisite-in-taking-cognizance\/","url_meta":{"origin":53721,"position":5},"title":"Private complaint against public servant under PC Act, 1988 need not necessarily be accompanied by sanction order but, is pre-requisite in taking cognizance","author":"Saba","date":"October 19, 2016","format":false,"excerpt":"High Court of Karnataka: While deciding\u00a0\u00a0the issues raised for consideration of the Court pertaining to the nature of judicial process involved in the Court of the Special Judge directing an investigation by the police under Section 156(3) of the Criminal Procedure Code, when a private complaint is filed against a\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/53721","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=53721"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/53721\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=53721"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=53721"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=53721"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}