{"id":52911,"date":"2016-06-23T12:43:43","date_gmt":"2016-06-23T07:13:43","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=52911"},"modified":"2016-08-20T14:57:59","modified_gmt":"2016-08-20T09:27:59","slug":"compromise-betwen-parties-in-case-of-death-by-rash-and-negligent-driving-is-not-a-ground-to-quash-the-offence-us-304-a-ipc","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/06\/23\/compromise-betwen-parties-in-case-of-death-by-rash-and-negligent-driving-is-not-a-ground-to-quash-the-offence-us-304-a-ipc\/","title":{"rendered":"Compromise between parties in case of death by rash and negligent driving is not a ground to quash the offence u\/S 304-A IPC"},"content":{"rendered":"

Kerala High Court:<\/strong>\u00a0 Dismissing the criminal miscellaneous case where the petitioner having been\u00a0 charged under Sections 304-A, 279 and 338 of the Penal Code, 1860 for causing death due to rash and negligent driving, sought quashing of the proceedings on the basis of a compromise entered into by the parties, the Court observed that such offences cannot be treated as a private dispute between the parties, so as to persuade the Court to accept a compromise and quash the proceedings.<\/p>\n

The petitioner contended that a compromise had been entered into at the instance of mediators and the respondents had no objection to the proceedings being quashed. The Public Prosecutor however opposed the same, submitting that the Court was kept in the dark as to the terms of the settlement and the actual legal heirs of the deceased. Hence, if the offence under Section 304-A is quashed on the basis of a purported settlement with one of the legal heirs of the victim,\u00a0 it would send a wrong signal.<\/p>\n

The Bench of Raja Vijayraghavan, J. observed that an offence under Section 304-A IPC has the potentiality of making victims in many a layer thus creating a concavity in the social fabric. The impact on the society is felt all the more when accidents take place due to rash driving by drunken, negligent or adventurous drivers with no concern for others. The Court in exercise of powers under Section 482 CrPC cannot send a signal to the wrongdoer that payment of money can be a substitute for the crime committed against the society. The Court held that taking a lenient view of such an offence under Section 304-A will leave a wrong impression about the criminal justice system, encouraging further criminal acts, thus endangering the peaceful co-existence and welfare of the society at large. [Mohammed Ashraf<\/em> v. State of Kerala<\/em>, 2016 SCC OnLine Ker 4258<\/a>, order dated May 18, 2016]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Kerala High Court:\u00a0 Dismissing the criminal miscellaneous case where the petitioner having been\u00a0 charged under Sections 304-A, 279 and 338 of the <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[2711,2523,7202],"class_list":["post-52911","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-compromise","tag-Kerala_High_Court","tag-rash-and-negligent-driving"],"yoast_head":"\nCompromise between parties in case of death by rash and negligent driving is not a ground to quash the offence u\/S 304-A IPC | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/06\/23\/compromise-betwen-parties-in-case-of-death-by-rash-and-negligent-driving-is-not-a-ground-to-quash-the-offence-us-304-a-ipc\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Compromise between parties in case of death by rash and negligent driving is not a ground to quash the offence u\/S 304-A IPC\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Kerala High Court:\u00a0 Dismissing the criminal miscellaneous case where the petitioner having been\u00a0 charged under Sections 304-A, 279 and 338 of the\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/06\/23\/compromise-betwen-parties-in-case-of-death-by-rash-and-negligent-driving-is-not-a-ground-to-quash-the-offence-us-304-a-ipc\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2016-06-23T07:13:43+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-08-20T09:27:59+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/03\/KeralaHC-e1521442636157.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Sucheta\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Sucheta\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/06\/23\/compromise-betwen-parties-in-case-of-death-by-rash-and-negligent-driving-is-not-a-ground-to-quash-the-offence-us-304-a-ipc\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/06\/23\/compromise-betwen-parties-in-case-of-death-by-rash-and-negligent-driving-is-not-a-ground-to-quash-the-offence-us-304-a-ipc\/\",\"name\":\"Compromise between parties in case of death by rash and negligent driving is not a ground to quash the offence u\/S 304-A IPC | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2016-06-23T07:13:43+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-08-20T09:27:59+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/06\/23\/compromise-betwen-parties-in-case-of-death-by-rash-and-negligent-driving-is-not-a-ground-to-quash-the-offence-us-304-a-ipc\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/06\/23\/compromise-betwen-parties-in-case-of-death-by-rash-and-negligent-driving-is-not-a-ground-to-quash-the-offence-us-304-a-ipc\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/06\/23\/compromise-betwen-parties-in-case-of-death-by-rash-and-negligent-driving-is-not-a-ground-to-quash-the-offence-us-304-a-ipc\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Compromise between parties in case of death by rash and negligent driving is not a ground to quash the offence u\/S 304-A IPC\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa\",\"name\":\"Sucheta\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Sucheta\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/legal_editor\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Compromise between parties in case of death by rash and negligent driving is not a ground to quash the offence u\/S 304-A IPC | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/06\/23\/compromise-betwen-parties-in-case-of-death-by-rash-and-negligent-driving-is-not-a-ground-to-quash-the-offence-us-304-a-ipc\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Compromise between parties in case of death by rash and negligent driving is not a ground to quash the offence u\/S 304-A IPC","og_description":"Kerala High Court:\u00a0 Dismissing the criminal miscellaneous case where the petitioner having been\u00a0 charged under Sections 304-A, 279 and 338 of the","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/06\/23\/compromise-betwen-parties-in-case-of-death-by-rash-and-negligent-driving-is-not-a-ground-to-quash-the-offence-us-304-a-ipc\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2016-06-23T07:13:43+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-08-20T09:27:59+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/03\/KeralaHC-e1521442636157.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Sucheta","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Sucheta","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/06\/23\/compromise-betwen-parties-in-case-of-death-by-rash-and-negligent-driving-is-not-a-ground-to-quash-the-offence-us-304-a-ipc\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/06\/23\/compromise-betwen-parties-in-case-of-death-by-rash-and-negligent-driving-is-not-a-ground-to-quash-the-offence-us-304-a-ipc\/","name":"Compromise between parties in case of death by rash and negligent driving is not a ground to quash the offence u\/S 304-A IPC | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2016-06-23T07:13:43+00:00","dateModified":"2016-08-20T09:27:59+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/06\/23\/compromise-betwen-parties-in-case-of-death-by-rash-and-negligent-driving-is-not-a-ground-to-quash-the-offence-us-304-a-ipc\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/06\/23\/compromise-betwen-parties-in-case-of-death-by-rash-and-negligent-driving-is-not-a-ground-to-quash-the-offence-us-304-a-ipc\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/06\/23\/compromise-betwen-parties-in-case-of-death-by-rash-and-negligent-driving-is-not-a-ground-to-quash-the-offence-us-304-a-ipc\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Compromise between parties in case of death by rash and negligent driving is not a ground to quash the offence u\/S 304-A IPC"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa","name":"Sucheta","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Sucheta"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/legal_editor\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":154844,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/09\/07\/himachal-pradesh-hc-quashes-fir-exercising-its-power-under-s-482-of-crpc-in-light-of-compromise-between-the-parties\/","url_meta":{"origin":52911,"position":0},"title":"Himachal Pradesh\u00a0HC quashes FIR exercising its power under S. 482 of CrPC in light of compromise between the parties","author":"Saba","date":"September 7, 2017","format":false,"excerpt":"High Court of Himachal Pradesh: While deciding a petition under Section 482 of CrPC praying to quash the FIR registered in a criminal case, a Single Judge Bench of Sanjay Karol, Acting CJ, held that when the respondent\/complainant, who is the worst affected person on account of the accident, does\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":377561,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/03\/07\/del-hc-high-speed-not-sine-qua-non-to-constitute-offence-under-section-279-ipc\/","url_meta":{"origin":52911,"position":1},"title":"High speed not \u2018sine qua non\u2019 to constitute offence under Section 279 IPC; Del HC grants leave to appeal against acquittal","author":"Ritu","date":"March 7, 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cPossibility of rashness and negligence by a driver cannot be negated on the mere account of low speed, especially when it is alleged that the respondent was driving a heavy vehicle, carrying material over the permissible weight limit, in a zig-zag manner prior to the accident.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Section 279 IPC","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/Section-279-IPC.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/Section-279-IPC.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/Section-279-IPC.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/Section-279-IPC.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":149294,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/08\/10\/compromise-is-not-a-concrete-ground-to-quash-fir-or-criminal-proceedings\/","url_meta":{"origin":52911,"position":2},"title":"Compromise is not a concrete ground to quash FIR or criminal proceedings","author":"Saba","date":"August 10, 2017","format":false,"excerpt":"Punjab and Haryana High Court: In a recent appeal before the High Court, it has held that a compromise between the parties is never a concrete ground to quash the criminal proceedings against the accused. The appellant in this case was sentenced to a RI of two years for offence\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":194515,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/03\/29\/criminal-proceedings-quashed-in-light-of-amicable-settlement-between-parties\/","url_meta":{"origin":52911,"position":3},"title":"Criminal proceedings quashed in light of amicable settlement between parties","author":"Saba","date":"March 29, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Himachal Pradesh High Court: A Single Judge Bench comprising of Ajay Mohan Goel, J., allowed a criminal petition filed by the accused-petitioner praying for quashing of FIR registered under Sections 353 and 506 IPC as well as the consequential proceedings arising therefrom. The petitioner submitted that the issue which led\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":309411,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/12\/15\/hp-hc-benefit-of-probation-and-offenders-act-cannot-be-granted-in-offence-involving-rash-and-negligent-driving-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":52911,"position":4},"title":"Benefit of Probation of Offenders Act, 1958 cannot be granted in offence involving rash and negligent driving: Himachal Pradesh High Court","author":"Editor","date":"December 15, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThe applicant submitted that he has deep roots in the society. He is a government servant and he should be given a chance to reform himself.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"himachal pradesh high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/himachal-pradesh-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/himachal-pradesh-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/himachal-pradesh-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/himachal-pradesh-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":145702,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/07\/28\/compromise-between-the-parties-can-be-a-ground-for-quashing-fir-under-s-482-crpc\/","url_meta":{"origin":52911,"position":5},"title":"Compromise between the parties can be a ground for quashing FIR under S. 482 CrPC\u00a0","author":"Saba","date":"July 28, 2017","format":false,"excerpt":"Punjab and Haryana High Court: The petition was filed by the petitioner under S. 482 CrPC for quashing an FIR under Section 420 IPC and S. 24 of the Immigration Act and the subsequent proceedings arising therefrom. The petitioner pleaded before the Court that compromise had already been reached between\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/52911","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=52911"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/52911\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=52911"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=52911"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=52911"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}