{"id":51071,"date":"2016-06-09T14:12:22","date_gmt":"2016-06-09T08:42:22","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=51071"},"modified":"2020-03-09T16:48:27","modified_gmt":"2020-03-09T11:18:27","slug":"competence-and-credibility-of-deaf-and-dumb-witness-not-affected-by-limited-vocabulary-of-sign-language","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/06\/09\/competence-and-credibility-of-deaf-and-dumb-witness-not-affected-by-limited-vocabulary-of-sign-language\/","title":{"rendered":"Competence and credibility of deaf and dumb witness not affected by limited vocabulary of sign language"},"content":{"rendered":"

Delhi High Court<\/strong>: Disposing of an appeal where the appellant was convicted for the offence under Section 9(k) of the Protection of Childen from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 for aggravated sexual assault of a deaf and dumb minor, and awarded rigorous imprisonment for six years with fine of Rs 5000, the Bench of Mukta Gupta, J. held that though charged with a major offence an accused can be convicted for a minor offence, however, the vice-versa is impermissible.
\nThough the appellant was charged under Section 7 of the POCSO Act<\/a> for sexual assault punishable under Section 8 wherein the minimum punishment is 3 years extending to 5 years with fine, he was convicted under Section 9(k) for aggravated sexual assault. The appellant had contented that since the prosecutrix, who was deaf and dumb, could not be cross-examined, her testimony cannot be read in evidence and even if the offence is proved against the appellant, the same would fall under Section 7 punishable under Section 8 and not under Section 9(k) punishable under Section 10 of the POCSO Act.
\nRelying upon State of Rajasthan v. Darshan Singh, (2012) 5 SCC 789<\/a> that Section 119 of the Evidence Act provides that a witness who is unable to speak may give his evidence in any other manner in which he can make it intelligible, the Court observed that the prosecutrix had explained the incident through her drawings and through gestures to her mother for the purpose of cross-examination. The Court observed that the purpose of cross-examination is to ascertain the truth in relation to the accusation levelled against an acused and discretion vests in the court to control the cross-examination. A party cross-examining a deaf and dumb witness like any other witness is required to act within the bounds of law and cannot be permitted to cross-examine the witness all and sundry on irrelevant questions. It is the duty of a Judge to control the cross-examination to prevent any abuse and to protect a witness from being unfairly dealt with. Sections 149 to 152 of the Evidence Act prohibited questions without reasonable grounds and Section 138 provides that cross-examination need not be confined to the facts to which the witness testified in his examination-in-chief.
\nThe Court observed that \u201cWhen a deaf and dumb witness is under cross-examination, the Court is required to take due care of the fact that vocabulary of such a person is limited as he or she speaks through sign language and it may not be possible for that witness to answer, or in detail explain every answer by sign language. This disability of a limited vocabulary of sign language does not affect either the competence or the credibility of such witness. The Court is required to exercise control over the cross-examination keeping in view the ability of the witness to answer the questions.\u201d
\nAs for the nature of the offence, the Court observed that in the facts of the case it is not required to go into whether aggravated sexual assault is made out or not from the evidence on record, for the reason there was no charge for aggravated sexual assault framed against the appellant. It is trite law that though charged with a major offence an accused can be convicted for a minor offence, however the vice-versa is impermissible, which has been done by the trial court. Observing that the conduct of the appellant in sexually assaulting a deaf and dumb girl who was not in a position to protect herself fully warranted maximum punishment, the conviction was altered to one for the offence under Section 7 and punishable under Section 8 and the order on sentence was modified to rigorous imprisonment for 5 years with fine of Rs 10,000. [Chander Singh v. State, 2016 SCC OnLine Del 3574<\/a>, decided on 03.06.2016]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Delhi High Court: Disposing of an appeal where the appellant was convicted for the offence under Section 9(k) of the Protection of <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[6682,2521,6672],"class_list":["post-51071","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-deaf-and-dumb","tag-Evidence","tag-witness"],"yoast_head":"\nCompetence and credibility of deaf and dumb witness not affected by limited vocabulary of sign language | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/06\/09\/competence-and-credibility-of-deaf-and-dumb-witness-not-affected-by-limited-vocabulary-of-sign-language\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Competence and credibility of deaf and dumb witness not affected by limited vocabulary of sign language\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Delhi High Court: Disposing of an appeal where the appellant was convicted for the offence under Section 9(k) of the Protection of\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/06\/09\/competence-and-credibility-of-deaf-and-dumb-witness-not-affected-by-limited-vocabulary-of-sign-language\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2016-06-09T08:42:22+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2020-03-09T11:18:27+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Delhi-HC.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1329\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"888\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Sucheta\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Sucheta\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/06\/09\/competence-and-credibility-of-deaf-and-dumb-witness-not-affected-by-limited-vocabulary-of-sign-language\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/06\/09\/competence-and-credibility-of-deaf-and-dumb-witness-not-affected-by-limited-vocabulary-of-sign-language\/\",\"name\":\"Competence and credibility of deaf and dumb witness not affected by limited vocabulary of sign language | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2016-06-09T08:42:22+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2020-03-09T11:18:27+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/06\/09\/competence-and-credibility-of-deaf-and-dumb-witness-not-affected-by-limited-vocabulary-of-sign-language\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/06\/09\/competence-and-credibility-of-deaf-and-dumb-witness-not-affected-by-limited-vocabulary-of-sign-language\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/06\/09\/competence-and-credibility-of-deaf-and-dumb-witness-not-affected-by-limited-vocabulary-of-sign-language\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Competence and credibility of deaf and dumb witness not affected by limited vocabulary of sign language\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa\",\"name\":\"Sucheta\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Sucheta\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/legal_editor\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Competence and credibility of deaf and dumb witness not affected by limited vocabulary of sign language | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/06\/09\/competence-and-credibility-of-deaf-and-dumb-witness-not-affected-by-limited-vocabulary-of-sign-language\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Competence and credibility of deaf and dumb witness not affected by limited vocabulary of sign language","og_description":"Delhi High Court: Disposing of an appeal where the appellant was convicted for the offence under Section 9(k) of the Protection of","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/06\/09\/competence-and-credibility-of-deaf-and-dumb-witness-not-affected-by-limited-vocabulary-of-sign-language\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2016-06-09T08:42:22+00:00","article_modified_time":"2020-03-09T11:18:27+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1329,"height":888,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Delhi-HC.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Sucheta","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Sucheta","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/06\/09\/competence-and-credibility-of-deaf-and-dumb-witness-not-affected-by-limited-vocabulary-of-sign-language\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/06\/09\/competence-and-credibility-of-deaf-and-dumb-witness-not-affected-by-limited-vocabulary-of-sign-language\/","name":"Competence and credibility of deaf and dumb witness not affected by limited vocabulary of sign language | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2016-06-09T08:42:22+00:00","dateModified":"2020-03-09T11:18:27+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/06\/09\/competence-and-credibility-of-deaf-and-dumb-witness-not-affected-by-limited-vocabulary-of-sign-language\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/06\/09\/competence-and-credibility-of-deaf-and-dumb-witness-not-affected-by-limited-vocabulary-of-sign-language\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/06\/09\/competence-and-credibility-of-deaf-and-dumb-witness-not-affected-by-limited-vocabulary-of-sign-language\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Competence and credibility of deaf and dumb witness not affected by limited vocabulary of sign language"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa","name":"Sucheta","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Sucheta"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/legal_editor\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":239223,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/11\/16\/bom-hc-70-year-old-man-convicted-under-s-10-pocso-act-in-light-of-touching-breast-of-a-minor-child-aged-8-years-old-amounting-to-aggravated-sexual-assault\/","url_meta":{"origin":51071,"position":0},"title":"Bom HC | 70-year old man convicted under S. 10 POCSO Act for touching breast of a minor child aged 8 years old amounting to ‘aggravated sexual assault’","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"November 16, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Bombay High Court: Vinay Joshi, J., altered the conviction for rape and penetrative sexual assault to an act of aggravated form of sexual assault punishable under Section 10 of the POCSO Act in light of touching the breast of the child. Appellant aged 67 years was convicted under Sections 376\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":239764,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/11\/27\/mad-hc-partially-deaf-and-mute-victim-voiced-to-have-been-subjected-to-attempt-to-rape-read-hcs-ruling\/","url_meta":{"origin":51071,"position":1},"title":"Madras HC | Partially deaf and mute victim voiced to have been subjected to attempt to rape: Read HC’s ruling","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"November 27, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Madras High Court: B. Pugalendhi, J., while partly allowing the appeal modified the offence to fall under Section 354 of the Penal Code 1860 from Section 377 IPC. The instant appeal was filed against the conviction and sentence imposed on the appellant. Trial Court found the appellant not guilty for\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":242892,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/01\/28\/bom-hc-opening-zip-of-pants-does-it-not-fit-in-the-definition-of-sexual-assault-under-pocso-act-bom-hc-says-so\/","url_meta":{"origin":51071,"position":2},"title":"Bom HC | “Opening zip of pants”, Does it NOT “fit in the definition of sexual assault” under POCSO Act? Bom HC says so","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"January 28, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Bombay High Court: Pushpa V. Ganediwala, J., altered the conviction of the appellant who was accused of sexually assaulting a minor child by partly quashing his conviction for the offence of sexual assault and aggravated sexual assault punishable under Sections 8 and 10 of POCSO Act, respectively. The instant appeal\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":257509,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/11\/22\/putting-penis-into-mouth\/","url_meta":{"origin":51071,"position":3},"title":"POCSO | Putting penis into mouth will fall under which category – Aggravated Sexual Assault or Penetrative Sexual Assault? All HC answers","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"November 22, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Allahabad High Court: Anil Kumar Ojha, J., while addressing a matter of child sexual assault, expressed that, Putting penis into the mouth does not fall in the category of aggravated sexual assault or sexual assault. It comes into the category of penetrative sexual assault which is punishable under Section 4\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":372180,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/09\/del-hc-making-minor-touch-private-parts-aggravated-sexual-assault-pocso\/","url_meta":{"origin":51071,"position":4},"title":"Making minor touch private parts with sexual intent constitutes Aggravated Sexual Assault under POCSO Act: Delhi High Court","author":"Ritu","date":"January 9, 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"Minor inconsistencies arising from age, vocabulary or manner of narration do not erode the credibility of the prosecution, particularly where the allegation relates to commission of sexual assault with sexual intent.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Making minor touch private parts","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Making-minor-touch-private-parts.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Making-minor-touch-private-parts.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Making-minor-touch-private-parts.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Making-minor-touch-private-parts.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":226230,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/02\/26\/del-hc-sexual-assault-of-10-year-old-minor-boy-variations-in-childs-statement-at-stages-of-investigation-trial-doesnt-retract-veracity-of-allegations-against-accused\/","url_meta":{"origin":51071,"position":5},"title":"Del HC | [Sexual Assault of 10-year old minor boy] Variations in child’s statement at stages of investigation & trial doesn\u2019t retract veracity of allegations against accused","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"February 26, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court: Anu Malhotra, J., while upholding the decision of the trial court in a case where a 10-year-old minor was sexually assaulted, issued directions for the Jail Superintendent to consider an appropriate programme for the appellant ensuring the following: appropriate correctional courses through meditational therapy educational opportunity, vocational\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/51071","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=51071"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/51071\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=51071"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=51071"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=51071"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}