{"id":50411,"date":"2016-06-03T14:33:06","date_gmt":"2016-06-03T09:03:06","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=50411"},"modified":"2016-08-20T14:47:45","modified_gmt":"2016-08-20T09:17:45","slug":"videocon-and-its-officers-exonerated-from-proceedings-under-s-18-of-foreign-exchange-regulation-act-1973","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/06\/03\/videocon-and-its-officers-exonerated-from-proceedings-under-s-18-of-foreign-exchange-regulation-act-1973\/","title":{"rendered":"Videocon and it\u2019s officers exonerated from proceedings under S. 18 of Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Supreme Court<\/strong>: In an appeal filed against the order of the Bombay High Court which had dislodged the order of discharge passed by the Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Mumbai in the case where the company as well as its officer were facing trial for the offence punishable under Section 56(1)(i) of the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973 for the alleged contravention of the provisions of Sections 18(2) and 18(3) of FERA, the Court allowed the appeal, thereby, restoring the order of the Magistrate.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">In the case where the appellants had purchased goods from Korea and Japan by spending foreign exchange, the Appellate Tribunal for Foreign Exchange (Tribunal) held that spending of foreign exchange in international trade by an Indian person is not forbidden by Section 19 of FERA. It was further held that there is no law whereby Indian resident is regulated from entering into international trade and hence, the appellant cannot be held guilty for Section 18(2) read with Section 18(3) of FERA. Hence, the Magistrate had discharged the appellants after application was filed under Section 245 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 for discharge of the accused. The High Court had, however, held that the order of the Tribunal was based on technical grounds and not merits.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The bench of Dipak Misra and Shiva Kirti Singh, JJ, hence, said that the High Court had totally erred in law as the judgment of the tribunal was decided on merits, inasmuch as findings had been recorded after analysis of facts and the conclusion had been arrived at that the appellants have not violated the provisions of the Act. [Videocon Industries Ltd. \u00a0v. State of Maharashtra, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/LoginForNewsLink\/2016_SCC_OnLine_SC_585\">2016 SCC OnLine SC 585<\/a>, decided on 19.04.2016]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Supreme Court: In an appeal filed against the order of the Bombay High Court which had dislodged the order of discharge passed <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":27341,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,9],"tags":[6481,6471,5363,6461],"class_list":["post-50411","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-supremecourt","tag-fera","tag-foreign-exchange-regulation","tag-supreme-court","tag-videocon"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Videocon and it\u2019s officers exonerated from proceedings under S. 18 of Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973 | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/06\/03\/videocon-and-its-officers-exonerated-from-proceedings-under-s-18-of-foreign-exchange-regulation-act-1973\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Videocon and it\u2019s officers exonerated from proceedings under S. 18 of Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Supreme Court: In an appeal filed against the order of the Bombay High Court which had dislodged the order of discharge passed\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/06\/03\/videocon-and-its-officers-exonerated-from-proceedings-under-s-18-of-foreign-exchange-regulation-act-1973\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2016-06-03T09:03:06+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-08-20T09:17:45+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/11\/DSC_5487.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1920\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"1280\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Sucheta\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Sucheta\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"1 minute\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/06\/03\/videocon-and-its-officers-exonerated-from-proceedings-under-s-18-of-foreign-exchange-regulation-act-1973\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/06\/03\/videocon-and-its-officers-exonerated-from-proceedings-under-s-18-of-foreign-exchange-regulation-act-1973\/\",\"name\":\"Videocon and it\u2019s officers exonerated from proceedings under S. 18 of Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973 | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/06\/03\/videocon-and-its-officers-exonerated-from-proceedings-under-s-18-of-foreign-exchange-regulation-act-1973\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/06\/03\/videocon-and-its-officers-exonerated-from-proceedings-under-s-18-of-foreign-exchange-regulation-act-1973\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/11\/DSC_5487.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2016-06-03T09:03:06+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-08-20T09:17:45+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/06\/03\/videocon-and-its-officers-exonerated-from-proceedings-under-s-18-of-foreign-exchange-regulation-act-1973\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/06\/03\/videocon-and-its-officers-exonerated-from-proceedings-under-s-18-of-foreign-exchange-regulation-act-1973\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/06\/03\/videocon-and-its-officers-exonerated-from-proceedings-under-s-18-of-foreign-exchange-regulation-act-1973\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/11\/DSC_5487.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/11\/DSC_5487.jpg\",\"width\":1920,\"height\":1280},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/06\/03\/videocon-and-its-officers-exonerated-from-proceedings-under-s-18-of-foreign-exchange-regulation-act-1973\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Videocon and it\u2019s officers exonerated from proceedings under S. 18 of Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa\",\"name\":\"Sucheta\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Sucheta\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/legal_editor\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Videocon and it\u2019s officers exonerated from proceedings under S. 18 of Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973 | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/06\/03\/videocon-and-its-officers-exonerated-from-proceedings-under-s-18-of-foreign-exchange-regulation-act-1973\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Videocon and it\u2019s officers exonerated from proceedings under S. 18 of Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973","og_description":"Supreme Court: In an appeal filed against the order of the Bombay High Court which had dislodged the order of discharge passed","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/06\/03\/videocon-and-its-officers-exonerated-from-proceedings-under-s-18-of-foreign-exchange-regulation-act-1973\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2016-06-03T09:03:06+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-08-20T09:17:45+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1920,"height":1280,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/11\/DSC_5487.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Sucheta","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Sucheta","Est. reading time":"1 minute"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/06\/03\/videocon-and-its-officers-exonerated-from-proceedings-under-s-18-of-foreign-exchange-regulation-act-1973\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/06\/03\/videocon-and-its-officers-exonerated-from-proceedings-under-s-18-of-foreign-exchange-regulation-act-1973\/","name":"Videocon and it\u2019s officers exonerated from proceedings under S. 18 of Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973 | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/06\/03\/videocon-and-its-officers-exonerated-from-proceedings-under-s-18-of-foreign-exchange-regulation-act-1973\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/06\/03\/videocon-and-its-officers-exonerated-from-proceedings-under-s-18-of-foreign-exchange-regulation-act-1973\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/11\/DSC_5487.jpg","datePublished":"2016-06-03T09:03:06+00:00","dateModified":"2016-08-20T09:17:45+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/06\/03\/videocon-and-its-officers-exonerated-from-proceedings-under-s-18-of-foreign-exchange-regulation-act-1973\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/06\/03\/videocon-and-its-officers-exonerated-from-proceedings-under-s-18-of-foreign-exchange-regulation-act-1973\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/06\/03\/videocon-and-its-officers-exonerated-from-proceedings-under-s-18-of-foreign-exchange-regulation-act-1973\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/11\/DSC_5487.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/11\/DSC_5487.jpg","width":1920,"height":1280},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/06\/03\/videocon-and-its-officers-exonerated-from-proceedings-under-s-18-of-foreign-exchange-regulation-act-1973\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Videocon and it\u2019s officers exonerated from proceedings under S. 18 of Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa","name":"Sucheta","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Sucheta"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/legal_editor\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/11\/DSC_5487.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":302732,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/30\/enforcement-officer-can-file-complaint-repealed-provisions-fera-sunset-period-after-fema-supreme-court\/","url_meta":{"origin":50411,"position":0},"title":"Can Enforcement Officer file complaint under repealed provisions of FERA after enforcement of FEMA? SC answers","author":"Apoorva","date":"September 30, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cA Statute cannot be interpreted in such a manner that any provision thereof is rendered otiose.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"repealed provisions of FERA","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/repealed-provisions-of-FERA.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/repealed-provisions-of-FERA.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/repealed-provisions-of-FERA.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/repealed-provisions-of-FERA.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":208996,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/30\/sc-appeal-against-order-passed-under-section-51-of-fera-lies-before-appellate-tribunal-only\/","url_meta":{"origin":50411,"position":1},"title":"SC| Appeal against order passed under Section 51 of FERA lies before Appellate Tribunal only","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"January 30, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: The bench of AM Sapre and Indira Banerjee, JJ has held that the appellate forum for deciding the appeals arising out of the order passed by the Adjudicating Officer under Section 51 of Foreign Exchange\u00a0Regulation\u00a0Act,\u00a01973 (FERA) whether filed prior to 01.06.2000 or filed after 01.06.2000 must be the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":331170,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/09\/19\/exaplained-enforcement-of-arbitral-award-expressed-in-foreign-currency-sc-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":50411,"position":2},"title":"Explained | Supreme Court decision on enforcement of Arbitral Award expressed in foreign currency","author":"Sucheta","date":"September 19, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"To resolve the questions arising and considering the uncertainties regarding time-lapse between the date of the award and its enforceability and the ever-fluctuating exchange rates, the Court formulated twin principles.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"enforcement of Arbitral Award expressed in foreign currency","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/enforcement-of-Arbitral-Award-expressed-in-foreign-currency.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/enforcement-of-Arbitral-Award-expressed-in-foreign-currency.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/enforcement-of-Arbitral-Award-expressed-in-foreign-currency.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/enforcement-of-Arbitral-Award-expressed-in-foreign-currency.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":244759,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/02\/28\/can-foreigners-transfer-dispose-of-immovable-property-situated-in-india-by-sale-or-mortgage-without-rbis-prior-permission-sc-explains-the-true-import-of-section-31-of-fera-1973\/","url_meta":{"origin":50411,"position":3},"title":"Can foreigners transfer\/dispose of immovable property situated in India by sale or mortgage without RBI&#8217;s prior permission? SC explains the true import of Section 31 of FERA, 1973","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"February 28, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cMerely because no provision in the Act makes the transaction void or says that no title in the property passes to the purchaser in case there is contravention of the provisions of Section 31, will be of no avail. That does not validate the transfer referred to in Section 31,\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-3-3.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-3-3.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-3-3.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-3-3.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-3-3.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":220129,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/09\/27\/fema-appellate-tribunal-active-involvement-and-intentional-aiding-must-be-present-in-order-to-constitute-an-offence-of-abetment\/","url_meta":{"origin":50411,"position":4},"title":"FEMA Appellate Tribunal | Active involvement and intentional aiding must be present in order to constitute an offence of abetment","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"September 27, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Appellate Tribunal for SAFEMA, FEMA, PMLA, NDPS & PBPT Act: Justice Manmohan Singh (Chairman) allowed an appeal challenging the impugned Judgment wherein the appellants were penalized for abetting illegal transfer of money. In the present case, the respondent had alleged that the appellant-Bank abettor in illegal and unauthorized dealing of\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/05\/APPELLATE-TRIBUNAL-.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/05\/APPELLATE-TRIBUNAL-.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/05\/APPELLATE-TRIBUNAL-.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/05\/APPELLATE-TRIBUNAL-.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/05\/APPELLATE-TRIBUNAL-.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":302739,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/30\/cofeposa-act-inordinate-delay-30-years-compels-bombay-hc-quash-1993-detention-order\/","url_meta":{"origin":50411,"position":5},"title":"COFEPOSA Act | \u2018Inordinate delay of 30 years\u2019 compels Bombay High Court to quash 1993 detention order","author":"Ridhi","date":"September 30, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThe satisfaction of the authorities based on conduct must precede action for prevention based on subjective satisfaction.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"bombay high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/bombay-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/bombay-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/bombay-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/bombay-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/50411","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=50411"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/50411\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/27341"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=50411"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=50411"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=50411"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}