{"id":50291,"date":"2016-06-03T09:43:19","date_gmt":"2016-06-03T04:13:19","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=50291"},"modified":"2016-08-20T14:47:01","modified_gmt":"2016-08-20T09:17:01","slug":"statement-of-accused-can-be-used-for-corroboration-of-evidence-without-reducing-burden-of-prosecution-to-prove-its-case-beyond-reasonable-doubt","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/06\/03\/statement-of-accused-can-be-used-for-corroboration-of-evidence-without-reducing-burden-of-prosecution-to-prove-its-case-beyond-reasonable-doubt\/","title":{"rendered":"Statement of accused can be used for corroboration of evidence without reducing burden of prosecution to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Allahabad High Court: <\/strong>The Division Bench comprising of Surendra Vikram Singh Rathore and Anil Kumar Srivastava, JJ. held that statements given by the accused persons under Section 313 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 can be used for the appreciation of evidence and can also be used for corroboration of the evidence, but the burden of the prosecution to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt is not reduced to any extent. The accused had filed an appeal against the judgment and order passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court No. 2, Gonda, in Sessions Trial No. 177 of 2004 whereby \u00a0the appellants were convicted under Sections 147, 148, 304 and 342 of the Penal Code, 11860. The counsel for State argued on the behalf of the complainant that the accused persons have admitted the date, time and place of occurrence themselves in the statement recorded under Section \u00a0313 CrPC \u00a0and the manner in which \u00a0the whole incident\u00a0 had taken place has been stated by the witnesses.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Allowing the appeals, the Court held that prosecution must stand on its own legs and cannot take advantage of the weakness in the defence case. Further, the Court on examining the features of Section 313 of the Code noted the observation of the Supreme Court in <em>Balaji Gunthu Dhule<\/em> v. <em>State of Maharashtra<\/em>, (2012) 11 SCC 685, that the statement of the accused can be used to test the accuracy of the exculpatory nature of the admission, if any, made by the accused. It can be taken into consideration in any enquiry or trial but still it is not strictly evidence in the case. [<em>Ashok Singh<\/em> v. <em>State of U.P<\/em>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/LoginForNewsLink\/2016_SCC_OnLine_All_290\">2016 SCC OnLine All 290<\/a>, decided on May 26, 2016]<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Allahabad High Court: The Division Bench comprising of Surendra Vikram Singh Rathore and Anil Kumar Srivastava, JJ. held that statements given by <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[6431,6421],"class_list":["post-50291","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-beyond-reasonable-doubt","tag-corroboration-of-evidence"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Statement of accused can be used for corroboration of evidence without reducing burden of prosecution to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/06\/03\/statement-of-accused-can-be-used-for-corroboration-of-evidence-without-reducing-burden-of-prosecution-to-prove-its-case-beyond-reasonable-doubt\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Statement of accused can be used for corroboration of evidence without reducing burden of prosecution to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Allahabad High Court: The Division Bench comprising of Surendra Vikram Singh Rathore and Anil Kumar Srivastava, JJ. held that statements given by\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/06\/03\/statement-of-accused-can-be-used-for-corroboration-of-evidence-without-reducing-burden-of-prosecution-to-prove-its-case-beyond-reasonable-doubt\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2016-06-03T04:13:19+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-08-20T09:17:01+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Sucheta\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Sucheta\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"1 minute\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/06\/03\/statement-of-accused-can-be-used-for-corroboration-of-evidence-without-reducing-burden-of-prosecution-to-prove-its-case-beyond-reasonable-doubt\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/06\/03\/statement-of-accused-can-be-used-for-corroboration-of-evidence-without-reducing-burden-of-prosecution-to-prove-its-case-beyond-reasonable-doubt\/\",\"name\":\"Statement of accused can be used for corroboration of evidence without reducing burden of prosecution to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2016-06-03T04:13:19+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-08-20T09:17:01+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/06\/03\/statement-of-accused-can-be-used-for-corroboration-of-evidence-without-reducing-burden-of-prosecution-to-prove-its-case-beyond-reasonable-doubt\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/06\/03\/statement-of-accused-can-be-used-for-corroboration-of-evidence-without-reducing-burden-of-prosecution-to-prove-its-case-beyond-reasonable-doubt\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/06\/03\/statement-of-accused-can-be-used-for-corroboration-of-evidence-without-reducing-burden-of-prosecution-to-prove-its-case-beyond-reasonable-doubt\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Statement of accused can be used for corroboration of evidence without reducing burden of prosecution to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa\",\"name\":\"Sucheta\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Sucheta\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/legal_editor\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Statement of accused can be used for corroboration of evidence without reducing burden of prosecution to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/06\/03\/statement-of-accused-can-be-used-for-corroboration-of-evidence-without-reducing-burden-of-prosecution-to-prove-its-case-beyond-reasonable-doubt\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Statement of accused can be used for corroboration of evidence without reducing burden of prosecution to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt","og_description":"Allahabad High Court: The Division Bench comprising of Surendra Vikram Singh Rathore and Anil Kumar Srivastava, JJ. held that statements given by","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/06\/03\/statement-of-accused-can-be-used-for-corroboration-of-evidence-without-reducing-burden-of-prosecution-to-prove-its-case-beyond-reasonable-doubt\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2016-06-03T04:13:19+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-08-20T09:17:01+00:00","author":"Sucheta","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Sucheta","Est. reading time":"1 minute"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/06\/03\/statement-of-accused-can-be-used-for-corroboration-of-evidence-without-reducing-burden-of-prosecution-to-prove-its-case-beyond-reasonable-doubt\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/06\/03\/statement-of-accused-can-be-used-for-corroboration-of-evidence-without-reducing-burden-of-prosecution-to-prove-its-case-beyond-reasonable-doubt\/","name":"Statement of accused can be used for corroboration of evidence without reducing burden of prosecution to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2016-06-03T04:13:19+00:00","dateModified":"2016-08-20T09:17:01+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/06\/03\/statement-of-accused-can-be-used-for-corroboration-of-evidence-without-reducing-burden-of-prosecution-to-prove-its-case-beyond-reasonable-doubt\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/06\/03\/statement-of-accused-can-be-used-for-corroboration-of-evidence-without-reducing-burden-of-prosecution-to-prove-its-case-beyond-reasonable-doubt\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/06\/03\/statement-of-accused-can-be-used-for-corroboration-of-evidence-without-reducing-burden-of-prosecution-to-prove-its-case-beyond-reasonable-doubt\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Statement of accused can be used for corroboration of evidence without reducing burden of prosecution to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa","name":"Sucheta","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Sucheta"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/legal_editor\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":318376,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/26\/singapore-high-ourt-acquits-father-on-all-13-charges-of-sexual-assault-against-teen-daughter\/","url_meta":{"origin":50291,"position":0},"title":"Singapore High Court acquits father on all 13 charges of sexual assault against minor daughter","author":"Editor","date":"March 26, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"Notwithstanding the conclusion due to inconsistent prosecution evidence, the Court emphasized that timely disclosure, effective investigation and prompt trial are necessary in sexual abuse cases involving young complainants.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Singapore High Court acquits father of 13 sexual assault against daughter","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Singapore-High-Court-acquits-father-of-13-sexual-assault-against-daughter.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Singapore-High-Court-acquits-father-of-13-sexual-assault-against-daughter.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Singapore-High-Court-acquits-father-of-13-sexual-assault-against-daughter.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Singapore-High-Court-acquits-father-of-13-sexual-assault-against-daughter.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":194932,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/04\/07\/acquittal-upheld-as-prosecution-failed-to-prove-the-case-beyond-reasonable-doubt\/","url_meta":{"origin":50291,"position":1},"title":"Acquittal upheld as prosecution failed to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt","author":"Saba","date":"April 7, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Himachal Pradesh High Court: A Single Judge Bench comprising of Chander Bhusan Barowalia, J., decided a criminal appeal filed by the State under Section 378 of CrPC challenging the order of acquittal of the accused persons passed by the trial court, wherein the said order was upheld holding that the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":217627,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/08\/02\/bom-hc-not-necessary-for-rape-accused-to-disprove-absence-of-consent-beyond-reasonable-doubt-conviction-for-rape-quashed-for-lack-of-proof\/","url_meta":{"origin":50291,"position":2},"title":"Bom HC | Not necessary for rape accused to disprove absence of consent beyond reasonable doubt; conviction for rape quashed for lack of proof","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"August 2, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Bombay High Court:\u00a0Rohit B. Deo, J. allowed a criminal appeal filed against the judgment of the Additional Sessions Judge whereby the appellant was convicted for the offence of committing rape repeatedly on the same woman punishable under Section 376(1)(n) IPC along with the offence punishable under Section 506 (criminal intimidation).\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":272737,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/09\/01\/whether-pleading-guilty-in-the-statement-recorded-under-section-313-crpc-sufficient-for-conviction-or-not-allahabad-high-court-answers\/","url_meta":{"origin":50291,"position":3},"title":"Whether pleading guilty in the statement recorded under Section 313 CrPC sufficient for conviction or not? Allahabad High Court answers","author":"Editor","date":"September 1, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"\u00a0 \u00a0 Allahabad High Court: Samit Gopal, J. acquitted the appellant of the charges leveled against him of Section 307 of Penal Code, 1860 (\u2018IPC') wherein he was ordered to undergo three years and six months of rigorous imprisonment by the Additional District & Sessions Judge holding that the prosecution\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Allahabad High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/allahabad_high_court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/allahabad_high_court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/allahabad_high_court.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/allahabad_high_court.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/allahabad_high_court.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":379195,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/03\/24\/mad-hc-strained-marriage-not-proof-of-wifes-murder-husband-conviction-set-aside\/","url_meta":{"origin":50291,"position":4},"title":"Strained marriage and alcohol addiction not enough to presume husband\u2019s guilt in wife\u2019s murder: Madras HC","author":"Soumya Yadav","date":"March 24, 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cEven a strong suspicion was not enough to convict a person and that the prosecution had to necessarily prove each circumstance in the chain beyond reasonable doubt.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Strained marriage not proof of wife's murder","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/Strained-marriage-not-proof-of-wifes-murder.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/Strained-marriage-not-proof-of-wifes-murder.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/Strained-marriage-not-proof-of-wifes-murder.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/Strained-marriage-not-proof-of-wifes-murder.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":316506,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/08\/an-extrajudicial-confession-being-weak-evidence-requires-corroboration-calcutta-high-court-scc-times\/","url_meta":{"origin":50291,"position":5},"title":"\u2018An extrajudicial confession, being weak evidence, requires corroboration\u2019; Calcutta High Court sets aside conviction under Section 302 IPC","author":"Ritu","date":"March 8, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"The Calcutta High Court criticised the trial court for not properly assessing the evidence and for erroneously applying legal principles and set aside conviction on prosecution\u2019s failure to establish guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Calcutta High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Calcutta-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Calcutta-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Calcutta-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Calcutta-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/50291","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=50291"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/50291\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=50291"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=50291"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=50291"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}