{"id":47251,"date":"2016-05-16T11:45:37","date_gmt":"2016-05-16T06:15:37","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=47251"},"modified":"2016-05-31T16:30:27","modified_gmt":"2016-05-31T11:00:27","slug":"allegations-of-abuse-of-dominance-against-magicbricks-com-along-with-four-other-real-estate-websites-dismissed","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/05\/16\/allegations-of-abuse-of-dominance-against-magicbricks-com-along-with-four-other-real-estate-websites-dismissed\/","title":{"rendered":"Allegations of abuse of dominance against Magicbricks.com along with four other real estate websites, dismissed"},"content":{"rendered":"

Competition Commission of India (CCI):\u00a0<\/strong>While observing that Magicbricks.com along with four other real estate websites is not dominant in the market of \u201cservices of real estate brokers\/ agents in India\u201d, CCI dismissed the allegations of monopolization of real estate broking business in India by the said websites. CCI was hearing an information filed by Confederation of Real Estate Brokers\u2019 Association of India having combined membership of approximately 20,000 real estate brokers, against Magicbricks.com, Housing.com, 99acres.com, Commonfloor.com and Nobroker.in. It was alleged in the information that these online real estate listing portals have abused their dominant position by advertising \u2018No Brokerage Policy\u2019 (NBP) on their websites, mobile applications, newspapers etc. <\/em>and imposed unfair and discriminatory conditions on the traditional real estate brokers who are doing real estate business on the basis of commission. It was further alleged that the websites were practicing \u2018No NBP\u2019 either through auction of properties or through the offer of \u2018buy directly from owners\u2019 on their websites and newspaper advertisements in order to eliminate competition and real estate brokers from the market. It was also averred in the information that due to conduct of said online real estate listing portals in indulging NBP or charging much less as brokerage fee compared to the traditional brokerage fee of 2% of the sale\/ purchase value of a property while undertaking a real estate transaction or public auctioning of properties, traditional real estate brokers are getting eliminated from the market. After hearing both the parties and perusal of material on record, CCI observed that in India, no licence or registration is required to undertake the brokerage business in real estate sector, thus, the presence of a large number of listing sites and traditional brokers in the said relevant market pose competitive restraint on each other and hence, no specific player can act independently of the market forces and affect the consumers or other players in its favour. The Commission also perused the website ranking figures of Alexa.com submitted by the Association and noted that based on the said figures it was not possible to gauge the dominance of any of the five real estate websites in the relevant market because the ranking was limited to only the websites\/ portals and does not include the off-line brokers. CCI further noted that in absence of dominance of any of the five real estate websites in the relevant market, there can be no case of contravention of the provisions of Section 4 of the Competition Act against any of the five real estate websites. [Confederation of Real Estate Brokers\u2019 Association of India<\/em> v. Magicbricks.com<\/em>, [2016] CCI 19<\/a>, decided on May 3, 2016]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Competition Commission of India (CCI):\u00a0While observing that Magicbricks.com along with four other real estate websites is not dominant in the market of <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":76441,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,11],"tags":[5461,2660,5471],"class_list":["post-47251","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-tribunals_commissions_regulatorybodies","tag-cci","tag-competition_laws","tag-magicbricks"],"yoast_head":"\nAllegations of abuse of dominance against Magicbricks.com along with four other real estate websites, dismissed | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/05\/16\/allegations-of-abuse-of-dominance-against-magicbricks-com-along-with-four-other-real-estate-websites-dismissed\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Allegations of abuse of dominance against Magicbricks.com along with four other real estate websites, dismissed\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Competition Commission of India (CCI):\u00a0While observing that Magicbricks.com along with four other real estate websites is not dominant in the market of\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/05\/16\/allegations-of-abuse-of-dominance-against-magicbricks-com-along-with-four-other-real-estate-websites-dismissed\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2016-05-16T06:15:37+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-05-31T11:00:27+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Competition-Commission.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1329\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"888\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Sucheta\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Sucheta\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/05\/16\/allegations-of-abuse-of-dominance-against-magicbricks-com-along-with-four-other-real-estate-websites-dismissed\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/05\/16\/allegations-of-abuse-of-dominance-against-magicbricks-com-along-with-four-other-real-estate-websites-dismissed\/\",\"name\":\"Allegations of abuse of dominance against Magicbricks.com along with four other real estate websites, dismissed | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/05\/16\/allegations-of-abuse-of-dominance-against-magicbricks-com-along-with-four-other-real-estate-websites-dismissed\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/05\/16\/allegations-of-abuse-of-dominance-against-magicbricks-com-along-with-four-other-real-estate-websites-dismissed\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Competition-Commission.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2016-05-16T06:15:37+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-05-31T11:00:27+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/05\/16\/allegations-of-abuse-of-dominance-against-magicbricks-com-along-with-four-other-real-estate-websites-dismissed\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/05\/16\/allegations-of-abuse-of-dominance-against-magicbricks-com-along-with-four-other-real-estate-websites-dismissed\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/05\/16\/allegations-of-abuse-of-dominance-against-magicbricks-com-along-with-four-other-real-estate-websites-dismissed\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Competition-Commission.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Competition-Commission.jpg\",\"width\":1329,\"height\":888},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/05\/16\/allegations-of-abuse-of-dominance-against-magicbricks-com-along-with-four-other-real-estate-websites-dismissed\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Allegations of abuse of dominance against Magicbricks.com along with four other real estate websites, dismissed\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa\",\"name\":\"Sucheta\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Sucheta\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/legal_editor\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Allegations of abuse of dominance against Magicbricks.com along with four other real estate websites, dismissed | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/05\/16\/allegations-of-abuse-of-dominance-against-magicbricks-com-along-with-four-other-real-estate-websites-dismissed\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Allegations of abuse of dominance against Magicbricks.com along with four other real estate websites, dismissed","og_description":"Competition Commission of India (CCI):\u00a0While observing that Magicbricks.com along with four other real estate websites is not dominant in the market of","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/05\/16\/allegations-of-abuse-of-dominance-against-magicbricks-com-along-with-four-other-real-estate-websites-dismissed\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2016-05-16T06:15:37+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-05-31T11:00:27+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1329,"height":888,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Competition-Commission.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Sucheta","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Sucheta","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/05\/16\/allegations-of-abuse-of-dominance-against-magicbricks-com-along-with-four-other-real-estate-websites-dismissed\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/05\/16\/allegations-of-abuse-of-dominance-against-magicbricks-com-along-with-four-other-real-estate-websites-dismissed\/","name":"Allegations of abuse of dominance against Magicbricks.com along with four other real estate websites, dismissed | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/05\/16\/allegations-of-abuse-of-dominance-against-magicbricks-com-along-with-four-other-real-estate-websites-dismissed\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/05\/16\/allegations-of-abuse-of-dominance-against-magicbricks-com-along-with-four-other-real-estate-websites-dismissed\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Competition-Commission.jpg","datePublished":"2016-05-16T06:15:37+00:00","dateModified":"2016-05-31T11:00:27+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/05\/16\/allegations-of-abuse-of-dominance-against-magicbricks-com-along-with-four-other-real-estate-websites-dismissed\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/05\/16\/allegations-of-abuse-of-dominance-against-magicbricks-com-along-with-four-other-real-estate-websites-dismissed\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/05\/16\/allegations-of-abuse-of-dominance-against-magicbricks-com-along-with-four-other-real-estate-websites-dismissed\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Competition-Commission.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Competition-Commission.jpg","width":1329,"height":888},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/05\/16\/allegations-of-abuse-of-dominance-against-magicbricks-com-along-with-four-other-real-estate-websites-dismissed\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Allegations of abuse of dominance against Magicbricks.com along with four other real estate websites, dismissed"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa","name":"Sucheta","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Sucheta"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/legal_editor\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Competition-Commission.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":74721,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/10\/01\/charges-of-anti-competitive-practices-against-realty-firm-bestech-india-pvt-ltd-dismissed\/","url_meta":{"origin":47251,"position":0},"title":"Charges of anti-competitive practices against realty firm Bestech India Pvt. Ltd., dismissed","author":"Saba","date":"October 1, 2016","format":false,"excerpt":"Competition Commission of India (CCI):\u00a0Charges of anti-competitive practices leveled against Gurgaon-based realty firm Bestech India Pvt. Ltd. has been dismissed by CCI as the Commission observed that Bestech India was not in a dominant position in the relevant market and no cogent material evidence was provided to substantiate the allegations.\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Competition-Commission.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Competition-Commission.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Competition-Commission.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Competition-Commission.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Competition-Commission.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":6628,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/04\/29\/charges-against-real-estate-firm-vatika-group-alleging-abuse-of-dominant-market-position-dismissed\/","url_meta":{"origin":47251,"position":1},"title":"Charges against real estate firm Vatika Group alleging abuse of dominant market position, dismissed","author":"Sucheta","date":"April 29, 2015","format":false,"excerpt":"Competition Commission of India (CCI): While observing that real estate developer Vatika Group does not appear to be in a dominant position in the relevant market, CCI rejected charges against the Company alleging abuse of dominant market position in market of services for development and sale of its commercial units\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Tribunals\/Commissions\/Regulatory Bodies"","block_context":{"text":"Tribunals\/Commissions\/Regulatory Bodies","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/tribunals_commissions_regulatorybodies\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":94381,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/12\/23\/allegations-against-mercedes-benz-india-pvt-ltd-for-alleged-abuse-of-dominant-position-dismissed\/","url_meta":{"origin":47251,"position":2},"title":"Allegations against Mercedes Benz India Pvt. Ltd. for alleged abuse of dominant position, dismissed","author":"Saba","date":"December 23, 2016","format":false,"excerpt":"Competition Commission of India (CCI):\u00a0CCI has dismissed allegations of abuse of dominant position against German luxury car manufacturer Mercedes Benz India Pvt. Ltd. Earlier, an information was filed by Shree Hari Inn Pvt. Ltd. alleging that an authorised service centre of Mercedes in Gujarat was resorting to malpractices with regard\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Competition-Commission.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Competition-Commission.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Competition-Commission.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Competition-Commission.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Competition-Commission.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":57531,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/07\/21\/allegations-of-abuse-of-dominant-market-position-against-coal-india-ltd-dismissed\/","url_meta":{"origin":47251,"position":3},"title":"Allegations of abuse of dominant market position against Coal India Ltd., dismissed","author":"Sucheta","date":"July 21, 2016","format":false,"excerpt":"Competition Commission of India (CCI): While observing that though Coal India Ltd. was dominant in the market of \u201cprovision of services relating to collection, preparation and transportation of coal samples in India,\u201d no entry barrier were created through the conditions of depositing of Rs 1 crore earnest money and annual\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Competition-Commission.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Competition-Commission.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Competition-Commission.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Competition-Commission.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Competition-Commission.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":6656,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/06\/11\/allegations-of-unfair-business-practices-against-automobile-company-maruti-suzuki-india-ltd-dismissed\/","url_meta":{"origin":47251,"position":4},"title":"Allegations of unfair trade practices against automobile company Maruti Suzuki India Ltd., dismissed","author":"Sucheta","date":"June 11, 2015","format":false,"excerpt":"Competition Commission of India (CCI):\u00a0CCI has rejected allegations of \u201cunfair trade practices\u201d against automobile company Maruti Suzuki India Ltd. on the ground that prima facie, no case of contravention of the provisions of either Section 3 or Section 4 of the Competition Act, 2002 was made out against the Company.\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Tribunals\/Commissions\/Regulatory Bodies"","block_context":{"text":"Tribunals\/Commissions\/Regulatory Bodies","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/tribunals_commissions_regulatorybodies\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":97821,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/01\/06\/allegations-of-abuse-of-dominant-position-against-toyota-kirloskar-motor-pvt-ltd-dismissed\/","url_meta":{"origin":47251,"position":5},"title":"Allegations of abuse of dominant position against Toyota Kirloskar Motor Pvt. Ltd., dismissed","author":"Saba","date":"January 6, 2017","format":false,"excerpt":"Competition Commission of India (CCI):\u00a0CCI has dismissed allegations of abuse of dominant position against Toyota Kirloskar Motor Pvt. Ltd. in terms of after-sales\u00a0services while observing that the issue raised in the information pertained to alleged deficiency in services and no case of\u00a0contravention of the provisions of Section 4 of the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Competition-Commission.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Competition-Commission.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Competition-Commission.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Competition-Commission.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Competition-Commission.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/47251","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=47251"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/47251\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/76441"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=47251"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=47251"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=47251"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}